AgentTuning: Enabling Generalized Agent Abilities for LLMs
Open accessAbstract
Open large language models (LLMs) with great performance in various tasks have significantly advanced the development of LLMs. However, they are far inferior to commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 when acting as agents to tackle complex tasks in the real world. These agent tasks employ LLMs as the central controller responsible for planning, memorization, and tool utilization, necessitating both fine-grained prompting methods and robust LLMs to achieve satisfactory performance. Though many prompting methods have been proposed to complete particular agent tasks, there is lack of research focusing on improving the agent capabilities of LLMs themselves without compromising their general abilities. In this work, we present AgentTuning, a simple and general method to enhance the agent abilities of LLMs while maintaining their general LLM capabilities. We construct AgentInstruct, a lightweight instruction-tuning dataset containing high-quality interaction trajectories. We employ a hybrid instruction-tuning strategy by combining AgentInstruct with open-source instructions from general domains. AgentTuning is used to instruction-tune the Llama 2 series, resulting in AgentLM. Our evaluations show that AgentTuning enables LLMs' agent capabilities without compromising general abilities. The AgentLM-70B is comparable to GPT-3.5-turbo on unseen agent tasks, demonstrating generalized agent capabilities. We open source the AgentInstruct and AgentLM-7B, 13B, and 70B models at https://github.com/THUDM/AgentTuning, serving open and powerful alternatives to commercial LLMs for agent tasks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fine-tuning approaches typically treat entire trajectories as single units weighted by terminal success/failure, neglecting rich intermediate steps.
“Fine-tuning approaches [2, 27, 29] adapt agents via supervised learning or RLHF, but typically treat entire trajectories as single units weighted by terminal success/failure, neglecting rich intermediate steps.”
From Learning Hierarchical Procedural Memory for LLM Agents through Bayesian Selection and Contrastive Refinement (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The Trajectory Interaction and Filter sections say that each trajectory receives a final reward and that rewards are used to select trajectories for fine-tuning. But the Introduction says AgentInstruct includes chain-of-thought rationales for each decision step, so this paper does not support the claim that its approach neglects intermediate steps. It also does not establish that fine-tuning approaches typically do so. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGPT-4o agent's outcomes on MiniWoB full benchmark and WebGum subset surpass prior studies on zero-shot web agents.
“surpass those of prior studies on zero-shot web agents (Assouel et al., 2023;Zeng et al., 2023)”
From WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? (2024) · cites this paper as Zeng et al., 2023
The Evaluation Setup reports prior agent results on MiniWoB++ and WebArena, providing a basis for comparison with the citing paper’s results. It does not report WebGum results, and its task overview lists varying numbers of shots rather than establishing a uniformly zero-shot comparison. GPT-4o’s outcomes are the citing paper’s own results, not a finding attributed to Zeng et al. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGPT-4o agent achieves 82.9% on the WebGum subset of MiniWoB.
“The outcomes on the full benchmark and the WebGum subset (82.9%) surpass those of prior studies on zero-shot web agents (Assouel et al., 2023;Zeng et al., 2023)”
From WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? (2024) · cites this paper as Zeng et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NIPS'20, Red Hook, NY, USA.
- Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek, Heewoo Jun, Qiming Yuan, Henrique Ponde de Oliveira Pinto, Jared Ka- plan, Harri Edwards, Yuri Burda, Nicholas Joseph, Greg Brockman, Alex Ray, Raul Puri, Gretchen Krueger, Michael Petrov, Heidy Khlaaf, Girish Sas- try, Pamela Mishkin, Brooke Chan, Scott Gray, Nick Ryder, Mikhail Pavlov, Alethea Power, Lukasz Kaiser, Mohammad Bavarian, Clemens Winter, Philippe Tillet, Felipe Petroski Such, Dave Cum- mings, Matthias Plappert, Fotios Chantzis, Eliza- beth Barnes, Ariel Herbert-Voss, William Hebgen Guss, Alex Nichol, Alex Paino, Nikolas Tezak, Jie Tang, Igor Babuschkin, Suchir Balaji, Shantanu Jain, William Saunders, Christopher Hesse, Andrew N. Carr, Jan Leike, Josh Achiam, Vedant Misra, Evan Morikawa, Alec Radford, Matthew Knight, Miles Brundage, Mira Murati, Katie Mayer, Peter Welinder, Bob McGrew, Dario Amodei, Sam McCandlish, Ilya Sutskever, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2021. Evaluating large language models trained on code.
- Aakanksha Chowdhery, Sharan Narang, Jacob Devlin, Maarten Bosma, Gaurav Mishra, Adam Roberts, Paul Barham, Hyung Won Chung, Charles Sutton, Sebastian Gehrmann, et al. 2022. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311. · arXiv
- Xiang Deng, Yu Gu, Boyuan Zheng, Shijie Chen, Samuel Stevens, Boshi Wang, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. 2023. Mind2web: Towards a generalist agent for the web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.06070. · arXiv
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Stein- hardt. 2021. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
- Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2020. The curious case of neural text degeneration. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net.
- Xiao Liu, Hao Yu, Hanchen Zhang, Yifan Xu, Xuanyu Lei, Hanyu Lai, Yu Gu, Hangliang Ding, Kaiwen Men, Kejuan Yang, et al. 2023. Agentbench: Evalu- ating llms as agents. ArXiv preprint, abs/2308.03688. · arXiv
- Pattie Maes. 1994. Agents that reduce work and infor- mation overload. Commun. ACM, 37:30-40.
- OpenAI. 2022. Introducing chatgpt. OpenAI. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, pages 2303-08774.
- Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Jonathan Chang, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Han Wang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen, Zheng Xin Yong, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Tr- ishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, An- drea Santilli, Thibault Févry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf, and Alexander M. Rush. 2022. Multi- task prompted training enables zero-shot task gener- alization. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022. OpenReview.net.
- Mohit Shridhar, Xingdi Yuan, Marc-Alexandre Cote, Yonatan Bisk, Adam Trischler, and Matthew Hausknecht. 2020. Alfworld: Aligning text and em- bodied environments for interactive learning. In In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations.
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al. 2023a. Llama: Open and effi- cient foundation language models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2302.13971. · arXiv
- Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Al- bert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, et al. 2023b. Llama 2: Open founda- tion and fine-tuned chat models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2307.09288. · arXiv
- Ruoyao Wang, Peter Jansen, Marc-Alexandre Côté, and Prithviraj Ammanabrolu. 2022. ScienceWorld: Is your agent smarter than a 5th grader? In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 11279-11298, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Jason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu, Adams Wei Yu, Brian Lester, Nan Du, An- drew M. Dai, and Quoc V. Le. 2022a. Finetuned language models are zero-shot learners. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representa- tions, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022. OpenReview.net.
- Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou, et al. 2022b. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits rea- soning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:24824-24837.
- Michael Wooldridge and Nicholas R Jennings. 1995. In- telligent agents: Theory and practice. The knowledge engineering review, 10(2):115-152.
- Shunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, and Karthik Narasimhan. 2022. Webshop: Towards scalable real- world web interaction with grounded language agents. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:20744-20757.
- Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao. 2023. React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Aohan Zeng, Xiao Liu, Zhengxiao Du, Zihan Wang, Hanyu Lai, Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Yifan Xu, Wendi Zheng, Xiao Xia, et al. 2022. Glm-130b: An open bilingual pre-trained model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02414. · arXiv
- Shuyan Zhou, Frank F Xu, Hao Zhu, Xuhui Zhou, Robert Lo, Abishek Sridhar, Xianyi Cheng, Yonatan Bisk, Daniel Fried, Uri Alon, et al. 2023. Webarena: A realistic web environment for building autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13854. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap
Pan, S., Luo, L., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Wang, J., & Wu, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2024.3352100 · Cited by 1,376 · see citing works
Agentic AI: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals–a comprehensive survey
Acharya, D. B., Kuppan, K., & Divya, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3532853 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agents
Hong, W., Wang, W., Lv, Q., Xu, J., Yu, W., Ji, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Ding, M., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01354 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationAgentic AI: The age of reasoning—A review
Nisa, U., Shirazi, M., Saip, M. A., & Pozi, M. S. M. (2025) · Journal of Automation and Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.jai.2025.08.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
VisualWebArena: evaluating multimodal agents on realistic visual web tasks
Koh, J. Y., Lo, R., Jang, L., Duvvur, V., Lim, M., Huang, P.-Y., Neubig, G., Zhou, S., Salakhutdinov, R., & Fried, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.50 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
Huang, X., Liu, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, H., Lian, D., Wang, Y., Tang, R., & Chen, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02716 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Practices, opportunities and challenges in the fusion of knowledge graphs and large language models
Cai, L., Yu, C., Kang, Y., Fu, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1590632 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Agent Lumos: Unified and Modular Training for Open-Source Language Agents
Yin, D., Brahman, F., Ravichander, A., Chandu, K., Chang, K.-W., Choi, Y., & Lin, B. Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.670 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Distilling Wisdom: A Review on Optimizing Learning From Massive Language Models
Zhang, D., Listiyani, D., Singh, P., & Mohanty, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3554586 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
BAIT: Large Language Model Backdoor Scanning by Inverting Attack Target
Shen, G., Cheng, S., Zhang, Z., Tao, G., Zhang, K., Guo, H., Yan, L., Jin, X., An, S., Ma, S., et al. (2025) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp61157.2025.00103 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Empowering LLMs with Toolkits: An Open-Source Intelligence Acquisition Method
Yuan, X., Wang, J., Zhao, H., Yan, T., & Qi, F. Z. (2024) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi16120461 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Engineering RAG Systems for Real-World Applications: Design, Development, and Evaluation
Hasan, M. T., Waseem, M., Kemell, K., Khan, A. A., Saari, M., & Abrahamsson, P. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04200-2_10 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Liu, N., Chen, L., Tian, X., Zou, W., Chen, K., & Cui, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.02777 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
KALIE: Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models for Open-World Manipulation Without Robot Data
Tang, G., Rajkumar, S., Zhou, Y., Walke, H., Levine, S., & Fang, K. (2025) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra55743.2025.11128156 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A Survey of Task-Oriented Knowledge Graph Reasoning: Status, Applications, and ProspectsPreprint
Niu, G., Li, B., & Lin, Y. (2025) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.174961563.32605293/v1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
DeepAgent: A General Reasoning Agent with Scalable Toolsets
Li, X., Jiao, W., Jin, J., Dong, G., Jin, J., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Zhu, Y., Wen, J.-R., Yuan, L., et al. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792460 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
ResilioMate: A Resilient Multi-Agent Task Executing Framework for Enhancing Small Language Models
Xiong, Y., Huang, M., Liang, X., & Tao, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3567244 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bringing Two Worlds Together: The Convergence of Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs
Cai, L., Kang, Y., Yu, C., Fu, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhao, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Computer Engineering (ICARCE) · doi:10.1109/icarce63054.2024.00046 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?
Drouin, A., Gasse, M., Caccia, M., Laradji, I. H., Del Verme, M., Marty, T., Boisvert, L., Thakkar, M., Cappart, Q., Vazquez, D., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.07718 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“%) surpass those of prior studies on zero-shot web agents (Assouel et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2023), underscoring the effectiveness of both our agent design and the features offered by BrowserGym.”
ResultBhat, A. K., & Krishnan, G. (2025) · International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS) · doi:10.1109/icscds65426.2025.11167368 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Empowering Large Language Model Agent through Step-Level Self-Critique and Self-Training
Zhai, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Z., Lin, T., Xu, K., Yang, C., Feng, D., Ding, B., & Wang, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3726302.3729965 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A-MemGuard: A Proactive Defense Framework for LLM-Based Agent Memory
Wei, Q., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Yin, Z., Zhan, Y., Holz, T., Lin, Z., & Wang, X. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.02373 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“For instance, memory supports long-term planning in question answering and multi-agent collaboration (Liu et al., 2023; Zeng et al., 2023).”
Small Language Model Agent for the Operations of Continuously Updating ICT Systems
Fukuda, N., Nozue, H., & Oishi, H. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3544637 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AgentTOD: A Task-Oriented Dialogue Agent with a Flexible and Adaptive API Calling Paradigm
Xu, H.-D., Mao, X.-L., Sun, F., Che, T.-Y., Xu, C., & Huang, H. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3745021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
TOT-DS: Demonstration Selection for Enhancing the Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
Liu, X. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11228014 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationLook Before You Leap: Using Serialized State Machine for Language Conditioned Robotic Manipulation
Mu, T., Liu, Y., & Armand, M. (2025) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros60139.2025.11245926 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
LogPilot: Intent-aware and Scalable Alert Diagnosis for Large-scale Online Service Systems
Jiang, Z., Liu, J., Li, Y., Huang, H., He, X., Zhang, T., Chen, J., Li, Y., Shi, R., & Lyu, M. R. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase63991.2025.00272 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
Fan, S., Ye, X., Huo, Y., Chen, Z.-Y., Guo, Y., Yang, S., Yang, W., Ye, S., Chen, J., Chen, H., et al. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3817494 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks
Koh, J. Y., Lo, R., Jang, L., Duvvur, V., Lim, M. C., Huang, P.-Y., Neubig, G., Zhou, S., Salakhutdinov, R., & Fried, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.13649 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
LatentEvolve: Self-Evolving Test-Time Scaling in Latent Space
Zhang, G., Meng, F., Wan, G., Li, Z., Wang, K., Yin, Z., Bai, L., & Yan, S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.24771
“…employ certain carriers for evolution, including: (I) parametric update , wherein prior experiences are encoded directly into model parameters (Zeng et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024; Zhao et al., 2025; Chen et al., 2025b); (II) experience databases , in which past problem-solving trajectories…”
Forouzandeh, S., Peng, W., Moradi, P., Yu, X., & Jalili, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.18950
MEM1: Learning to Synergize Memory and Reasoning for Efficient Long-Horizon Agents
Zhou, Z., Qu, A., Wu, Z., Kim, S., Prakash, A., Rus, D., Zhao, J., Low, B. K. H., & Liang, P. P. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.15841
“For the WebShop environment, we compare against Agent-FLAN [11], Agent-R [64], and AgentLM [66].”
Self-Improving LLM Agents at Test-Time
Acikgoz, E. C., Qian, C., Ji, H., Hakkani-Tür, D., & Tur, G. (2025) · arXiv
“…has shown promising results across a wide range of tasks (Kumar et al., 2025) by equipping these models with explicit knowledge (Grattafiori et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025), reasoning (Zelikman et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2025), and agentic capabilities (Zeng et al., 2024; Chen et al., 2024b).”
Li, H., Feng, L., & Wang, D. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15102011
Advancing Large Language Model Agent via Iterative Contrastive Trajectory Optimization
Jing, C., Jing, X., & Li, K. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Network Monitoring and Controls · doi:10.2478/ijanmc-2024-0033
INSIGHT-RAG: Internal State Signals-Heightened Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Chen, Y., Gu, B., Qu, Y., Chen, Y., Cui, L., & Gao, L. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4091-4_4
SuperFC: Selective Data Utilization for a Sustainable and Effective Function-Calling Agent
Yang, X., Liu, Y., Tao, S., Zhao, C., Meng, W., He, M., Su, C., Liu, R., Ma, H., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11228427
LogReader: General-Purpose Log Analysis via Open-Source Large Language Models
Qi, J., Luan, Z., Huang, S., Lu, Y. H., Yang, H., & Qian, D. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11227375
Large Language Model Based Multi-agent Learning for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environments
He, C., Yin, Q., Chang, Y., & Yu, T. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3343-5_37
Research on Agent-Based Code Generation Intelligence Construction Using AgentGPT
Li, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science, Electronic Information Engineering and Intelligent Control Technology (CEI) · doi:10.1109/cei66465.2025.11398531
ModSolAgent: Automated Finite Element Code Generation for Abaqus via LLM-Based Agent
Li, Z., Ge, H., Tang, G., & Liu, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2026.3669495
Zhou, X., Shao, X., Guo, R., & Liu, S. H. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccc68654.2025.11437995
Garrido, P. Y., & Arias, D. F. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8252-4.ch010
The Risks of Agentic AI in Autonomous Vehicles
Goyal, N. K. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7355-3.ch008
Development of Housing Price Trends Visualization App Using Agents and Korean Open-Dataset
Yang, J., Sanchez, R., Lee, L., Kim, R., Kim, A. D., Eo, S., Kim, Y., & Lee, J.-K. (2025) · IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference (URTC) · doi:10.1109/urtc68753.2025.11533139
Evaluating BERT and RAG Frameworks for Legal Information Retrieval and Reasoning
Maniyar, A. I., Hoolgeri, M., Nidagundi, M., Kumar, J. V., Kulkarni, U., & Gani, P. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Engineering Informatics (ICEI) · doi:10.1109/icei68356.2025.11603709
Trustworthy LLM-Based Agents for Data-Centric AI
Chen, T., Pei, J., Zhang, M., & Zhao, L. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3816453
Oechsner, C., Leusmann, J., Zhang, X., Weber, T., Butz, A. M., & Mayer, S. (2026) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3820253.3820269
DiagAgent: A LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for Highly Accurate Product Fault Diagnosis
Zhang, H., Xu, K., & Tang, Y. (2025) · International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design · doi:10.1109/iscid68789.2025.00044
A critical assessment of the rise of agentic AI, its capabilities, task domains and open challenges
Khan, R. U., Aljuaid, H., & Ning, Z. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02342-5
ActionNex: A Production-Grade System for Next-Best-Action Recommendation in Cloud Outage Management
Lin, Z., Hu, H., Hao, M., Zhang, X., 何宇迪, Kulygin, O., Tuna, H., Bansal, C., Li, Z., Chintalapati, M., et al. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3834472
Shinde, S. K., Chaudhari, S. K., Chandanshiv, S. R., Chavan, O. K., Deshmukh, A. S., & Dhole, A. R. (2026) · International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Robotics & Artificial Intelligence (ICCMRAI) · doi:10.1109/iccmrai67732.2026.11723665
- Authors
- Zeng, A., Liu, M., Lu, R., Wang, B., Liu, X., Dong, Y., & Tang, J.
- Affiliations
- Zhipu AI (China) (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Tang, Jie
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 3053-3077
- arXiv
- 2310.12823
- OpenAlex
- W4402670718
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62276148)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- instruction tuning, Llama 2, tool use, planning, memorization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
