PreprintCited by 1Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningTopic ModelingExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Assessing biomedical knowledge robustness in large language models by query-efficient sampling attacks

Open access
Xian, R. Patrick, Lee, Alex J., Lolla, Satvik, Wang, Vincent, Cui, Qiming, Ro, Russell, Abbasi-Asl, Reza·2024·arXiv

Abstract

The increasing depth of parametric domain knowledge in large language models (LLMs) is fueling their rapid deployment in real-world applications. Understanding model vulnerabilities in high-stakes and knowledge-intensive tasks is essential for quantifying the trustworthiness of model predictions and regulating their use. The recent discovery of named entities as adversarial examples (i.e. adversarial entities) in natural language processing tasks raises questions about their potential impact on the knowledge robustness of pre-trained and finetuned LLMs in high-stakes and specialized domains. We examined the use of type-consistent entity substitution as a template for collecting adversarial entities for billion-parameter LLMs with biomedical knowledge. To this end, we developed an embedding-space attack based on powerscaled distance-weighted sampling to assess the robustness of their biomedical knowledge with a low query budget and controllable coverage. Our method has favorable query efficiency and scaling over alternative approaches based on random sampling and blackbox gradient-guided search, which we demonstrated for adversarial distractor generation in biomedical question answering. Subsequent failure mode analysis uncovered two regimes of adversarial entities on the attack surface with distinct characteristics and we showed that entity substitution attacks can manipulate token-wise Shapley value explanations, which become deceptive in this setting. Our approach complements standard evaluations for high-capacity models and the results highlight the brittleness of domain knowledge in LLMs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2402.10527

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xian et al. (2024) develops a query-efficient adversarial sampling method, which leverages power-scaled distance-weighted sampling (PDWS) to generate realistic adversarial distractions in clinical queries, effectively testing robustness under adversarial conditions.

    “Xian et al. ( 2024) develops a query-efficient adversarial sampling method, which leverages power-scaled distanceweighted sampling (PDWS) to generate realistic adversarial distractions (e.g., disease and pharmaceutical entities) in clinical queries, effectively testing robustness under adversarial conditions.”

    From Trustworthy Medical Question Answering: An Evaluation-Centric Survey (2025) · cites this paper as Xian et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. David Alvarez-Melis and Tommi S. Jaakkola. On the Robustness of Interpretability Methods, June 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08049. arXiv:1806.08049 [cs, stat]. · arXiv
  2. Moustafa Alzantot, Yash Sharma, Ahmed Elgohary, Bo-Jhang Ho, Mani Srivastava, and Kai-Wei Chang. Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2890-2896, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2018. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D18-1316. URL http://aclweb.org/anthology/ D18-1316. · DOI
  3. Giovanni Apruzzese, Hyrum S. Anderson, Savino Dambra, David Freeman, Fabio Pierazzi, and Kevin Roundy. "Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Re- search and Practice. In 2023 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML), pp. 339-364, February 2023. doi: 10.1109/SaTML54575.2023.00031. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee. org/document/10136152. · DOI
  4. Isabelle Augenstein, Timothy Baldwin, Meeyoung Cha, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, David Corney, Renee DiResta, Emilio Ferrara, Scott Hale, Alon Halevy, Eduard Hovy, Heng Ji, Fil- ippo Menczer, Ruben Miguez, Preslav Nakov, Dietram Scheufele, Shivam Sharma, and Giovanni Zagni. Factuality challenges in the era of large language models and opportunities for fact-checking. Nature Ma- chine Intelligence, 6(8):852-863, August 2024. ISSN 2522-5839. doi: 10.1038/s42256-024-00881-z. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-024-00881-z. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Anas Awadalla, Mitchell Wortsman, Gabriel Ilharco, Sewon Min, Ian Magnusson, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, and Ludwig Schmidt. Exploring The Landscape of Distributional Robustness for Question Answering Models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pp. 5971-5987, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.441. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-emnlp.441. · DOI
  6. Nathaniel Berger, Stefan Riezler, Sebastian Ebert, and Artem Sokolov. Don't Search for a Search Method - Simple Heuristics Suffice for Adversarial Text Attacks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 8216-8224, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.647. URL https://aclanthology.org/ 2021.emnlp-main.647. · DOI
  7. O. Bodenreider. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research, 32(90001):267D-270, jan 2004. ISSN 1362-4962. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh061. URL https: //academic.oup.com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkh061. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ovalle, Kai-Wei Chang, Yang Trista Cao, Ninareh Mehrabi, Jieyu Zhao, Aram Galstyan, Jwala Dhamala, Anoop Kumar, and Rahul Gupta (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP 2024), pp. 109-117, Mexico City, Mexico, June 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.trustnlp-1.11. URL https://aclanthology.org/2024.trustnlp-1. · DOI
  9. Dhawaleswar Rao CH and Sujan Kumar Saha. Automatic Multiple Choice Question Generation From Text: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(1):14-25, jan 2020. ISSN 1939-1382. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2018.2889100. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8585151/. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Joyce Y. Chai and Rong Jin. Discourse Structure for Context Question Answering. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Pragmatics of Question Answering at HLT-NAACL 2004, pp. 23-30, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, May 2004. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/W04-2504.
  11. Patrick Chao, Alexander Robey, Edgar Dobriban, Hamed Hassani, George J. Pappas, and Eric Wong. Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries. arXiv, pp. 2310.08419, oct 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.08419. · arXiv
  12. Hugh Chen, Ian C. Covert, Scott M. Lundberg, and Su-In Lee. Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributions. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(6):590-601, may 2023. ISSN 2522-5839. doi: 10. 1038/s42256-023-00657-x. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-023-00657-x. · DOI
  13. Minhao Cheng, Thong Le, Pin-Yu Chen, Huan Zhang, JinFeng Yi, and Cho-Jui Hsieh. Query-Efficient Hard- label Black-box Attack: An Optimization-based Approach. September 2019. URL https://openreview. net/forum?id=rJlk6iRqKX.
  14. Youngduck Choi, Chill Yi-I. Chiu, and David Sontag. Learning Low-Dimensional Representations of Medical Concepts. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Transla- tional Science, 2016:41-50, 2016. ISSN 2153-4063.
  15. Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Webson, Shixiang Shane Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suzgun, Xinyun Chen, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Alex Castro-Ros, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Dasha Valter, Sharan Narang, Gaurav Mishra, Adams Yu, Vincent Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew Dai, Hongkun Yu, Slav Petrov, Ed H. Chi, Jeff Dean, Jacob Devlin, Adam Roberts, Denny Zhou, Quoc V. Le, and Jason Wei. Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(70): 1-53, 2024. ISSN 1533-7928. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v25/23-0870.html.
  16. Jan Clusmann, Fiona R. Kolbinger, Hannah Sophie Muti, Zunamys I. Carrero, Jan-Niklas Eckardt, Narmin Ghaffari Laleh, Chiara Maria Lavinia Löffler, Sophie-Caroline Schwarzkopf, Michaela Unger, Gregory P. Veldhuizen, Sophia J. Wagner, and Jakob Nikolas Kather. The future landscape of large language models in medicine. Communications Medicine, 3(1):141, October 2023. ISSN 2730-664X. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00370-1. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-023-00370-1. · DOI · Paper page
  17. A. P. Davis, C. G. Murphy, C. A. Saraceni-Richards, M. C. Rosenstein, T. C. Wiegers, and C. J. Mattingly. Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: a knowledgebase and discovery tool for chemical-gene-disease networks. Nucleic Acids Research, 37(Database):D786-D792, jan 2009. ISSN 0305-1048. doi: 10.1093/ nar/gkn580. URL https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkn580. · DOI
  18. Tim Dettmers and Luke Zettlemoyer. The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Laws. In Proceed- ings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7750-7774. PMLR, July 2023. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/dettmers23a.html.
  19. John C. Duchi, Michael I. Jordan, Martin J. Wainwright, and Andre Wibisono. Optimal Rates for Zero- Order Convex Optimization: The Power of Two Function Evaluations. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 61(5):2788-2806, May 2015. ISSN 0018-9448, 1557-9654. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2015.2409256. URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7055287/. · DOI
  20. Salijona Dyrmishi, Salah Ghamizi, and Maxime Cordy. How do humans perceive adversarial text? A reality check on the validity and naturalness of word-based adversarial attacks. In Anna Rogers, Jor- dan Boyd-Graber, and Naoaki Okazaki (eds.), Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 8822-8836, Toronto, Canada, July 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.491. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.491. · DOI
  21. Yanai Elazar, Nora Kassner, Shauli Ravfogel, Abhilasha Ravichander, Eduard Hovy, Hinrich Schütze, and Yoav Goldberg. Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models. Transac- tions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:1012-1031, dec 2021. ISSN 2307-387X. doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00410. URL https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/doi/10.1162/tacl_a_00410/ 107384/Measuring-and-Improving-Consistency-in-Pretrained. · DOI
  22. Wee Chung Gan and Hwee Tou Ng. Improving the Robustness of Question Answering Systems to Question Paraphrasing. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 6065-6075, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/ v1/P19-1610. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1610. · DOI
  23. Ji Gao, Jack Lanchantin, Mary Lou Soffa, and Yanjun Qi. Black-Box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifiers. In 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pp. 50-56. IEEE, may 2018. ISBN 978-1-5386-8276-0. doi: 10.1109/SPW.2018.00016. URL https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8424632/. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Matt Gardner, Jonathan Berant, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Alon Talmor, and Sewon Min. Question answering is a format; when is it useful?, September 2019. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.11291. arXiv:1909.11291 · arXiv
  25. Tianyu Han, Lisa C. Adams, Jens-Michalis Papaioannou, Paul Grundmann, Tom Oberhauser, Alexander Löser, Daniel Truhn, and Keno K. Bressem. MedAlpaca -An Open-Source Collection of Medical Con- versational AI Models and Training Data, October 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08247. arXiv:2304.08247 [cs. · arXiv
  26. Leif Hancox-Li. Robustness in machine learning explanations: does it matter? In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 640-647, New York, NY, USA, January 2020. ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-6936-7. doi: 10.1145/3351095.3372836. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/ 10.1145/3351095.3372836. · DOI
  27. Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Anish Athalye, and Jessy Lin. Black-box Adversarial Attacks with Limited Queries and Information. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2137-2146. PMLR, July 2018. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/ilyas18a.html.
  28. Robin Jia and Percy Liang. Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2021-2031, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D17-1215. URL http://aclweb.org/anthology/D17-1215. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Di Jin, Eileen Pan, Nassim Oufattole, Wei-Hung Weng, Hanyi Fang, and Peter Szolovits. What Disease Does This Patient Have? A Large-Scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Exams. Applied Sciences, 11(14):6421, jul 2021. ISSN 2076-3417. doi: 10.3390/app11146421. URL https://www. mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/14/6421. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Aneta Koleva, Martin Ringsquandl, and Volker Tresp. Adversarial Attacks on Tables with Entity Swap. In Joint Proceedings of Workshops at the 49th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2023), Vancouver, Canada, volume 3462 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2023. URL https://ceur-ws. org/Vol-3462/TADA4.pdf.
  31. Tiffany H. Kung, Morgan Cheatham, Arielle Medenilla, Czarina Sillos, Lorie De Leon, Camille Elepaño, Maria Madriaga, Rimel Aggabao, Giezel Diaz-Candido, James Maningo, and Victor Tseng. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2):e0000198, feb 2023. ISSN 2767-3170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198. URL https: //dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198. · DOI · Paper page
  32. Emanuele La Malfa, Min Wu, Luca Laurenti, Benjie Wang, Anthony Hartshorn, and Marta Kwiatkowska. Assessing Robustness of Text Classification through Maximal Safe Radius Computation. In Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 2949-2968, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/ 2020.findings-emnlp.266. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.findings-emnlp.266. · DOI
  33. Pierre L'Ecuyer and George Yin. Budget-Dependent Convergence Rate of Stochastic Approximation. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8(1):217-247, 1998. doi: 10.1137/S1052623495270723. URL https://epubs. siam.org/doi/10.1137/S1052623495270723. Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. · DOI
  34. Eric Lehman, Evan Hernandez, Diwakar Mahajan, Jonas Wulff, Micah J Smith, Zachary Ziegler, Daniel Nadler, Peter Szolovits, Alistair Johnson, and Emily Alsentzer. Do We Still Need Clinical Language Models? In Bobak J Mortazavi, Tasmie Sarker, Andrew Beam, and Joyce C Ho (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, volume 209 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 578-597. PMLR, 2023. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v209/eric23a.html.
  35. Xinzhe Li, Ming Liu, Shang Gao, and Wray Buntine. A Survey on Out-of-Distribution Evaluation of Neural NLP Models. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 6683-6691, California, aug 2023a. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. ISBN 978-1-956792-03-4. doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2023/749. URL https://www.ijcai.org/ proceedings/2023/749. · DOI
  36. Zehan Li, Xin Zhang, Yanzhao Zhang, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, and Meishan Zhang. Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learning, August 2023b. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2308.03281. arXiv:2308.03281 [cs. · arXiv
  37. Chris Lin, Ian Covert, and Su-In Lee. On the Robustness of Removal-Based Feature At- tributions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:79613-79666, De- cember 2023. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2023/hash/ fbbda4e85a6641bf425be3a6cfd84d20-Abstract-Conference.html.
  38. Aiwei Liu, Honghai Yu, Xuming Hu, Shu'ang Li, Li Lin, Fukun Ma, Yawen Yang, and Lijie Wen. Character- level White-Box Adversarial Attacks against Transformers via Attachable Subwords Substitution. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 7664- 7676, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022. emnlp-main.522. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.522. · DOI
  39. Siru Liu, Aileen P Wright, Barron L Patterson, Jonathan P Wanderer, Robert W Turer, Scott D Nelson, Allison B McCoy, Dean F Sittig, and Adam Wright. Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(7): 1237-1245, July 2023. ISSN 1527-974X. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad072. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ jamia/ocad072. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Valentin Liévin, Christoffer Egeberg Hother, Andreas Geert Motzfeldt, and Ole Winther. Can large language models reason about medical questions? Patterns, 5(3):100943, March 2024. ISSN 2666- 3899. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.100943. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S2666389924000424. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Shayne Longpre, Kartik Perisetla, Anthony Chen, Nikhil Ramesh, Chris DuBois, and Sameer Singh. Entity- Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 7052-7063, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.565. URL https://aclanthology.org/ 2021.emnlp-main.565. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Rishabh Maheshwary, Saket Maheshwary, and Vikram Pudi. A Strong Baseline for Query Efficient Attacks in a Black Box Setting. In Marie-Francine Moens, Xuanjing Huang, Lucia Specia, and Scott Wen-tau Yih (eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 8396-8409, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 2021. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.661. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021. emnlp-main.661. · DOI
  43. Danaë Metaxa, Joon Sung Park, Ronald E. Robertson, Karrie Karahalios, Christo Wilson, Jeff Hancock, and Christian Sandvig. Auditing Algorithms: Understanding Algorithmic Systems from the Outside In. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction, 14(4):272-344, 2021. ISSN 1551-3955. doi: 10.1561/1100000083. URL http://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/HCI-083. · DOI
  44. Sunil Mohan and Donghui Li. MedMentions: A Large Biomedical Corpus Annotated with UMLS Concepts. In Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC), 2019. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id= SylxCx5pTQ.
  45. Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Alhussein Fawzi, Omar Fawzi, and Pascal Frossard. Universal Adversarial Perturbations. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 86- 94. IEEE, jul 2017. ISBN 978-1-5386-0457-1. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.17. URL http://ieeexplore. ieee.org/document/8099500/. · DOI · Paper page
  46. John Morris, Eli Lifland, Jack Lanchantin, Yangfeng Ji, and Yanjun Qi. Reevaluating Adversarial Examples in Natural Language. In Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu (eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 3829-3839, Online, November 2020a. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.341. URL https://aclanthology. org/2020.findings-emnlp.341. · DOI
  47. John Morris, Eli Lifland, Jin Yong Yoo, Jake Grigsby, Di Jin, and Yanjun Qi. TextAttack: A Framework for Adversarial Attacks, Data Augmentation, and Adversarial Training in NLP. In Qun Liu and David Schlangen (eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing: System Demonstrations, pp. 119-126, Online, October 2020b. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.16. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.emnlp-demos. · DOI
  48. Maximilian Mozes, Pontus Stenetorp, Bennett Kleinberg, and Lewis Griffin. Frequency-Guided Word Sub- stitutions for Detecting Textual Adversarial Examples. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, pp. 171-186, Strouds- burg, PA, USA, 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.13. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.eacl-main.13. Nikola Mrkšić, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Blaise Thomson, Milica Gašić, Lina M. Rojas-Barahona, Pei-Hao Su, David Vandyke, Tsung-Hsien Wen, and Steve Young. Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguis- tic Constraints. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 142-148, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2016. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N16-1018. URL http: //aclweb.org/anthology/N16-1018. · DOI
  49. W. James Murdoch, Chandan Singh, Karl Kumbier, Reza Abbasi-Asl, and Bin Yu. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116 (44):22071-22080, oct 2019. ISSN 0027-8424. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900654116. URL https://pnas.org/ doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1900654116. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Harikrishna Narasimhan, Aditya Krishna Menon, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Neha Gupta, and Sanjiv Kumar. Learning to Reject Meets Long-tail Learning. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=ta26LtNq2r.
  51. Yurii Nesterov and Vladimir Spokoiny. Random Gradient-Free Minimization of Convex Functions. Foun- dations of Computational Mathematics, 17(2):527-566, April 2017. ISSN 1615-3383. doi: 10.1007/ s10208-015-9296-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-015-9296-2. · DOI
  52. Mark Neumann, Daniel King, Iz Beltagy, and Waleed Ammar. ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processing. In Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task, pp. 319-327, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/ W19-5034. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-5034. · DOI
  53. Maximilian Noppel and Christian Wressnegger. SoK: Explainable Machine Learning in Adversarial Envi- ronments. In 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 21. IEEE Computer Society, oct 2024. ISBN 9798350331301. doi: 10.1109/SP54263.2024.00021. URL https://www.computer.org/csdl/ proceedings-article/sp/2024/313000a021/1RjE9XVNjnW. · DOI
  54. Harsha Nori, Yin Tat Lee, Sheng Zhang, Dean Carignan, Richard Edgar, Nicolo Fusi, Nicholas King, Jonathan Larson, Yuanzhi Li, Weishung Liu, Renqian Luo, Scott Mayer McKinney, Robert Osazuwa Ness, Hoifung Poon, Tao Qin, Naoto Usuyama, Chris White, and Eric Horvitz. Can Generalist Founda- tion Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicine. arXiv, pp. 2311.16452, nov 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16452. · arXiv
  55. Ankit Pal, Logesh Kumar Umapathi, and Malaikannan Sankarasubbu. MedMCQA: A Large-scale Multi- Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answering. In Gerardo Flores, George H Chen, Tom Pollard, Joyce C Ho, and Tristan Naumann (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, volume 174 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 248-260. PMLR, 2022. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v174/pal22a.html.
  56. Nicolas Papernot, Patrick McDaniel, and Ian Goodfellow. Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples. arXiv, pp. 1605.07277, may 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.07277. · arXiv
  57. Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexan- der Miller. Language Models as Knowledge Bases? In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 2463-2473, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1250. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D19-1250. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Pouya Pezeshkpour and Estevam Hruschka. Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questions. arXiv, pp. 2308.11483, aug 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11483. · arXiv
  59. C.Radhakrishna Rao. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach. Theoretical Population Biology, 21(1):24-43, feb 1982. ISSN 00405809. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(82)90004-1. URL https:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0040580982900041. · DOI
  60. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Kentaro Inui, Jing Jiang, Vincent Ng, and Xiaojun Wan (eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 3982-3992, Hong Kong, China, November 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1410. URL https://aclanthology.org/D19-1410. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Shuhuai Ren, Yihe Deng, Kun He, and Wanxiang Che. Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples through Probability Weighted Word Saliency. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1085-1097, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P19-1103. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1103. · DOI
  62. Kyle Richardson and Ashish Sabharwal. What Does My QA Model Know? Devising Controlled Probes Using Expert Knowledge. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:572-588, dec 2020. ISSN 2307-387X. doi: 10.1162/tacl_a_00331. URL https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/96481. · DOI
  63. Joshua Robinson and David Wingate. Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answering. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=yKbprarjc5B.
  64. Omid Rohanian, Mohammadmahdi Nouriborji, and David A. Clifton. Exploring the Effectiveness of In- struction Tuning in Biomedical Language Processing, December 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2401.00579. arXiv:2401.00579 [cs. · arXiv
  65. Tom Roth, Yansong Gao, Alsharif Abuadbba, Surya Nepal, and Wei Liu. Token-modification adversar- ial attacks for natural language processing: A survey. AI Communications, Pre-press:1-22, January 2024. ISSN 0921-7126. doi: 10.3233/AIC-230279. URL https://content.iospress.com/articles/ ai-communications/aic230279. Publisher: IOS Press. · DOI
  66. Khaled Saab, Tao Tu, Wei-Hung Weng, Ryutaro Tanno, David Stutz, Ellery Wulczyn, Fan Zhang, Tim Strother, Chunjong Park, Elahe Vedadi, Juanma Zambrano Chaves, Szu-Yeu Hu, Mike Schaekermann, Aishwarya Kamath, Yong Cheng, David G. T. Barrett, Cathy Cheung, Basil Mustafa, Anil Palepu, Daniel McDuff, Le Hou, Tomer Golany, Luyang Liu, Jean-baptiste Alayrac, Neil Houlsby, Nenad Tomasev, Jan Freyberg, Charles Lau, Jonas Kemp, Jeremy Lai, Shekoofeh Azizi, Kimberly Kanada, SiWai Man, Kavita Kulkarni, Ruoxi Sun, Siamak Shakeri, Luheng He, Ben Caine, Albert Webson, Natasha Latysheva, Melvin Johnson, Philip Mansfield, Jian Lu, Ehud Rivlin, Jesper Anderson, Bradley Green, Renee Wong, Jonathan Krause, Jonathon Shlens, Ewa Dominowska, S. M. Ali Eslami, Katherine Chou, Claire Cui, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu, James Manyika, Jeff Dean, Demis Hassabis, Yossi Matias, Dale Webster, Joelle Barral, Greg Corrado, Christopher Semturs, S. Sara Mahdavi, Juraj Gottweis, Alan Karthikesalingam, and Vivek Natarajan. Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine, May 2024. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/2404.18416. arXiv:2404.18416 [cs]. · arXiv
  67. Priyanka Sen and Amir Saffari. What do Models Learn from Question Answering Datasets? In Pro- ceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 2429-2438, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/ 2020.emnlp-main.190. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.190. · DOI
  68. Erfan Shayegani, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, Yu Fu, Pedram Zaree, Yue Dong, and Nael Abu-Ghazaleh. Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks, October 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10844. arXiv:2310.10844 [cs. · arXiv
  69. Satya Narayan Shukla, Anit Kumar Sahu, Devin Willmott, and Zico Kolter. Simple and Efficient Hard Label Black-box Adversarial Attacks in Low Query Budget Regimes. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD '21, pp. 1461-1469, New York, NY, USA, August 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 978-1-4503-8332-5. doi: 10.1145/3447548. 3467386. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467386. · DOI
  70. Chenglei Si, Zhe Gan, Zhengyuan Yang, Shuohang Wang, Jianfeng Wang, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber, and Lijuan Wang. Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=98p5x51L5af.
  71. Karan Singhal, Shekoofeh Azizi, Tao Tu, S. Sara Mahdavi, Jason Wei, Hyung Won Chung, Nathan Scales, Ajay Tanwani, Heather Cole-Lewis, Stephen Pfohl, Perry Payne, Martin Seneviratne, Paul Gam- ble, Chris Kelly, Abubakr Babiker, Nathanael Schärli, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Philip Mansfield, Dina Demner-Fushman, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Dale Webster, Greg S. Corrado, Yossi Matias, Katherine Chou, Juraj Gottweis, Nenad Tomasev, Yun Liu, Alvin Rajkomar, Joelle Barral, Christopher Sem- turs, Alan Karthikesalingam, and Vivek Natarajan. Large language models encode clinical knowl- edge. Nature, 620(7972):172-180, aug 2023. ISSN 0028-0836. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.13138https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06291-2. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Karthik Soman, Peter W Rose, John H Morris, Rabia E Akbas, Brett Smith, Braian Peetoom, Catalina Villouta-Reyes, Gabriel Cerono, Yongmei Shi, Angela Rizk-Jackson, Sharat Israni, Charlotte A Nelson, Sui Huang, and Sergio E Baranzini. Biomedical knowledge graph-enhanced prompt generation for large language models. arXiv, pp. 2311.17330, nov 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17330. · arXiv
  73. Giovanni Spitale, Nikola Biller-Andorno, and Federico Germani. AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humans. Science Advances, 9(26), jun 2023. ISSN 2375-2548. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh1850. URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh1850. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Mujeen Sung, Jinhyuk Lee, Sean Yi, Minji Jeon, Sungdong Kim, and Jaewoo Kang. Can Language Models be Biomedical Knowledge Bases? In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 4723-4734, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2021. Association for Computational Linguis- tics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.388. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.388. · DOI
  75. Yi Tay, Mostafa Dehghani, Vinh Q. Tran, Xavier Garcia, Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Hyung Won Chung, Dara Bahri, Tal Schuster, Steven Zheng, Denny Zhou, Neil Houlsby, and Donald Metzler. UL2: Unifying language learning paradigms. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=6ruVLB727MC.
  76. Robert Tinn, Hao Cheng, Yu Gu, Naoto Usuyama, Xiaodong Liu, Tristan Naumann, Jianfeng Gao, and Hoifung Poon. Fine-tuning large neural language models for biomedical natural language processing. Patterns, 4(4):100729, apr 2023. ISSN 26663899. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100729. URL https:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666389923000697. · DOI
  77. Oleg Ursu, Jayme Holmes, Jeffrey Knockel, Cristian G. Bologa, Jeremy J. Yang, Stephen L. Mathias, Stuart J. Nelson, and Tudor I. Oprea. DrugCentral: online drug compendium. Nucleic Acids Research, 45(D1):D932-D939, jan 2017. ISSN 0305-1048. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw993. URL https://academic.oup. com/nar/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/nar/gkw993. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Nikhil Kandpal, Matt Gardner, and Sameer Singh. Universal Adversarial Trig- gers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Process- ing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 2153-2162, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019a. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1221. URL https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D19-1221. · DOI · Paper page
  79. Eric Wallace, Pedro Rodriguez, Shi Feng, Ikuya Yamada, and Jordan Boyd-Graber. Trick Me If You Can: Human-in-the-Loop Generation of Adversarial Examples for Question Answering. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:387-401, nov 2019b. ISSN 2307-387X. doi: 10.1162/tacl_ a_00279. URL https://direct.mit.edu/tacl/article/43493. · DOI
  80. Benyou Wang, Qianqian Xie, Jiahuan Pei, Zhihong Chen, Prayag Tiwari, Zhao Li, and Jie Fu. Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3):55:1- 55:52, October 2023a. ISSN 0360-0300. doi: 10.1145/3611651. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3611651. · DOI
  81. Yanshan Wang, Sijia Liu, Naveed Afzal, Majid Rastegar-Mojarad, Liwei Wang, Feichen Shen, Paul Kings- bury, and Hongfang Liu. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 87:12-20, November 2018. ISSN 1532-0464. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018. 09.008. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046418301825. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Yubo Wang, Xueguang Ma, and Wenhu Chen. Augmenting Black-box LLMs with Medical Text- books for Clinical Question Answering, September 2023b. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02233. arXiv:2309.02233 [cs. · arXiv
  83. Chih-Hsuan Wei, Alexis Allot, Robert Leaman, and Zhiyong Lu. PubTator central: automated concept anno- tation for biomedical full text articles. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(W1):W587-W593, jul 2019. ISSN 0305- 1048. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz389. URL https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/47/W1/W587/5494727. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Gerhard Weikum, Xin Luna Dong, Simon Razniewski, and Fabian Suchanek. Machine Knowledge: Creation and Curation of Comprehensive Knowledge Bases. Foundations and Trends® in Databases, 10(2-4):108- 490, 2021. ISSN 1931-7883. doi: 10.1561/1900000064. URL http://www.nowpublishers.com/article/ Details/DBS-064. · DOI
  85. Michael Wornow, Yizhe Xu, Rahul Thapa, Birju Patel, Ethan Steinberg, Scott Fleming, Michael A. Pfeffer, Jason Fries, and Nigam H. Shah. The shaky foundations of large language models and foundation models for electronic health records. npj Digital Medicine, 6(1):135, jul 2023. ISSN 2398-6352. doi: 10.1038/ s41746-023-00879-8. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00879-8. · DOI · Paper page
  86. Chao-Yuan Wu, R. Manmatha, Alexander J. Smola, and Philipp Krähenbühl. Sampling matters in deep embedding learning. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2859-2867, October 2017. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.309. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8237571. · DOI
  87. Jun Yan, Yang Xiao, Sagnik Mukherjee, Bill Yuchen Lin, Robin Jia, and Xiang Ren. On the Robustness of Reading Comprehension Models to Entity Renaming. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 508-520, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2022. naacl-main.37. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.37. Puyudi Yang, Jianbo Chen, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Jane-Ling Wang, and Michael I Jordan. Greedy Attack and Gum- bel Attack: Generating Adversarial Examples for Discrete Data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(43):1-36, 2020. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-569.html. · DOI
  88. Zhen Yu, Zhenhua Chen, and Kun He. Query-Efficient Textual Adversarial Example Generation for Black- Box Attacks. In Kevin Duh, Helena Gomez, and Steven Bethard (eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 556-569, Mexico City, Mexico, June 2024. Association for Com- putational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.31. URL https://aclanthology.org/2024. naacl-long. · DOI
  89. Zheng Yuan, Zhengyun Zhao, Haixia Sun, Jiao Li, Fei Wang, and Sheng Yu. CODER: Knowledge-infused cross-lingual medical term embedding for term normalization. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 126: 103983, feb 2022. ISSN 15320464. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103983. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier. com/retrieve/pii/S1532046421003129. · DOI
  90. Wei Emma Zhang, Quan Z. Sheng, Ahoud Alhazmi, and Chenliang Li. Adversarial Attacks on Deep-learning Models in Natural Language Processing. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 11 (3):1-41, jun 2020. ISSN 2157-6904. doi: 10.1145/3374217. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/ 3374217. · DOI
  91. Wayne Xin Zhao, Kun Zhou, Junyi Li, Tianyi Tang, Xiaolei Wang, Yupeng Hou, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Junjie Zhang, Zican Dong, Yifan Du, Chen Yang, Yushuo Chen, Zhipeng Chen, Jinhao Jiang, Ruiyang Ren, Yifan Li, Xinyu Tang, Zikang Liu, Peiyu Liu, Jian-Yun Nie, and Ji-Rong Wen. A Survey of Large Language Models. arXiv, pp. 2303.18223, mar 2023. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18223. · arXiv
  92. Chujie Zheng, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, and Minlie Huang. Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectors. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=shr9PXz7T0.
  93. Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, J. Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson. Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models, December 2023. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/2307.15043. arXiv:2307.15043 [cs]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xian, R. P., Lee, A. J., Lolla, S., Wang, V., Cui, Q., Ro, R., & Abbasi-Asl, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391940853
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM067547)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
large language models, adversarial examples, named entities, biomedical question answering, failure mode analysis, model credibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review