Cited by 309Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Vision-Language Pre-Training with Triple Contrastive Learning

Open access
Yang, Jinyu, Duan, Jiali, Tran, Son, Xu, Yi, Chanda, Sampath, Chen, Liqun, Zeng, Belinda, Chilimbi, Trishul +1 more·2022·2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Vision-language representation learning largely benefits from image-text alignment through contrastive losses (e.g., InfoNCE loss). The success of this alignment strategy is attributed to its capability in maximizing the mutual information (MI) between an image and its matched text. However, simply performing cross-modal alignment (CMA) ignores data potential within each modality, which may result in degraded representations. For instance, although CMA-based models are able to map image-text pairs close together in the embedding space, they fail to ensure that similar inputs from the same modality stay close by. This problem can get even worse when the pre-training data is noisy. In this paper, we propose triple contrastive learning (TCL) for vision-language pre-training by leveraging both cross-modal and intra-modal self-supervision. Besides CMA, TCL introduces an intra-modal contrastive objective to provide complementary benefits in representation learning. To take advantage of localized and structural information from image and text input, TCL further maximizes the average MI between local regions of image/text and their global summary. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first work that takes into account local structure information for multi-modality representation learning. Experimental evaluations show that our approach is competitive and achieves the new state of the art on various common downstream vision-language tasks such as image-text retrieval and visual question answering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01522

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Properly tackling the noise issue is useful.

    “It has been recently shown that properly tackling the noise issue is useful [263], [309].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [309]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Duan, J., Tran, S., Xu, Y., Chanda, S., Chen, L., Zeng, B., Chilimbi, T., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
Venue
2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-06
Pages
15650-15659
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312877428
Cited by
309
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 90 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 15
FWCI
25.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) (RP190107)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
vision-language representation learning, vision-language pre-training, cross-modal alignment, mutual information maximization, image-text retrieval, visual question answering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review