PreprintCited by 1Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Zero-shot cross-modal transfer of reinforcement learning policies through a global workspace

Open access
Maytié, Léopold, Devillers, Benjamin, Arnold, Alexandre, VanRullen, Rufin·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Humans perceive the world through multiple senses, enabling them to create a comprehensive representation of their surroundings and to generalize information across domains. For instance, when a textual description of a scene is given, humans can mentally visualize it. In fields like robotics and Reinforcement Learning (RL), agents can also access information about the environment through multiple sensors; yet redundancy and complementarity between sensors is difficult to exploit as a source of robustness (e.g. against sensor failure) or generalization (e.g. transfer across domains). Prior research demonstrated that a robust and flexible multimodal representation can be efficiently constructed based on the cognitive science notion of a 'Global Workspace': a unique representation trained to combine information across modalities, and to broadcast its signal back to each modality. Here, we explore whether such a brain-inspired multimodal representation could be advantageous for RL agents. First, we train a 'Global Workspace' to exploit information collected about the environment via two input modalities (a visual input, or an attribute vector representing the state of the agent and/or its environment). Then, we train a RL agent policy using this frozen Global Workspace. In two distinct environments and tasks, our results reveal the model's ability to perform zero-shot cross-modal transfer between input modalities, i.e. to apply to image inputs a policy previously trained on attribute vectors (and vice-versa), without additional training or fine-tuning. Variants and ablations of the full Global Workspace (including a CLIP-like multimodal representation trained via contrastive learning) did not display the same generalization abilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2403.04588

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have used AI to test predictions of AST and GWT.

    “For example, recent studies have used AI to test predictions of AST [ 75,76] and GWT [ 77,78].”

    From Identifying indicators of consciousness in AI systems (2026) · cites this paper as [78]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bernard J. Baars. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1988.
  2. Stanislas Dehaene, Michel Kerszberg, and Jean-Pierre Changeux. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(24): 14529-14534, November 1998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/ full/10.1073/pnas.95.24.14529. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Benjamin Devillers, Bhavin Choksi, Romain Bielawski, and Rufin VanRullen. Does language help generalization in vision models? In Arianna Bisazza and Omri Abend (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 171-182, Online, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.conll-1.13. URL https: //aclanthology.org/2021.conll-1. · DOI
  4. Benjamin Devillers, Léopold Maytié, and Rufin VanRullen. Semi-Supervised Multimodal Rep- resentation Learning Through a Global Workspace. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, pp. 1-15, 2024. ISSN 2162-2388. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3416701. RLJ | RLC 2024 URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10580966. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Yilun Du, Chuang Gan, and Phillip Isola. Curious Representation Learning for Embodied Intelligence. pp. 10408-10417, 2021. URL https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/ ICCV2021/html/Du_Curious_Representation_Learning_for_Embodied_Intelligence_ICCV_ 2021_paper.html.
  6. Chelsea Finn, Xin Yu Tan, Yan Duan, Trevor Darrell, Sergey Levine, and Pieter Abbeel. Deep spatial autoencoders for visuomotor learning. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 512-519. IEEE, 2016.
  7. David Friede, Christian Reimers, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, and Mathias Niepert. Learning Disentan- gled Discrete Representations. In Danai Koutra, Claudia Plant, Manuel Gomez Rodriguez, Elena Baralis, and Francesco Bonchi (eds.), Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 593-609, Cham, 2023. Springer Nature Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-031-43421-1. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43421-1_35. · DOI
  8. Abhishek Gupta, Coline Devin, YuXuan Liu, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Learning Invariant Feature Spaces to Transfer Skills with Reinforcement Learning, March 2017. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1703.02949. arXiv:1703.02949 [cs]. · arXiv
  9. David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber. World Models. March 2018. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1207631. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10122. arXiv:1803.10122 [cs, stat]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, and Timothy P. Lillicrap. Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models. CoRR, abs/2301.04104, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2301.04104. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Irina Higgins, Arka Pal, Andrei Rusu, Loic Matthey, Christopher Burgess, Alexander Pritzel, Matthew Botvinick, Charles Blundell, and Alexander Lerchner. DARLA: improving zero-shot transfer in reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Ma- chine Learning -Volume 70, ICML'17, pp. 1480-1490, Sydney, NSW, Australia, August 2017. JMLR.org.
  12. Douwe Kiela and Stephen Clark. Multi-and Cross-Modal Semantics Beyond Vision: Grounding in Auditory Perception. In Lluís Màrquez, Chris Callison-Burch, and Jian Su (eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2461-2470, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2015. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/ D15-1293. URL https://aclanthology.org/D15-1293. · DOI
  13. Michael Laskin, Aravind Srinivas, and Pieter Abbeel. CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Repre- sentations for Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5639-5650. PMLR, November 2020. URL https://proceedings.mlr. press/v119/laskin20a.html. ISSN: 2640-3498.
  14. Michelle A. Lee, Yuke Zhu, Krishnan Srinivasan, Parth Shah, Silvio Savarese, Li Fei-Fei, Animesh Garg, and Jeannette Bohg. Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Self-Supervised Learning of Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Tasks. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 8943-8950, May 2019. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793485. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8793485. ISSN: 2577-087X. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1928- 1937. PMLR, June 2016. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/mniha16.html. ISSN: 1938-7228.
  16. Hai Pham, Paul Pu Liang, Thomas Manzini, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Barnabás Póczos. Found in Translation: Learning Robust Joint Representations by Cyclic Translations between Modalities. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(01):6892-6899, July 2019. ISSN 2374-3468. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016892. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/ article/view/4666. Number: 01. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, Gretchen Krueger, and Ilya Sutskever. Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8748-8763. PMLR, July 2021. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a.html. ISSN: 2640-3498.
  18. Antonin Raffin, Ashley Hill, Adam Gleave, Anssi Kanervisto, Maximilian Ernestus, and Noah Dor- mann. Stable-baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(268):1-8, 2021. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/20-1364.html.
  19. John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms, August 2017. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347. arXiv:1707.06347 [cs. · arXiv
  20. Carina Silberer and Mirella Lapata. Grounded Models of Semantic Representation. In Jun'ichi Tsujii, James Henderson, and Marius Paşca (eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learn- ing, pp. 1423-1433, Jeju Island, Korea, July 2012. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/D12-1130.
  21. Rui Silva, Miguel Vasco, Francisco S Melo, Ana Paiva, and Manuela Veloso. Playing Games in the Dark: An Approach for Cross-Modality Transfer in Reinforcement Learning. Proceed ings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pp. pp. 1260-1268, 2020.
  22. Kunal Pratap Singh, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. Scene Graph Contrastive Learning for Embodied Navigation. In 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 10850-10860, Paris, France, October 2023. IEEE. ISBN 9798350307184. doi: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00999. URL https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/10377327/. · DOI · Paper page
  23. R.S. Sutton and A.G. Barto. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 9(5):1054-1054, 1998. doi: 10.1109/TNN.1998.712192. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rufin VanRullen and Ryota Kanai. Deep learning and the Global Workspace Theory. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(9):692-704, September 2021. ISSN 0166-2236, 1878-108X. doi: 10.1016/j.tins. 2021.04.005. URL https://www.cell.com/trends/neurosciences/abstract/S0166-2236(21) 00077-1. Publisher: Elsevier. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Xin Wang, Hong Chen, Yuwei Zhou, Jianxin Ma, and Wenwu Zhu. Disentangled Representation Learning for Recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(1):408-424, January 2023. ISSN 1939-3539. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3153112. URL https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9720218. Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. · DOI
  26. Manuel Watter, Jost Springenberg, Joschka Boedecker, and Martin Riedmiller. Em- bed to Control: A Locally Linear Latent Dynamics Model for Control from Raw Im- ages. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 28.
  27. Curran Asso- ciates, Inc., 2015. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2015/hash/ a1afc58c6ca9540d057299ec3016d726-Abstract.html. Webots. http://www.cyberbotics.com. URL http://www.cyberbotics.com.
  28. Hang Yin, Francisco Melo, Aude Billard, and Ana Paiva. Associate Latent Encodings in Learn- ing from Demonstrations. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1), February 2017. ISSN 2374-3468. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11040. URL https://ojs.aaai.org/ index.php/AAAI/article/view/11040. Number: 1. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maytié, L., Devillers, B., Arnold, A., & VanRullen, R.
Affiliations
Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (FR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
OpenAlex
W4392617537
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-P3IA-0004, ANR‐19, ANR-21-FAI2-0005)
  • Région Occitanie Pyrénées-Méditerranée
  • HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101096017)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
global workspace, cross-modal transfer, zero-shot transfer, reinforcement learning policy, multimodal representation, brain-inspired models, contrastive learning, CLIP, domain generalization, sensor failure robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review