PreprintCited by 36Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Video-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Video-based Large Language Models

Open access
Ning, Munan, Zhu, Bin, Xie, Yujia, Lin, Bin, Cui, Jiaxi, Yuan, Lu, Chen, Dongdong, Yuan, Li·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Video-based large language models (Video-LLMs) have been recently introduced, targeting both fundamental improvements in perception and comprehension, and a diverse range of user inquiries. In pursuit of the ultimate goal of achieving artificial general intelligence, a truly intelligent Video-LLM model should not only see and understand the surroundings, but also possess human-level commonsense, and make well-informed decisions for the users. To guide the development of such a model, the establishment of a robust and comprehensive evaluation system becomes crucial. To this end, this paper proposes \textit{Video-Bench}, a new comprehensive benchmark along with a toolkit specifically designed for evaluating Video-LLMs. The benchmark comprises 10 meticulously crafted tasks, evaluating the capabilities of Video-LLMs across three distinct levels: Video-exclusive Understanding, Prior Knowledge-based Question-Answering, and Comprehension and Decision-making. In addition, we introduce an automatic toolkit tailored to process model outputs for various tasks, facilitating the calculation of metrics and generating convenient final scores. We evaluate 8 representative Video-LLMs using \textit{Video-Bench}. The findings reveal that current Video-LLMs still fall considerably short of achieving human-like comprehension and analysis of real-world videos, offering valuable insights for future research directions. The benchmark and toolkit are available at: \url{https://github.com/PKU-YuanGroup/Video-Bench}.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2311.16103

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most prior works focus on content-level understanding, which primarily serves as a temporal extension of 2D image understanding without 3D spatial consideration.

    “Despite their significance, most prior works focus on content-level understanding [24, 43, 55, 63], which primarily serves as a temporal extension of 2D image understanding without 3D spatial consideration.”

    From Thinking in Space: How Multimodal Large Language Models See, Remember, and Recall Spaces (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Introduction (p. 1) says existing benchmarks are concentrated on image understanding or, in SEEDBench’s case, limited to temporal understanding. This supports the concern that prior evaluations were narrow, but the paper does not establish that most prior works focus on content-level understanding or characterize them generally as 2D understanding extended over time without 3D spatial consideration. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [3][3] Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems , 33:1877-1901, 2020. 1 -
  2. [5][5] David Chen and William B Dolan. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies , pages 190-200, 2011. 3 -
  3. [11][11] Chunhui Gu, Chen Sun, David A Ross, Carl Vondrick, Caroline Pantofaru, Yeqing Li, Sudheendra Vijayanarasimhan, George Toderici, Susanna Ricco, Rahul Sukthankar, et al. Ava: A video dataset of spatio-temporally localized atomic visual actions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 6047-6056, 2018. 3 -
  4. [22][22] Chunyuan Li, Haotian Liu, Liunian Li, Pengchuan Zhang, Jyoti Aneja, Jianwei Yang, Ping Jin, Houdong Hu, Zicheng Liu, Yong Jae Lee, et al. Elevater: A benchmark and toolkit for evaluating language-augmented visual models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 35:9287-9301, 2022. 3 -
  5. [31][31] Xiaojian Ma, Silong Yong, Zilong Zheng, Qing Li, Yitao Liang, Song-Chun Zhu, and Siyuan Huang. Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations , 2022. 2, 5 -
  6. [34][34] Vicente Ordonez, Girish Kulkarni, and Tamara Berg. Im2text: Describing images using 1 million captioned photographs. Advances in neural information processing systems , 24, 2011. 2 -
  7. [38][38] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , 1(8):9, 2019. 1 -
  8. [39][39] Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J Liu. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(1):5485-5551, 2020. 2, 5, 7 -
  9. [45][45] Makarand Tapaswi, Yukun Zhu, Rainer Stiefelhagen, Antonio Torralba, Raquel Urtasun, and Sanja Fidler. Movieqa: Understanding stories in movies through questionanswering. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 4631-4640, 2016. 3 -
  10. [50][50] Dejing Xu, Zhou Zhao, Jun Xiao, Fei Wu, Hanwang Zhang, Xiangnan He, and Yueting Zhuang. Video question answering via gradually refined attention over appearance and motion. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia , pages 1645-1653, 2017. 2, 3, 4 -
  11. [51][51] Jun Xu, Tao Mei, Ting Yao, and Yong Rui. Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 5288-5296, 2016. 3 -
  12. [55][55] Zhou Yu, Dejing Xu, Jun Yu, Ting Yu, Zhou Zhao, Yueting Zhuang, and Dacheng Tao. Activitynet-qa: A dataset for understanding complex web videos via question answering. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages 9127-9134, 2019. 2, 3, 4 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ning, M., Zhu, B., Xie, Y., Lin, B., Cui, J., Yuan, L., Chen, D., & Yuan, L.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
71-84
ISSN
2096-0433 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417132154
Cited by
36
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Visual Media (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (62202014,62332002,62425101)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
benchmark, evaluation toolkit, video understanding, question answering, decision-making, commonsense reasoning, automatic evaluation metrics, artificial general intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review