PreprintCited by 1,925Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningTopic Modeling

A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

Open access
Wang, Lei, Ma, Chen, Feng, Xueyang, Zhang, Zeyu, Yang, Hao, Zhang, Jingsen, Chen, Zhiyuan, Tang, Jiakai +5 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Autonomous agents have long been a prominent research focus in both academic and industry communities. Previous research in this field often focuses on training agents with limited knowledge within isolated environments, which diverges significantly from human learning processes, and thus makes the agents hard to achieve human-like decisions. Recently, through the acquisition of vast amounts of web knowledge, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence. This has sparked an upsurge in studies investigating LLM-based autonomous agents. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these studies, delivering a systematic review of the field of LLM-based autonomous agents from a holistic perspective. More specifically, we first discuss the construction of LLM-based autonomous agents, for which we propose a unified framework that encompasses a majority of the previous work. Then, we present a comprehensive overview of the diverse applications of LLM-based autonomous agents in the fields of social science, natural science, and engineering. Finally, we delve into the evaluation strategies commonly used for LLM-based autonomous agents. Based on the previous studies, we also present several challenges and future directions in this field. To keep track of this field and continuously update our survey, we maintain a repository of relevant references at https://github.com/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2308.11432

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLM-based agents are characterized by a self-evolving capability that is the basis for solving real-world problems requiring long-term and complex agent-environment interactions.

    “Compared with original LLMs, LLMbased agents are featured in their self-evolving capability, which is the basis for solving real-world problems that need long-term and complex agent-environment interactions.”

    From A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    Section 2.1, “Agent architecture design” (page unavailable), distinguishes autonomous agents from traditional LLMs by their ability to perceive and learn from the environment and evolve. The “Capability acquisition without fine-tuning” section describes self-driven evolution through environmental interaction. Our copy does not establish the further claim that this capability is the basis for solving real-world problems requiring long-term, complex agent–environment interactions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Robust goal-directed and planning behavior is still an open and widely researched problem in foundation models.

    “However, robust goal-directed and planning behavior is still an open and widely researched problem in foundation models [Wang et al., 2023].”

    From The alignment problem from a deep learning perspective (2022) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023

  • Many recent language agents are described as compositions of components of different functionalities.

    “Many recent language agents are described as compositions of components of different functionalities (Wang et al., 2023).”

    From Language Agents as Optimizable Graphs (2024) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2023

  • Recent years have seen many studies on LLM-based agents, where the key is to equip LLMs with additional modules to enhance their self-evolving capability in real-world environments.

    “To further push the boundary of LLMs towards AGI, recent years have witnessed a large number of studies on LLM-based agents [3, 4], where the key is to equip LLMs with additional modules to enhance their self-evolving capability in real-world environments.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 168

  1. Mnih V, Kavukcuoglu K, Silver D, Rusu A A, Veness J, Bellemare M G, Graves A, Riedmiller M, Fidjeland A K, Ostrovski G, Petersen S, Beattie C, Sadik A, Antonoglou I, King H, Kumaran D, Wierstra D, Legg S, Hassabis D. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 2015, 518(7540): 529-533
  2. Lillicrap T P, Hunt J J, Pritzel A, Heess N, Erez T, Tassa Y, Silver D, Wierstra D. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1509.02971 · arXiv
  3. Schulman J, Wolski F, Dhariwal P, Radford A, Klimov O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1707.06347 · arXiv
  4. Haarnoja T, Zhou A, Abbeel P, Levine S. Soft actor-critic: off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2018, 1861-1870
  5. Brown T B, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan J D, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, Shyam P, Sastry G, Askell A, Agarwal S, Herbert- Voss A, Krueger G, Henighan T, Child R, Ramesh A, Ziegler D M, Wu J, Winter C, Hesse C, Chen M, Sigler E, Litwin M, Gray S, Chess B, Clark J, Berner C, McCandlish S, Radford A, Sutskever I, Amodei D. Language models are few-shot learners. In: Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020, 1877-1901
  6. Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 2019, 1(8): 9
  7. OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.08774 · arXiv
  8. Touvron H, Lavril T, Izacard G, Martinet X, Lachaux M A, Lacroix T, Rozière B, Goyal N, Hambro E, Azhar F, Rodriguez A, Joulin A, Grave E, Lample G. LLaMA: open and efficient foundation language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.13971 · arXiv
  9. Touvron H, Martin L, Stone K, Albert P, Almahairi A, et al. Llama 2: open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.09288 · arXiv
  10. Chen X, Li S, Li H, Jiang S, Qi Y, Song L. Generative adversarial user model for reinforcement learning based recommendation system. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2019, 1052-1061
  11. Shinn N, Cassano F, Gopinath A, rasimhan K, Yao S. Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. NaIn: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  12. Shen Y, Song K, Tan X, Li D, Lu W, Zhuang Y. HuggingGPT: solving AI tasks with chatGPT and its friends in hugging face. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  13. Qin Y, Liang S, Ye Y, Zhu K, Yan L, Lu Y, Lin Y, Cong X, Tang X, Qian B, Zhao S, Hong L, Tian R, Xie R, Zhou J, Gerstein M, Li D, Liu Z, Sun M. ToolLLM: facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.16789 · arXiv
  14. Schick T, Dwivedi-Yu J, Dessì R, Raileanu R, Lomeli M, Hambro E, Zettlemoyer L, Cancedda N, Scialom T. Toolformer: language models can teach themselves to use tools. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  15. Zhu X, Chen Y, Tian H, Tao C, Su W, Yang C, Huang G, Li B, Lu L, 16. Wang X, Qiao Y, Zhang Z, Dai J. Ghost in the minecraft: generally capable agents for open-world environments via large language models with text-based knowledge and memory. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.17144 · arXiv
  16. Sclar M, Kumar S, West P, Suhr A, Choi Y, Tsvetkov Y. Minding language models' (lack of) theory of mind: a plug-and-play multi- character belief tracker. In: Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023, 13960-13980
  17. Qian C, Cong X, Liu W, Yang C, Chen W, Su Y, Dang Y, Li J, Xu J, Li S, Liu Z, Sun M. Communicative agents for software development. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.07924 · arXiv
  18. Chen W, Su Y, Zuo J, Yang C, Yuan C, Chan C, Yu H, Lu Y, Hung Y, Qian C, Qin Y, Cong X, Xie R, Liu Z, Sun M, Zhou, J. Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors in agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10848 . · arXiv
  19. Park J S, O'Brien J, Cai C J, Morris M R, Liang P, Bernstein M S. Generative agents: interactive simulacra of human behavior. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2023, 2
  20. Zhang H, Du W, Shan J, Zhou Q, Du Y, Tenenbaum J B, Shu T, Gan C. Building cooperative embodied agents modularly with large language models. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.02485 · arXiv
  21. Hong S, Zhuge M, Chen J, Zheng X, Cheng Y, Zhang C, Wang J, Wang Z, Yau S K S, Lin Z, Zhou L, Ran C, Xiao L, Wu C, Schmidhuber J. MetaGPT: meta programming for a multi-agent collaborative framework. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.00352 · arXiv
  22. Dong Y, Jiang X, Jin Z, Li G. Self-collaboration code generation via chatGPT. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.07590 · arXiv
  23. Serapio-García G, Safdari M, Crepy C, Sun L, Fitz S, Romero P, Abdulhai M, Faust A, Matarić M. Personality traits in large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.00184 · arXiv
  24. Johnson J A. Measuring thirty facets of the five factor model with a 120-item public domain inventory: development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 2014, 51: 78-89
  25. John O P, Donahue E M, Kentle R L. Big five inventory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1991.
  26. Deshpande A, Murahari V, Rajpurohit T, Kalyan A, Narasimhan K. Toxicity in chatGPT: analyzing persona-assigned language models. In: Proceedings of Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023, 1236-1270
  27. Wang L, Zhang J, Yang H, Chen Z, Tang J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Lin Y, Song R, Zhao W X, Xu J, Dou Z, Wang J, Wen J R. User behavior simulation with large language model based agents. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.02552 · arXiv
  28. Argyle L P, Busby E C, Fulda N, Gubler J R, Rytting C, Wingate D. Out of one, many: using language models to simulate human samples. Political Analysis, 2023, 31(3): 337-351
  29. Fischer K A. Reflective linguistic programming (RLP): a stepping stone in socially-aware AGI (socialAGI). 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.12647 · arXiv
  30. Rana K, Haviland J, Garg S, Abou-Chakra J, Reid I, Suenderhauf N. SayPlan: grounding large language models using 3D scene graphs for scalable robot task planning. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Robot Learning. 2023, 23-72
  31. Zhu A, Martin L, Head A, Callison-Burch C. CALYPSO: LLMs as dungeon master's assistants. In: Proceedings of the 19th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 2023, 380-390
  32. Wang Z, Cai S, Chen G, Liu A, Ma X, Liang Y. Describe, explain, plan and select: interactive planning with large language models enables open-world multi-task agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.01560 · arXiv
  33. Lin J, Zhao H, Zhang A, Wu Y, Ping H, Chen Q. AgentSims: an open- source sandbox for large language model evaluation. 2023, arXiv 34. preprint arXiv: 2308.04026 · arXiv
  34. Wang B, Liang X, Yang J, Huang H, Wu S, Wu P, Lu L, Ma Z, Li Z. Enhancing large language model with self-controlled memory framework. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.13343 · arXiv
  35. Ng Y, Miyashita D, Hoshi Y, Morioka Y, Torii O, Kodama T, Deguchi J. SimplyRetrieve: a private and lightweight retrieval-centric generative AI tool. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03983 · arXiv
  36. Huang Z, Gutierrez S, Kamana H, Macneil S. Memory sandbox: transparent and interactive memory management for conversational agents. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2023, 97
  37. Wang G, Xie Y, Jiang Y, Mandlekar A, Xiao C, Zhu Y, Fan L, Anandkumar A. Voyager: an open-ended embodied agent with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.16291 · arXiv
  38. Zhong W, Guo L, Gao Q, Ye H, Wang Y. MemoryBank: enhancing large language models with long-term memory. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.10250 · arXiv
  39. Hu C, Fu J, Du C, Luo S, Zhao J, Zhao H. ChatDB: augmenting LLMs with databases as their symbolic memory. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.03901 · arXiv
  40. Zhou X, Li G, Liu Z. LLM as DBA. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.05481 · arXiv
  41. Modarressi A, Imani A, Fayyaz M, Schütze H. RET-LLM: towards a general read-write memory for large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.14322 · arXiv
  42. Schuurmans D. Memory augmented large language models are computationally universal. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2301.04589 · arXiv
  43. Zhao A, Huang D, Xu Q, Lin M, Liu Y J, Huang G. Expel: LLM agents are experiential learners. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.10144 · arXiv
  44. Wei J, Wang X, Schuurmans D, Bosma M, Ichter B, Xia F, Chi E H, Le Q V, Zhou D. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022, 24824-24837
  45. Kojima T, Gu S S, Reid M, Matsuo Y, Iwasawa Y. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022, 22199-22213
  46. Raman S S, Cohen V, Rosen E, Idrees I, Paulius D, Tellex S. Planning with large language models via corrective re-prompting. In: Proceedings of Foundation Models for Decision Making Workshop at Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022
  47. Xu B, Peng Z, Lei B, Mukherjee S, Liu Y, Xu D. ReWOO: decoupling reasoning from observations for efficient augmented language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.18323 · arXiv
  48. Wang X, Wei J, Schuurmans D, Le Q V, Chi E H, Narang S, Chowdhery A, Zhou D. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations. 2023
  49. Yao S, Yu D, Zhao J, Shafran I, Griffiths T L, Cao Y, Narasimhan K. Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  50. Wang Y, Jiang Z, Chen Z, Yang F, Zhou Y, Cho E, Fan X, Huang X, Lu Y, Yang Y. RecMind: Large language model powered agent for recommendation. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.14296 · arXiv
  51. Besta M, Blach N, Kubicek A, Gerstenberger R, Podstawski M, Gianinazzi L, Gajda J, Lehmann T, Niewiadomski H, Nyczyk P, Hoefler T. Graph of thoughts: solving elaborate problems with large language models. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.09687 · arXiv
  52. Sel B, Al-Tawaha A, Khattar V, Jia R, Jin M. Algorithm of thoughts: enhancing exploration of ideas in large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.10379 · arXiv
  53. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2022, 9118-9147
  54. Gramopadhye M, Szafir D. Generating executable action plans with environmentally-aware language models. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2023, 3568-3575
  55. Hao S, Gu Y, Ma H, Hong J, Wang Z, Wang D, Hu Z. Reasoning with language model is planning with world model. In: Proceedings of 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023, 8154-8173
  56. Liu B, Jiang Y, Zhang X, Liu Q, Zhang S, Biswas J, Stone P. LLM+P: empowering large language models with optimal planning proficiency. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.11477 · arXiv
  57. Dagan G, Keller F, Lascarides A. Dynamic planning with a LLM. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.06391 · arXiv
  58. Yao S, Zhao J, Yu D, Du N, Shafran I, Narasimhan K R, Cao Y. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations. 2023
  59. Song C H, Sadler B M, Wu J, Chao W L, Washington C, Su Y. LLM- planner: few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2023, 2986-2997
  60. Huang W, Xia F, Xiao T, Chan H, Liang J, Florence P, Zeng A, Tompson J, Mordatch I, Chebotar Y, Sermanet P, Jackson T, Brown N, Luu L, Levine S, Hausman K, Ichter B. Inner monologue: embodied reasoning through planning with language models. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning, 2023, 1769-1782
  61. Madaan A, Tandon N, Gupta P, Hallinan S, Gao L, Wiegreffe S, Alon U, Dziri N, Prabhumoye S, Yang Y, Gupta S, Majumder B P, Hermann K, Welleck S, Yazdanbakhsh A, Clark P. Self-refine: iterative refinement with self-feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024, 36.
  62. Miao N, Teh Y W, Rainforth T. SelfCheck: using LLMs to zero-shot check their own step-by-step reasoning. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.00436 · arXiv
  63. Chen P L, Chang C S. InterAct: exploring the potentials of chatGPT as a cooperative agent. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.01552 · arXiv
  64. Chen Z, Zhou K, Zhang B, Gong Z, Zhao X, Wen J R. ChatCoT: tool- augmented chain-of-thought reasoning on chat-based large language models. In: Proceedings of Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023, 14777-14790
  65. Nakano R, Hilton J, Balaji S, Wu J, Ouyang L, Kim C, Hesse C, Jain S, Kosaraju V, Saunders W, Jiang X, Cobbe K, Eloundou T, Krueger G, Button K, Knight M, Chess B, Schulman J. WebGPT: browser- assisted question-answering with human feedback. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2112.09332 · arXiv
  66. Ruan J, Chen Y, Zhang B, Xu Z, Bao T, Du G, Shi S, Mao H, Li Z, Zeng X, Zhao R. TPTU: large language model-based AI agents for task planning and tool usage. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03427 · arXiv
  67. Patil S G, Zhang T, Wang X, Gonzalez J E. Gorilla: large language model connected with massive APIs. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.15334 · arXiv
  68. Li M, Zhao Y, Yu B, Song F, Li H, Yu H, Li Z, Huang F, Li Y. API- bank: a comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs. In: Proceedings of 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023, 3102-3116
  69. Song Y, Xiong W, Zhu D, Wu W, Qian H, Song M, Huang H, Li C, Wang K, Yao R, Tian Y, Li S. RestGPT: connecting large language models with real-world RESTful APIs. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.06624 · arXiv
  70. Liang Y, Wu C, Song T, Wu W, Xia Y, Liu Y, Ou Y, Lu S, Ji L, Mao S, Wang Y, Shou L, Gong M, Duan N. TaskMatrix.AI: Completing 71. tasks by connecting foundation models with millions of APIs. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.16434 · arXiv
  71. Karpas E, Abend O, Belinkov Y, Lenz B, Lieber O, Ratner N, Shoham Y, Bata H, Levine Y, Leyton-Brown K, Muhlgay D, Rozen N, Schwartz E, Shachaf G, Shalev-Shwartz S, Shashua A, Tenenholtz M. MRKL systems: a modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoning. 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2205.00445 · arXiv
  72. Ge Y, Hua W, Mei K, Tan J, Xu S, Li Z, Zhang Y. OpenAGI: When LLM meets domain experts. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023, 36
  73. Surís D, Menon S, Vondrick C. ViperGPT: visual inference via python execution for reasoning. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.08128 · arXiv
  74. Bran A M, Cox S, Schilter O, Baldassari C, White A D, Schwaller P. ChemCrow: augmenting large-language models with chemistry tools. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.05376 · arXiv
  75. Yang Z, Li L, Wang J, Lin K, Azarnasab E, Ahmed F, Liu Z, Liu C, Zeng M, Wang L. MM-REACT: Prompting chatGPT for multimodal reasoning and action. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.11381 · arXiv
  76. Gao C, Lan X, Lu Z, Mao J, Piao J, Wang H, Jin D, Li Y. S3: social- network simulation system with large language model-empowered agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.14984 · arXiv
  77. Ichter B, Brohan A, Chebotar Y, Finn C, Hausman K, et al. Do as I can, not as I say: grounding language in robotic affordances. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Robot Learning. 2023, 287-318
  78. Liu H, Sferrazza C, Abbeel P. Chain of hindsight aligns language models with feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.02676 · arXiv
  79. Yao S, Chen H, Yang J, Narasimhan K. WebShop: towards scalable real-world Web interaction with grounded language agents. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2022, 20744-20757
  80. Dan Y, Lei Z, Gu Y, Li Y, Yin J, Lin J, Ye L, Tie Z, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Zhou A, Zhou Z, Chen Q, Zhou J, He L, Qiu X. EduChat: a large-scale language model-based chatbot system for intelligent education. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.02773 · arXiv
  81. Lin B Y, Fu Y, Yang K, Brahman F, Huang S, Bhagavatula C, Ammanabrolu P, Choi Y, Ren X. SwiftSage: a generative agent with fast and slow thinking for complex interactive tasks. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  82. Evans J S B T, Stanovich K E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013, 8(3): 223-241
  83. Liu R, Yang R, Jia C, Zhang G, Zhou D, Dai A M, Yang D, Vosoughi S. Training socially aligned language models on simulated social interactions. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.16960 · arXiv
  84. Weng X, Gu Y, Zheng B, Chen S, Stevens S, Wang B, Sun H, Su Y. Mind2Web: towards a generalist agent for the Web. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36
  85. Sun R, Arik S O, Nakhost H, Dai H, Sinha R, Yin P, Pfister T. SQL- PaLm: improved large language model adaptation for text-to-SQL. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.00739 · arXiv
  86. Yao W, Heinecke S, Niebles J C, Liu Z, Feng Y, Xue L, Murthy R, Chen Z, Zhang J, Arpit D, Xu R, Mui P, Wang H, Xiong C, Savarese S. Retroformer: retrospective large language agents with policy gradient optimization, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.02151 · arXiv
  87. Shu Y, Zhang H, Gu H, Zhang P, Lu T, Li D, Gu N. RAH! RecSys- assistant-human: a human-centered recommendation framework with LLM agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.09904 · arXiv
  88. Mandi Z, Jain S, Song S. RoCo: dialectic multi-robot collaboration with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.04738 · arXiv
  89. Zhang C, Liu L, Wang J, Wang C, Sun X, Wang H, Cai M. PREFER: prompt ensemble learning via feedback-reflect-refine. 2023, arXiv 90. preprint arXiv: 2308.12033 · arXiv
  90. Du Y, Li S, Torralba A, Tenenbaum J B, Mordatch I. Improving factuality and reasoning in language models through multiagent debate. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.14325 · arXiv
  91. Zhang C, Yang Z, Liu J, Han Y, Chen X, Huang Z, Fu B, Yu G. AppAgent: multimodal agents as smartphone users. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.13771 · arXiv
  92. Madaan A, Tandon N, Clark P, Yang Y. Memory-assisted prompt editing to improve GPT-3 after deployment. In: Proceedings of 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022, 2833-2861
  93. Colas C, Teodorescu L, Oudeyer P Y, Yuan X, Côté M A. Augmenting autotelic agents with large language models. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Lifelong Learning Agents. 2023, 205-226
  94. Nascimento N, Alencar P, Cowan D. Self-adaptive large language model (LLM)-based multiagent systems. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self- Organizing Systems Companion. 2023, 104-109
  95. Saha S, Hase P, Bansal M. Can language models teach weaker agents? Teacher explanations improve students via personalization. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.09299 · arXiv
  96. Zhuge M, Liu H, Faccio F, Ashley D R, Csordás R, Gopalakrishnan A, Hamdi A, Hammoud H A A K, Herrmann V, Irie K, Kirsch L, Li B, Li G, Liu S, Mai J, Piękos P, Ramesh A, Schlag I, Shi W, Stanić A, Wang W, Wang Y, Xu M, Fan D P, Ghanem B, Schmidhuber J. Mindstorms in natural language-based societies of mind. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.17066 · arXiv
  97. Park J S, Popowski L, Cai C, Morris M R, Liang P, Bernstein M S. Social simulacra: creating populated prototypes for social computing systems. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 2022, 74
  98. Li G, Hammoud H A A K, Itani H, Khizbullin D, Ghanem B. CAMEL: communicative agents for "mind" exploration of large language model society. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.17760 · arXiv
  99. Chen L, Wang L, Dong H, Du Y, Yan J, Yang F, Li S, Zhao P, Qin S, Rajmohan S, Lin Q, Zhang D. Introspective tips: large language model for in-context decision making. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.11598 101. · arXiv
  100. Aher G V, Arriaga R I, Kalai A T. Using large language models to simulate multiple humans and replicate human subject studies. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2023, 337-371 102.
  101. Akata E, Schulz L, Coda-Forno J, Oh S J, Bethge M, Schulz E. Playing repeated games with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.16867 103. · arXiv
  102. Ma Z, Mei Y, Su Z. Understanding the benefits and challenges of using large language model-based conversational agents for mental well-being support. In: Proceedings of AMIA Symposium. 2023, 1105-1114 104.
  103. Ziems C, Held W, Shaikh O, Chen J, Zhang Z, Yang D. Can large language models transform computational social science? 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.03514 105. · arXiv
  104. Horton J J. Large language models as simulated economic agents: what can we learn from homo silicus? 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2301.07543 106. · arXiv
  105. Li S, Yang J, Zhao K. Are you in a masquerade? Exploring the behavior and impact of large language model driven social bots in online social networks. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.10337 107. · arXiv
  106. Li C, Su X, Han H, Xue C, Zheng C, Fan C. Quantifying the impact of large language models on collective opinion dynamics. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03313 108. · arXiv
  107. Kovač G, Portelas R, Dominey P F, Oudeyer P Y. The SocialAI 109. school: insights from developmental psychology towards artificial socio-cultural agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.07871 · arXiv
  108. Williams R, Hosseinichimeh N, Majumdar A, Ghaffarzadegan N. Epidemic modeling with generative agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.04986 110. · arXiv
  109. Shi J, Zhao J, Wang Y, Wu X, Li J, He L. CGMI: configurable general multi-agent interaction framework. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.12503 111. · arXiv
  110. Cui J, Li Z, Yan Y, Chen B, Yuan L. ChatLaw: open-source legal large language model with integrated external knowledge bases. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.16092 112. · arXiv
  111. Hamilton S. Blind judgement: agent-based supreme court modelling with GPT. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2301.05327 113. · arXiv
  112. Boiko D A, MacKnight R, Gomes G. Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.05332 115. · arXiv
  113. Kang Y, Kim J. ChatMOF: an autonomous AI system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.01423 116. · arXiv
  114. Swan M, Kido T, Roland E, Santos R P D. Math agents: computational infrastructure, mathematical embedding, and genomics. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.02502 117. · arXiv
  115. Drori I, Zhang S, Shuttleworth R, Tang L, Lu A, Ke E, Liu K, Chen L, Tran S, Cheng N, Wang R, Singh N, Patti T L, Lynch J, Shporer A, Verma N, Wu E, Strang G. A neural network solves, explains, and generates university math problems by program synthesis and few-shot learning at human level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(32): e2123433119 118.
  116. Chen M, Tworek J, Jun H, Yuan Q, de Oliveira Pinto H P, et al. Evaluating large language models trained on code. 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2107.03374 119. · arXiv
  117. Liffiton M, Sheese B E, Savelka J, Denny P. CodeHelp: using large language models with guardrails for scalable support in programming classes. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. 2023, 8 120.
  118. Matelsky J K, Parodi F, Liu T, Lange R D, Kording K P. A large language model-assisted education tool to provide feedback on open- ended responses. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.02439 121. · arXiv
  119. Mehta N, Teruel M, Sanz P F, Deng X, Awadallah A H, Kiseleva J. Improving grounded language understanding in a collaborative environment by interacting with agents through help feedback. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.10750 122. SmolModels. See Githubcom/smol-ai/developer website, 2023 123. DemoGPT. See Github.com/melih-unsal/Demo website, 2023 124. · arXiv
  120. Li H, Hao Y, Zhai Y, Qian Z. The hitchhiker's guide to program analysis: a journey with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.00245 126. · arXiv
  121. He Z, Wu H, Zhang X, Yao X, Zheng S, Zheng H, Yu B. ChatEDA: a large language model powered autonomous agent for EDA. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for CAD. 2023, 1-6 127.
  122. Deng G, Liu Y, Mayoral-Vilches V, Liu P, Li Y, Xu Y, Zhang T, Liu Y, Pinzger M, Rass S. PentestGPT: an LLM-empowered automatic penetration testing tool. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.06782 128. · arXiv
  123. Xia Y, Shenoy M, Jazdi N, Weyrich M. Towards autonomous system: flexible modular production system enhanced with large language model agents. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 28th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. 2023, 1-8 129.
  124. Ogundare O, Madasu S, Wiggins N. Industrial engineering with large language models: a case study of chatGPT's performance on oil & gas 130. problems. In: Proceedings of the 2023 11th International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and Automation. 2023, 458-461
  125. Hu B, Zhao C, Zhang P, Zhou Z, Yang Y, Xu Z, Liu B. Enabling intelligent interactions between an agent and an LLM: a reinforcement learning approach. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2306.03604 131. · arXiv
  126. Wu Y, Min S Y, Bisk Y, Salakhutdinov R, Azaria A, Li Y, Mitchell T, Prabhumoye S. Plan, eliminate, and track-language models are good teachers for embodied agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.02412 132. · arXiv
  127. Zhang D, Chen L, Zhang S, Xu H, Zhao Z, Yu K. Large language models are semi-parametric reinforcement learning agents. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36 133.
  128. Di P N, Byravan A, Hasenclever L, Wulfmeier M, Heess N, Riedmiller M. Towards a unified agent with foundation models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.09668 134. · arXiv
  129. Dasgupta I, Kaeser-Chen C, Marino K, Ahuja A, Babayan S, Hill F, Fergus R. Collaborating with language models for embodied reasoning. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.00763 135. · arXiv
  130. Zhou W, Peng X, Riedl M O. Dialogue shaping: empowering agents through NPC interaction. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.15833 136. · arXiv
  131. Nottingham K, Ammanabrolu P, Suhr A, Choi Y, Hajishirzi H, Singh S, Fox R. Do embodied agents dream of pixelated sheep: embodied decision making using language guided world modelling. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2023, 26311-26325 137.
  132. Wu Z, Wang Z, Xu X, Lu J, Yan H. Embodied task planning with large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.01848 138. · arXiv
  133. Wu J, Antonova R, Kan A, Lepert M, Zeng A, Song S, Bohg J, Rusinkiewicz S, Funkhouser T. TidyBot: personalized robot assistance with large language models. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2023, 3546-3553 139.
  134. Qin Y, Hu S, Lin Y, Chen W, Ding N, Cui G, Zeng Z, Huang Y, Xiao C, Han C, Fung Y R, Su Y, Wang H, Qian C, Tian R, Zhu K, Liang S, Shen X, Xu B, Zhang Z, Ye Y, Li B, Tang Z, Yi J, Zhu Y, Dai Z, Yan L, Cong X, Lu Y, Zhao W, Huang Y, Yan J, Han X, Sun X, Li D, Phang J, Yang X, Wu T, Ji H, Liu Z, Sun M. Tool learning with foundation models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2304.08354 149. Transformers agent. See Huggingface.co/docs/transformers/ transformers website, 2023 150. Mini-agi. See Github.com/muellerberndt/mini website, 2023 151. SuperAGI. See Github.com/TransformerOptimus/Super website, 2023 152. · arXiv
  135. Wu Q, Bansal G, Zhang J, Wu Y, Li B, Zhu E, Jiang L, Zhang X, Zhang S, Liu J, Awadallah A H, White R W, Burger D, Wang C. AutoGen: enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.08155 153. · arXiv
  136. Grossmann I, Feinberg M, Parker D C, Christakis N A, Tetlock P E, Cunningham W A. AI and the transformation of social science research: careful bias management and data fidelity are key. Science, 2023, 380(6650): 1108-1109 154.
  137. Huang X, Lian J, Lei Y, Yao J, Lian D, Xie X. Recommender AI agent: integrating large language models for interactive recommendations. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.16505 155. Front. Comput. Sci., 2024, 18(6): 186345 · arXiv
  138. Zhang C, Yang K, Hu S, Wang Z, Li G, Sun Y, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Liu A, Zhu S C, Chang X, Zhang J, Yin F, Liang Y, Yang Y. ProAgent: building proactive cooperative agents with large language models. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.11339 156. · arXiv
  139. Xiang J, Tao T, Gu Y, Shu T, Wang Z, Yang Z, Hu Z. Language models meet world models: embodied experiences enhance language models. In: Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023, 36 157.
  140. Lee M, Srivastava M, Hardy A, Thickstun J, Durmus E, Paranjape A, Gerard-Ursin I, Li X L, Ladhak F, Rong F, Wang R E, Kwon M, Park J S, Cao H, Lee T, Bommasani R, Bernstein M, Liang P. Evaluating human-language model interaction. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2212.09746 158. · arXiv
  141. Krishna R, Lee D, Fei-Fei L, Bernstein M S. Socially situated artificial intelligence enables learning from human interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022, 119(39): e2115730119 159.
  142. Huang J T, Lam M H, Li E J, Ren S, Wang W, Jiao W, Tu Z, Lyu M R. Emotionally numb or empathetic? Evaluating how LLMs feel using emotionbench. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03656 160. · arXiv
  143. Chan C M, Chen W, Su Y, Yu J, Xue W, Zhang S, Fu J, Liu Z. ChatEval: towards better LLM-based evaluators through multi-agent debate. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.07201 161. · arXiv
  144. Chen A, Phang J, Parrish A, Padmakumar V, Zhao C, Bowman S R, Cho K. Two failures of self-consistency in the multi-step reasoning of LLMs. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.14279 162. · arXiv
  145. Zhang D, Xu H, Zhao Z, Chen L, Cao R, Yu K. Mobile-env: an evaluation platform and benchmark for LLM-GUI interaction. 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.08144 163. · arXiv
  146. Liang Y, Zhu L, Yang Y. Tachikuma: understading complex interactions with multi-character and novel objects by large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.12573 164. · arXiv
  147. Choi M, Pei J, Kumar S, Shu C, Jurgens D. Do LLMs understand social knowledge? Evaluating the sociability of large language models with socKET benchmark. In: Proceedings of 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023, 11370-11403 165.
  148. Liu Z, Yao W, Zhang J, Xue L, Heinecke S, Murthy R, Feng Y, Chen Z, Niebles J C, Arpit D, Xu R, Mui P, Wang H, Xiong C, Savarese S. BOLAA: benchmarking and orchestrating LLM-augmented autonomous agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.05960 166. · arXiv
  149. Liu X, Yu H, Zhang H, Xu Y, Lei X, Lai H, Gu Y, Ding H, Men K, Yang K, Zhang S, Deng X, Zeng A, Du Z, Zhang C, Shen S, Zhang T, Su Y, Sun H, Huang M, Dong Y, Tang J. AgentBench: evaluating LLMs as agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.03688 167. · arXiv
  150. Kang S, Yoon J, Yoo S. Large language models are few-shot testers: exploring LLM-based general bug reproduction. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. 2023, 2312-2323 168.
  151. Jalil S, Rafi S, LaToza T D, Moran K, Lam W. ChatGPT and software testing education: Promises & perils. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops. 2023, 4130-4137 169.
  152. Feldt R, Kang S, Yoon J, Yoo S. Towards autonomous testing agents via conversational large language models. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering. 2023, 1688-1693 170.
  153. Zhou S, Xu F F, Zhu H, Zhou X, Lo R, Sridhar A, Cheng X, Ou T, Bisk Y, Fried D, Alon U, Neubig G. WebArena: a realistic Web environment for building autonomous agents. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.13854 171. · arXiv
  154. Xu B, Liu X, Shen H, Han Z, Li Y, Yue M, Peng Z, Liu Y, Yao Z, Xu D. Gentopia.AI: a collaborative platform for tool-augmented LLMs. 172. In: Proceedings of 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 2023, 237-245
  155. Chalamalasetti K, Götze J, Hakimov S, Madureira B, Sadler P, Schlangen D. clembench: Using game play to evaluate chat-optimized language models as conversational agents. In: Proceedings of 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023, 11174-11219 173.
  156. Banerjee D, Singh P, Avadhanam A, Srivastava S. Benchmarking LLM powered chatbots: methods and metrics. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.04624 174. · arXiv
  157. Lin J, Tomlin N, Andreas J, Eisner J. Decision-oriented dialogue for human-AI collaboration. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2305.20076 175. · arXiv
  158. Zhao W X, Zhou K, Li J, Tang T, Wang X, Hou Y, Min Y, Zhang B, Zhang J, Dong Z, Du Y, Yang C, Chen Y, Chen Z, Jiang J, Ren R, Li Y, Tang X, Liu Z, Liu P, Nie J Y, Wen J R. A survey of large language models. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.18223 176. · arXiv
  159. Yang J, Jin H, Tang R, Han X, Feng Q, Jiang H, Zhong S, Yin B, Hu X. Harnessing the power of LLMs in practice: a survey on chatGPT and beyond. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3649506 177. · DOI · Paper page
  160. Wang Y, Zhong W, Li L, Mi F, Zeng X, Huang W, Shang L, Jiang X, Liu Q. Aligning large language models with human: a survey. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.12966 178. · arXiv
  161. Huang J, Chang K C C. Towards reasoning in large language models: a survey. In: Proceedings of Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023. 2023, 1049-1065 179.
  162. Mialon G, Dessì R, Lomeli M, Nalmpantis C, Pasunuru R, Raileanu R, Rozière B, Schick T, Dwivedi-Yu J, Celikyilmaz A, Grave E, LeCun Y, Scialom T. Augmented language models: a survey. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2302.07842 180. · arXiv
  163. Chang Y, Wang X, Wang J, Wu Y, Yang L, Zhu K, Chen H, Yi X, Wang C, Wang Y, Ye W, Zhang Y, Chang Y, Yu P S. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3641289 181. · DOI · Paper page
  164. Chang T A, Bergen B K. Language model behavior: a comprehensive survey. Computational Linguistics, 2024, doi: 10.1162/coli_a_00492 182. · DOI · Paper page
  165. Li C, Wang J, Zhu K, Zhang Y, Hou W, Lian J, Xie X. Emotionprompt: Leveraging psychology for large language models enhancement via emotional stimulus. 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2307.11760 183. · arXiv
  166. Zhuo T Y, Li Z, Huang Y, Shiri F, Wang W, Haffari G, Li Y F. On robustness of prompt-based semantic parsing with large pre-trained language model: an empirical study on codex. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2023, 1090-1102 184.
  167. Gekhman Z, Oved N, Keller O, Szpektor I, Reichart R. On the robustness of dialogue history representation in conversational question answering: a comprehensive study and a new prompt-based method. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2023, 11(11): 351-366 185.
  168. Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, Yu T, Su D, Xu Y, Ishii E, Bang Y J, Madotto A, Fung P. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): 248 186.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., Zhao, W. X., Wei, Z., & Wen, J.-R.
Affiliations
Renmin University of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Xu
  • Lin, Yankai
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
18
Issue
6
ISSN
2095-2228 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393065402
Cited by
1,925
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1043 · 2025: 624 · 2024: 249 · 2023: 9
FWCI
283.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers of Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62102420)
  • Renmin University of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
large language models, autonomous agents, LLM agents, agent applications, assessment methods, human-like decision making, social science applications, engineering applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review