The KiTS21 Challenge: Automatic segmentation of kidneys, renal tumors, and renal cysts in corticomedullary-phase CT
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents the challenge report for the 2021 Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge (KiTS21) held in conjunction with the 2021 international conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI). KiTS21 is a sequel to its first edition in 2019, and it features a variety of innovations in how the challenge was designed, in addition to a larger dataset. A novel annotation method was used to collect three separate annotations for each region of interest, and these annotations were performed in a fully transparent setting using a web-based annotation tool. Further, the KiTS21 test set was collected from an outside institution, challenging participants to develop methods that generalize well to new populations. Nonetheless, the top-performing teams achieved a significant improvement over the state of the art set in 2019, and this performance is shown to inch ever closer to human-level performance. An in-depth meta-analysis is presented describing which methods were used and how they faired on the leaderboard, as well as the characteristics of which cases generally saw good performance, and which did not. Overall KiTS21 facilitated a significant advancement in the state of the art in kidney tumor segmentation, and provides useful insights that are applicable to the field of semantic segmentation as a whole.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tumor segmentation is less stable because lesions are not tied to a fixed anatomical shape or location and may be small, heterogeneous, or weakly contrasted.
“Tumor segmentation is less stable because lesions are not tied to a fixed anatomical shape or location and may be small, heterogeneous, or weakly contrasted [3,8,23].”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Section 3.4.3 reports lower average Dice for tumor than kidney segmentation (0.8813 versus 0.9748), and Section 3.1 describes substantial variation in how teams delineated the tumor–kidney boundary. The paper does not attribute that difficulty to lesions lacking a fixed shape or location, or to their being small, heterogeneous, or weakly contrasted. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMSD-Colon contains 126 abdominal CT volumes with colon tumor annotations, and KiTS21 contains 300 CT volumes with kidney tumor annotations.
“MSD-Colon contains 126 abdominal CT volumes with colon tumor annotations, and KiTS21 contains 300 CT volumes with kidney tumor annotations.”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Section 2.1.1 (page unavailable) identifies 300 CT cases for the KiTS21 training set, supporting the kidney-tumor portion of the claim. Section 2.1.2 (page unavailable) describes a separate 100-case test set, so 300 is not the full KiTS21 dataset. The paper does not address the claimed 126 MSD-Colon volumes or their annotations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDifferent lesion appearances and annotation targets have been reported across tumor benchmarks.
“different lesion appearances and annotation targets have been reported across tumor benchmarks [3,8,23]”
From Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts (2026) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and it has served as an invaluable resource to the protein structure prediction community over the last 30 years as it has progressed through several generations of computational biochemistry [29], with the latest being dominated by deep learning methods such as DeepMind’s ”AlphaFold” [26].”
BackgroundA Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526 · cited 1× · see citing works
“05 and corrections for multiple hypothesis testing were made using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure [23].”
MethodnnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477 · cited 5× · see citing works
“All models were trained with a combination of Dice and cross-entropy losses [24].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRadiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Gillies, R. J., Kinahan, P. E., & Hricak, H. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015151169 · Cited by 8,421 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Increasingly, the so-called “radiome” is revealing itself as a powerful quantitative predictor of clinically-meaningful outcomes in cancer [15].”
BackgroundUMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 · Cited by 7,101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Researchers often exploit this property in conjunction with a variety of nonparametric dimensional reduction techniques [49, 38] in order to visualize the clusters of input samples which appear to be represented by the network in similar ways.”
BackgroundKutikov, A., & Uzzo, R. (2009) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035 · Cited by 2,311 · cited 1×
“In surgical oncology, a number of “nephrometry” scores such as R.E.N.A.L. [30] and PADUA [13] have been developed which synthesize various manually-extracted radiomic features to produce scores which have been shown to robustly correlate with perioperative and oncologic outcomes.”
BackgroundBakas, S., Reyes, M., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Rempfler, M., Crimi, A., Shinohara, R. T., Berger, C., Ha, S. M., Rozycki, M., et al. (2018) · Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository · doi:10.17863/cam.38755 · Cited by 1,441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)
Bilic, P., Christ, P., Li, H. B., Vorontsov, E., Ben-Cohen, A., Kaissis, G., Szeskin, A., Jacobs, C., Mamani, G. E. H., Chartrand, G., et al. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102680 · Cited by 1,412 · cited 2× · see citing works
“One of the models in the final ensemble used by this method was initialized with weights of a model pretrained on the publicly available Liver Tumor Segmentation (LiTS) dataset [5].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationPhysicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Health Care Disparities
Chapman, E., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2013) · Journal of general internal medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1 · Cited by 1,167 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing health care disparities are well-documented [3, 10, 11], and there is a significant concern that the proliferation of predictive models in medicine will serve to exacerbate these disparities [9].”
BackgroundFicarra, V., Novara, G., Secco, S., et al. (2009) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.040 · Cited by 1,031 · cited 1×
“In surgical oncology, a number of “nephrometry” scores such as R.E.N.A.L. [30] and PADUA [13] have been developed which synthesize various manually-extracted radiomic features to produce scores which have been shown to robustly correlate with perioperative and oncologic outcomes.”
BackgroundThe Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Ljungberg, B., Campbell, S. C., Cho, H. Y., Didier Jacqmin, D., Lee, J. E., Weikert, S., & Kiemeney, L. A. L. M. (2011) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.049 · Cited by 1,013 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This imbalance is consistent between the training and test sets, and is, in fact, a well established phenomenon in the epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma [7].”
BackgroundResultHemmant, J. (2016) · Urology Annals · doi:10.1177/1755738015578489 · Cited by 963 · cited 1×
“With the utilization of cross-sectional imaging now as high as it’s ever been, kidney tumors are now most often discovered incidentally, rather than on the basis of symptoms [37, 8].”
BackgroundEvaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge
Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., et al. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002 · Cited by 857 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationCHAOS Challenge - combined (CT-MR) healthy abdominal organ segmentation
Kavur, A. E., Gezer, N. S., BARIŞ, M. M., Aslan, S., Conze, P.-H., Groza, V., Pham, D. D., Chatterjee, S., Ernst, P., Özkan, S., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101950 · Cited by 828 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationCultural Competence And Health Care Disparities: Key Perspectives And Trends
Betancourt, J. R., Green, A. R., Carrillo, J. E., & Park, E. R. (2005) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.499 · Cited by 707 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing health care disparities are well-documented [3, 10, 11], and there is a significant concern that the proliferation of predictive models in medicine will serve to exacerbate these disparities [9].”
BackgroundA Brief Survey on Semantic Segmentation with Deep Learning
Hao, S., Zhou, Y., & Guo, Y. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.118 · Cited by 608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Modern deep learning approaches have achieved impressive performance on a wide variety of semantic segmentation tasks [18], but their need for large and high-quality training datasets has hindered their development in problems such as kidney cancer for which little annotated data is publicly…”
BackgroundHeller, N. E., Isensee, F., Maier-Hein, K. H., Hou, X., Xie, C., Li, F., Nan, Y., Mu, G., Lin, Z., Han, M., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101821 · Cited by 586 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The challenge described in this report, “The 2021 Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge” or “KiTS21” is the second challenge in the “KiTS” series after its 2019 iteration, “KiTS19” [21].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationSources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review
Celi, L. A., Cellini, J., Charpignon, M.-L., Dee, E. C., Dernoncourt, F., Eber, R., Mitchell, W. G., Moukheiber, L., Schirmer, J., Situ, J., et al. (2022) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000022 · Cited by 576 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Which teams used which of these methods is presented in tabular form in figure 9.”
BackgroundMethodCritical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round <scp>XIV</scp>
Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Topf, M., Fidelis, K., & Moult, J. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26237 · Cited by 503 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and it has served as an invaluable resource to the protein structure prediction community over the last 30 years as it has progressed through several generations of computational biochemistry [29], with the latest being dominated by deep learning methods such as DeepMind’s ”AlphaFold” [26].”
BackgroundA decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction
Moult, J. (2005) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011 · Cited by 485 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One of the first machine learning competitions to use this format was the Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction or “CASP” competition which has been followed by a sequel CASP event every even-numbered year since 1994 [39].”
MethodActive surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer.
Jewett, M., Mattar, K., Basiuk, J., et al. (2011) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.030 · Cited by 473 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There is growing evidence that large numbers of renal tumors are either benign or indolent, especially when they are small and incidentally discovered, and they might therefore be best managed with surveillance rather than intervention [42, 50, 25].”
BackgroundMcDonald, R. J., Schwartz, K. M., Eckel, L. J., Diehn, F. E., Hunt, C. H., Bartholmai, B. J., Erickson, B. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2015) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.05.007 · Cited by 460 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With the utilization of cross-sectional imaging now as high as it’s ever been, kidney tumors are now most often discovered incidentally, rather than on the basis of symptoms [37, 8].”
BackgroundVerSe: A Vertebrae labelling and segmentation benchmark for multi-detector CT images
Sekuboyina, A., Husseini, M. E., Bayat, A., Löffler, M. T., Liebl, H., Li, H., Tetteh, G., Kukačka, J., Payer, C., Štern, D., et al. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102166 · Cited by 391 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationWhy rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care
Maier‐Hein, L., Eisenmann, M., Reinke, A., Onogur, S., Stankovic, M., Godau, P., Arbel, T., Bogunović, H., Bradley, A. P., Carass, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7 · Cited by 390 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Many excellent challenges have been organized in the medical image analysis community over the last two decades, and the semantic segmentation of cross-sectional images is one of the most popular subjects [36].”
BackgroundBluemke, D. A., Moy, L., Bredella, M. A., Ertl-Wagner, B. B., Fowler, K. J., Goh, V. J., Halpern, E. F., Hess, C. P., Schiebler, M. L., & Weiss, C. R. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019192515 · Cited by 343 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is therefore generally recommended that data from a separate institution should be used for external validation [6].”
BackgroundChunara, R., Zhao, Y., Chen, J., Lawrence, K. S., Testa, P. A., Nov, O., & Mann, D. M. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa217 · Cited by 325 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Existing health care disparities are well-documented [3, 10, 11], and there is a significant concern that the proliferation of predictive models in medicine will serve to exacerbate these disparities [9].”
BackgroundKarlo, C. A., Paolo, P. L. D., Chaim, J. L., Hakimi, A. A., Ostrovnaya, I., Russo, P., Hricak, H., Motzer, R. J., Hsieh, J. J.-D., & Akın, O. (2013) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.13130663 · Cited by 270 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Best viewed in color. radiomic features have shown exciting potential for predicting histologic subtype [4], nuclear grade [40], somatic tumor mutations [27], and even cancer-specific and overall survival [17].”
BackgroundNikolov, S., Blackwell, S., Zverovitch, A., Mendes, R. L., Livne, M., Fauw, J. D., Patel, Y., Meyer, C., Askham, H., Romera‐Paredes, B., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.04430 · Cited by 239 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To address this, the Sørensen-Dice metric was supplemented with the Surface Dice metric, as described in [41].”
MethodFast and Low-GPU-memory abdomen CT organ segmentation: The FLARE challenge
Ma, J., Zhang, Y., Gu, S., An, X., Wang, Z., Ge, C., Wang, C., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Xu, Y., et al. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102616 · Cited by 166 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBenign renal neoplasms in adults: cross-sectional imaging findings.
Prasad, S., Surabhi, V., Menias, C., et al. (2008) · AJR. American journal of roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.07.2724 · Cited by 125 · cited 1×
“There is growing evidence that large numbers of renal tumors are either benign or indolent, especially when they are small and incidentally discovered, and they might therefore be best managed with surveillance rather than intervention [42, 50, 25].”
BackgroundNazari, M., Shiri, I., Hajianfar, G., Oveisi, N., Abdollahi, H., Deevband, M. R., Oveisi, M., & Zaidi, H. (2020) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-020-01169-z · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Best viewed in color. radiomic features have shown exciting potential for predicting histologic subtype [4], nuclear grade [40], somatic tumor mutations [27], and even cancer-specific and overall survival [17].”
BackgroundINCIDENTAL RENAL TUMOURS: THE FREQUENCY OF BENIGN LESIONS AND THE ROLE OF PREOPERATIVE CORE BIOPSY
Somani, B. K., & Nabi, G. (2006) · BJU International · doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.06408_5.x · Cited by 94 · cited 1×
“There is growing evidence that large numbers of renal tumors are either benign or indolent, especially when they are small and incidentally discovered, and they might therefore be best managed with surveillance rather than intervention [42, 50, 25].”
BackgroundHeterogeneity and renal mass biopsy: a review of its role and reliability
Tomaszewski, J., Uzzo, R., & Smaldone, M. (2014) · Cancer Biology and Medicine · doi:10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.002 · Cited by 93 · cited 1×
“…that renal mass biopsy has the potential to resolve this treatment decision dilemma, but others argue that its relative lack of sensitivity hinders its ability to convince physicians and patients that their disease won’t progress [48], and ultimately, its utilization remains relatively low [32].”
BackgroundLabelling instructions matter in biomedical image analysis
Rädsch, T., Reinke, A., Weru, V., Tizabi, M. D., Schreck, N., Kavur, A. E., Pekdemir, B., Roß, T., Kopp‐Schneider, A., & Maier‐Hein, L. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00625-5 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There has recently been some discussion about the need for greater clarity about how annotations are produced for medical image analysis research [43].”
BackgroundMethods and open-source toolkit for analyzing and visualizing challenge results
Wiesenfarth, M., Reinke, A., Landman, B. A., Eisenmann, M., Saiz, L. A., Cardoso, M. J., Maier-Hein, L., & Kopp‐Schneider, A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82017-6 · Cited by 89 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Generated with the ChallengeR package [51].”
Utilization of Renal Mass Biopsy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma
Leppert, J., Hanley, J. M., Wagner, T., et al. (2014) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.073 · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“…that renal mass biopsy has the potential to resolve this treatment decision dilemma, but others argue that its relative lack of sensitivity hinders its ability to convince physicians and patients that their disease won’t progress [48], and ultimately, its utilization remains relatively low [32].”
BackgroundCancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment
Klotz, L. (2012) · Current Opinion in Urology · doi:10.1097/mou.0b013e32835259aa · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“However, metastatic renal cancer remains highly lethal, so the rare instances in which a small and/or incidentally-discovered renal tumor progresses to metastatic disease are unacceptable, and their risk must be weighed against overtreatment and its associated cost and morbidity [46].”
BackgroundAndrearczyk, V., Oreiller, V., Jreige, M., et al. (2020) · HECKTOR@MICCAI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67194-5_1 · Cited by 81 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These segmentation challenges have asked participants to segment things such as specific anatomical structures like bones and organs [33, 19, 28, 47, 35], organs at risk in radiation therapy planning [31], and, like KiTS, lesions and the organs they affect [1, 5, 2].”
BackgroundCT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review
Bhandari, A., Ibrahim, M. A., Sharma, C., Liong, R., Gustafson, S., & Prior, M. (2020) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-020-02832-9 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Best viewed in color. radiomic features have shown exciting potential for predicting histologic subtype [4], nuclear grade [40], somatic tumor mutations [27], and even cancer-specific and overall survival [17].”
BackgroundExploratory and Inferential Analysis of Benchmark Experiments
Eugster, M., Hothorn, T., & Leisch, F. (2008) · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.4134 · Cited by 60 · cited 1×
“At the top, a podium plot [12] shows the aggregate metric values for each team for each bootstrap sample of the test set, with lines connecting each sample iteration.”
BackgroundLiu, R.-J., Elhalawani, H., Mohamed, A. S. R., et al. (2019) · Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2019.11.005 · Cited by 44 · cited 1×
“As one might imagine, manually delineating each region of interest is a very time consuming activity, and is subject to significant interobserver variability [20] to which, ra-diomics algorithms are sometimes quite sensitive [34].”
BackgroundImperfect Segmentation Labels: How Much Do They Matter?
Heller, N., Dean, J., & Papanikolopoulos, N. (2018) · CVII-STENT/LABELS@MICCAI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01364-6_13 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As one might imagine, manually delineating each region of interest is a very time consuming activity, and is subject to significant interobserver variability [20] to which, ra-diomics algorithms are sometimes quite sensitive [34].”
BackgroundSelf-citationHan, D., Yu, N., Yu, Y., He, T., & Duan, X. (2022) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-022-01526-0 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Best viewed in color. radiomic features have shown exciting potential for predicting histologic subtype [4], nuclear grade [40], somatic tumor mutations [27], and even cancer-specific and overall survival [17].”
BackgroundRenal cancer: overdiagnosis and overtreatment
Rosiello, G., Larcher, A., Montorsi, F., et al. (2021) · World journal of urology · doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03798-z · Cited by 32 · cited 1×
“However, metastatic renal cancer remains highly lethal, so the rare instances in which a small and/or incidentallydiscovered renal tumor progresses to metastatic disease are unacceptable, and their risk must be weighed against overtreatment and its associated cost and morbidity [46].”
BackgroundA Coarse-to-Fine Framework for the 2021 Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation Challenge
Zhao, Z., Chen, H., & Wang, L. (2021) · KiTS@MICCAI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98385-7_8 · Cited by 28 · cited 1×
“This submission [52] was made by Zhongchen Zhao, Huai Chen, and Lisheng Wang from the Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.”
MethodSelf-citationCommon Pitfalls and Recommendations for Grand Challenges in Medical Artificial Intelligence
Reinke, A., Tizabi, M. D., Eisenmann, M., & Maier‐Hein, L. (2021) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.008 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Machine learning competitions, or “challenges” as they are often called, have become a mainstay in the medical image analysis research community [45].”
BackgroundA Coarse-to-Fine 3D U-Net Network for Semantic Segmentation of Kidney CT Scans
George, Y. (2021) · KiTS@MICCAI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98385-7_18 · Cited by 21 · cited 2×
“For more details please refer to our paper [14].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationHeller, N., Tejpaul, R., Isensee, F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000002390 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“Of these, the R.E.N.A.L. score has recently been approximated in terms of segmentation-based radiomic features, and was shown to be noninferior to human-derived scores at predicting clinical outcomes [22], and the others are sure to follow in short order.”
Self-citationAn Ensemble of 3D U-Net Based Models for Segmentation of Kidney and Masses in CT Scans
Golts, A. M., Khapun, D., Shats, D., et al. (2021) · KiTS@MICCAI · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98385-7_14 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This submission [16] was made by Alex Golts, Daniel Khapun, Daniel Shats, Yoel Shoshan and Flora Gilboa-Solomon of IBM Research - Israel.”
MethodSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [19][19] Tobias Heimann, Bryan J Morrison, Martin A Styner, Marc Niethammer, and Simon Warfield. Segmentation of knee images: a grand challenge. In Proc. MICCAI Workshop on Medical Image Analysis for the Clinic , volume 1. Beijing, China, 2010. -
- [22][22] Nicholas Heller, Resha Tejpaul, Fabian Isensee, Tarik Benidir, Martin Hofmann, P Blake, Zachary Rengal, Keenan Moore, Niranjan Sathianathen, Arveen Adith Kalapara, et al. Computer-generated renal nephrometry scores yield comparable predictive results to those of human-expert scores in predicting oncologic and perioperative outcomes. The Journal of urology , 207(5):1105-1115, 2022. -
- [30][30] Alexander Kutikov and Robert G Uzzo. The renal nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. The Journal of urology , 182(3):844-853, 2009. -
- [31][31] Zo´ e Lambert, Caroline Petitjean, Bernard Dubray, and Su Kuan. Segthor: segmentation of thoracic organs at risk in ct images. In 2020 Tenth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) , pages 1-6. IEEE, 2020. -
- [49][49] Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research , 9(11), 2008. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentation
Isensee, F., Wald, T., Ulrich, C., Baumgartner, M., Roy, S., Maier-Hein, K. H., & Jäger, P. F. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72114-4_47 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationSAM-Med3D: Towards General-purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Images
Wang, H., Guo, S., Ye, J., Deng, Z., Cheng, J., Li, T., Chen, J., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Shen, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.15161 · Cited by 115
SAM-Med3D: Towards General-Purpose Segmentation Models for Volumetric Medical Images
Wang, H., Guo, S., Jin, Y., Deng, Z., Cheng, J., Li, T., Chen, J., Su, Y., Huang, Z., Shen, Y., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91721-9_4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Systematic Review of Hybrid Vision Transformer Architectures for Radiological Image Analysis
Kim, J. W., Khan, A. U., & Banerjee, I. (2025) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01322-4 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Following the similar trend as CNN, hybrid models are often trained and validated on open-source datasets, e.g., BraTS [32], Figshare [33], KiTS21 [34], TCIA [35], Synapse, with limited samples of high dimensional medical images, and obtained current state-of-the-art performance for all major…”
Li, W., Qu, C., Chen, X., Bassi, P. R. A. S., Shi, Y., Lai, Y., Qian, Y., Xue, H., Chen, Y., Lin, X., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103285 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Large-vocabulary segmentation for medical images with text prompts
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01964-w · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Note that , some public datasets are not mutually exclusive, e.g., KiTS23andKiTS21 12 , we thus only collectthe latest version, to avoid redundancy and potential data leakage in the train-test split.”
Self-citationde Grauw, M., Scholten, E. T., Smit, E. J., Rutten, M. J. C. M., Prokop, M., van Ginneken, B., & Hering, A. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103525 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Tang, F., Nian, B., Li, Y., Jiang, Z., Yang, J., Liu, W., & Zhou, S. K. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103606 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Zenk, M., Zimmerer, D., Isensee, F., Traub, J., Norajitra, T., Jäger, P. F., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103392 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, Z., Deng, Z., Jin, Y., Wang, H., Su, Y., Li, T., Sun, H., Cheng, J., Chen, J., He, J., et al. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103499 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“This trend was influenced by the constraints of early datasets such as MSD [1], LiTS [2], and KiTS [10, 11].”
Uhm, K.-H., Jung, S., Hong, S., & Ko, S.-J. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108746 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Adapting YOLOv8 for Kidney Tumor Segmentation in Computed Tomography
Tanasković, I., Ičagić, S., Šolić, I., & Rakić, B. (2024) · International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech) · doi:10.23919/splitech61897.2024.10612634 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The results proposed in this paper show superiority to the results provided by the participant involved in KiTS23 challenge [5] only by comparing tumour dice metrics and more comprehensive evaluation (involving calculation of dice and surface dice metrics) would be included in future research.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLarge-scale generative tumor synthesis in computed tomography images for improving tumor recognition
Wu, L., Zhuang, J., Zhou, Y., He, S., Ma, J., Luo, L., Wang, X., Ni, X., Zhong, X., Wu, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66071-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“To evaluate the effectiveness of scaling up datasets, we conduct ablation studies on fi ve segmentation datasets, i.e., LiTS 61 (liver tumors), MSD07 10 (pancreas tumors), KiTS23 66 , MSD06 10 (lung tumors), and CV19-20 69 (COVID-19 infection).”
Self-citationAl-Battal, A. F., Tang, V. H., Tran, Q. D., Truong, S. Q. H., Phan, C. C., Nguyen, T. Q., & An, C. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109602 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
AI-Generated Annotations Dataset for Diverse Cancer Radiology Collections in NCI Image Data Commons
Murugesan, G. K., McCrumb, D., Aboian, M., et al. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03977-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
A promptable CT foundation model for solid tumor evaluation
Machado, L., Alberge, L., Philippe, H., Ferreres, É., Khlaut, J., Dupuis, J., Floch, K. L., Gatenyo, D. H., Roux, P., Grégory, J., et al. (2025) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-025-00903-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Additionally, it is worth mentioning that nnUNet models are often restricted to specific tasks, tends to underperform on complex datasets, and require longer training and inference times while ONCOPILOT offers an all-in-one solution.”
Cascaded nnU-Net for Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation
Wang, Y., Dai, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54806-2_16 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationKächele, J., Zenk, M., Rokuss, M., Ulrich, C., Wald, T., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-83274-1_3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Interpretable Auto Window setting for deep-learning-based CT analysis
Zhang, Y., Chen, M., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110994 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
3D Segmentation of Kidneys, Kidney Tumors and Cysts on CT Images - KiTS23 Challenge
Kaczmarska, M., & Majek, K. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54806-2_21 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Rel-UNet: Reliable Tumor Segmentation via Uncertainty Quantification in nnU-Net
Ziaee, S. S., Maleki, F., & Ovens, K. L. (2025) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1109/iccai66501.2025.00009 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“We evaluated our approach on the KiTS23 dataset [13], demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying ambiguous regions and out-of-distribution data.”
Robust semantic learning for precise medical image segmentation
Chakraborty, S., Kumar, K., Deria, A., et al. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108251 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yoon, J. H., Lee, Y. J., & Yoo, S. B. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110728 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Huang, Y., Jin, Y., Tao, K., Xia, K., Gu, J., Yu, L., Li, H., Du, L., & Chen, C. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108618 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Investigation into Semantic Segmentation and its Applications
Vu, K. H., Nguyen, D. P., & Pham, H.-A. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04436-w · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Deep Learning Approach for the Segmentation of Kidney, Tumor and Cyst in Computed Tomography Scans
Sahoo, K., & Punithakumar, K. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54806-2_17 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liu, S., Bao, L., Yang, Q., Geng, W., Zheng, B., Li, C., Chen, W., Peng, H., & Yuan, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.03320 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…reward R total within each group to capture the relative quality of the rollouts O i : Land-man et al., 2015; Ji et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2022; Heller et al., 2023; Armato III et al., 2011), MRI (Bernard et al., 2018; Ji et al., 2022; Buda et al., 2019), X-Ray (Jaeger et al., 2014; Chowdhury…”
Correction-aware interactive 3D tumor segmentation with sparse and revisable prompts
Li, H., & Li, H. (2026) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-026-04560-5
“…especially relevant for tumor segmentation, where different lesion appearances and annotation targets have been reported across tumor benchmarks [3, 8, 23], and where different cases may call for different interactions: A compact lesion may be corrected with a few clicks, an elongated lesion may…”
InfluentialConformal Lesion Segmentation for 3D Medical Images
Tan, B., Wang, Z., Duan, J., Xu, K., Shen, H. T., Shi, X., & Shen, F. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.17897
“We consider six fully annotated 3D medical segmentation datasets from the ULS23 Segmentation Challenge (de Grauw et al. 2025), each covering a different anatomical region or organ system: KiTS21 (Heller et al. 2023), LiTS (Bilic et al. 2023), NIH-LN ABD (Roth et al. 2014), LIDC-IDRI (Armato III et al. 2011), MDSC-Colo…”
InfluentialKidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation via Transfer Learning
Giorgi, N. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54806-2_22
Siomos, V., Marimont, S. N., Passerat‐Palmbach, J., & Tarroni, G. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi56570.2024.10635565
“The Abdomen-SSL dataset was created by extracting 20 slices around the center of each volume in 4 abdominal CT datasets [23, 24, 25], cropping around the subject, resizing to 224x224 and copying the channel over, resulting in ∼ 21 , 000 whole abdomen images.”
MethodAI Age Discrepancy: A Novel Parameter for Frailty Assessment in Kidney Tumor Patients
Seshadri, R., Siva, J., Bartholomew, A., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73376-5_16
Self-citationImplantable Adaptive Cells: A Novel Enhancement for Pre-Trained U-Nets in Medical Image SegmentationPreprint
Benedykciuk, E., Denkowski, M., & Wójcik, G. M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5228400
Oliveira, M. V., Matos, C. E. F., Bráz, G., et al. (2025) · doi:10.5753/sbcas.2025.7747
Sahin, S. I., Diaz, E., Rajagopal, A., Abtahi, M., Jones, S., Dai, Q., Kramer, S. P., Wang, Z. J., & Larson, P. E. Z. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.11.26346096
Church, S., Warner, J. D., Maqbool, D., Tie, X., Hu, J., Lubner, M. G., & Bradshaw, T. (2026) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-026-02097-6
AAsU-Net: adaptive anisotropic convolutional network for renal neoplasm segmentation
Wang, L., Ouyang, L., & Yin, X. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.4047
Self-citationMSB-Net: A Coarse-to-Fine Multi-Scale Boundary-Aware 3D Network for Kidney Tumor Segmentation
Gao, H., Yang, H., Wang, Q., et al. (2026) · Cybernetics & Systems · doi:10.1080/01969722.2026.2723278
- Authors
- Heller, N., Isensee, F., Trofimova, D., Tejpaul, R., Zhao, Z., Chen, H., Wang, L., Golts, A., Khapun, D., Shats, D., Shoshan, Y., Gilboa-Solomon, F., George, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., Xia, Y., Wu, M., Liu, Z., Walczak, E., McSweeney, S., Vasdev, R., Hornung, C., Solaiman, R., Schoephoerster, J., Abernathy, B., Wu, D., Abdulkadir, S., Byun, B., Spriggs, J., Struyk, G., Austin, A., Simpson, B., Hagstrom, M., Virnig, S., French, J., Venkatesh, N., Chan, S., Moore, K., Jacobsen, A., Austin, S., Austin, M., Regmi, S., Papanikolopoulos, N., & Weight, C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2307.01984
- OpenAlex
- W4383472689
- Semantic Scholar
- f8c16510ef80ba70ead16f4349179aceee6d1e43
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- kidney segmentation, semantic segmentation, web-based annotation, cross-population generalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review