Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
Open accessAbstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown significant intelligence, the progress to leverage LLMs as planning modules of autonomous agents has attracted more attention. This survey provides the first systematic view of LLM-based agents planning, covering recent works aiming to improve planning ability. We provide a taxonomy of existing works on LLM-Agent planning, which can be categorized into Task Decomposition, Plan Selection, External Module, Reflection and Memory. Comprehensive analyses are conducted for each direction, and further challenges for the field of research are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLM agents frequently optimize for actions with local consistency, resulting in a departure from objectives at the global level.
“Due to the inherent nature of planning by the agent, LLM agents frequently optimize for actions with local consistency, which results in a departure from objectives at the global level (Huang et al., 2024; Everitt et al., 2025).”
From From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2024
Section 9 (Conclusions and Future Directions; page unavailable) says existing LLM-agent planning can be greedy and may produce plans unfaithful to task prompts. That supports a concern about planning failures, but it does not say agents frequently optimize for locally consistent actions or establish that this causes departure from global objectives. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInteractive environments introduce a larger and more highly task-dependent design space compared to single-input-output settings.
“First, they introduce a larger and more highly task-dependent design space compared to the singleinput-output settings.”
From ADIAS: Automated Design of Interactive Agentic Systems (2026) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2024
The Evaluation section (page not provided) describes interactive environments with different action spaces and feedback, and explains that a method suitable for gaming tasks does not apply to the two-action QA tasks. This supports the task-dependent aspect, but the paper does not compare their overall design space with single-input-output settings. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe planning component enables an agent to decompose complex tasks into structured sequences of sub-tasks, facilitating long-horizon decision-making.
“The planning component enables an agent to decompose complex tasks into structured sequences of sub-tasks, facilitating long-horizon decision-making [269].”
From A Survey of Large Language Models (2026) · cites this paper as [269]
In dynamic environments, agents often need to interleave planning and execution, adapting their actions in response to evolving context.
“In dynamic environments, agents often need to interleave planning and execution, adapting their actions in response to evolving context [37].”
From Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Successful interactive agents may require different combinations of observation processing, memory, planning, tool use, verification, and recovery mechanisms.
“Successful agents may require different combinations of observation processing, memory, planning, tool use, verification, and recovery mechanisms (Huang et al., 2024;Wang et al., 2024a).”
From ADIAS: Automated Design of Interactive Agentic Systems (2026) · cites this paper as Huang et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- An et al., 2023] Shengnan An, Zexiong Ma, et al. Learning from mistakes makes llm better reasoner. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20689, 2023. · arXiv
- Maciej Besta, Nils Blach, et al. Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09687, 2023. · arXiv
- Deng Cai, Yan Wang, Lemao Liu, and Shuming Shi. Recent advances in retrieval-augmented text generation. In SIGIR, pages 3417-3419, 2022.
- Chen et al., 2021a] Lili Chen, Kevin Lu, et al. Decision transformer: Reinforcement learning via sequence mod- eling. NeurIPS, 34:15084-15097, 2021.
- Chen et al., 2021b] Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, et al. Eval- uating large language models trained on code. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03374, 2021. · arXiv
- Gao et al., 2023] Luyu Gao, Aman Madaan, et al. Pal: Program-aided language models. In ICML, pages 10764- 10799, 2023.
- Gerevini and Serina, 2002] Alfonso Gerevini and Ivan Se- rina. Lpg: A planner based on local search for planning graphs with action costs. In Aips, volume 2, pages 281- 290, 2002.
- Malik Ghallab, Dana Nau, et al. Auto- mated Planning: theory and practice. Elsevier, 2004.
- Haslum et al., 2019] Patrik Haslum, Nir Lipovetzky, et al. An introduction to the planning domain definition lan- guage, volume 13. Springer, 2019.
- Jeff Johnson, Matthijs Douze, and Hervé Jégou. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 7(3):535-547, 2019.
- Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, et al. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. NeurIPS, 35:22199-22213, 2022.
- Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. NeurIPS, 33:9459-9474, 2020.
- Joon Sung Park, Joseph O'Brien, et al. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behav- ior. In SUIST, pages 1-22, 2023.
- Schraagen et al., 2000] Jan Maarten Schraagen, Susan F Chipman, et al. Cognitive task analysis. Psychology Press, 2000.
- Shinn et al., 2023] Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, et al. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In NeurIPS, 2023.
- Ishika Singh, Valts Blukis, et al. Prog- prompt: Generating situated robot task plans using large language models. In ICRA 2023, pages 11523-11530. IEEE, 2023.
- James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, et al. Fever: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verifi- cation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05355, 2018. · arXiv
- Touvron et al., 2023] Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, et al. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. · arXiv
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, et al. Chain- of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. NeurIPS, 35:24824-24837, 2022.
- Yao et al., 2020b] Shunyu Yao, Rohan Rao, et al. Keep calm and explore: Language models for action generation in text-based games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02903, 2020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Dong, Z., Hou, Y., Zhang, B., Min, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., et al. (2026) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3 · Cited by 2,093 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom text to insight: large language models for chemical data extraction
Schilling-Wilhelmi, M., Ríos-García, M., Shabih, S., Gil, M. V., Miret, S., Koch, C. T., Marquez, J. A., & Jablonka, K. M. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d4cs00913d · Cited by 155 · see citing works
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationTool learning with large language models: a survey
Qu, C., Dai, S., Wei, X., Cai, H., Wang, S., Yin, D., Xu, J., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40678-2 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
UAVs meet LLMs: Overviews and perspectives towards agentic low-altitude mobility
Tian, Y., Lin, F., Li, Y., Zhang, T., Zhang, Q., Fu, X., Huang, J., Dai, X., Wang, Y., Tian, C., et al. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103158 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationEvaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
Mohammadi, M., Li, Y., Lo, J., & Yip, W. (2025) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 · doi:10.1145/3711896.3736570 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“At the same time, reasoning enables agents to make context-aware decisions, either ahead of time or dynamically during task execution [37].”
Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey
Jun-wei, L., Wang, K., Chen, Y., Peng, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, L., & Lou, Y. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3796507 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Industrial Foundation Models (IFMs) for intelligent manufacturing: A systematic review
Zhao, S., Liu, S., Jiang, Y., Zhao, B. M., Lv, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, L., & Zhong, R. Y. (2025) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2025.06.011 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Chakraborty, N., Ornik, M., & Driggs-Campbell, K. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3716846 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilities
Wei, H., Zhang, Z., He, S., Xia, T., Pan, S., & Liu, F. (2025) · Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.958 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
Masterman, T., Besen, S., Sawtell, M., & Chao, A. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11584 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Planning, which requires strong reasoning abilities, commonly falls into one of five major approaches: task decomposition, multi-plan selection, external module-aided planning, reflection and refinement and memory-augmented planning [12].”
BackgroundNavigating the future of B2B marketing: The transformative impact of the industrial metaverse
Bamberger, B., Reinartz, W., & Ulaga, W. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115057 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Jin, Y., & Ma, J. (2024) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105940 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
Tran, K.-T., Dao, D., Nguyen, M.-D., Pham, Q.-V., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.06322 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“They enhance long-term planning by delegating tasks across agents, supporting persistent problem-solving over extended interactions [58].”
A Survey of LLM-based Agents: Theories, Technologies, Applications and Suggestions
Dong, X., Zhang, X., Bu, W., Zhang, D., & Cao, F. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology (AIoTC) · doi:10.1109/aiotc63215.2024.10748304 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
LLM-Powered AI Agent Systems and Their Applications in Industry
Liang, G., & Tong, Q. (2025) · IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT) · doi:10.1109/aiiot65859.2025.11105299 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Agentic AI and the rise of in silico team science in biomedical research
Li, B., Saini, A. K., Hernandez, J. G., & Moore, J. H. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-026-03035-1 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Transforming agency: On the mode of existence of large language models
Barandiaran, X. E., & Almendros, L. S. (2025) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-025-10094-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Unlocking Robotic Autonomy: A Survey on the Applications of Foundation Models
Jang, D.-S., Cho, D.-H., Lee, W.-C., Ryu, S.-K., Jeong, B.-M., Hong, M., Jung, M., Kim, M., Lee, M., Lee, S., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Control Automation and Systems · doi:10.1007/s12555-024-0438-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A Survey of Task Planning with Large Language Models
Zhai, W., Liao, J., Chen, Z., Su, B., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Intelligent Computing · doi:10.34133/icomputing.0124 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Project Sid: Many-agent simulations toward AI civilization
AL, A., Ahn, A., Becker, N., Carroll, S., Christie, N., Cortes, M., Demirci, A., Du, M., Li, F., Luo, S., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.00114 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Modern AI Agents typically consist of multiple LLM-powered modules for reasoning, memory, planning, and tool use (49; 18; 55; 20; 62).”
BackgroundA Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
Zhang, Z., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Dai, Q., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13501 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationZhong, Y., Leng, Y., Gu, Z., Guo, S., Li, P., Das, S., Liu, Y., Wan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d5ta05224f · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Kuan, C.-Y., Yang, C.-K., Huang, W., Lu, K.-H., & Lee, H.-Y. (2024) · IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT) · doi:10.1109/slt61566.2024.10832184 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Spike sorting AI agentPreprint
Lin, Z., Marin‐Llobet, A., Baek, J., He, Y., Lee, J., Wang, W., Zhang, X., Lee, A. J., Liang, N., Du, J., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.11.637754 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cao, H., Ma, R., Zhai, Y., & Shen, J. (2024) · Applied Computing and Intelligence · doi:10.3934/aci.2024019 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Enhancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities Through Brokered Multi-Expert Reflection
Sheokand, T., Jain, G., Bahga, A., & Madisetti, V. K. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3561693 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fang, J., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yi, X., Zhang, G., Xu, Y., Wu, B., Liu, S., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07407 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAgentic Lab: An Agentic-physical AI system for cell and organoid experimentation and manufacturingPreprint
Wang, W., Swain, S., Lee, J., Lin, Z., Canales, B., Aljović, A., Liu, Y., Li, Q., Marin‐Llobet, A., Liu, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.11.686354 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Agentic Large Language Models for Conceptual Systems Engineering and Design
Massoudi, S., & Fuge, M. (2025) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4070328 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Survey on Collision Avoidance Algorithms for Multi-robot Systems
Oh, D., Lim, Y., Jung, H., Huh, J., Lee, J., Choi, C., Kim, H. J., & Park, J. (2025) · International Journal of Control Automation and Systems · doi:10.1007/s12555-024-1104-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Agentic profiles for effective AI governance
Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10805-z · Cited by 36 · see citing works
From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
Luo, J., Tian, Y., Cao, C., Luo, Z., Lin, H., Li, K., Kong, C., Yang, R., & Ma, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2069 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Due to the inherent nature of planning by the agent, LLM agents frequently optimize for actions with local consistency, which results in a departure from objectives at the global level (Huang et al., 2024; Everitt et al., 2025).”
Enhancing Reasoning Capacity of SLM Using Cognitive Enhancement
Pan, J., Wong, S. L., Chia, X. W., & Yuan, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) · doi:10.1109/icaiic64266.2025.10920811 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
H-MEM: Hierarchical Memory for High-Efficiency Long-Term Reasoning in LLM Agents
Sun, H., Zeng, S., & Zhang, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.eacl-long.15 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lightweight LLM Agent Memory with Small Language Models
Zhang, J., Zhang, C., Chen, S., Huang, Z., Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Guo, P., Mo, F., Bae, S.-H., Zou, J., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.acl-long.588 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hierarchical Memory for High-Efficiency Long-Term Reasoning in LLM Agents
Sun, H., & Zeng, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22925 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“To enhance the long-term reasoning capabilities of LLM Agents, numerous researchers have explored memory mechanisms of it (Zhang et al., 2024b; Huang et al., 2024a; Hatalis et al., 2023).”
C-LINK Agent. Connecting social media post generation with recommender systems*
Ordoumpozanis, K., Trichopoulos, G., & Caridakis, G. (2024) · International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP) · doi:10.1109/smap63474.2024.00030 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Small Language Model Agent for the Operations of Continuously Updating ICT Systems
Fukuda, N., Nozue, H., & Oishi, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3544637 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Qiu, Q., Cheng, Y., Hu, W., & Zhuge, Q. (2026) · Journal of Optical Communications and Networking · doi:10.1364/jocn.575402 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Theoretical Foundations of Agentic AI
Oliveira, P., Pereira, J. D. C., & Nováis, P. (2026) · SpringerBriefs in intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24781-0_2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Large language models as human proxies
Karetnikov, N., Rahwan, I., & Svetinović, D. (2026) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-026-01060-3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Potential and Dangers of LLM-based AgentsPreprint
Kumar, K. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5000207 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Unifying Modern AI with Robotics: Survey on MDPs with Diffusion and Foundation ModelsPreprint
Zhang, Z., Chen, R., Yang, Z., Xie, S., Chen, H., & Xiong, H. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174494994.46313754/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
iCLP: Large Language Model Reasoning with Implicit Cognition Latent Planning
Chen, S., & Niu, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.24014
“Instead of relying on resource-intensive approaches, enhancing reasoning with step-wise planning aims to directly guide LLMs using a plan — a textual instruction that specifies what to do at each step for reliable reasoning (Huang et al., 2024; 2022).”
Agent-Dice: Disentangling Knowledge Updates via Geometric Consensus for Agent Continual Learning
Wu, Z., Lou, X., Ma, X., Li, Y., Liu, W., Zhang, W., Wang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.03641
“…intelligence, empowering agents with robust capabilities in reasoning (Jiang et al., 2025; Plaat et al., 2024), planning (Wei et al., 2025; Huang et al., 2024), and decision-making (Sun et al., Figure 1: The stability-plasticity dilemma in agent continual learning (from Task A to Task C).”
Self-citationDeshpande, D., Gangal, V., Mehta, H., Kannappan, A., Qian, R., & Wang, P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.01353
“In the sector of evaluating planning capabilities, datasets such as AgentBench [35], τ Bench [36] and WebArena [37] have gained popularity but lack ecological validity or are simplistic for real world [38].”
Lightweight LLM Agent Memory with Small Language Models
Zhang, J., Zhang, C., Chen, S., Huang, Z., Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Guo, P., Mo, F., Bae, S.-H., Zou, J., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.07798
“LLM-driven agents excel at long-term dialogue, multi-step reasoning, and task-oriented interaction (Zhang et al., 2026c; Huang et al., 2024; Zhu et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2026a,b, 2025a).”
A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents
Huang, W.-C., Zhang, W., Liang, Y., Bei, Y., Chen, Y., Feng, T., Pan, X., Tan, Z., Wang, Y., Wei, T., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.06052
Self-citationThe AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?
Jia, Z., Li, J., Kang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, T., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09113
Self-citationADIAS: Automated Design of Interactive Agentic Systems
Jiang, L., Tang, B., Goetz, S., & Guo, Y. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.06410
A Large Language Model-Based Motion Planning for Human-Robot Interaction: An Experimental Case Study
Coppari, A., Proia, S., Ruo, A., Favali, F., Sabattini, L., Secchi, C., Villani, V., Piazzola, M., & Capra, L. (2025) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81688-8_8
Li, X., Wu, X., Xiao, L., Liu, T., Huang, P. S., & Shan, J. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde65706.2026.00355
An LLM-centred Lens on Generative AI in Marketing
Hartleif, L. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-47793-6_5
Causality in Bandits: A Survey
Subramanian, C., & Ravindran, B. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3744917
GRAgent: A Generative Retrieval Framework for Action Subspace Selection
Lv, M., Li, K., Zhou, W. J., & Hu, S. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033280
Context is King: From Prompt Engineering to Context Engineering in Healthcare AIPreprint
Shankar, R. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5365971
Uluçam, E., & Alptekin, S. E. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-00071-2_9
Intelligent Generative Design: A New Mechanical Design ConceptPreprint
Ning, F., Wang, Y., Li, H., Shi, Y., & Lu, J. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5393870
Self-citationAutonomous Reasoning-Retrieval for Large Language Model Based Recommendation
Zheng, B., Wang, X., Liu, E., Wang, X., Lu, H., Chen, Y., Zhao, W. X., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3746252.3761384
Self-citationEvaluating Agentic AI Through a Geopolitical Simulation Sandbox
Dessureault, J.-S., Manzi, A. T. I., Ismaili, S. A., Barisoa, A. M., Djioke, D. Y., Bergeron, A., Yared-Amare, A., Lalancette, M., & Bélanger, É. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-15632-7_11
Application of Large Language Models in the Problem of Event Forecasting
Dakhnovich, A. D., Богина, В. М., & Makeeva, A. A. (2025) · Automatic Control and Computer Sciences · doi:10.3103/s0146411625701111
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Z., Xu, R., Lei, C., Han, D., Li, Y., & Wang, X. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44685-0
Self-citationDuCCAE: A Hybrid Engine for Immersive Conversation via Collaboration, Augmentation, and Evolution
Shen, X., Jiang, Z., Yang, J., Liu, H., Wan, Y., Zhang, J., Dai, T., Xu, L., Wu, S., Qi, G., et al. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3818383
Beyond Outcomes: Toward Process-Aware Software Agents
Liu, S. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3844569
The rise of agentic AI in drug discovery from static tools to autonomous virtual scientists
Zhao, D., Fang, M., Mao, L., Zhu, Y., Su, Q., Shi, H., Xu, H., Li, L., Hou, T., & Hsieh, C.-Y. (2026) · npj Drug Discovery. · doi:10.1038/s44386-026-00075-0
Collaborative Large Language Models for Automated Data Extraction in Living Systematic Reviews
Khan, M. A., Ayub, U., Naqvi, S. A. A., Khakwani, K. Z. R., Sipra, Z. B. R., Raina, A., Zou, S., He, H., Hossein, S. A., Hasan, B., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.20.24314108 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“[56 57] Moreover, a key future direction involves further exploring the reasoning chains of LLMs, which could not only enhance confidence in their use but also improve trackability throughout the data extraction process.”
BackgroundA Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Min, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.18223 · Cited by 2,090
Self-citationGraphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
Bei, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Zhou, S., Chen, H., Li, Y., Bu, J., Pan, S., Yu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18019
- Authors
- Huang, X., Liu, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, H., Lian, D., Wang, Y., Tang, R., & Chen, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Huawei Technologies (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2402.02716
- OpenAlex
- W4391620956
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 9
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Keywords
- large language models, LLM agents, autonomous agents, planning, task decomposition, plan selection, external module, reflection, memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
