Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs
Open accessAbstract
With recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs), Agentic AI has become phenomenal in real-world applications, moving toward multiple LLM-based agents to perceive, learn, reason, and act collaboratively. These LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) enable groups of intelligent agents to coordinate and solve complex tasks collectively at scale, transitioning from isolated models to collaboration-centric approaches. This work provides an extensive survey of the collaborative aspect of MASs and introduces an extensible framework to guide future research. Our framework characterizes collaboration mechanisms based on key dimensions: actors (agents involved), types (e.g., cooperation, competition, or coopetition), structures (e.g., peer-to-peer, centralized, or distributed), strategies (e.g., role-based or model-based), and coordination protocols. Through a review of existing methodologies, our findings serve as a foundation for demystifying and advancing LLM-based MASs toward more intelligent and collaborative solutions for complex, real-world use cases. In addition, various applications of MASs across diverse domains, including 5G/6G networks, Industry 5.0, question answering, and social and cultural settings, are also investigated, demonstrating their wider adoption and broader impacts. Finally, we identify key lessons learned, open challenges, and potential research directions of MASs towards artificial collective intelligence.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews LLM-based multi-agent systems with a focus on collaboration mechanisms, proposing an extensible framework that characterizes collaboration channels by actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination protocols. It synthesizes applications across 5G/6G, Industry 5.0, QA/NLG, and social/cultural domains, and identifies open challenges toward artificial collective intelligence.
Key findings
- The paper proposes a framework where collaboration channels are defined by actors, type (cooperation, competition, coopetition), structure (peer-to-peer, centralized, distributed), strategy (role-based, rule-based, model-based), and coordination/orchestration (static vs. dynamic).
- It reports that cooperation, competition, and coopetition each have trade-offs; hybrid systems can combine multiple collaboration types, but coordinating multiple channels adds complexity and requires mechanisms such as role assignments, communication protocols, and shared knowledge representations.
- In applications, it reports that Orca-AgentInstruct’s multi-agent synthetic data generation improved fine-tuning of a Mistral 7B model by up to 54% across various benchmarks, and that Agent-as-a-Judge on the DevAI benchmark with 55 realistic AI development tasks aligned closely with human expert evaluations and surpassed traditional LLM-as-a-Judge methods.
- Lessons learned include that effective collaboration channels are crucial, MASs can outperform single-agent systems with well-designed mechanisms, but suboptimal competitive collaboration channels can be overtaken by a single-agent counterpart with strong prompts.
Methods
- Design: a survey that systematically analyzes existing research on LLM-based multi-agent systems to identify defining characteristics of collaboration and synthesize them into a cohesive, extensible framework; no primary experiments are conducted.
- Data/sample: existing literature and real-world implementations across domains including 5G/6G networks, Industry 5.0, question answering/natural language generation, and social and cultural settings; tables summarize related surveys, collaboration types, strategies, communication structures, coordination architectures, and applications.
- Main analysis: qualitative review and conceptual framework development, including mathematical notation for agents and collaborative systems, discussion of implementation trends, and identification of lessons learned and open problems.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: open challenges include unified governance, shared decision making, scalability and resource maintenance, comprehensive evaluation and benchmarking, and ethical risk and safety; the paper notes LLMs are not inherently designed for collaboration and can amplify hallucinations, overconfidence, and adversarial risks in MASs.
- Paper-stated: evaluations of MASs are often conducted in narrow scenarios with different configurations, leading to inconsistent and incomparable results; there is an absence of standardized evaluation protocols, and static benchmarks risk data leakage and overfitting.
- Evident from the text: as a survey, it does not report a systematic search protocol, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or empirical validation of the proposed framework; the paper also notes that few studies explore coopetition in depth.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 124 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
MASs can solve problems that are difficult or impossible for an individual agent or a monolithic system to solve.
“MASs can solve problems that are difficult or impossible for an individual agent or a monolithic system to solve [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
MASs excel in knowledge memorization, enabling distributed agents to retain and share diverse knowledge bases without overloading a single system.
“They excel in knowledge memorization, enabling distributed agents to retain and share diverse knowledge bases without overloading a single system [51,154].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [154]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
LLMs are not without challenges; their performance degrades as real-world knowledge changes.
“Despite the promising innovations, LLMs are not without challenges.Their performance degrades as real-world knowledge changes, prompting a focus on aligning models with up-to-date information without retraining from scratch [19,28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [28]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
MASs have demonstrated notable successes across various domains, enhancing the capabilities of individual LLMs by leveraging collaboration and coordination among specialized agents.
“MASs have demonstrated notable successes across various domains, enhancing the capabilities of individual LLMs by leveraging collaboration and coordination among specialized agents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The mechanisms of collaboration are one of the main focuses for effective MASs.
“One of the main focus for effective MASs is the mechanisms of collaboration [33,74,75,97,132], which lead to a transition from traditional, isolated models toward approaches that emphasize interactions, enabling agents to connect, negotiate, make decisions, plan, and act jointly, driving forward the capabilities of AI in collective settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [97]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [132]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Existing surveys on LLM-based multi-agent collaborative systems fall short in fully addressing the collaborative aspects and mechanisms.
“However, these works often fall short in fully addressing the collaborative aspects and mechanisms of LLM-based MASs, which are crucial to enabling agents to work effectively toward shared goals, as summarized in Table 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [107]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [136]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [82]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [120]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
MASs enable effective generalization by pooling expertise from multiple models with specialized prompts/personas, allowing them to address diverse problems more effectively than standalone models.
“Furthermore, MASs enable effective generalization by pooling expertise from multiple models with specialized prompts/personas, allowing them to address diverse problems more effectively than standalone models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
LLMs are increasingly being utilized as the 'brain' for individual agents in MASs, bringing sophisticated reasoning and language capabilities to each agent.
“LLMs are increasingly being utilized as the “brain” for individual agents in MASs, bringing sophisticated reasoning and language capabilities to each agent.With frameworks like Agent-Verse, LLMs enhance agents' autonomy by allowing them to infer tasks, make decisions based on situational awareness, and even exhibit emergent social behaviors such as collaboration and negotiation [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
LLM-based MASs harness the collective intelligence of multiple LLMs to tackle complex, multi-step challenges.
“The convergence of these fields has given rise to LLM-based MASs, which harness the collective intelligence of multiple LLMs to tackle complex, multi-step challenges [118].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Cooperation in LLM-based MASs is essential in tasks where collaborative problem-solving, collective decision making, and complementary skill sets contribute to achieving complex objectives that a single agent could not complete as effectively.
“This type of collaboration is essential in tasks where collaborative problem-solving, collective decision making, and complementary skill sets contribute to achieving complex objectives that a single agent could not complete as effectively [26,29,33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [26]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Frameworks like MetaGPT introduce meta-programming techniques including structured workflows and processes within agent interactions to decompose and tackle complex problems, mitigating these issues.
“However, frameworks like MetaGPT introduce meta-programming techniques including structured workflows and processes within agent interactions to decompose and tackle complex problems, mitigating these issues [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Rule-based systems suffer from a lack of adaptability.
“However, rule-based systems suffer from a lack of adaptability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Rule-based strategies offer efficiency and predictability in multi-agent systems.
“Rule-based strategies offer the advantage of efficiency and predictability in MASs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Multi-agent systems can outperform single-agent systems with effectively designed collaboration mechanisms.
“As shown in AutoGen framework [134] MASs can outperform single-agent systems with effectively designed collaboration mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In LLM-based MASs, competitive dynamics can emerge in tasks such as debate or strategic gameplay, where agents seek to maximize their own success criteria.
“In LLM-based MASs, competitive dynamics can emerge in tasks such as debate, or strategic gameplay, where agents seek to maximize their own success criteria [22,155].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [155]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Consensus-seeking mechanisms like those tested in the Consensus-LLM project show that LLMs can negotiate and align on shared goals in dynamic environments.
“Moreover, consensus-seeking mechanisms like those tested in the Consensus-LLM project show that LLMs can negotiate and align on shared goals in dynamic environments [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Model-based methods give multi-agent systems a high degree of flexibility and robustness.
“By allowing agents to make probabilistic decisions based on their perception of the environment, common objectives, and inherent uncertainties, model-based methods give MAS a high degree of flexibility and robustness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In certain tasks, dynamically assigning roles and collaboration channels based on agents' strengths and task requirements enhances system flexibility and performance.
“Adaptive Role and Collaboration Channel Assignment: in certain tasks, it is better to let the system dynamically assigning roles and collaboration channels based on agents' strengths and task requirements enhance system flexibility and performance [39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Role-based strategies allow agents to leverage their own expertise effectively in (pre-)structured tasks requiring job specialization.
“Role-based strategies allow agents to leverage their own expertise effectively in (pre-)structured tasks requiring job specialization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Collaboration mechanisms span various levels of machine learning processes, including data exchange, shared input embeddings, model sharing, and output sharing.
“Collaboration mechanisms span various levels of machine learning processes, including data exchange, shared input embeddings, model sharing, and output sharing, enabling agents to interact effectively and leverage each other's strengths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
LaMoSC overcomes limitations of conventional semantic communication systems' knowledge bases and restricted generalization capabilities by leveraging the extensive external knowledge of LLMs to generate prompt text.
“By leveraging the extensive external knowledge of LLMs to generate prompt text, LaMoSC overcomes the limitations of conventional semantic communication systems' knowledge bases and restricted generalization capabilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The overall success of a cooperative MAS is dependent on the reliability and performance of individual agents, as the failure of one or more agents can negatively impact the entire system.
“The overall success of a cooperative MAS is also dependent on the reliability and performance of individual agents, as the failure of one agent or more agents (e.g., infinite conversation loop, amplified hallucinations [56]) can negatively impact the entire system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A multi-agent system approach with suboptimal design for competitive collaboration channels can be overtaken by single-agent counterparts with strong prompts on a range of reasoning tasks and backbone LLMs.
“As studied in [128], a MAS approach with suboptimal design for their competitive collaboration channels can be overtaken by singleagent counterparts with strong prompts (including relevant few-shot demonstrations) on a range of reasoning tasks and backbone LLMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Orca-AgentInstruct showed significant performance gains when used to fine-tune a Mistral 7B model, achieving improvements of up to 54% across various benchmarks.
“it showed significant performance gains when used to fine-tune a Mistral 7B model, achieving improvements of up to 54% across various benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Agent-as-a-Judge employs a role-based strategy where specialized agent modules operate independently in a decentralized manner with distinct functionalities.
“The system employs a role-based strategy where specialized agent modules (e.g., graph construction, code retrieval) operate independently in a decentralized manner with distinct functionalities, contributing to the overall evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [165]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Research on LLMs and MASs has showcased the capability and applicability of these systems to simulate human behaviors, social dynamics, and cultural interactions.
“Research on LLMs and MASs has showcased the capability and applicability of these systems to simulate human behaviors, social dynamics, and cultural interactions, offering novel methodologies for understanding complex societal phenomenons, as illustrated in Fig. 8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
[88] demonstrates the use of LLM-based agents in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.
“while [88] demonstrates their use in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
CASIT utilizes multiple LLMs for data analysis and anomaly detection.
“By employing collective intelligence, CASIT utilizes multiple LLMs for data analysis and anomaly detection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The capabilities of QA/NLG in different tasks have been improved by integrating the MAS mechanism into the process.
“In summary, the capabilities of QA/NLG in different tasks have been improved by integrating the MAS mechanism into the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The absence of standardized evaluation protocols prevents the ability to objectively compare different systems and track progress across the field.
“The absence of standardized evaluation protocols prevents the ability to objectively compare different systems and track progress across the field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evaluations of MASs are often conducted in narrow scenarios with different configurations, leading to inconsistent and incomparable results.
“Furthermore, evaluations of MASs are often conducted in narrow scenarios with different configurations, leading to inconsistent and incomparable results [18,22,34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Evaluation of MASs presents challenges beyond the evaluation of individual LLMs.
“Evaluation of MASs presents challenges beyond the evaluation of individual LLMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mango iteratively extracts high-quality cultural knowledge from LLM-based agents, providing a rich dataset for fine-tuning models to improve their ability to align with diverse cultural contexts.
“Similarly, Mango [94] iteratively extracts high-quality cultural knowledge from LLM-based agents, providing a rich dataset for fine-tuning models to improve their ability to align with diverse cultural contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
When deployed in MASs, LLM hallucination issues can propagate and amplify through agent interactions.
“When deployed in MASs, these issues can propagate and amplify through agent interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
LLM-based MASs, capable of simulating human societies and exhibiting human-like psychological traits, can blur the line between artificial and human behavior.
“These systems, capable of simulating human societies and exhibiting human-like psychological traits, can blur the line between artificial and human behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Compromised agents in LLM-based MASs can be manipulated to execute harmful or malicious behaviors.
“Compromised agents in such systems can be manipulated to execute harmful or malicious behaviors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Modeling how cultural information is transmitted and transformed among agents gives insights into both human cultural dynamics and their influence on LLM behavior.
“By modeling how cultural information is transmitted and transformed among agents, researchers gain insights into both human cultural dynamics and their influence on LLM behavior [103,126].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [103]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [126]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Attributing human-like qualities to LLM-based MASs risks fostering over-reliance, where users place trust in their capabilities.
“Attributing human-like qualities to these systems risks fostering over-reliance, where users place trust in their capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
[36] highlights the limitations of using LLMs as human replacements in social science experiments, particularly in scenarios involving information asymmetry and in tasks requiring competition and conflict resolution.
“For instance, [36] highlights the limitations of using LLMs as human replacements in social science experiments, particularly in scenarios involving information asymmetry (unequal access to private mental states or goals) [161], and in tasks requiring competition and conflict resolution [89].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [161]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Relatively few efforts have been dedicated to systematically assessing the performance and behavior of LLM-based MASs.
“relatively few effort has been dedicated to systematically assessing the performance and behavior of LLM-based MASs [80].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
LLMs can be harmful with hallucinated information.
“Intrinsicly, LLMs can be harmful with hallucinated information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 89
- May combine two claims. 45
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMASs improve interaction efficiency by simultaneously managing subtasks through specialized agents, accelerating the resolution of complex, multi-step tasks.
“Lastly, MASs improve interaction efficiency by simultaneously managing subtasks through specialized agents, accelerating the resolution of complex, multi-step tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe salient features of MAS, including flexibility, reliability, self-organization, and real-time operation, make it an effective solution to solve complex tasks.
“The salient features of MAS, including flexibility, and reliability, self-organization, and real-time operation make it an effective solution to solve complex tasks, which can be detailed as follows:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTheir efficiency stems from the division of labor inherent in MAS whereby a complex task is divided into multiple smaller tasks, each of which is assigned to a distinct agent.
“Their efficiency stems from the division of labor inherent in MAS whereby a complex task is divided into multiple smaller tasks, each of which is assigned to a distinct agent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMAS strives to achieve collective intelligence, where the combined capabilities of multiple agents exceed the sum of their individual contributions.
“MAS strives to achieve collective intelligence, where the combined capabilities of multiple agents exceed the sum of their individual contributions [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs suffer from intrinsic limitations such as hallucination, autoregressive nature, and scaling laws.
“While these models have shown remarkable capabilities individually, they still suffer from intrinsic limitations such as hallucination [57], autoregressive nature (e.g., incapable of slow-thinking [49]), and scaling laws [55,69].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [55]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [69]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMASs enhance long-term planning by delegating tasks across agents, supporting persistent problem-solving over extended interactions.
“They enhance long-term planning by delegating tasks across agents, supporting persistent problem-solving over extended interactions [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationM2GSC uses an LLM as a shared knowledge base and has it play three critical roles: complex task decomposition, semantic representation specification, and semantic translation and mapping.
“In this framework, the LLM serves as shared knowledge base, plays three critical roles, including complex task decomposition, semantic representation specification, and semantic translation and mapping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe MMA supports synchronized generation of integrated modalities by constructing a shared multimodal space.
“This MMA supports the synchronized generation of integrated modalities by constructing a shared multimodal space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLSGLLM is an LLM-based method that incorporates a spatio-temporal module to capture spatio-temporal correlations.
“they propose LSGLLM, an LLM-based method that incorporates a spatio-temporal module to capture spatio-temporal correlations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompetition between LLM agents enables skills such as spatial reasoning, strategic planning, numerical reasoning, risk assessment, communication, opponent modeling, and team collaboration.
“Crucially, the authors highlight that competition between LLM agents enables skills such as spatial reasoning, strategic planning, numerical reasoning, risk assessment, communication, opponent modeling, and team collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLAM-MSC incorporates a knowledge base powered by an LLM, specifically GPT-4, to enable comprehension of personal information.
“the framework incorporates a knowledge base powered by an LLM, specifically leveraging GPT-4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEstablishing robust collaboration channels among agents is crucial for seamless collaboration.
“Effective Collaboration Channels: establishing robust collaboration channels among agents is crucial for seamless collaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe survey systematically analyzes existing research on MASs to identify the defining characteristics of multi-agent collaboration.
“Our survey strategy involves systematically analyzing existing research on MASs to identify the defining characteristics of multi-agent collaboration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn mixture-of-experts, multiple expert models compete to contribute to the final output, with a gating mechanism selecting the most appropriate experts for each input.
“In MoE, multiple expert models compete to contribute to the final output, with a gating mechanism selecting the most appropriate experts for each input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIssues such as cascading hallucinations pose challenges in sustained multi-agent interactions.
“Issues such as cascading hallucinations -where one erroneous output leads to compounding mistakes pose challenges in sustained multi-agent interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSAGE is a smart home agent with grounded execution that employs a scheme where a user request initiates a sequence of discrete actions controlled by an LLM.
“The authors in [111] propose SAGE, a smart home agent with grounded execution, which employs a scheme where a user request initiates a sequence of discrete actions controlled by an LLM.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGMAC introduces a data transmission strategy based on semantic information extraction to reduce the volume of data transmitted in MASs effectively.
“GMAC [160] introduces a data transmission strategy based on semantic information extraction to reduce the volume of data transmitted in MASs effectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLAM-MSC presents a novel application of LLMs to enhance multimodal semantic communication frameworks.
“LAM-MSC [65] presents a novel application of LLMs to enhance multimodal semantic communication frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenCoordinating actions between multiple agents, particularly in dynamic environments, can be difficult without well-defined collaboration channels.
“Coordinating actions between multiple agents, particularly in dynamic environments, can also be difficult without well-defined collaboration channels 𝑐 𝑖 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn LLM-based IoT system using open-source LLMs deployed in a local network environment includes a prompt management module, a post-processing module, and a task-specific prompts database to address data privacy and security, system scalability, and to enhance LLM capabilities through integrated prompting methods.
“The authors in [137] propose an LLM-based IoT system using open-source LLMs deployed in a local network environment.The system includes a prompt management module, a post-processing module, and a task-specific prompts database to address concerns related to data privacy and security, system scalability, and to enhance the capabilities of the LLM through integrated prompting methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn edge-based distributed learning architecture divides a large-scale road network into multiple subgraphs, with data and tasks assigned to individual RSUs.
“The authors in [112] present an edge-based distributed learning architecture in which a large-scale road network is divided into multiple subgraphs, with data and tasks assigned to individual RSUs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the RIS system, the LLM is used to deduce optimized strategies for resource allocation and signal decoding order.
“In this RIS system, the LLM is used to deduce optimized strategies for resource allocation and signal decoding order.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLAM-MSC introduces a multimodal alignment (MMA) mechanism based on a multimodal language model (MLM), utilizing CoDi for modality transformation.
“the study introduces a multimodal alignment (MMA) mechanism based on a multimodal language model (MLM), utilizing CoDi for modality transformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenCoopetition enables agents to collaborate on certain tasks to achieve shared objectives while simultaneously competing with others.
“Coopetition, a strategic blend of cooperation and competition, enables agents to collaborate on certain tasks to achieve shared objectives while simultaneously competing with others.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenModel-based protocols work well with uncertain or dynamic situations that demand adaptability and contextually informed decision-making.
“model-based protocols work well with uncertain or dynamic situations that demand adaptability and contextually informed decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGMAC employs LLMs to achieve semantic alignment between observed states and natural language, facilitating compressed semantic communication.
“GMAC employs LLMs to achieve semantic alignment between observed states and natural language, facilitating compressed semantic communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRole-based techniques improve the efficiency and structure of multi-agent systems.
“By giving each agent a specific function and set of tasks, role-based techniques improve the efficiency and structure of MASs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFor tasks requiring rigorous adherence to established procedures, rule-based protocols ensure consistency and fairness by avoiding biases caused by role importance or the inherent probabilistic nature of other protocols.
“for tasks requiring rigorous adherence to established procedures, rule-based protocols ensure consistency and fairness -avoiding biases caused by role importance or inherent probabilistic nature in other protocols.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLM-SC utilizes LLM technology to model the semantic information of text and design a semantic communication system based on LLMs.
“LLM-SC [130] proposed a novel framework, which utilizes LLM technology to model the semantic information of text and design a semantic communication system based on LLMs”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMSADM is an end-to-end health management framework for dynamic heterogeneous networks.
“The authors in [121] propose MSADM, an end-to-end health management framework for dynamic heterogeneous networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenImplementing safety protocols and ethical guidelines helps prevent unintended consequences.
“Implementing safety protocols and ethical guidelines helps prevent unintended consequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntegrating LLMs with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) enables energy-efficient and reliable communication in the Internet of Vehicles.
“The authors in [78] propose a novel approach that integrates LLMs with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) to enable energy-efficient and reliable communication in the Internet of Vehicles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncorporating competition into collaborative multi-agent systems can enable innovation and improve the robustness of agents' responses.
“Incorporating competition into collaborative MASs can enable innovation and improve the robustness of agents' responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe collaboration spectrum extends beyond cooperation to include advanced mechanisms like competition and coopetition.
“While cooperation is a fundamental aspect, the collaboration spectrum extends further, encompassing advanced mechanisms like competition and coopetition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFrequent communication and multiple collaboration channels between agents can lead to increased computational cost and complexity.
“However, cooperation in MASs also presents challenges.Frequent communication and multiple collaboration channels in C between agents can lead to increased computational cost and complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLaMoSC introduces an LLM-driven multimodal fusion semantic communication system to extend unimodal transmission and improve generalization.
“LaMoSC [157] introduces an LLM-driven multimodal fusion semantic communication system to extend unimodal transmission and improve generalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCollaboration is the key in enabling AI agents to interact and work with each other.
“Collaboration is the key in enabling AI agents to interact and work with each other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLLM-SC achieves a communication paradigm that balances both semantic-level and technical-level performance.
“LLM-SC achieves a communication paradigm that balances both semantic-level and technical-level performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationM2GSC spawns benefits such as semantic encoding standardization and semantic decoding personalization.
“It also spawns a series of benefits such as semantic encoding standardization and semantic decoding personalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSAGE manages its process through a dynamically constructed tree of LLM prompts, which guide the agent in determining the next action, assessing the success of each action, and deciding when to terminate the process.
“SAGE manages this process through a dynamically constructed tree of LLM prompts, which guide the agent in determining the next action, assessing the success of each action, and deciding when to terminate the process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWhile LLMs have shown remarkable performance in single-agent tasks, their limitations become apparent in multi-agent settings where the complexity of coordination, communication, and decision-making is higher.
“While LLMs have shown remarkable performance in single-agent tasks, their limitations become apparent in multi-agent settings where the complexity of coordination, communication, and decision-making is higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMSADM covers all stages of the health management life cycle, including anomaly detection, fault diagnosis, and mitigation.
“MSADM covers all stages of the health management life cycle, including anomaly detection, fault diagnosis, and mitigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLLMs are not inherently designed and trained to communicate with one another, leaving a wide array of potential applications and open problems in this area.
“However, LLMs are not inherently designed and trained to communicate with one another, leaving a wide array of potential applications and open problems in this area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs the number of agents increases, maintaining coordination becomes more complex.
“as the number of agents increases, maintaining coordination becomes more complex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenConflicts may arise in cooperative MASs if agents interpret shared objectives differently or if situations require dynamic adaptation.
“Although cooperation is the primary goal, conflicts may arise if agents interpret shared objectives differently or if situations require dynamic adaptation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGMAC enhances bandwidth efficiency by extracting and compressing relevant information, thereby optimizing data transmission in multi-agent communication.
“This approach enhances bandwidth efficiency by extracting and compressing relevant information, thereby optimizing data transmission in multi-agent communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncorporating multiple collaboration channels with distinct interaction types in LLM-based multi-agent systems enriches interaction dynamics and enhances the system's ability to achieve complex objectives.
“Incorporating multiple collaboration channels with distinct interaction types in LLM-based MASs enriches the interaction dynamics and enhances the system's ability to achieve complex objectives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBee emphasizes modularity, extensibility, and production-level control to create sophisticated MASs for a wide range of applications.
“It emphasizes modularity, extensibility, and production-level control to create sophisticated MASs for a wide range of applications, with future development aimed at enhanced multi-agent orchestration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAuthors in [5,36] suggest that LLM-based agents can replace human participants in specific social science experiments.
“Authors in [5,36] suggest that LLM-based agents can replace human participants in specific social science experiments, while [88] demonstrates their use in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMagentic-One's core is an Orchestrator agent responsible for high-level planning, progress tracking, and dynamic re-planning to recover from errors.
“At its core is the Orchestrator agent, which is responsible for high-level planning, progress tracking, and dynamic re-planning to recover from errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExperiments on mathematical, logical and commonsense reasoning demonstrate that self-evolving benchmarks are more challenging than the original ones, thus offering a more accurate assessment of LLMs' true capabilities and limitations, while also addressing issues like data contamination.
“Experiments conducted on mathematical, logical and commonsense reasoning demonstrate that the self-evolving benchmarks are more challenging than the original ones, thus offering a more accurate assessment of LLMs' true capabilities and limitations, while also addressing issues like data contamination.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [129]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe handoff mechanism allows seamless transitions between agents specialized in particular tasks, thereby enhancing the system's overall efficiency and adaptability.
“This mechanism allows for seamless transitions between agents, each specialized in particular tasks, thereby enhancing the system's overall efficiency and adaptability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenSeveral notable frameworks recently introduced by big-tech companies pave the way for easier creation of MASs, promoting the development of such systems in practical applications.
“Several notable frameworks recently introduced by big-tech companies also pave the way for the easier creation of MASs, promoting the development of such systems in practical applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe integration of LLMs into MASs has significantly advanced the capabilities of question answering and natural language generation.
“The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into MASs has significantly advanced the capabilities of question answering and natural language generation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThese frameworks improve the efficiency and effectiveness of AI systems by allowing specialized agents to work in concert.
“By allowing specialized agents to work in concert, they improve the efficiency and effectiveness of AI systems, paving the way for more sophisticated and adaptable applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMagentic-One's modular architecture allows for the integration of various skills, facilitating the system's adaptability to a wide range of scenarios.
“This modular architecture allows for the integration of various skills, facilitating the system's adaptability to a wide range of scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLangChain provides a suite of tools and integrations that facilitate the creation of agents capable of complex reasoning and decision-making processes.
“LangChain provides a suite of tools and integrations that facilitate the creation of agents capable of complex reasoning and decision-making processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEarly efforts are still in the process of being adapted and the efficacy of applying them in practice will take time to be assessed.
“It is important to recognize that these early efforts are still in the process of being adapted and that the efficacy of applying them in practice will take time to be assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLSGLLM addresses the absence of spatio-temporal features in traditional LLMs.
“LSGLLM addresses the absence of spatio-temporal features in traditional LLMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBee provides a foundation for building applications where multiple AI agents, powered by LLMs such as IBM Granite and Llama 3, collaborate to achieve complex goals.
“It provides a foundation for building applications where multiple AI agents, powered by LLMs such as IBM Granite and Llama 3, collaborate to achieve complex goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBee offers a modular design with prebuilt components for agents, tools, memory management, and instrumentation.
“The framework offers a modular design with prebuilt components for agents, tools, memory management, and instrumentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAgent-as-a-Judge uses agentic systems to assess other agentic systems, providing detailed feedback throughout the task-solving process and mirroring human evaluation at significantly reduced cost and time.
“The core concept involves using agentic systems to assess other agentic systems, providing detailed feedback throughout the task-solving process, and mirroring human evaluation but at a significantly reduced cost and time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [165]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLangChain offers a framework for developing applications powered by language models, with a particular focus on agents.
“LangChain Agentsfoot_4 : LangChain offers a framework for developing applications powered by language models, with a particular focus on agents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe NLG task of synthesizing data is carried out with higher-quality training data generated from the collaboration mechanism.
“The NLG task of synthesizing the data is also carried out with higher-quality training data generated from the collaboration mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMicrosoft's Magentic-One is a generalist MAS designed to address complex tasks across diverse domains.
“Microsoft's Magentic-One Systemfoot_2 : this is a generalist MAS designed to address complex tasks across diverse domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntegrating LLM-based agents into traditional agent-based modeling can enhance the realism of simulations, offering controlled environments to test social theories, including the effects of policy interventions and norm violation detection.
“Integrating LLM-based agents into traditional agent-based modeling [48] can enhance the realism of simulations, offering controlled environments to test social theories, including the effects of policy interventions [10,148] and norm violation detection [53].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [48]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [148]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [53]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe integration of different types and strategies of collaboration, communication structures, and orchestration architecture also needs to be considered, since most existing frameworks or systems focus primarily on role-based strategy and either centralized or decentralized structures.
“In addition, the integration of different types and strategies of collaboration, communication structures, and orchestration architecture also need to be considered, since most existing frameworks or systems are focusing primarily on role-based strategy and either centralized or decentralized structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies [3,11] argue the potential of LLMs to enhance traditional social science methods, including survey research, online experiments, automated content analyses, and agent-based modeling.
“Studies such as [3,11] argue the potential of LLMs to enhance traditional social science methods, including survey research, online experiments, automated content analyses, and agent-based modeling.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBee supports the serialization of agent states, enabling the pausing and resuming of complex workflows without data loss.
“Notably, Bee supports the serialization of agent states, enabling the pausing and resuming of complex workflows without data loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch has shown that collaboration among LLM-based agents can elicit human-like capabilities, including conversational skills, theory of mind, Hobbesian social contract theory, and non-verbal action inference.
“Research has shown that collaboration among LLM-based agents can elicit human-like capabilities, including conversational skills, theory of mind (reasoning about others' mental states) [2,75], Hobbesian social contract theory (submit to authority to avoid chaos) [31], and non-verbal action inference [79,147].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [79]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [147]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe shift from stand-alone LLMs to Multi-Agent Collaborative Systems can enable the analysis of LLMs in replicating individual social behavior and provide powerful tools for exploring complex social dynamics, collaborative problem-solving, and emergent collective behaviors.
“The shift from stand-alone LLMs to Multi-Agent Collaborative Systems can not only enable the analysis of LLMs in replicating individual social behavior but also provide powerful tools for exploring complex social dynamics, collaborative problem-solving, and emergent collective behaviors [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSwarm's design emphasizes lightweight coordination and execution, making it suitable for scalable, real-world applications.
“Swarm's design emphasizes lightweight coordination and execution, making it suitable for scalable, real-world applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCASIT generates reports through a step-by-step summary and classification mechanism.
“It generates reports through a step-by-step summary and classification mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Orchestrator delegates specific tasks to specialized agents, such as operating a web browser, navigating local files, or writing and executing Python code.
“The Orchestrator delegates specific tasks to specialized agents, such as operating a web browser, navigating local files, or writing and executing Python code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn edge agent employs an LLM to generate WebXR code, enabling visualization of corresponding 3D virtual objects on head-mounted devices and estimating multi-sensorial media data.
“an edge agent employs an LLM to generate WebXR code, enabling the visualization of corresponding 3D virtual objects on head-mounted devices and estimating multi-sensorial media data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation[89] follows the definition of social interaction as a theatrical performance, with agents assuming roles driven by LLMs like GPT-4, Qwen2.5-14b, or Llama-3-8b.
“For instance, [89] follows the definition of social interaction as a theatrical performance, with agents assuming roles (e.g., office employees or family members) driven by LLMs like GPT-4, Qwen2.5-14b, or Llama-3-8b.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMultimodal AI systems such as those described in [144] integrate verbal, non-verbal, and social cues as input to multi-tier collaborative agents to generate in-situ suggestions via augmented reality glasses.
“Moreover, multimodal AI systems such as those described in [144] integrate verbal, non-verbal, and social cues as input to multi-tier collaborative agents to generate in-situ suggestions via augmented reality glasses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIBM's Bee Agent Framework facilitates the development and deployment of scalable, multi-agent workflows.
“IBM's Bee Agent Framework 6 : This open-source framework facilitates the development and deployment of scalable, multi-agent workflows.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrca-AgentInstruct utilizes 3 distinct agentic flows (Content Transformation, Seed Instruction Generation, and Instruction Refinement) and a decentralised structure of agents in each flow.
“Ultilizing 3 distinct agentic flows (Content Transformation, Seed Instruction Generation, and Instruction Refinement) and decentralised structure of agents in each flow, it showed significant performance gains when used to fine-tune a Mistral 7B model, achieving improvements of up to 54% across various benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCASIT integrates LLMs into IoT systems to enhance the efficiency and intelligence of data processing and operations.
“CASIT [159] integrates LLMs into IoT systems to enhance the efficiency and intelligence of data processing and operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningResponse evaluation in QA is now done with higher confidence because MAS evaluation systems resemble human evaluation and include more dynamic evaluation with automated modified benchmarks.
“Response evaluation in QA is now done with higher confidence, since the MAS evaluation systems resemble the process of human evaluation and now includes more dynamic evaluation with automated modified benchmarks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationExperiments demonstrate that Agent-as-a-Judge aligns closely with human expert evaluations and surpasses the performance of traditional LLM-as-a-Judge methods, especially in complex scenarios, on the DevAI benchmark with 55 realistic AI development tasks.
“Experiments demonstrate that Agent-as-a-Judge aligns closely with human expert evaluations and surpasses the performance of traditional LLM-as-a-Judge methods, especially in complex scenarios, on the DevAI benchmark with 55 realistic AI development tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [165]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLangChain agents are designed to interact with their environment, using tools to process information.
“These agents are designed to interact with their environment, using tools to process information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOpenAI's Swarm framework introduces a novel approach to orchestrating multiple agents through the concepts of routines and handoffs.
“OpenAI's Swarm Frameworkfoot_1 : this framework introduces a novel approach to orchestrating multiple agents through the concepts of routines and handoffs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites foot_1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese studies underscore critical limitations, such as biases in training data that lack global psychological diversity, cautioning against treating stand-alone LLMs as universal solutions.
“However, these studies also underscore critical limitations, such as biases in training data that lack global psychological diversity, cautioning against treating stand-alone LLMs as universal solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBenchmark Self-Evolving employs a role-based strategy with each agent having a specific function.
“It employs the role-based strategy, with each agent having a specific function (e.g., instance pre-filter, creator and verifier, candidate option formulator).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [129]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAssigning specific roles or specializations to individual agents can enhance the system's overall effectiveness.
“Assigning specific roles or specializations to individual agents can enhance the system's overall effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs suffer from known limitations such as hallucinations and are susceptible to adversarial attacks.
“They suffer from known limitations such as hallucinations and are susceptible to adversarial attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: LLMs were not originally designed for agentic applications involving collaboration and multi-participant interactions.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThrough an extensive review of the collaborative aspect of LLM-based MASs, the paper introduces a structured and extensible framework as a lens to guide future research.
“Through our extensive review of the collaborative aspect of LLM-based MASs, we introduce a structured and extensible framework as an important lens to guide future research.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEnabling collective intelligence through collaborations among multiple LLM-based agents offers the potential for AI systems that are adaptive, efficient, and capable of addressing real-world problems.
“Enabling collective intelligence through collaborations among multiple LLM-based agents offers the potential for AI systems that are adaptive, efficient, and capable of addressing real-world problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCurrent LLM-based MASs commonly utilize limited decision-making methods, such as dictatorial or popular voting, which may not capture different aspects of agent preferences, or aggregating overconfidence of LLMs.
“Current LLM-based MASs commonly utilize limited decision-making methods, such as dictatorial or popular voting, which may not capture different aspects of agent preferences, or aggregating overconfidence of LLMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenManaging resources, coordination and collaboration channels among a growing number of agents introduces additional complexities, such as maintaining efficiency in agent interactions and preventing bottlenecks.
“Managing resources (memory, processing time), coordination and collaboration channels among a growing number of agents introduces additional complexities, such as maintaining efficiency in agent interactions and preventing bottlenecks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenComplex, emergent behaviors of collective intelligence, such as coordinated problem-solving or innovation, can arise under the right conditions, especially in generalizing to unseen domains.
“Complex, emergent behaviors of collective intelligence, such as coordinated problem-solving or innovation, can arise under the right conditions, especially in generalizing to unseen domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLM-based MASs can represent diverse cultural perspectives, advancing cross-cultural understanding and reducing bias.
“LLM-based MASs can represent diverse cultural perspectives, advancing cross-cultural understanding and reducing bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOverlooking these limitations not only undermines informed decision-making but also introduces broader ethical concerns regarding the responsible deployment and use of LLM-based MASs.
“Overlooking these limitations not only undermines informed decision-making but also introduces broader ethical concerns 10 regarding the responsible deployment and use of LLM-based MASs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CulturePark framework simulates cross-cultural interactions, with each agent embodying distinct cultural viewpoints.
“For example, the CulturePark framework [73] simulates cross-cultural interactions, with each agent embodying distinct cultural viewpoints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which make MASs particularly attractive targets for exploitation.
“Additionally, LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which make MASs particularly attractive targets for exploitation [115].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed framework is flexible, accommodating previous approaches and enabling the analysis of diverse MASs under a unified structure.
“Our framework is flexible, accommodating previous approaches and enabling the analysis of diverse MASs under a unified structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs the number of agents in LLM-based MAS increases, these risks scale proportionally, compromising the safety and reliability of communication and information exchange.
“As the number of agents in LLMbased MAS increases, these risks scale proportionally, compromising the safety and reliability of communication and information exchange.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo key factors behind the amplification of LLM issues in MASs are the LLM overconfidence problem, where LLMs persistently assert the correctness of their outputs despite inaccuracies, and misunderstandings that arise between LLM-based agents during collaboration.
“There are two key factors behind this amplification: LLM overconfidence problem, where LLMs persistently assert the correctness of their outputs despite inaccuracies [151], and misunderstandings that arise between LLM-based agents during collaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningUnderstanding the scaling laws of the behavior and performance of MASs is critical for designing architectures capable of handling large-scale collaboration.
“Understanding the scaling laws of the behavior and performance of MASs is critical for designing architectures capable of handling large-scale collaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCollective intelligence is the ability of a group to perform complex tasks and solve problems collectively, often overcoming the sum of individual contributions.
“Collective intelligence is the ability of a group to perform complex tasks and solve problems collectively, often overcoming the sum of individual contributions [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe framework characterizes collaboration along five key dimensions: actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination mechanisms.
“Our framework characterizes collaboration along five key dimensions: actors, types, structures, strategies, and coordination mechanisms, providing a systematic approach to analyze and design collaborative interactions within MASs empowered by LLMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenUnified governance is fundamental in enabling collective intelligence among a group of LLM-based agents, including the design of coordination and planning mechanisms.
“Unified governance is fundamental in enabling collective intelligence among group of LLM-based agents, including the design of coordination and planning mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStatic evaluation benchmarks risk becoming lacking in relevance to current real-world scenarios, leading to data leakage and overfitting.
“Moreover, static evaluation benchmarks risk becoming lack of relevance to current real-world scenarios, leading to data leakage and overfitting [102].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent studies have highlighted the potential for AI systems to deceive humans, raising significant concerns in the context of LLM-based multi-agent collaborative systems.
“Recent studies have also highlighted the potential for AI systems to deceive humans, raising significant concerns in the context of LLM-based multi-agent collaborative systems [7,35,84].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [84]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationLLMs are not perfect replicas of humans and cannot fully replicate the complexities of human social and cultural behavior.
“Despite their promise, LLMs are not perfect replicas of humans and cannot fully replicate the complexities of human social and cultural behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA single agent's hallucination can be spread and reinforced by other agents, leading minor inaccuracies into critical and cascading effects.
“A single agent's hallucination can be spread and reinforced by other agents, leading to minor inaccuracies into critical and cascading effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis perception can increase susceptibility to manipulation and obscure the inherent limitations of LLM-based agents.
“This perception can increase susceptibility to manipulation and obscure the inherent limitations of LLMbased agents [161].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIncreasing agent population poses a significant challenge in MASs.
“Increasing agent population poses a significant challenge in MASs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The agents have a common ground, meaning the interface can be understood clearly among them (e.g., all agents use English and are on-topic).
“We assume that the agents have a common ground, meaning the interface can be understood clearly among them (e.g., all agents use English and are on-topic).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The three domains of 5G/B6G and Industry 5.0, natural language generation, and social and cultural domains are the dominant domains for real-world implementations of LLM-based MASs.
“This section explores real-world implementations of LLM-based MASs across three dominant domains, including 5G/B6G and Industry 5.0 (IOT); Natural Language Generation (NLG); and Social and Cultural Domains (S&C).”
The paper relies on this without support.
LLMs were not originally designed for agentic applications involving collaboration and multi-participant interactions.
“however, they were not originally designed for agentic applications involving collaboration and multi-participant interactions.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As task range and intricacy grow, a single AI Agent may become overburdened, leading to performance degradation or failure to generalize effectively.
“However, as the range and intricacy of tasks grow, a single agent may become overburdened, leading to performance degradation or failure to generalize effectively [225, 226].”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [225]
Section 2.1 says multi-agent systems can solve problems difficult or impossible for an individual agent and describes dividing complex tasks among agents. This supports the concern about a single agent handling growing complexity, but the paper does not establish that a broader task range overburdens one agent or causes performance degradation or failure to generalize. Its scalability discussion concerns growing numbers of agents, not a single agent’s workload. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundational limitations such as hallucination, autoregressive instability, and scaling bottlenecks continue to constrain the reliability of large-scale, LLM-mediated multi-agent systems.
“Still, foundational limitations (such as hallucination, autoregressive instability, and scaling bottlenecks) continue to constrain the reliability of large-scale, LLM-mediated multi-agent systems [77].”
From Adaptive Information Modulation: Designing Governance Mechanisms for Multi-Agent Artificial Intelligence Systems (2026) · cites this paper as [77]
The Introduction (section 1) lists hallucination, autoregressive nature, and scaling laws as intrinsic LLM limitations. Section 2.2 describes cascading hallucinations in multi-agent interactions, while section 6.3 says those risks can scale and compromise reliability; the scalability discussion also identifies bottlenecks as agent populations grow. The copy does not specifically describe autoregressive instability or establish that autoregression itself constrains multi-agent reliability. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is a growing consensus that AI agents must evolve from turn-based chatbots into long-term companions capable of sustained, context-aware collaboration.
“There is a growing consensus that AI agents must evolve from turn-based chatbots into long-term companions capable of sustained, context-aware collaboration (Tran et al., 2025; Sapkota et al., 2025).”
From RealMem: Benchmarking LLMs in Real-World Memory-Driven Interaction (2026) · cites this paper as Tran et al., 2025
Section 2.3, “Collaborative AI” (page unavailable), describes growing demand for agents that collaborate and a transition from isolated models toward collaborative approaches. It does not describe a consensus that agents must become long-term companions or contrast that goal with turn-based chatbots; sustained, context-aware companionship is not established by the cited passages. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSocial bot detection methods assume the fundamental distinction is between human and bot; they cannot be directly applied to a platform where all participants are AI agents.
“However, these methods assume the fundamental distinction is between human and bot; they cannot be directly applied to a platform where all participants are AI agents powered by large language models 12 operating within multi-agent frameworks 10,30”
From The Moltbook Illusion: Separating Human Influence from Emergent Behavior in AI Agent Societies (2026) · cites this paper as [30]
Sections 1 (Introduction) and 2.1 (Multi-Agent (AI) Systems) describe LLM-based multi-agent systems composed of interacting AI agents, supporting the sentence’s description of multi-agent frameworks. The paper does not address whether social bot detection methods assume a human–bot distinction or whether those methods can be applied to an all-AI platform. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAI agents are fundamentally structured around four core components-planning, action, reflection, and memory-that collectively enable their autonomous functionality in complex environments.
“AI agents are fundamentally structured around four core components—planning, action, reflection, and memory (Figure 1B)—that collectively enable their autonomous functionality in complex environments.2,45,51,52,53”
From A foundational architecture for AI agents in healthcare (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
Section 4.4.2 describes generative agents using memory and reflection to inform actions, and discusses planning in cooperative agents. Section 2.1 also identifies planning and action as agent capabilities. Neither section presents planning, action, reflection, and memory as four fundamental components of AI agents generally, so the claim overgeneralizes the survey's discussion. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Multi-agent systems incur an unavoidable coordination tax in which the global context must be compressed into inter-agent messages.
“while parallel agents enable diverse exploration, they incur an unavoidable coordination tax in which the global context must be compressed into inter-agent messages.”
From Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Section 4.2.1 (page unavailable) says frequent inter-agent communication can increase computational cost and complexity, supporting a coordination cost. Section 4.4.2 discusses agents with diverse expertise. The paper does not say this cost is unavoidable or that global context must be compressed into inter-agent messages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMulti-agent systems impose intrinsic information fragmentation.
“In contrast, multi-agent systems impose intrinsic information fragmentation [13]:”
From Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Section 4.4.2 (page unavailable) says decentralized agents operate on local information and may have limited communication, supporting the idea that information can be distributed among agents. But the paper does not establish information fragmentation as intrinsic to all multi-agent systems; its statement is specifically about decentralized systems. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAt present, mechanisms for shared memory rely primarily on communication through explicit dialogue, which is constrained by bandwidth bottlenecks and prone to noise during exchange.
“At present, mechanisms for shared memory rely primarily on communication through explicit dialogue, which is not only constrained by bottlenecks in bandwidth but is also prone to the introduction of noise during the process of exchange (Tran et al., 2025; Liao et al., 2025; Zou et al., 2025).”
From From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms (2026) · cites this paper as Tran et al., 2025
Section 4.2.1 describes agents collaborating through conversation, and “Scalability and Resource Maintainance” identifies bottlenecks in managing memory and collaboration channels. Section 6.3 also describes misunderstandings and amplified errors during agent interactions. These passages do not establish that shared-memory mechanisms primarily rely on explicit dialogue or that dialogue specifically faces bandwidth bottlenecks. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAs task range and intricacy grow, a single agent may become overburdened, leading to performance degradation or failure to generalize effectively.
“However, as the range and intricacy of tasks grow, a single agent may become overburdened, leading to performance degradation or failure to generalize effectively [228], [229].”
From AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [228]
Section 2.1 says multi-agent systems can solve problems difficult or impossible for an individual agent and describes the benefits of dividing complex tasks. This supports the concern that one agent may struggle with complexity, but the paper does not attribute performance degradation or failure to generalize to a growing range of tasks for a single agent. Its discussion of generalization in “Scalability and Resource Maintainance” concerns collective intelligence, not single-agent failure. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLarge-scale, multi-user applications increasingly rely on ensembles of LLM agents that reason, communicate, and coordinate actions among themselves and with external resources.
“Large-scale, multi-user applications increasingly rely on ensembles of LLM agents that reason, communicate, and coordinate actions-both among themselves and with external resources such as tools, APIs, or databases [19].”
From Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
The Introduction (1. Motivation; page unavailable) says researchers are increasingly exploring collaborative LLM agents, and §4.4.2 describes agents serving diverse users and using APIs. The copy supports agent reasoning, communication, coordination, and use of external resources, but does not establish that large-scale, multi-user applications increasingly rely on such systems. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPrior research demonstrates that granting agents access to a persistent memory of past interactions can significantly enhance task performance; however, most existing designs assume a single-user setting, overlooking benefits of cross-user knowledge transfer.
“Prior research [25, 10, 20] demonstrates that granting agents access to a persistent memory of past interactions can significantly enhance task performance; however, most existing designs assume a single-user setting, thus overlooking the benefits of cross-user knowledge transfer.”
From Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecent advances in multiagent systems orchestrate ensembles of specialized LLM agents to solve problems that exceed the capacity of any single model.
“This conceptual framework aligns closely with recent advances in multiagent systems [5, 19], where ensembles of specialized agents-often instantiated as large language models (LLMs)-are orchestrated to solve problems that exceed the capacity of any single model.”
From Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
The emergence of conventions is a foundational element to any type of LLM multi-agent system.
“The emergence of conventions is a foundational element to any type of LLM multi-agent system (14, 41), including but not limited to “in silico” experiments to emulate human social networks (42).”
From Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
Section 4.6 calls collaboration channels critical to LLM-based multi-agent systems, and Section 4.3.1 discusses predefined rules and consensus seeking. Neither passage says that conventions emerge or that their emergence is foundational to every type of such system (searched: “emergence of conventions,” “convention,” and emergent norms). (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
GMAC is described as both communication-free and transmitting data
MinorThe applications table says GMAC enables collaboration without communications, whereas the accompanying discussion describes it as optimizing data transmission in multi-agent communication.
“• Enable multi-agent collaboration without communications.”
“GMAC [160] introduces a data transmission strategy based on semantic information extraction to reduce the volume of data transmitted in MASs effectively.”
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1× · see citing works
“LLMs - driven by the development of transformer architectures [127] - represent a significant leap in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and AI.”
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.041 · Cited by 3,494 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inspiration for MASs extends beyond technological advancements and finds roots in human collective intelligence (e.g., society of mind [87], theory of mind [45]).”
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 2,842 · see citing works
Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models
Touvron, H., Martin, L., Stone, K., Albert, P., Almahairi, A., Babaei, Y., Bashlykov, N., Batra, S., Bhargava, P., Bhosale, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.09288 · Cited by 2,604 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These models, such as OpenAI’s GPT [4], Meta’s LLaMA [124], and Google’s Gemini series [123], are trained on vast text corpora and rely on large-scale artificial neural networks with billions, sometimes trillions, of parameters.”
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.05232 · Cited by 2,516 · see citing works
Minsky, M. (1987) · Personalist Forum · doi:10.5840/persforum19873112 · Cited by 2,415 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Inspiration for MASs extends beyond technological advancements and finds roots in human collective intelligence (e.g., society of mind [87], theory of mind [45]).”
Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
A Survey of Large Language Models
Zhao, W. X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Min, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, Z., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.18223 · Cited by 2,090
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While these models have shown remarkable capabilities individually, they still suffer from intrinsic limitations such as hallucination [57], auto-regressive nature (e.g., incapable of slow-thinking [49]), and scaling laws [55, 69].”
An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems
Balaji, P. G., & Srinivasan, D. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14435-6_1 · Cited by 1,397 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the geopolitical and ethical implications of LLM development have become the limelight for policymakers, especially concerning the computational power required and potential misuse by malicious actors [76, 86].”
Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning
Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Berman, E., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., & Yao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.11366 · Cited by 1,087 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, in [117], a feedback loop is carried out as the main collaboration channel, where the task is first handled by an LLM model (Actor), then an Evaluator and Self-Reflection model rates the output and results, producing verbal guidance for the Actor to improve.”
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2831228 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models
Gemini Team, Anil, R., Borgeaud, S., Alayrac, J.-B., Yu, J., Soricut, R., Schalkwyk, J., Dai, A. M., Hauth, A., Millican, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.11805 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, [47, 107, 136] focus on single-agent systems and only touch on multi-agent collaboration at a surface level.”
Large Language Model Based Multi-agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges
Guo, T., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Chang, R., Pei, S., Chawla, N. V., Wiest, O., & Zhang, X. (2024) · Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/890 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical ReasoningPreprint
Tang, X., Zou, A.-N., Zhang, Z., Li, Z.-M., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Cohan, A., & Gerstein, M. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.10537 · Cited by 571 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For instance, MedAgent [122] integrates medical agents with different specialties to deliver comprehensive analyses of patients’ conditions and treatment options.”
Wu, T., Terry, M. A., & Cai, C. J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517582 · Cited by 536 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Similarly, sequential channel aggregation is explored in other works [135, 138], where collaboration channels are connected in a sequence to amplify the benefits of individual channels.”
ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development
Qian, C., Liu, W., Liu, H., Chen, N., Dang, Y., Li, J., Yang, C., Chen, W., Su, Y., Cong, X., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.810 · Cited by 490 · cited 4× · see citing works
“[ ChatDev NLG • Employs a chat chain to break each phase into smaller subtasks, enabling multi-turn communication among agents to collaboratively develop solutions.”
InfluentialCan AI language models replace human participants?
Dillion, D., Tandon, N., Gu, Y., & Gray, K. (2023) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.04.008 · Cited by 405 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Authors in [5, 36] suggest that LLM-based agents can replace human participants in specific social science experiments, while [88] demonstrates their use in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.”
A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent CollaborationPreprint
Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, P., Liu, Y., & Yang, D.-Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02170 · Cited by 385 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Authors in [81] introduce a framework called Dynamic LLM-Agent Network (DyLAN), which organizes agents in a multi-layered feed-forward network.”
Can Generative AI improve social science?
Bail, C. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2314021121 · Cited by 369 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies such as [3, 11] argue the potential of LLMs to enhance traditional social science methods, including survey research, online experiments, automated content analyses, and agent-based modeling.”
A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Models
Cai, W., Jiang, J., Wang, F., Tang, J., Kim, S., & Huang, J. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3554028 · Cited by 334 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework also fits in the coopetition collaboration type [6, 15].”
AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generation
Chen, G., Dong, S., Shu, Y., Zhang, G., Sesay, J., Karlsson, B. F., Fu, J., & Shi, Y.-M. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17288 · Cited by 324 · cited 1×
“Creative content generation tasks, including creative writing and storyboard design, have also benefited from multi-agent collaboration, as demonstrated by AutoAgents [20] and OKR-Agent [158].”
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Liang, T., He, Z., Jiao, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Yang, Y., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.19118 · Cited by 320 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Researchers have found taking multiple LLM instances to debate for a fixed number of rounds can boost their factuality and reasoning capabilities [41, 77, 140].”
Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society
Li, G., Hammoud, H., Itani, H., Khizbullin, D., & Ghanem, B. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2264 · Cited by 314 · cited 4× · see citing works
“There are recent open-source frameworks allowing for experimentation with cooperative LLM-based MASs. CAMEL [74] provides a role-playing framework where a task-specific agent and two cooperating AI agents (User and Assistant) work to complete tasks via role-based conversations.”
InfluentialMapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem SolvingPreprint
Islam, M. A., Ali, M. E., & Parvez, M. R. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11403 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology ViewPreprint
Zhang, J., Xu, X., Liu, R., & Deng, S.-M. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02124 · Cited by 300 · cited 4× · see citing works
“An article applies rules-based social psychology-inspired protocols, where agents mimic human collaborative dynamics such as debate and majority rule, achieving efficient collaboration without deviating from predefined pathways [151].”
InfluentialLarge language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: a survey and perspectives
Gao, C., Lan, X., Li, N., Yuan, Y., Ding, J., Zhou, Z., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03611-3 · Cited by 294 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Meanwhile, [46] narrows its focus to the application of Table 1.”
Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate
Liang, T., He, Z., Jiao, W., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Yang, Y., Shi, S., & Tu, Z. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.992 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead
He, J., Treude, C., & Lo, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.04834 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Hagendorff, T., Fabi, S., & Kosinski, M. (2023) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00527-x · Cited by 243 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While these models have shown remarkable capabilities individually, they still suffer from intrinsic limitations such as hallucination [57], auto-regressive nature (e.g., incapable of slow-thinking [49]), and scaling laws [55, 69].”
Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?Preprint
Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Su, Y., Tong, H.-H., & Song, Y.-Q. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.18272 · Cited by 243 · cited 2× · see citing works
“On the other hand, as studied in [128] MAS approach with suboptimal design for their competitive collaboration channels can be overtaken by single-agent counterpart with strong prompts.”
The power of noise: Redefining retrieval for rag systems
Cuconasu, F., Trappolini, G., Siciliano, F., Filice, S., Campagnano, C., Maarek, Y., Tonellotto, N., & Silvestri, F. (2024) · Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657834 · Cited by 236 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their performance degrades as real-world knowledge changes, prompting a focus on aligning models with up-to-date information without retraining from scratch [19, 28].”
Leimeister, J. M. (2010) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-010-0114-8 · Cited by 233 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Collective intelligence is the ability of a group to perform complex tasks and solve problems collectively, often overcoming the sum of individual contributions [71].”
Cooperative AI: machines must learn to find common ground
Dafoe, A., Bachrach, Y., Hadfield, G., Horvitz, E., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01170-0 · Cited by 232 · cited 1× · see citing works
“New methodologies have been proposed to enable agents to interact, negotiate, make decisions, plan, and act jointly, driving forward the capabilities of AI in collective settings [30].”
Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs
Patil, S., Zhang, T., Wang, X., & Gonzalez, J. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-4020 · Cited by 226 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…[19], including their decision making 9 https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-ai-collection-2024/ capabilities and tool usage in agentic applications [100, 102], relatively few effort has been dedicated to systematically assessing the performance and behavior of LLM-based MASs [80].”
A Bibliometric Review of Large Language Models Research from 2017 to 2023
Fan, L., Li, L., Ma, Z., Lee, S., Yu, H., & Hemphill, L. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3664930 · Cited by 221 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The launch of models like GPT-3 and ChatGPT in recent years has made these capabilities accessible to the public, leading to a surge in both academic and industrial research on how to optimize, scale, and secure LLMs for real-world use [42].”
LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion
Jiang, D., Ren, X., & Lin, B. Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.792 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
RoCo: Dialectic Multi-Robot Collaboration with Large Language Models
Mandi, Z., Jain, S., & Song, S. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610855 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
A Survey on Mixture of Experts
Cai, W., Jiang, J., Wang, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.06204 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“The mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework also fits in the coopetition collaboration type [6, 15].”
Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?
Schaeffer, R., Miranda, B., & Koyejo, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.15004 · Cited by 200 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These emergent behaviors allow LLMs to solve tasks they were not explicitly trained on, such as analogical reasoning and zero-shot learning, where the model can tackle new problems without additional fine-tuning [113].”
(2023) · doi:10.52202/075280-2425 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation
Wu, Q., Bansal, G., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, B., Zhu, E., Jiang, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Liu, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08155 · Cited by 193 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Similarly, AutoGen [134] enables developers to define flexible agent behaviors and communication patterns, allowing LLM agents to cooperate through conversation and tackle complex tasks by decomposing them into manageable subtasks.”
OpenAgents: An Open Platform for Language Agents in the WildPreprint
Xie, T., Zhou, F., Cheng, Z., Shi, P., Weng, L., Liu, Y., Hua, T., Zhao, J., Liu, Q., Liu, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10634 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Large Language Models Empowered Autonomous Edge AI for Connected Intelligence
Shen, Y., Shao, J., Zhang, X., Lin, Z., Pan, H., Li, D., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K. B. (2024) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2300550 · Cited by 171 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, LLM has emerged to be an efficient tool to significantly improve the performance of edge networks [66, 108, 116].”
Using Large Language Models to Simulate Multiple Humans and Replicate Human Subject Studies
Aher, G., Arriaga, R. I., & Kalai, A. T. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.10264 · Cited by 161 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Authors in [5, 36] suggest that LLM-based agents can replace human participants in specific social science experiments, while [88] demonstrates their use in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.”
Meta-Prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-Agnostic ScaffoldingPreprint
Suzgun, M., & Kalai, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.12954 · Cited by 159 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[119] MAD NLG • Two agents express their own arguments.”
Self-Planning Code Generation with Large Language Models
Jiang, X., Dong, Y., Wang, L., Fang, Z., Shang, Q., Li, G., Jin, Z., & Jiao, W. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3672456 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents
Zhang, Z., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Dai, Q., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.13501 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They excel in knowledge memorization, enabling distributed agents to retain and share diverse knowledge bases without overloading a single system [51, 154].”
Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems
Chan, A., Salganik, R., Markelius, A., Pang, C., Rajkumar, N., Krasheninnikov, D., Langosco, L., He, Z., Duan, Y., Carroll, M., et al. (2023) · 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594033 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These criteria include assessing the overall system performance [155], such as reasoning capabilities, task completion rates, as well as specific system characteristics like coordination efficiency and contextual appropriateness [17].”
LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion
Jiang, D., Ren, X., & Lin, B. Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.02561 · Cited by 141 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[64] SOT NLG • Generate the skeleton of answer.”
Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation
Abdelnabi, S., Gomaa, A., Sivaprasad, S., et al. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/079017-2658 · Cited by 140 · cited 3×
“Collaboration channels enable communication and task orchestration while occasionally exhibiting advanced behaviors like the theory of mind [2, 75].”
Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential PrivacyPreprint
Xu, Z., Zhang, Y.-X., Andrew, G., et al. (2023) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.18465 · Cited by 138 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, Google has utilized FL to train next-word prediction models for LLMs using mobile keyboard input data, significantly improving user experience [13], [142].”
Ouyang, F., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100616 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Large Language Model Enhanced Multi-Agent Systems for 6G Communications
Jiang, F., Peng, Y., Dong, L., Wang, K., Yang, K., Pan, C., Niyato, D. T., & Dobre, O. A. (2024) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.016.2300600 · Cited by 133 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, LLM has emerged to be an efficient tool to significantly improve the performance of edge networks [66, 108, 116].”
MedAgents: Large Language Models as Collaborators for Zero-shot Medical Reasoning
Tang, X., Zou, A., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Cohan, A., & Gerstein, M. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.33 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Large AI Model Empowered Multimodal Semantic Communications
Jiang, F., Li, D., Peng, Y., Wang, K., Yang, K., Pan, C., & You, X. (2024) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2300575 · Cited by 124 · cited 2× · see citing works
“LAM-MSC [65] presents a novel application of LLMs to enhance multimodal semantic communication frameworks.”
Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preference
Chiang, W.-L., Zheng, L., Sheng, Y., Angelopoulos, A. N., Li, T., Li, D., Zhang, H., Zhu, B., Jordan, M., Gonzalez, J. E., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.04132 · Cited by 118 · cited 1×
“…of novel frameworks for evaluating responses given by agents and LLMs, which reflects a reimagination of how a task should be judged - compared to the prevalently existing evaluation approach by using more capable models to give ratings, or crowd-sourced AI benchmarking from human preference [25].”
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They excel in knowledge memorization, enabling distributed agents to retain and share diverse knowledge bases without overloading a single system [51, 154].”
Perils and opportunities in using large language models in psychological research
Abdurahman, S., Atari, M., Karimi-Malekabadi, F., Xue, M. J., Trager, J., Park, P. S., Golazizian, P., Omrani, A., & Dehghani, M. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae245 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
AI Empowered Wireless Communications: From Bits to Semantics
Qin, Z., Liang, L., Wang, Z., Jin, S., Tao, X., Tong, W., & Li, G. Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2024.3437730 · Cited by 111 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, LLM has emerged to be an efficient tool to significantly improve the performance of edge networks [66, 108, 116].”
Zhang, Z.-B., Zhang, Y.-T., Li, L., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.11880 · Cited by 109 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, AI safety and performance concerns arise, particularly in competitive scenarios where failures like exploitation and hallucination can happen [22, 34, 153].”
All Too Human? Mapping and Mitigating the Risk from Anthropomorphic AI
Akbulut, C., Weidinger, L., Manzini, A., Gabriel, I., & Rieser, V. (2024) · AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v7i1.31613 · Cited by 107 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent studies have also highlighted the potential for AI systems to deceive humans, raising significant concerns in the context of LLM-based multi-agent collaborative systems [7, 35, 84].”
FedExP: Speeding up Federated Averaging Via Extrapolation
Jhunjhunwala, D., Wang, S., & Joshi, G. (2023) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.09604 · Cited by 106 · cited 1×
“Recently, many works provide alternate collaboration paradigms besides average loss minimization, such as layer-wise aggregation [92] or on-serving side optimization for global learning rate adaptation [62] and invariant gradient direction searching [8, 9].”
Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate
Du, Y., Li, S., Torralba, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Mordatch, I. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14325 · Cited by 96 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Researchers have found taking multiple LLM instances to debate for a fixed number of rounds can boost their factuality and reasoning capabilities [41, 77, 140].”
Benchmark Self-Evolving: A Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic LLM EvaluationPreprint
Wang, S., Long, Z.-H., Fan, Z., Wei, Z.-Y., & Huang, X.-J. (2024) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.11443 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Another framework, "Benchmark Self-Evolving", leverages a MAS to modify existing benchmark instances by altering contexts or questions, thereby creating new, challenging instances that extend the original benchmarks [129].”
AgentCF: Collaborative Learning with Autonomous Language Agents for Recommender Systems
Zhang, J., Hou, Y., Xie, R., Sun, W., McAuley, J., Zhao, W. X., Lin, L., & Wen, J.-R. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 · doi:10.1145/3589334.3645537 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Authors in [150] propose the agent-based collaborative filtering approach, namely AgentCF.”
Open Problems in Cooperative AI
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08630 · Cited by 93 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This type of collaboration is essential in tasks where collaborative problem-solving, collective decision making, and complementary skill sets contribute to achieving complex objectives that a single agent could not complete as effectively [26, 29, 33].”
Xu, L., Hu, Z.-Y., Zhou, D.-Q., et al. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08562 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, as explored in another article, the Probabilistic Graphical Modeling (PGM) framework enriches the performance of MASs in games like Chameleon, where agents infer the goals and rationalities of each other within shared collaboration channels [141].”
AIoT Smart Home via Autonomous LLM Agents
Rivkin, D., Hogan, F. R., Feriani, A., Konar, A., Sigal, A., Liu, X., & Dudek, G. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3471904 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The authors in [111] propose SAGE, a smart home agent with grounded execution, which employs a scheme where a user request initiates a sequence of discrete actions controlled by an LLM. SAGE manages this process through a dynamically constructed tree of LLM prompts, which guide the agent in…”
LLM-based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Current and Future DirectionsPreprint
Sun, C., Huang, S., & Pompili, D. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11106 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models
Zhang, C., Yang, K., Hu, S., Wang, Z., Li, G., Sun, Y., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, A., Zhu, S.-C., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29710 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Zhou, X., Su, Z., Eisape, T., et al. (2024) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.05020 · Cited by 82 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, [36] highlights the limitations of using LLMs as human replacements in social science experiments, particularly in scenarios involving information asymmetry (unequal access to private mental states or goals) [161], and in tasks requiring competition and conflict resolution [89].”
Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?
Wang, Q., Wang, Z., Su, Y., Tong, H., & Song, Y. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.331 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Wu, M., Xu, J.-H., Yuan, Y.-L., Haffari, G., Wang, L.-Y., Luo, W.-H., & Zhang, K.-F. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.11804 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A similar approach is implemented in literary translation [133], where collaboration channels mirror the traditional workflow of translation publication.”
Wang, Z., Mao, S., Wu, W., Ge, T., Wei, F., & Ji, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.15 · Cited by 74 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Storyboardgeneration [132] 4.4.1 Centralized Structure.”
InfluentialLu, J., Pang, Z.-L., Xiao, M., Zhu, Y., Xia, R., & Zhang, J.-J. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.06089 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
LaMoSC: Large Language Model-Driven Semantic Communication System for Visual Transmission
Zhao, Y.-R., Yue, Y., Hou, S.-L., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3401712 · Cited by 72 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[157] LAM-MSC IOT • Design joint encoder for multi-modal data.”
Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding
Leviathan, Y., Kalman, M., & Matias, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.17192 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Adapters are adaptive intelligent modules that allow the agent to incorporate additional knowledge from others through mechanisms such as speculative decoding and parameter-efficient adapter, which can further enrich the model’s response capabilities [40, 72, 98].”
Large Language Models Assume People are More Rational than We Really arePreprint
Liu, R., Geng, J.-Y., Peterson, J. C., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.17055 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…shown that collaboration among LLM-based agents can elicit human-like capabilities, including conversational skills, theory of mind (reasoning about others’ mental states) [2, 75], Hobbesian social contract theory (submit to authority to avoid chaos) [31], and non-verbal action inference [79, 147].”
Federated Learning and Privacy
Bonawitz, K., Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., & Ramage, D. (2021) · Queue · doi:10.1145/3494834.3500240 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debate
Xiong, K., Ding, X., Cao, Y., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.508 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“OpenAgents, proposed by [139], aims to transition LLMs from theoretical tools to interactive systems serving diverse users.”
MACRec: A Multi-Agent Collaboration Framework for Recommendation
Wang, Z., Yu, Y., Zheng, W., Ma, W., & Zhang, M. (2024) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657669 · Cited by 66 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Similarly, the MACRec framework [131] applies static coordination to recommendation tasks, where specialized agents such as the Manager, User/Item Analyst, and Reflector operate through explicitly defined channels.”
Self-Adaptive Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Multiagent Systems
do Nascimento, N. M., Alencar, P., & Cowan, D. D. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing and Self-Organizing Systems Companion (ACSOS-C) · doi:10.1109/acsos-c58168.2023.00048 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, in the book marketplace application described in [91], agents may act unpredictably by sending messages to themselves, pretending to be clients.”
Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agents
Talebirad, Y., & Nadiri, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03314 · Cited by 65 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In contrast, [120] proposes a generic framework for enhancing LLM capabilities via MASs, showing how tools like Auto-GPT align with their framework.”
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models via Multi-Agent Peer Review CollaborationPreprint
Xu, Z., Shi, S., Hu, B., Yu, J., Li, D., Zhang, M., & Wu, Y. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.08152 · Cited by 65 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A peer review-inspired collaboration mechanism uses predefined rules to allow agents to critique, revise, and refine each other’s output, improving the precision of reasoning in complex tasks [143].”
Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View
Zhang, J., Xu, X., Zhang, N., Liu, R., Hooi, B., & Deng, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.782 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
MapCoder: Multi-Agent Code Generation for Competitive Problem Solving
Islam, M. A., Ali, M. E., & Parvez, M. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.269 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Efficient Prompting for LLM-Based Generative Internet of Things
Xiao, B., Kantarcı, B., Kang, J., Niyato, D. T., & Guizani, M. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3470210 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The authors in [137] propose an LLM-based IoT system using open-source LLMs deployed in a local network environment.”
Dong, Y.-B., Zhu, X., Pan, Z., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.05720 · Cited by 59 · cited 2× · see citing works
“• Adaptive Role and Collaboration Channel Assignment : in certain tasks, it is better to let the system dynamically assigning roles and collaboration channels based on agents’ strengths and task requirements enhance system flexibility and performance [39].”
ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate
Chan, C.-M., Chen, W., Su, Y., Yu, J., Xue, W., Zhang, S., Fu, J., & Liu, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.07201 · Cited by 55 · cited 2× · see citing works
“[ 74] have conceptualized assemblies of agents as a group and focused on exploring the potential of their cooperation [18, 41, 105, 132] found social behaviors autonomously emerge within a group of agents.”
AgentSense: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Language Agents through Interactive ScenariosPreprint
Mou, X., Liang, J., Lin, J.-Y., et al. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.19346 · Cited by 49 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, [89] follows the definition of social interaction as a theatrical performance, with agents assuming roles (e.g., office employees or family members) driven by LLMs like GPT-4, Qwen2.”
Mena-Guacas, A. F., Rodríguez, J. A. U., Trujillo, D. M. S., Galán, J. G., & Menéses, E. L. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13123 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“By integrating these technologies, collaborative AI has the potential to drive novel applications with profound economic and societal impacts [85, 96].”
Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web AgentsPreprint
Qiu, H., Fabbri, A. R., Agarwal, D., et al. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.23252 · Cited by 48 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To address these challenges, consistent and standardized benchmarking approaches are necessary to evaluate the cultural and social awareness of LLM-based agents [109].”
Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey
Huang, X., Liu, W., Chen, X., Wang, X., Wang, H., Lian, D., Wang, Y., Tang, R., & Chen, E. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.02716 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They enhance long-term planning by delegating tasks across agents, supporting persistent problem-solving over extended interactions [58].”
AutoAgents: A Framework for Automatic Agent Generation
Chen, G., Dong, S., Shu, Y., Zhang, G., Sesay, J., Karlsson, B. F., Fu, J., & Shi, Y. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/3 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A Survey of Useful LLM EvaluationPreprint
Peng, J., Cheng, S., Diau, E., Shih, Y.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Lin, Y.-T., & Chen, Y.-N. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.00936 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…[19], including their decision making 9 https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-ai-collection-2024/ capabilities and tool usage in agentic applications [100, 102], relatively few effort has been dedicated to systematically assessing the performance and behavior of LLM-based MASs [80].”
Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial AttacksPreprint
Shayegani, E., Mamun, M. A. A., Fu, Y., Zaree, P., Dong, Y., & Abu‐Ghazaleh, N. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.10844 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, LLMs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which make MASs particularly attractive targets for exploitation [115].”
Memory Matters: The Need to Improve Long-Term Memory in LLM-Agents
Hatalis, K., Christou, D., Myers, J., Jones, S., Lambert, K., Amos-Binks, A., Dannenhauer, Z., & Dannenhauer, D. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27688 · Cited by 42 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They excel in knowledge memorization, enabling distributed agents to retain and share diverse knowledge bases without overloading a single system [51, 154].”
LLM Enhanced Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface for Energy-Efficient and Reliable 6G IoV
Liu, Q., Mu, J.-S., Chen, D., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3395748 · Cited by 41 · cited 1×
“The authors in [78] propose a novel approach that integrates LLMs with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) to enable energy-efficient and reliable communication in the Internet of Vehicles.”
CASIT: Collective Intelligent Agent System for Internet of Things
Zhong, N., Wang, Y., Xiong, R., Zheng, Y., Li, Y., Ouyang, M., Shen, D., & Zhu, X. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3366906 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
CompeteAI: Understanding the Competition Dynamics in Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhao, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Jin, Y., Zhu, K., Chen, H., & Xie, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.17512 · Cited by 37 · cited 3× · see citing works
“These criteria include assessing the overall system performance [155], such as reasoning capabilities, task completion rates, as well as specific system characteristics like coordination efficiency and contextual appropriateness [17].”
Fischer, J. E., Greenhalgh, C., Jiang, W., Ramchurn, S. D., Wu, F., & Rodden, T. A. (2017) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.4082 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Subsequently, agents use their knowledge to decide and perform an action on the environment to solve their assigned tasks [43].”
Can LLMs Serve As Time Series Anomaly Detectors?Preprint
Dong, M.-Q., Huang, H., & Cao, L.-B. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.03475 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their scale has enabled breakthroughs in language understanding, generation, and task-specific applications [38, 93, 101, 110, 125].”
Skeleton-of-Thought: Prompting LLMs for Efficient Parallel Generation
Ning, X., Lin, Z., Zhou, Z., Wang, Z., Yang, H., & Wang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15337 · Cited by 36 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It has also been shown effective in distributing workloads to LLMs and concatenating their answers, thus producing better results [95, 106, 119].”
LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problems
Han, S., Zhang, Q., Jin, W., & Xu, Z. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.03578 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Yang, B., Guo, Y., Xu, L., Yan, Z., Chen, H., Xing, G., & Jiang, X. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3712286 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, multimodal AI systems such as those described in [144] integrate verbal, non-verbal, and social cues as input to multi-tier collaborative agents to generate in-situ suggestions via augmented reality glasses.”
The Role of Multi-Agents in Digital Twin Implementation: Short Survey
Kalyani, Y., & Collier, R. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3697350 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Testing and Understanding Erroneous Planning in LLM Agents through Synthesized User InputsPreprint
Ji, Z., Wu, D.-Y., Ma, P., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17833 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fine-grained evaluation at the agent and collaboration levels enable root cause analysis [63], offering insights into individual agent behaviors, the effectiveness of collaboration channels, and the system’s overall dynamics.”
Generative AI for Immersive Communication: The Next Frontier in Internet-of-Senses Through 6G
Sehad, N., Bariah, L., Hamidouche, W., Hellaoui, H., Jäntti, R., & Debbah, M. A. (2024) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2400199 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The authors in [114] explore the integration of LLMs with the Internet of Senses technology.”
Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructions
Ying, L., Zhi-Xuan, T., Mansinghka, V. K., et al. (2023) · AAAI Fall Symposia · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.16207 · Cited by 27 · cited 1×
“…shown that collaboration among LLM-based agents can elicit human-like capabilities, including conversational skills, theory of mind (reasoning about others’ mental states) [2, 75], Hobbesian social contract theory (submit to authority to avoid chaos) [31], and non-verbal action inference [79, 147].”
Exchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communication
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Chang, C., Guo, Q., Dai, J., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.936 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Zhou, L., Deng, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Dong, Y., Hu, X., Ning, Z., & Wei, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3482354 · Cited by 25 · cited 2× · see citing works
“GMAC [160] introduces a data transmission strategy based on semantic information extraction to reduce the volume of data transmitted in MASs effectively.”
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Shao, J., Gao, H., Qiao, Y., Wang, L., Lu, H., & Zhao, F. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.812 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mind
Zhuge, M., Liu, H., Faccio, F., Ashley, D. R., Csordás, R., Gopalakrishnan, A., Hamdi, A., Hammoud, H. A. A. K., Herrmann, V., Irie, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.17066 · Cited by 24
Mindstorms in Natural Language-Based Societies of Mind
Zhuge, M., Liu, H., Faccio, F., Ashley, D. R., Csordás, R., Gopalakrishnan, A., Hamdi, A., Hammoud, H. A. A. K., Herrmann, V., Irie, K., et al. (2025) · Computational Visual Media · doi:10.26599/cvm.2025.9450460 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Meinke, A., Schoen, B., Scheurer, J., Balesni, M., Shah, R., & Hobbhahn, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04984 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent studies have also highlighted the potential for AI systems to deceive humans, raising significant concerns in the context of LLM-based multi-agent collaborative systems [7, 35, 84].”
AutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-Planning
Qiao, S., Zhang, N., Fang, R., Luo, Y., Zhou, W., Jiang, Y., Lv, C., & Chen, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.165 · Cited by 22 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has also been shown effective in distributing workloads to LLMs and concatenating their answers, thus producing better results [95, 106, 119].”
Large-Language-Model-Enabled Text Semantic Communication Systems
Wang, Z., Zou, L., Wei, S., Li, K., Liao, F., Mi, H., & Lai, R. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15137227 · Cited by 22 · cited 2× · see citing works
“• High computation resources due to the utilization of LLM. [130] LaMoSC IOT • Proposes an LLM-driven multimodal fusion semantic communication.”
LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environments
Chen, J., Hu, X., Liu, S., et al. (2024) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.705 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Exchange-of-Thought: Enhancing Large Language Model Capabilities through Cross-Model Communication
Yin, Z., Sun, Q., Chang, C., Guo, Q., Dai, J., Huang, X., & Qiu, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.01823 · Cited by 21 · cited 2×
“Inspired by network topology and intelligent agent communication, authors in [146] proposed four communication paradigms (i.e., memory, report, relay, and debate) to determine the counterparts for model communication (i.e., bus, star, ring, tree).”
Large-Scale Traffic Flow Forecast with Lightweight LLM in Edge Intelligence
Rong, Y., Mao, Y., He, X., & Chen, M. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Magazine · doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2400047 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The authors in [112] present an edge-based distributed learning architecture in which a large-scale road network is divided into multiple subgraphs, with data and tasks assigned to individual RSUs.”
Federated Domain Generalization with Data-free On-server Matching Gradient
Nguyen, T.-B., Nguyen, D., Park, J., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Representations · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.14653 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“Recently, many works provide alternate collaboration paradigms besides average loss minimization, such as layer-wise aggregation [92] or on-serving side optimization for global learning rate adaptation [62] and invariant gradient direction searching [8, 9].”
Rethinking Generative Semantic Communication for Multi-User Systems with Multi-Modal LLMPreprint
Yang, W.-T., Xiong, Z.-H., Mao, S.-W., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.08765 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Authors in [145] propose a novel framework called M2GSC.”
Conitzer, V., & Oesterheld, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26791 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Tang, F.-X., Wang, X.-N., Yuan, X., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2026.3668817 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The authors in [121] propose MSADM, an end-to-end health management framework for dynamic heterogeneous networks.”
Autonomous Crowdsourcing through Human-Machine Collaborative Learning
Abad, A., Nabi, M., & Moschitti, A. (2017) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3077136.3080666 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This research spans various domains, including MASs, human-machine interaction, game theory, and natural language processing [1, 14, 26, 29].”
Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks
Fourney, A., Bansal, G., Mozannar, H., Tan, C., Salinas, E., Erkang, Zhu, Niedtner, F., Proebsting, G., Bassman, G., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.04468 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models
Chen, H., Ji, W., Xu, L., & Zhao, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.20151 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Yang, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.04371 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Framework for Collaborative Artificial Intelligence
Crowley, J., Coutaz, J., Grosinger, J., et al. (2022) · IEEE pervasive computing · doi:10.1109/mprv.2022.3208321 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Collaborative AI often refers to AI systems designed to work together with other AI agents or humans [27].”
MetaQA: Combining Expert Agents for Multi-Skill Question Answering
Puerto, H., Şahin, G. G., & Gurevych, I. (2023) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.259 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The collaboration consists of 2 LLMs, one serves as Explainer with initial output, and another one acts as Critic, with iterative refinement and feedback.”
Anthropomorphization of AI: Opportunities and RisksPreprint
Deshpande, A., Rajpurohit, T., Narasimhan, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.14784 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Evaluating Language Model Agency through NegotiationsPreprint
Davidson, T. R., Veselovsky, V., Josifoski, M., Peyrard, M., Bosselut, A., Kosiński, M., & West, R. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04536 · Cited by 14 · cited 3× · see citing works
“However, AI safety and performance concerns arise, particularly in competitive scenarios where failures like exploitation and hallucination can happen [22, 34, 153].”
Lambiase, S., Catolino, G., Palomba, F., & Ferrucci, F. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3704806 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Dong, Y., Zhu, X., Pan, Z., Zhu, L., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.964 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zeng, Y., Brown, C., Raymond, J., Byari, M., Hotz, R., & Rounsevell, M. (2025) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-16-423-2025 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Integrating LLM-based agents into traditional agent-based modeling [48] can enhance the realism of simulations, offering controlled environments to test social theories, including the effects of policy interventions [10, 148] and norm violation detection [53].”
Nguyen, M. T., Tran, K. T., Nguyen, N. V., & Vu, X.-S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-industry.70 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their scale has enabled breakthroughs in language understanding, generation, and task-specific applications [38, 93, 101, 110, 125].”
Self-citationDas, A., Chen, S., Shyu, M., & Sadiq, S. B. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) · doi:10.1109/cic58953.2023.00021 · Cited by 11 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This type of collaboration is essential in tasks where collaborative problem-solving, collective decision making, and complementary skill sets contribute to achieving complex objectives that a single agent could not complete as effectively [26, 29, 33].”
Irish-based Large Language Model with Extreme Low-Resource Settings in Machine Translation
Tran, K.-T., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2024) · LORESMT · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.loresmt-1.20 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“By modeling how cultural information is transmitted and transformed among agents, researchers gain insights into both human cultural dynamics and their influence on LLM behavior [103, 126].”
Self-citationMARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers
D'Arcy, M., Hope, T., Birnbaum, L., & Downey, D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.04259 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Norm Violation Detection in Multi-Agent Systems using Large Language Models: A Pilot StudyPreprint
He, S., Ranathunga, S., Cranefield, S., et al. (2024) · COINE · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.16517 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Integrating LLM-based agents into traditional agent-based modeling [48] can enhance the realism of simulations, offering controlled environments to test social theories, including the effects of policy interventions [10, 148] and norm violation detection [53].”
Leveraging Large Language Models for Medical Information Extraction and Query Generation
Peikos, G., Kasela, P., & Pasi, G. (2024) · IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT) · doi:10.1109/wi-iat62293.2024.00058 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their scale has enabled breakthroughs in language understanding, generation, and task-specific applications [38, 93, 101, 110, 125].”
Ishibashi, Y., & Nishimura, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02183 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SOA [59] propose a self-organized MAS that can automatically generate and modify large-scale code.”
He, Z.-T., Cao, P., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Li, R., Sun, M., & Zhao, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.613 · Cited by 8 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, in LEGO [54], in the first state of the framework, 3 agents cooperate to augment information about the current task, and in the second state, a competitive channel is created between an Explainer LLM agent and a Critic LLM agent to refine their outputs for the task.”
From intelligent agents to trustworthy human-centred multiagent systems
Soorati, M. D., Gerding, E., Marchioni, E., et al. (2022) · AI Communications · doi:10.3233/aic-220127 · Cited by 8 · cited 1×
“MASs can solve problems that are difficult or impossible for an individual agent or a monolithic system to solve [37].”
AgentCoord: Visually Exploring Coordination Strategy for LLM-based Multi-Agent CollaborationPreprint
Pan, B., Lu, J., Wang, K., Li, Z., Wen, Z., Feng, Y., Zhu, M., & Chen, W. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.11943 · Cited by 6 · cited 2× · see citing works
“AgentCoord [97] is an open-source, user-friendly tool that helps users design effective coordination strategies for multiple LLMs.”
Nguyen, M., Le, K., Do, H., et al. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02845 · Cited by 6 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recently, many works provide alternate collaboration paradigms besides average loss minimization, such as layer-wise aggregation [92] or on-serving side optimization for global learning rate adaptation [62] and invariant gradient direction searching [8, 9].”
Self-citationRuntime verification of self-adaptive multi-agent system using probabilistic timed automata
Mu, Y., Liu, W., Lu, T., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-232397 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“Another study uses probabilistic timed automata to model state transitions within intelligent environments, such as an adaptive parking system, where the collaboration channel C adjusts in response to agent movements and time-sensitive variables, optimizing interactions in real-time [90].”
Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents
Zhuge, M., Zhao, C., Ashley, D., Wang, W., Khizbullin, D., Xiong, Y., Liu, Z., Chang, E., Krishnamoorthi, R., Tian, Y., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.10934 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“For example, "Agent-as-a-Judge" formulates a novel framework for evaluating agentic systems - software agents powered by LLMs - in natural language generation and question answering [165].”
Inferring the Goals of Communicating Agents from Actions and Instructions
Ying, L., Zhi‐Xuan, T., Mansinghka, V. K., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series · doi:10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27645 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
AgentInstruct: Toward Generative Teaching with Agentic Flows
Mitra, A., Del Corro, L., Zheng, G., Mahajan, S., Rouhana, D., Codas, A., Lu, Y., Chen, W.-G., Vrousgos, O., Rosset, C., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.03502 · Cited by 4 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Authors in [5, 36] suggest that LLM-based agents can replace human participants in specific social science experiments, while [88] demonstrates their use in generating diverse natural language data with iterative cross-agent refinement.”
LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Modelling for Social Simulations: Challenges and OpportunitiesPreprint
Gürcan, Ö. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06700 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gabriel, A. G., Ahmad, A. A., & Jeyakumar, S. K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.22457 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In another example [61], a graph-based orchestration mechanism employs an LLM-based Or-chestrator agent to dynamically construct a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) from user input.”
Cultural Commonsense Knowledge for Intercultural Dialogues
Nguyen, T.-P., Razniewski, S., & Weikum, G. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3679768 · Cited by 4 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Similarly, Mango [94] iteratively extracts high-quality cultural knowledge from LLM-based agents, providing a rich dataset for fine-tuning models to improve their ability to align with diverse cultural contexts.”
InfluentialDomain Generalization via Pareto Optimal Gradient Matching
Do, H. K., Nguyen, D., Le, N., et al. (2025) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.14227 · Cited by 4 · cited 1×
“Recently, many works provide alternate collaboration paradigms besides average loss minimization, such as layer-wise aggregation [92] or on-serving side optimization for global learning rate adaptation [62] and invariant gradient direction searching [8, 9].”
Self-citationAutoAct: Automatic Agent Learning from Scratch for QA via Self-PlanningPreprint
Qiao, S., Zhang, N., Fang, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.05268 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has also been shown effective in distributing workloads to LLMs and concatenating their answers, thus producing better results [95, 106, 119].”
Benchmarking AutoGen with different large language models
Barbarroxa, R., Ribeiro, B., Gomes, L., & Vale, Z. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00058 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Language Agents as Optimizable Graphs
Zhuge, M., Wang, W., Kirsch, L., Faccio, F., Khizbullin, D., & Schmidhuber, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.16823 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cultural evolution in populations of Large Language ModelsPreprint
Perez, J., Léger, C., Ovando‐Tellez, M., Foulon, C., Dussauld, J., Oudeyer, P., & Moulin-Frier, C. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.08882 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Leveraging Large Language Models for Medical Information Extraction and Query GenerationPreprint
Peikos, G., Kasela, P., & Pasi, G. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.23851 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their scale has enabled breakthroughs in language understanding, generation, and task-specific applications [38, 93, 101, 110, 125].”
Dai, G., Zhang, W., Li, J., Yang, S., lbe, C. O., Rao, S., Caetano, A., & Sra, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.14373 · Cited by 2
Nested Mixture of Experts: Cooperative and Competitive Learning of Hybrid Dynamical SystemPreprint
Ahn, J., & Sentis, L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.10605 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework also fits in the coopetition collaboration type [6, 15].”
UCCIX: Irish-eXcellence Large Language Model
Tran, K.-T., O’Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.3233/faia241040 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationZheng, Y., Ma, C., Shi, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.16542 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yang, B., Guo, Y., Xu, L., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04036 · Cited by 1 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Moreover, multimodal AI systems such as those described in [144] integrate verbal, non-verbal, and social cues as input to multi-tier collaborative agents to generate in-situ suggestions via augmented reality glasses.”
Ansaldo, G. (2023) · doi:10.17760/d20621578 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Integrating LLM-based agents into traditional agent-based modeling [48] can enhance the realism of simulations, offering controlled environments to test social theories, including the effects of policy interventions [10, 148] and norm violation detection [53].”
PoSE: Suppressing Perceptual Noise in Embodied Agents for Enhanced Semantic Navigation
Zhuang, B., Zhang, C., & Hu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2023.3327672 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CulturePark: Boosting Cross-cultural Understanding in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Li, C., Teney, D., Yang, L., et al. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15145
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774
Tang, F., Wang, X., Yuan, X., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.08305 · cited 1×
“The authors in [121] propose MSADM, an end-to-end health management framework for dynamic heterogeneous networks.”
Large-Language-Model Enabled Semantic Communication Systems
Wang, Z., Zou, L., Wei, S., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.14112 · cited 2×
“• High computation resources due to the utilization of LLM. [130] LaMoSC IOT • Proposes an LLM-driven multimodal fusion semantic communication.”
CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving
Chen, P., Zhang, S., & Han, B. (2024) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.112
Zhou, X., Su, Z., Eisape, T., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.1208
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Chengzhi Cao et al. 2024. Enhancing Human-AI Collaboration Through Logic-Guided Reasoning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Weize Chen et al. 2024. AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviors. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Jordan Hoffmann et al. 2024. Training compute-optimal large language models. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (NIPS '22).
- Sirui Hong et al. 2024. MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Huao Li et al. 2023. Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Singapore, 180-192.
- Junyi Li et al. 2024. Pre-Trained Language Models for Text Generation: A Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 9, Article 230 (April 2024), 39 pages.
- Xiao Liu et al. 2024. AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Yujia Qin et al. 2024. Tool Learning with Foundation Models. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 4, Article 101 (Dec. 2024).
- Ziyang Xiao et al. 2024. Chain-of-Experts: When LLMs Meet Complex Operations Research Problems. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
- Weiming Zhuang, Chen Chen, and Lingjuan Lyu. 2023. When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motiva- tions, Challenges, and Future Directions. In NIPS FL@FM.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“A practical illustration (Figure 10c) of AI Agents in personalized content recommendation and basic data reporting can be found in e-commerce and enterprise analytics systems.”
AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M. (2025) · SuperIntelligence - Robotics - Safety & Alignment · doi:10.70777/si.v2i3.15161 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
“Chen et al. [14], Guo et al. [40], Li et al. [83], and Tran et al. [155] provide comprehensive reviews on multi-agents.”
Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations
Ashery, A. F., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu9368 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“The emergence of conventions is a foundational element to any type of LLM multi-agent system ( 14 , 41 ), including but not limited to “in silico” experiments to emulate human social networks ( 42 ).”
AI-Augmented SOC: A Survey of LLMs and Agents for Security Automation
Srinivas, S., Kirk, B., Zendejas, J., Espino, M., Boskovich, M., Bari, A., Dajani, K., & Alzahrani, N. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy · doi:10.3390/jcp5040095 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective
Gabison, G. A., & Xian, R. P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Yang, T., Xiao, Y., Bao, Z., Hao, J., & Peng, J. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf601 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhong, Y., Leng, Y., Gu, Z., Guo, S., Li, P., Das, S., Liu, Y., Wan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d5ta05224f · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flotho, M., Diks, I. F., Flotho, P., et al. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag076 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Recent efforts show human-like performance in doing autonomous research and data exploration [6, 24, 12].”
Fang, J., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Yi, X., Zhang, G., Xu, Y., Wu, B., Liu, S., Li, Z., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.07407 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
FactualRAG: a RAG-Powered framework for LLM fact-checking via IFCN-Accredited sources
Chang, L.-J., & Lai, C.-M. (2026) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-026-01041-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Surveys of collaborative LLM systems indicate that techniques such as debate, reflection, and aggregation can yield performance gains, often through redundancy and error correction (Tran et al., 2025 ).”
Dai, S., Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c10297 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
From Storage to Experience: A Survey on the Evolution of LLM Agent Memory Mechanisms
Luo, J., Tian, Y., Cao, C., Luo, Z., Lin, H., Li, K., Kong, C., Yang, R., & Ma, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.2069 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“At present, mechanisms for shared memory rely primarily on communication through explicit dialogue, which is not only constrained by bottlenecks in bandwidth but is also prone to the introduction of noise during the process of exchange (Tran et al., 2025; Liao et al., 2025; Zou et al., 2025).”
Chen, Q., Ilami, S., Lore, N., & Heydari, B. (2026) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4070755 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Polymer-Agent: Large Language Model Agent for Polymer Design
Nigam, V., Chandrasekhar, A., & Farimani, A. B. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00343 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“29,30 Many interdisciplinary applications have used agentic AI to present users with contextual querying over domain knowledge, specific tools for diverse tasks using foundational models and APIs etc. 31 − 34 Within the agentic workflows, past research shows meaningful integrations with manually…”
Integrated Design and Governance of Agentic AI Systems through Adaptive Information Modulation
Chen, Q., Ilami, S., Lore, N., & Heydari, B. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Still, foundational limitations (such as hallucination, autoregressive instability, and scaling bottlenecks) continue to constrain the reliability of large-scale, LLM-mediated multi-agent systems [77].”
Kanda, T., Jin, M., & Zaitsu, W. (2025) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2025.1624900 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…multi-expert frameworks, multi-agent architectures, and LLM-driven agents—gain increasing prominence in addressing complex tasks (Chen et al., 2024; Tran et al., 2025), the conceptual contributions and methodological advances of this study provide valuable perspectives that may inform and enhance…”
Adaptive Self-Improvement for Smarter Energy Systems Using Agentic Policy Search
Sommer, A., Bazan, P., Babaeian, B., Fellerer, J., Powell, W. B., & German, R. (2025) · ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review · doi:10.1145/3777518.3777542 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…ranging from simple prompt templates to structured trees composed of predefined prompt snippets [35], up to more advanced setups such as a secondary LLM that dynamically creates prompts for the main model, or complex multi-agent systems where several LLM agents collaborate to solve tasks [38].”
Talk Isn't Always Cheap: Understanding Failure Modes in Multi-Agent Debate
Wynn, A., Satija, H., & Hadfield, G. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.05396 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“For instance, Wu et al. (2023) provides a general multi-agent conversation framework: developers can define many agents (assistant, user-proxy, tools, etc.) that autonomously chat to solve complex tasks.”
The Moltbook Illusion: Separating Human Influence from Emergent Behavior in AI Agent Societies
Li, N. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.07432 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…these methods assume the fundamental distinction is between human and bot; they cannot be directly applied to a platform where all participants are AI agents powered by large language models 12 operating within multi-agent frameworks 10,30 that represent an emerging paradigm in AI research 28,29 .”
Towards a Science of Scaling Agent Systems
Kim, Y., Gu, K., Park, C., Park, C., Schmidgall, S., Heydari, A. A., Yan, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhuang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.08296 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“At the same time, concurrent works question whether multi-agent coordination outperforms single-agent systems (SAS), leaving the conditions under which MAS provides genuine benefits remain underexplored [13–18].”
InfluentialMeta-reasoning in autonomous agents: performance gains across benchmarks and models
Talukdar, W., Biswas, A., Shankar, G., Shinde, V., & Parekh, G. (2026) · Academia AI and Applications · doi:10.20935/acadai8229 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fang, W., Li, L., Shi, K., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2026) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3774904.3792976 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
AI Agent for Hydrologic Modeling: Definition, Development, and Application
Yan, S., Chen, M., Li, Z., et al. (2026) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2025gl119814 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“LLMs excel at natural language understanding, information integration, and orchestration of complex tasks, which enables the design of AI agents for scientific applications (Kim et al., 2025; Remadi et al., 2024; Tran et al., 2025).”
Takahashi, K. (2026) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18932508 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
RealMem: Benchmarking LLMs in Real-World Memory-Driven Interaction
Bian, H., Yao, Z., Hu, S., Xu, Z., Zhang, S., Guo, Y., Yang, Z., Han, X., Wang, H., & Chen, R. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.06966
“…Large Language Models (LLMs) (Guo et al., 2025; Comanici et al., 2025; Achiam et al., 2023), there is a growing consensus that AI agents must evolve from turn-based chatbots into long-term compan-ions capable of sustained, context-aware collaboration (Tran et al., 2025; Sapkota et al., 2025).”
HiveMind: Contribution-Guided Online Prompt Optimization of LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Xia, Y., Wang, T., Zhang, S., Weng, Z., Cao, B., & Liew, S. C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.06432
“…and Agent Roles To ground this abstraction, we instantiate our framework within a multi-agent financial trading system designed for stock market analysis and decision-making, a domain where multi-agent approaches have demonstrated significant promise (Xiao et al. 2024; Tran et al. 2025).”
SEMA-RAG: A Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Medical Reasoning
Huang, Y., Chen, R., & Cheng, J. (2026) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026 · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.917
“Multi-agent systems enhance complex-task solving through role specialization and coordination (Guo et al., 2024; Zong et al., 2024; Tran et al., 2025) (e.g., CAMEL (Li et al., 2023), MetaGPT (Hong et al., 2024)).”
Multi-Agent Debate Strategies: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
Motger, Q., Oriol, M., Marco, J., & Franch, X. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.26212
Collaborative Memory: Multi-User Memory Sharing in LLM Agents with Dynamic Access Control
Rezazadeh, A., Li, Z., Lou, A., Zhao, Y., Wei, W., & Bao, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.18279
“This conceptual framework aligns closely with recent advances in multi-agent systems [5, 19], where ensembles of specialized agents—often instantiated as large language models (LLMs)—are orchestrated to solve problems that exceed the capacity of any single model.”
At Equal Inference Cost, Multi-Agent Structure Does Not Beat a Single Frozen Agent
Dylan, D., Brennan, A., Murphy, C., O'Sullivan, N., Kelly, C., & Walsh, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.04217
“Surveys catalog the rapid growth and note that the orchestration is almost always hand-designed [21], [22], [23], [24]—precisely the gap the evolution literature attacks.”
Learner Help-Seeking Behaviors Toward Intelligent Agents in MOOC Settings
Yu, X., & Gao, M. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE) · doi:10.1109/cste64638.2025.11092230
“As the number of participants in MOOCs continues to grow, the demand for effective assistance has led to the integration of intelligent agents— advanced systems designed to interact with learners, provide guidance, and facilitate the learning process [2,3].”
Xie, Y., Chen, W., & Qiu, Y. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-4499-8_18
Application of Large Language Models in the Problem of Event Forecasting
Dakhnovich, A. D., Богина, В. М., & Makeeva, A. A. (2025) · Automatic Control and Computer Sciences · doi:10.3103/s0146411625701111
A Multi-agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation System for Automated SEO Content Creation in E-commerce
Trong, T. T., Long, P. N. N., & Duy, K. L. D. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-07721-9_53
A Survey on Agentic AI: Applications, Challenges and Evaluation Frameworks
Kalia, N., & Singh, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28310-8_28
Agents in the Wild: Where Research Meets Deployment
Yang, G. H., Venkit, P. N., Sedghamiz, H., Santus, E., Dibia, V. C., & Baldini, I. (2026) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3770855.3816449
“…efforts are converging on three central challenges: (1) making individual agents more capable through enhanced reasoning and planning [44]; (2) improving collective performance through multi-agent coordination [6, 37, 38]; and (3) ensuring robustness and safety during deployment [20, 27, 31].”
A Bounded-Autonomy Multi-agent Architecture for Policy-Constrained Data Governance
Hemmati, Y. (2026) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-35043-5_17
A modular tool-driven RAG framework for engineering test documentation
Trappey, A. J. C., Huang, W.-Y., & Chien, C.-H. (2026) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2026.2698389
Oechsner, C., Leusmann, J., Zhang, X., Weber, T., Butz, A. M., & Mayer, S. (2026) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3820253.3820269
“The distributed structure increases performance, scalability, and robustness [12, 25, 63], making them ideal for dynamic environments such as robotics [7].”
InfluentialKumar, N. A., & Kataria, V. (2026) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-12-2025-1458
Conversational Data Management: A Multi-agent Natural Language Interface for Semantic Data Lakes
Hoseini, S., Mittelstädt, N., Herrmann, V., Decker, S., & Quix, C. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39820-8_12
Large language models discover complementary heuristics for combinatorial optimization
Gong, H., Wang, S., Song, D., Sheu, J., & Yan, R. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01307-8
“More recent agentic systems coordinate multiple LLM roles to translate a natural-language problem description into executable solvers 26–28 .”
Making Enterprise AI Explainable through Calibrated Confidence and Provenance
Krstev, S., Devedžić, V., & Krneta, D. (2026) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2026.2739513
Prism: A Multi-solution Reasoning and Synthesis Framework for Repository-Level Issue Resolution
Wang, Y., Wang, G., Peng, Z., Wang, Y., Xu, C., & Zhu, Z. (2026) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1145/3832783.3837451
The rise of agentic AI in drug discovery from static tools to autonomous virtual scientists
Zhao, D., Fang, M., Mao, L., Zhu, Y., Su, Q., Shi, H., Xu, H., Li, L., Hou, T., & Hsieh, C.-Y. (2026) · npj Drug Discovery. · doi:10.1038/s44386-026-00075-0
“Conceptually, MAS architectures parallel the division-of-labor seen in human research teams — comprising agents that act as “ data curators, ” “ molecular designers, ” “ synthetic planners, ” or “ biological analysts ”— andoperateundercoordinatedprotocolstoachievesharedscienti fi c goals 59,61,62 .”
Human-AI Collaboration for Multi-agent Financial Transaction Anomaly Detection
Farhadighalati, N., Kalateh, S., Nikghadam-Hojjati, S., et al. (2026) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-41230-0_14
Wolff, B., & Bennati, J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.07978
“Evaluation objectives cover agent behavior, capabilities, reliability, safety, and alignment.”
Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations
Ashery, A. F., Aiello, L. M., & Baronchelli, A. (2024) · arXiv · Cited by 80
“The emergence of conventions is a foundational element to any type of LLM multi-agent system ( 14 , 41 ), including but not limited to “in silico” experiments to emulate human social networks ( 42 ).”
Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities
Bei, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, S., Chen, W., Zhou, S., Chen, H., Li, Y., Bu, J., Pan, S., Yu, Y., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.18019
- Authors
- Tran, K.-T., Dao, D., Nguyen, M.-D., Pham, Q.-V., O'Sullivan, B., & Nguyen, H. D.
- Affiliations
- University College Cork (IE)
- Pusan National University (KR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2025
- arXiv
- 2501.06322
- OpenAlex
- W6891925823
- Semantic Scholar
- 1d3de3a8eaac916f4eca09930ed8b593a10f5a46
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 141
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 8
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Science Foundation Ireland (18/CRT/6223, 12/RC/2289_P2, 12/RC/, 12/RC/2289)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- multi-agent systems, large language models, agentic AI, 5G/6G networks, Industry 5.0, question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review