PreprintCited by 101Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

SE(3)-DiffusionFields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusion

Open access

Abstract

Multi-objective optimization problems are ubiquitous in robotics, e.g., the optimization of a robot manipulation task requires a joint consideration of grasp pose configurations, collisions and joint limits. While some demands can be easily hand-designed, e.g., the smoothness of a trajectory, several task-specific objectives need to be learned from data. This work introduces a method for learning data-driven SE(3) cost functions as diffusion models. Diffusion models can represent highly-expressive multimodal distributions and exhibit proper gradients over the entire space due to their score-matching training objective. Learning costs as diffusion models allows their seamless integration with other costs into a single differentiable objective function, enabling joint gradient-based motion optimization. In this work, we focus on learning SE(3) diffusion models for 6DoF grasping, giving rise to a novel framework for joint grasp and motion optimization without needing to decouple grasp selection from trajectory generation. We evaluate the representation power of our SE(3) diffusion models w.r.t. classical generative models, and we showcase the superior performance of our proposed optimization framework in a series of simulated and real-world robotic manipulation tasks against representative baselines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2209.03855

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 101

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. N. Ratliff, M. Zucker, J. A. Bagnell, and S. Srinivasa, "Chomp: Gradient optimization techniques for efficient motion planning," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009.
  2. M. Kalakrishnan, S. Chitta, E. Theodorou, P. Pastor, and S. Schaal, "Stomp: Stochastic trajectory optimization for motion planning," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011.
  3. J. Schulman, Y. Duan, J. Ho, A. Lee, I. Awwal, H. Bradlow, J. Pan, S. Patil, K. Goldberg, and P. Abbeel, "Motion planning with sequential convex optimization and convex collision checking," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2014.
  4. T. Osa, "Motion planning by learning the solution manifold in trajectory optimization," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2022.
  5. A. Mousavian, C. Eppner, and D. Fox, "6-DoF graspnet: Variational grasp generation for object manipulation," in International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019.
  6. J. Urain, M. Ginesi, D. Tateo, and J. Peters, "Imitationflows: Learning deep stable stochastic dynamic systems by normalizing flows," in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2020.
  7. A. Simeonov, Y. Du, A. Tagliasacchi, J. B. Tenenbaum, A. Ro- driguez, P. Agrawal, and V. Sitzmann, "Neural descriptor fields: Se (3)- equivariant object representations for manipulation," in International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2022.
  8. D. Koert, G. Maeda, R. Lioutikov, G. Neumann, and J. Peters, "Demon- stration based trajectory optimization for generalizable robot motions," in IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2016.
  9. A. Lambert, A. T. Le, J. Urain, G. Chalvatzaki, B. Boots, and J. Peters, "Learning implicit priors for motion optimization," IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2022.
  10. A. Murali, A. Mousavian, C. Eppner, C. Paxton, and D. Fox, "6- DoF grasping for target-driven object manipulation in clutter," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2020.
  11. C. Finn, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, "Guided cost learning: Deep inverse optimal control via policy optimization," in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2016.
  12. M. Arjovsky and L. Bottou, "Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.04862, 2017. · arXiv
  13. T. Miyato, T. Kataoka, M. Koyama, and Y. Yoshida, "Spectral normal- ization for generative adversarial networks," in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018.
  14. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, "Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations," in International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, 2020.
  15. C. Luo, "Understanding diffusion models: A unified perspective," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11970 · arXiv
  16. C.-W. Huang, M. Aghajohari, A. J. Bose, P. Panangaden, and A. Courville, "Riemannian diffusion models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07949, 2022. · arXiv
  17. V. D. Bortoli, E. Mathieu, M. J. Hutchinson, J. Thornton, Y. W. Teh, and A. Doucet, "Riemannian score-based generative modelling," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. H. Oh, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, and K. Cho, Eds., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=oDRQGo8I7P
  18. D. Gnaneshwar, B. Ramsundar, D. Gandhi, R. Kurchin, and V. Viswanathan, "Score-based generative models for molecule genera- tion," arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04698, 2022. · arXiv
  19. C. Eppner, A. Mousavian, and D. Fox, "Acronym: A large-scale grasp dataset based on simulation," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2021.
  20. Y. Song and D. P. Kingma, "How to train your energy-based models," arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03288, 2021. · arXiv
  21. M. Janner, Y. Du, J. Tenenbaum, and S. Levine, "Planning with diffusion for flexible behavior synthesis," in International Conference on Machine Learning, 2022.
  22. Y. Song and S. Ermon, "Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  23. S. Saremi, A. Mehrjou, B. Schölkopf, and A. Hyvärinen, "Deep energy estimator networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.08306, 2018. · arXiv
  24. Y. Song and S. Ermon, "Improved techniques for training score- based generative models," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020.
  25. J. Sola, J. Deray, and D. Atchuthan, "A micro lie theory for state estimation in robotics," arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01537, 2018. · arXiv
  26. G. Chirikjian and M. Kobilarov, "Gaussian approximation of non- linear measurement models on lie groups," in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2014.
  27. L. Pineda, T. Fan, M. Monge, S. Venkataraman, P. Sodhi, R. Chen, J. Ortiz, D. DeTone, A. Wang, S. Anderson et al., "Theseus: A library for differentiable nonlinear optimization," arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09442, 2022. · arXiv
  28. B. Wen, C. Mitash, B. Ren, and K. E. Bekris, "se (3)-tracknet: Data- driven 6d pose tracking by calibrating image residuals in synthetic domains," in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 10 367-10 373.
  29. A. Simeonov, Y. Du, A. Tagliasacchi, J. B. Tenenbaum, A. Ro- driguez, P. Agrawal, and V. Sitzmann, "Neural descriptor fields: Se(3)- equivariant object representations for manipulation," in International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2022.
  30. J. J. Park, P. Florence, J. Straub, R. Newcombe, and S. Lovegrove, "Deepsdf: Learning continuous signed distance functions for shape representation," in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019.
  31. F. Lagriffoul, D. Dimitrov, J. Bidot, A. Saffiotti, and L. Karlsson, "Efficiently combining task and motion planning using geometric constraints," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2014.
  32. S. Levine, "Reinforcement learning and control as probabilistic infer- ence: Tutorial and review," arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00909, 2018. · arXiv
  33. A. X. Chang, T. Funkhouser, L. Guibas, P. Hanrahan, Q. Huang, Z. Li, S. Savarese, M. Savva, S. Song, H. Su et al., "Shapenet: An information- rich 3d model repository," arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015. · arXiv
  34. V. Makoviychuk, L. Wawrzyniak, Y. Guo, M. Lu, K. Storey, M. Mack- lin, D. Hoeller, N. Rudin, A. Allshire, A. Handa et al., "Isaac gym: High performance gpu-based physics simulation for robot learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10470, 2021. · arXiv
  35. A. Tanaka, "Discriminator optimal transport," Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  36. M. Sundermeyer, A. Mousavian, R. Triebel, and D. Fox, "Contact- graspnet: Efficient 6-DoF grasp generation in cluttered scenes," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2021.
  37. A. ten Pas, M. Gualtieri, K. Saenko, and R. Platt, "Grasp pose detec- tion in point clouds," The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2017.
  38. K. Rahardja and A. Kosaka, "Vision-based bin-picking: Recognition and localization of multiple complex objects using simple visual cues," in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys- tems., 1996.
  39. J. Mahler, J. Liang, S. Niyaz, M. Laskey, R. Doan, X. Liu, J. A. Ojea, and K. Goldberg, "Dex-net 2.0: Deep learning to plan robust grasps with synthetic point clouds and analytic grasp metrics," arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.09312, 2017. · arXiv
  40. I. Kapelyukh, V. Vosylius, and E. Johns, "Dall-e-bot: Introducing web- scale diffusion models to robotics," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02438, 2022. · arXiv
  41. W. Liu, T. Hermans, S. Chernova, and C. Paxton, "Structdiffusion: Object-centric diffusion for semantic rearrangement of novel objects," arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04604, 2022. · arXiv
  42. A. Ajay, Y. Du, A. Gupta, J. Tenenbaum, T. Jaakkola, and P. Agrawal, "Is conditional generative modeling all you need for decision-making?" arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15657, 2022. · arXiv
  43. Z. Wang, J. J. Hunt, and M. Zhou, "Diffusion policies as an ex- pressive policy class for offline reinforcement learning," arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.06193, 2022. · arXiv
  44. Z. Zhong, D. Rempe, D. Xu, Y. Chen, S. Veer, T. Che, B. Ray, and M. Pavone, "Guided conditional diffusion for controllable traffic simulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17366, 2022. · arXiv
  45. W. Park, J. S. Kim, Y. Zhou, N. J. Cowan, A. M. Okamura, and G. S. Chirikjian, "Diffusion-based motion planning for a nonholonomic flexible needle model," in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2005, pp. 4600-4605.
  46. X. Lou, Y. Yang, and C. Choi, "Collision-aware target-driven object grasping in constrained environments," in IEEE International Confer- ence on Robotics and Automation, 2021.
  47. H. Liang, X. Ma, S. Li, M. Görner, S. Tang, B. Fang, F. Sun, and J. Zhang, "Pointnetgpd: Detecting grasp configurations from point sets," in International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2019.
  48. X. Yan, J. Hsu, M. Khansari, Y. Bai, A. Pathak, A. Gupta, J. David- son, and H. Lee, "Learning 6-DoF grasping interaction via deep geometry-aware 3d representations," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2018.
  49. J. Hager, R. Bauer, M. Toussaint, and J. Mainprice, "Graspme-grasp manifold estimator," in 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication, 2021.
  50. T. Weng, D. Held, F. Meier, and M. Mukadam, "Neural grasp distance fields for robot manipulation," arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.02647, 2022. · arXiv
  51. D. Berenson, S. Srinivasa, and J. Kuffner, "Task space regions: A framework for pose-constrained manipulation planning," The Interna- tional Journal of Robotics Research, 2011.
  52. N. Vahrenkamp, M. Do, T. Asfour, and R. Dillmann, "Integrated grasp and motion planning," in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2010.
  53. N. Funk, C. Schaff, R. Madan, T. Yoneda, J. U. De Jesus, J. Watson, E. K. Gordon, F. Widmaier, S. Bauer, S. S. Srinivasa et al., "Benchmark- ing structured policies and policy optimization for real-world dexterous object manipulation," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 478-485, 2021.
  54. J. Fontanals, B.-A. Dang-Vu, O. Porges, J. Rosell, and M. A. Roa, "Integrated grasp and motion planning using independent contact re- gions," in IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2014.
  55. D. F. Crouse, "On implementing 2d rectangular assignment algo- rithms," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2016.
  56. C. Deng, O. Litany, Y. Duan, A. Poulenard, A. Tagliasacchi, and L. J. Guibas, "Vector neurons: A general framework for so (3)-equivariant networks," in IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021.
  57. D. Chetverikov, D. Svirko, D. Stepanov, and P. Krsek, "The trimmed iterative closest point algorithm," in International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2002.

Metadata

Authors
Urain, J., Funk, N., Peters, J., & Chalvatzaki, G.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
5923-5930
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383109488
Cited by
101
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 5
FWCI
43.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Keywords
robotic manipulation, multi-objective optimization, score matching, collision avoidance, trajectory generation, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SE(3)-DiffusionFields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2209.03855
The paper
Urain, J., Funk, N., Peters, J., & Chalvatzaki, G. (2022). SE(3)-DiffusionFields: Learning smooth cost functions for joint grasp and motion optimization through diffusion. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2209.03855