The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuning
Open accessAbstract
A compelling use case of offline reinforcement learning (RL) is to obtain a policy initialization from existing datasets followed by fast online fine-tuning with limited interaction. However, existing offline RL methods tend to behave poorly during fine-tuning. In this paper, we devise an approach for learning an effective initialization from offline data that also enables fast online fine-tuning capabilities. Our approach, calibrated Q-learning (Cal-QL), accomplishes this by learning a conservative value function initialization that underestimates the value of the learned policy from offline data, while also being calibrated, in the sense that the learned Q-values are at a reasonable scale. We refer to this property as calibration, and define it formally as providing a lower bound on the true value function of the learned policy and an upper bound on the value of some other (suboptimal) reference policy, which may simply be the behavior policy. We show that offline RL algorithms that learn such calibrated value functions lead to effective online fine-tuning, enabling us to take the benefits of offline initializations in online fine-tuning. In practice, Cal-QL can be implemented on top of the conservative Q learning (CQL) for offline RL within a one-line code change. Empirically, Cal-QL outperforms state-of-the-art methods on 9/11 fine-tuning benchmark tasks that we study in this paper. Code and video are available at https://nakamotoo.github.io/Cal-QL
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Current offline RL techniques rely on a task-specific coefficient that balances value estimation and the regularizer.
“and (2) relies on a task-specific coefficient that balances value estimation and the regularizer.”
From TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control (2023) · cites this paper as Nakamoto et al., 2023
Current offline RL techniques rely on explicit or implicit conservatism in Q-value estimation, which requires modifications to the training objective and empirically hampers online RL performance.
“Current offline RL techniques rely on (1) explicit or implicit conservatism in Q -value estimation which requires modifications to the training objective and empirically hampers online RL performance (Nakamoto et al., 2023)”
From TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control (2023) · cites this paper as Nakamoto et al., 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE COLOSSEUM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generalization for Robotic Manipulation
Pumacay, W., Singh, I., Duan, J., Krishna, R., Thomason, J., & Fox, D. (2024) · Robotics: Science and Systems XX · doi:10.15607/rss.2024.xx.133 · Cited by 29
TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control
Hansen, N., Su, H., & Wang, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16828 · Cited by 8
“…rely on (1) explicit or implicit conservatism in Q -value estimation which requires modifications to the training objec-tive and empirically hampers online RL performance (Nakamoto et al., 2023), and (2) relies on a task-specific coefficient that balances value estimation and the regularizer.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakamoto, M., Zhai, Y., Singh, A., Mark, M. S., Ma, Y., Finn, C., Kumar, A., & Levine, S.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 62244-62269
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2303.05479
- OpenAlex
- W7133245541
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (public-domain)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2031899)
- Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen institute
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-22-1-2102, N00014-22, FA9550, N00014)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-22-1-0273, -21-1-)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-21-1-, W911NF-21-1-0097, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- offline reinforcement learning, pre-training, online fine-tuning, calibration, efficient fine-tuning, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review