CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 145Speech and dialogue systemsMulti-Agent Systems and NegotiationNatural Language Processing Techniques

WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agents

Open access
Yao, Shunyu, Chen, Howard, Yang, John, Narasimhan, Karthik·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2207.01206arXiv 2207.01206
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Existing benchmarks for grounding language in interactive environments either lack real-world linguistic elements, or prove difficult to scale up due to substantial human involvement in the collection of data or feedback signals. To bridge this gap, we develop WebShop -- a simulated e-commerce website environment with $1.18$ million real-world products and $12,087$ crowd-sourced text instructions. Given a text instruction specifying a product requirement, an agent needs to navigate multiple types of webpages and issue diverse actions to find, customize, and purchase an item. WebShop provides several challenges for language grounding including understanding compositional instructions, query (re-)formulation, comprehending and acting on noisy text in webpages, and performing strategic exploration. We collect over $1,600$ human demonstrations for the task, and train and evaluate a diverse range of agents using reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and pre-trained image and language models. Our best model achieves a task success rate of $29\%$, which outperforms rule-based heuristics ($9.6\%$) but is far lower than human expert performance ($59\%$). We also analyze agent and human trajectories and ablate various model components to provide insights for developing future agents with stronger language understanding and decision making abilities. Finally, we show that agents trained on WebShop exhibit non-trivial sim-to-real transfer when evaluated on amazon.com and ebay.com, indicating the potential value of WebShop in developing practical web-based agents that can operate in the wild.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2207.01206

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another class focuses on agent acting in single-session tasks without the need for long-term memory.

    “Another class focuses on agent acting in single-session tasks without the need for long-term memory.”

    From MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Yao et al., 2022

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes WebShop tasks as shopping episodes that end when the agent buys a product, supporting the single-session characterization. But §3.3 Research Challenges (p. 5) explicitly identifies long-term memory for comparing items or backtracking as a challenge, so the claim that these tasks do not need long-term memory is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In assessment of web agents, researchers built web simulators (MiniWoB, WebShop, WebArena) where agent behavior can be programmed to verify the correct sequence.

    “For example, in the assessment of web agents, researchers built web simulators (MiniWoB [85], WebShop [103], WebArena [126], etc.) where the behavior of an agent (clicking links, filling forms) can be programmed to verify the correct sequence.”

    From Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [103]

    The Introduction (p. 2) identifies WebShop as a simulated shopping environment in which agents search, select options, and click buttons. Task Formulation (p. 5) says evaluation uses an automatically computed reward for how well the selected product meets the instruction; it does not establish that WebShop verifies a correct sequence of agent actions. This citation supports WebShop as an example of a web simulator, but not the claimed sequence-verification mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • AgentDojo requires agents to dynamically call multiple tools in a stateful, adversarial environment.

    “In contrast to prior benchmarks for AI Agents [32, 43, 50, 68] and for prompt injections [34, 57, 66, 71], AgentDojo requires agents to dynamically call multiple tools in a stateful, adversarial environment.”

    From AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The second class of benchmarks primarily evaluate action by placing agents in dynamic environments, but are typically confined to a single session.

    “In contrast, the second class of benchmarks (Yao et al., 2022; Zhou et al.; Deng et al., 2023), such as SWEBench (Jimenez et al., 2023) and WebArena (Zhou et al.), primarily evaluate action by placing agents in dynamic environments, but are typically confined to a single session.”

    From MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Yao et al., 2022

  • The WebShop dataset contains over one million items.

    “we performed large-scale retrieval on the WebShop dataset (containing over one million items)”

    From MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Tasks (2026) · cites this paper as Yao et al., 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1][1] L. Adolphs, B. Boerschinger, C. Buck, M. C. Huebscher, M. Ciaramita, L. Espeholt, T. Hofmann, and Y. Kilcher. Boosting Search Engines with Interactive Agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00527 , 2021. - · arXiv
  2. [2][2] A. Aghajanyan, D. Okhonko, M. Lewis, M. Joshi, H. Xu, G. Ghosh, and L. Zettlemoyer. Htlm: Hyper-text pre-training and prompting of language models. ArXiv , abs/2107.06955, 2021. - · arXiv
  3. [3][3] J. Andreas, J. Bufe, D. Burkett, C. Chen, J. Clausman, J. Crawford, K. Crim, J. DeLoach, L. Dorner, J. Eisner, et al. Task-oriented dialogue as dataflow synthesis. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 8:556-571, 2020. -
  4. [4][4] E. M. Bender and A. Koller. Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , pages 5185-5198, 2020. -
  5. [5][5] G. Brockman, V. Cheung, L. Pettersson, J. Schneider, J. Schulman, J. Tang, and W. Zaremba. OpenAI Gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540 , 2016. - · arXiv
  6. [6][6] T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33:1877-1901, 2020. -
  7. [7][7] P. Budzianowski, T.-H. Wen, B.-H. Tseng, I. Casanueva, S. Ultes, O. Ramadan, and M. Gaši´ c. Multiwoz-a large-scale multi-domain wizard-of-oz dataset for task-oriented dialogue modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00278 , 2018. - · arXiv
  8. [8][8] A. Burns, D. Arsan, S. Agrawal, R. Kumar, K. Saenko, and B. A. Plummer. Interactive Mobile App Navigation with Uncertain or Under-specified Natural Language Commands. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02312 , 2022. - · arXiv
  9. [9][9] J. Chung, Çaglar Gülçehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. ArXiv , abs/1412.3555, 2014. - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. ArXiv , abs/1810.04805, 2019. - · arXiv
  11. [11][11] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In NAACL-HLT (1) , 2019. -
  12. [12][12] A. Ecoffet, J. Huizinga, J. Lehman, K. O. Stanley, and J. Clune. Go-explore: a new approach for hard-exploration problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10995 , 2019. - · arXiv
  13. [13][13] M. Fortunato, M. Tan, R. Faulkner, S. Hansen, A. Puigdomènech Badia, G. Buttimore, C. Deck, J. Z. Leibo, and C. Blundell. Generalization of reinforcement learners with working and episodic memory. Advances in neural information processing systems , 32, 2019. -
  14. [14][14] X. Guo, M. Yu, Y. Gao, C. Gan, M. Campbell, and S. Chang. Interactive fiction game playing as multi-paragraph reading comprehension with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02386 , 2020. - · arXiv
  15. [15][15] I. Gur, U. Rueckert, A. Faust, and D. Hakkani-Tur. Learning to Navigate the Web. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.09195 , 2018. - · arXiv
  16. [16][16] I. Gur, N. Jaques, K. Malta, M. Tiwari, H. Lee, and A. Faust. Adversarial Environment Generation for Learning to Navigate the Web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01991 , 2021. - · arXiv
  17. [17][17] M. Hausknecht, P. Ammanabrolu, M.-A. Côté, and X. Yuan. Interactive fiction games: A colossal adventure. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 34, pages 7903-7910, 2020. -
  18. [18][18] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 770-778, 2016. -
  19. [19][19] A. Hotti, R. S. Risuleo, S. Magureanu, A. Moradi, and J. Lagergren. The Klarna Product Page Dataset: A RealisticBenchmark for Web Representation Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02168 , 2021. - · arXiv
  20. [20][20] P. C. Humphreys, D. Raposo, T. Pohlen, G. Thornton, R. Chhaparia, A. Muldal, J. Abramson, P. Georgiev, A. Goldin, A. Santoro, et al. A data-driven approach for learning to control computers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.08137 , 2022. - · arXiv
  21. [21][21] S. Jia, J. Kiros, and J. Ba. Dom-q-net: Grounded RL on Structured Language. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07257 , 2019. - · arXiv
  22. [22][22] M. Komeili, K. Shuster, and J. Weston. Internet-augmented dialogue generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07566 , 2021. - · arXiv
  23. [23][23] A. Lampinen, S. Chan, A. Banino, and F. Hill. Towards mental time travel: a hierarchical memory for reinforcement learning agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:28182-28195, 2021. -
  24. [24][24] A. Lazaridou, A. Potapenko, and O. Tieleman. Multi-agent Communication meets Natural Language: Synergies between Functional and Structural Language Learning. In ACL , 2020. -
  25. [25][25] A. Lazaridou, E. Gribovskaya, W. Stokowiec, and N. Grigorev. Internet-augmented language models through few-shot prompting for open-domain question answering. ArXiv , abs/2203.05115, 2022. - · arXiv
  26. [26][26] M. Lewis, Y. Liu, N. Goyal, M. Ghazvininejad, A. Mohamed, O. Levy, V. Stoyanov, and L. Zettlemoyer. BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 , 2019. - · arXiv
  27. [27][27] X. Li, X. Yin, C. Li, P. Zhang, X. Hu, L. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Hu, L. Dong, F. Wei, et al. Oscar: Object-semantics aligned pre-training for vision-language tasks. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 121-137. Springer, 2020. -
  28. [28][28] J. Lin, X. Ma, S.-C. Lin, J.-H. Yang, R. Pradeep, and R. Nogueira. Pyserini: An Easy-to-Use Python Toolkit to Support Replicable IR Research with Sparse and Dense Representationss. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10073 , 2021. - · arXiv
  29. [29][29] E. Z. Liu, K. Guu, P. Pasupat, T. Shi, and P. Liang. Reinforcement Learning on Web Interfaces using Workflow-Guided Exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08802 , 2018. - · arXiv
  30. [30][30] J. Luketina, N. Nardelli, G. Farquhar, J. N. Foerster, J. Andreas, E. Grefenstette, S. Whiteson, and T. Rocktäschel. A survey of reinforcement learning informed by natural language. In IJCAI , 2019. -
  31. [31][31] S. Mazumder and O. Riva. FLIN: A Flexible Natural Language Interface for Web Navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12844 , 2020. - · arXiv
  32. [32][32] V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. Lillicrap, T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning , pages 1928-1937. PMLR, 2016. -
  33. [33][33] R. Nakano, J. Hilton, S. Balaji, J. Wu, L. Ouyang, C. Kim, C. Hesse, S. Jain, V. Kosaraju, W. Saunders, et al. WebGPT: Browser-Assisted Question-Answering with Human Feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09332 , 2021. - · arXiv
  34. [34][34] K. Narasimhan, A. Yala, and R. Barzilay. Improving Information Extraction by Acquiring External Evidence with Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 2355-2365, 2016. -
  35. [36][36] R. Nogueira and K. Cho. End-to-End Goal-Driven Web Navigation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 29, 2016. -
  36. [37][37] R. Nogueira and K. Cho. Task-Oriented Query Reformulation with Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pages 574-583, 2017. -
  37. [38][38] P. Pasupat, T.-S. Jiang, E. Z. Liu, K. Guu, and P. Liang. Mapping natural language commands to web elements. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) , 2018. -
  38. [39][39] P. Pasupat, T.-S. Jiang, E. Z. Liu, K. Guu, and P. Liang. Mapping natural language commands to web elements. In EMNLP , 2018. -
  39. [40][40] D. Pathak, P. Agrawal, A. A. Efros, and T. Darrell. Curiosity-driven exploration by selfsupervised prediction. In International conference on machine learning , pages 2778-2787. PMLR, 2017. -
  40. [42][42] M. Seo, A. Kembhavi, A. Farhadi, and H. Hajishirzi. Bidirectional attention flow for machine comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01603 , 2016. - · arXiv
  41. [43][43] T. Shi, A. Karpathy, L. Fan, J. Hernandez, and P. Liang. World of Bits: An Open-Domain platform for web-based agents. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 3135-3144. PMLR, 2017. -
  42. [44][44] M. Shridhar, J. Thomason, D. Gordon, Y. Bisk, W. Han, R. Mottaghi, L. Zettlemoyer, and D. Fox. Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for everyday tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 10740-10749, 2020. -
  43. [45][45] K. Shuster, M. Komeili, L. Adolphs, S. Roller, A. D. Szlam, and J. Weston. Language models that seek for knowledge: Modular search & generation for dialogue and prompt completion. ArXiv , abs/2203.13224, 2022. - · arXiv
  44. [46][46] Y. Su, A. H. Awadallah, M. Khabsa, P. Pantel, M. Gamon, and M. Encarnacion. Building Natural Language Interfaces to Web APIs. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pages 177-186, 2017. -
  45. [47][47] Y. Su, A. Hassan Awadallah, M. Wang, and R. W. White. Natural Language Interfaces with Fine-Grained User Interaction: A Case Study on Web APIs. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval , pages 855-864, 2018. -
  46. [48][48] D. Toyama, P. Hamel, A. Gergely, G. Comanici, A. Glaese, Z. Ahmed, T. Jackson, S. Mourad, and D. Precup. AndroidEnv: A Reinforcement Learning Platform for Android. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13231 , 2021. - · arXiv
  47. [49][49] J. Tuyls, S. Yao, S. Kakade, and K. Narasimhan. Multi-stage episodic control for strategic exploration in text games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01251 , 2022. - · arXiv
  48. [50][50] V. Uc-Cetina, N. Navarro-Guerrero, A. Martin-Gonzalez, C. Weber, and S. Wermter. Survey on reinforcement learning for language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05565 , 2021. - · arXiv
  49. [51][51] X. Wang, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Deep reinforced query reformulation for information retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.07987 , 2020. - · arXiv
  50. [52][52] Z. Wang, J. Yu, A. W. Yu, Z. Dai, Y. Tsvetkov, and Y. Cao. Simvlm: Simple visual language model pretraining with weak supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10904 , 2021. - · arXiv
  51. [53][53] G. Wayne, C.-C. Hung, D. Amos, M. Mirza, A. Ahuja, A. Grabska-Barwinska, J. Rae, P. Mirowski, J. Z. Leibo, A. Santoro, et al. Unsupervised predictive memory in a goal-directed agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10760 , 2018. - · arXiv
  52. [54][54] K. Williams, S. H. Hashemi, and I. Zitouni. Automatic Task Completion Flows from Web APIs. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval , pages 1009-1012, 2019. -
  53. [55][55] S. Yao, R. Rao, M. J. Hausknecht, and K. Narasimhan. Keep CALM and Explore: Language Models for Action Generation in Text-based Games. ArXiv , abs/2010.02903, 2020. - · arXiv
  54. [56][56] S. Yao, K. Narasimhan, and M. Hausknecht. Reading and acting while blindfolded: The need for semantics in text game agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13552 , 2021. - · arXiv
  55. [57][57] X. Yuan, J. Fu, M.-A. Côté, Y. Tay, C. J. Pal, and A. Trischler. Interactive machine comprehension with information seeking agents. In ACL , 2020. -
  56. [58][58] V. Zhong, A. W. Hanjie, S. Wang, K. Narasimhan, and L. Zettlemoyer. Silg: The multidomain symbolic interactive language grounding benchmark. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:21505-21519, 2021. -
  57. [59][59] S. Zhuang, H. Ren, L. Shou, J. Pei, M. Gong, G. Zuccon, and D. Jiang. Bridging the gap between indexing and retrieval for differentiable search index with query generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10128 , 2022. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Yao, S., Chen, H., Yang, J., & Narasimhan, K.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
20744-20757
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2207.01206
arXiv
2207.01206
OpenAlex
W7133227044
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5
FWCI
7.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (2107048)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
web interaction, WebShop, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review