Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

High-resolution canopy height map in the Landes forest (France) based on GEDI, Sentinel-1, and Sentinel-2 data with a deep learning approach

Schwartz, Martin, Ciais, Philippe, Ottlé, Catherine, De Truchis, Aurelien, Vega, Cedric, Fayad, Ibrahim, Brandt, Martin, Fensholt, Rasmus, Baghdadi, Nicolas, Morneau, François, Morin, David, Guyon, Dominique, Dayau, Sylvia, Wigneron, Jean-Pierre·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2212.10265arXiv 2212.10265
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In intensively managed forests in Europe, where forests are divided into stands of small size and may show heterogeneity within stands, a high spatial resolution (10 - 20 meters) is arguably needed to capture the differences in canopy height. In this work, we developed a deep learning model based on multi-stream remote sensing measurements to create a high-resolution canopy height map over the "Landes de Gascogne" forest in France, a large maritime pine plantation of 13,000 km$^2$ with flat terrain and intensive management. This area is characterized by even-aged and mono-specific stands, of a typical length of a few hundred meters, harvested every 35 to 50 years. Our deep learning U-Net model uses multi-band images from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 with composite time averages as input to predict tree height derived from GEDI waveforms. The evaluation is performed with external validation data from forest inventory plots and a stereo 3D reconstruction model based on Skysat imagery available at specific locations. We trained seven different U-net models based on a combination of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 bands to evaluate the importance of each instrument in the dominant height retrieval. The model outputs allow us to generate a 10 m resolution canopy height map of the whole "Landes de Gascogne" forest area for 2020 with a mean absolute error of 2.02 m on the Test dataset. The best predictions were obtained using all available satellite layers from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 but using only one satellite source also provided good predictions. For all validation datasets in coniferous forests, our model showed better metrics than previous canopy height models available in the same region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2212.10265

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ball, J.E., Anderson, D.T., Sr, C.S.C., 2017. Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: theories, tools, and challenges for the community. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 11, 042609. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042609 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berger, A., Gschwantner, T., McRoberts, R.E., Schadauer, K., 2014. Effects of Measurement Errors on Individual Tree Stem Volume Estimates for the Austrian National Forest Inventory. For. Sci. 60, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.5849/forsci.12-164 · DOI
  3. Dalagnol, R., Wagner, F.H., Emilio, T., Streher, A.S., Galvão, L.S., Ometto, J.P.H.B., Aragão, L.E.O.C., 2022. Canopy palm cover across the Brazilian Amazon forests mapped with airborne LiDAR data and deep learning. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 8, 601-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.264 · DOI
  4. Dubayah, R., Blair, J.B., Goetz, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Hansen, M., Healey, S., Hofton, M., Hurtt, G., Kellner, J., Luthcke, S., Armston, J., Tang, H., Duncanson, L., Hancock, S., Jantz, P., Marselis, S., Patterson, P.L., Qi, W., Silva, C., 2020. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dubayah, R.O., Hofton, M., Blair, J.B., Armston, J., Tang, H., Luthcke, S., 2021. GEDI L2A Elevation and Height Metrics Data Global Footprint Level V002. https://doi.org/10.5067/GEDI/GEDI02_A.002 · DOI
  6. Duncanson, L., Kellner, J.R., Armston, J., Dubayah, R., Minor, D.M., Hancock, S., Healey, S.P., Patterson, P.L., Saarela, S., Marselis, S., Silva, C.E., Bruening, J., Goetz, S.J., Tang, H., Hofton, M., Blair, B., Luthcke, S., Fatoyinbo, L., Abernethy, K., Alonso, A., Andersen, H.-E., Aplin, P., Baker, T.R., Barbier, N., Bastin, J.F., Biber, P., Boeckx, P., Bogaert, J., Boschetti, L., Boucher, P.B., Boyd, D.S., Burslem, D.F.R.P., Calvo-Rodriguez, S., Chave, J., Chazdon, R.L., Clark, D.B., Clark, D.A., Cohen, W.B., Coomes, D.A., Corona, P., Cushman, K.C., Cutler, M.E.J., Dalling, J.W., Dalponte, M., Dash, J., de-Miguel, S., Deng, S., Ellis, P.W., Erasmus, B., Fekety, P.A., Fernandez-Landa, A., Ferraz, A., Fischer, R., Fisher, A.G., García- Abril, A., Gobakken, T., Hacker, J.M., Heurich, M., Hill, R.A., Hopkinson, C., Huang, H., Hubbell, S.P., Hudak, A.T., Huth, A., Imbach, B., Jeffery, K.J., Katoh, M., Kearsley, E., Kenfack, D., Kljun, N., Knapp, N., Král, K., Krůček, M., Labrière, N., Lewis, S.L., Longo, M., Lucas, R.M., Main, R., Manzanera, J.A., Martínez, R.V., Mathieu, R., Memiaghe, H., Meyer, V., Mendoza, A.M., Monerris, A., Montesano, P., Morsdorf, F., Næsset, E., Naidoo, L., Nilus, R., O'Brien, M., Orwig, D.A., Papathanassiou, K., Parker, G., Philipson, C., Phillips, O.L., Pisek, J., Poulsen, J.R., Pretzsch, H., Rüdiger, C., Saatchi, S., Sanchez- Azofeifa, A., Sanchez-Lopez, N., Scholes, R., Silva, C.A., Simard, M., Skidmore, A., Stereńczak, K., Tanase, M., Torresan, C., Valbuena, R., Verbeeck, H., Vrska, T., Wessels, K., White, J.C., White, L.J.T., Zahabu, E., Zgraggen, C., 2022. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112845 · DOI · Paper page
  7. El Hajj, M., Baghdadi, N., Wigneron, J.-P., Zribi, M., Albergel, C., Calvet, J.-C., Fayad, I., 2019. First Vegetation Optical Depth Mapping from Sentinel-1 C-band SAR Data over Crop Fields. Remote Sens. 11, 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232769 · DOI
  8. Fayad, I., Baghdadi, N., Bailly, J.-S., Barbier, N., Gond, V., Hajj, M.E., Fabre, F., Bourgine, B., 2014. Canopy Height Estimation in French Guiana with LiDAR ICESat/GLAS Data Using Principal Component Analysis and Random Forest Regressions. Remote Sens. 6, 11883-11914. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61211883 · DOI
  9. Fayad, I., Baghdadi, N.N., Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Bailly, J.S., Scolforo, H.F., Zribi, M., Maire, G.L., 2021a. Assessment of GEDI's LiDAR Data for the Estimation of Canopy Heights and Wood Volume of Eucalyptus Plantations in Brazil. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 14, 7095-7110. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3092836 · DOI
  10. Fayad, I., Ienco, D., Baghdadi, N., Gaetano, R., Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Ferraço Scolforo, H., Le Maire, G., 2021b. A CNN-based approach for the estimation of canopy heights and wood volume from GEDI waveforms. Remote Sens. Environ. 265, 112652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112652 · DOI
  11. Fayad, I., Baghdadi, N., Alcarde Alvares, C., Stape, J.L., Bailly, J.S., Scolforo, H.F., Cegatta, I.R., Zribi, M., Le Maire, G., 2021c. Terrain Slope Effect on Forest Height and Wood Volume Estimation from GEDI Data. Remote Sens. 13, 2136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112136 · DOI
  12. Griscom, B.W., Adams, J., Ellis, P.W., Houghton, R.A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D.A., Schlesinger, W.H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J.V., Smith, P., Woodbury, P., Zganjar, C., Blackman, A., Campari, J., Conant, R.T., Delgado, C., Elias, P., Gopalakrishna, T., Hamsik, M.R., Herrero, M., Kiesecker, J., Landis, E., Laestadius, L., Leavitt, S.M., Minnemeyer, S., Polasky, S., Potapov, P., Putz, F.E., Sanderman, J., Silvius, M., Wollenberg, E., Fargione, J., 2017. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 11645-11650. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S.A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S.V., Goetz, S.J., Loveland, T.R., Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C.O., Townshend, J.R.G., 2013. High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342, 850-853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Illarionova, S., Shadrin, D., Ignatiev, V., Shayakhmetov, S., Trekin, A., Oseledets, I., 2022. Estimation of the Canopy Height Model From Multispectral Satellite Imagery With Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Access 10, 34116-34132.
  15. Jurjević, L., Liang, X., Gašparović, M., Balenović, I., 2020. Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed - Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 169, 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.09.014 · DOI
  16. Kitahara, F., Mizoue, N., Yoshida, S., 2010. Effects of training for inexperienced surveyors on data quality of tree diameter and height measurements. Silva Fenn. 44. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.133 · DOI
  17. Kutchartt, E., Pedron, M., Pirotti, F., 2022. ASSESSMENT OF CANOPY AND GROUND HEIGHT ACCURACY FROM GEDI LIDAR OVER STEEP MOUNTAIN AREAS. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. V-3-2022, 431-438. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-431-2022 · DOI
  18. Lang, N., Jetz, W., Schindler, K., Wegner, J.D., 2022a. A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth. ArXiv220408322 Cs Eess. Lang, N., Kalischek, N., Armston, J., Schindler, K., Dubayah, R., Wegner, J.D., 2022b. Global canopy height regression and uncertainty estimation from GEDI LIDAR waveforms with deep ensembles. Remote Sens. Environ. 268, 112760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112760 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lang, N., Schindler, K., Wegner, J.D., 2019. Country-wide high-resolution vegetation height mapping with Sentinel- 2. Remote Sens. Environ. 233, 111347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111347 · DOI · Paper page
  20. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Li, W., Niu, Z., Shang, R., Qin, Y., Wang, L., Chen, H., 2020. High-resolution mapping of forest canopy height using machine learning by coupling ICESat-2 LiDAR with Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation 92, 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102163 · DOI
  22. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T., 2015. Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation. pp. 3431-3440.
  23. Main-Knorn, M., Pflug, B., Louis, J., Debaecker, V., Müller-Wilm, U., Gascon, F., 2017. Sen2Cor for Sentinel-2, in: Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXIII. SPIE, pp. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2278218 · DOI
  24. Morin, D., Planells, M., Baghdadi, N., Bouvet, A., Fayad, I., Le Toan, T., Mermoz, S., Villard, L., 2022. Improving Heterogeneous Forest Height Maps by Integrating GEDI-Based Forest Height Information in a Multi- Sensor Mapping Process. Remote Sens. 14, 2079. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092079 · DOI
  25. Morin, D., Planells, M., Guyon, D., Villard, L., Mermoz, S., Bouvet, A., Thevenon, H., Dejoux, J.-F., Le Toan, T., Dedieu, G., 2019. Estimation and Mapping of Forest Structure Parameters from Open Access Satellite Images: Development of a Generic Method with a Study Case on Coniferous Plantation. Remote Sens. 11, 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11111275 · DOI
  26. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P.E., Kurz, W.A., Phillips, O.L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S.L., Canadell, J.G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R.B., Pacala, S.W., McGuire, A.D., Piao, S., Rautiainen, A., Sitch, S., Hayes, D., 2011. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests. Science 333, 988-993. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201609 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pereira-Pires, J.E., Mora, A., Aubard, V., Silva, J.M.N., Fonseca, J.M., 2021. Assessment of Sentinel-2 Spectral Features to Estimate Forest Height with the New GEDI Data, in: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ferreira, P., Brito, G. (Eds.), Technological Innovation for Applied AI Systems, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_12 · DOI
  28. Potapov, P., Li, X., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Hansen, M.C., Kommareddy, A., Pickens, A., Turubanova, S., Tang, H., Silva, C.E., Armston, J., Dubayah, R., Blair, J.B., Hofton, M., 2021. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Pourrahmati, M.R., Baghdadi, N., Darvishsefat, A.A., Namiranian, M., Fayad, I., Bailly, J.S., Gond, V., 2015. Capability of GLAS/ICESat data to estimate forest canopy height and volume in mountainous forests of Iran. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2478478 · DOI
  30. Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer- Assisted Intervention -MICCAI 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Saatchi, S.S., Harris, N.L., Brown, S., Lefsky, M., Mitchard, E.T.A., Salas, W., Zutta, B.R., Buermann, W., Lewis, S.L., Hagen, S., Petrova, S., White, L., Silman, M., Morel, A., 2011. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 9899-9904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019576108 · DOI
  32. Smith, L.N., 2017. Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networks, in: 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, Santa Rosa, CA, USA, pp. 464-472. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2017.58 · DOI
  33. Tommaso, S.D., Wang, S., Lobell, D.B., 2021. Combining GEDI and Sentinel-2 for wall-to-wall mapping of tall and short crops. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 125002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac358c · DOI
  34. Wilkes, P., Jones, S.D., Suárez, L., Mellor, A., Woodgate, W., Soto-Berelov, M., Haywood, A., Skidmore, A., 2015. Mapping Forest Canopy Height Across Large Areas by Upscaling ALS Estimates with Freely Available Satellite Data. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS70912563 · DOI
  35. Zhang, W., Qi, J., Wan, P., Wang, H., Xie, D., Wang, X., Yan, G., 2016. An Easy-to-Use Airborne LiDAR Data Filtering Method Based on Cloth Simulation. Remote Sens. 8, 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060501 · DOI
  36. Zhu, X.X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., Fraundorfer, F., 2017. Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Mag. 5, 8-36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zribi, M., D. Guyon, E. Motte, S. Dayau, J.-P. Wigneron, N. Baghdadi, N. Pierdicca. 2019. Performance of GNSS-R GLORI data for biomass estimation over the Landes forest, Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation 74, 150- 158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.010, 2019 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, M., Ciais, P., Ottlé, C., De Truchis, A., Vega, C., Fayad, I., Brandt, M., Fensholt, R., Baghdadi, N., Morneau, F., Morin, D., Guyon, D., Dayau, S., & Wigneron, J.-P.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2212.10265
arXiv
2212.10265
References
0
Type
Preprint
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.