Cited by 349Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Self-Supervised Learning of Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Tasks

Open access
Lee, Michelle A., Zhu, Yuke, Srinivasan, Krishnan, Shah, Parth, Savarese, Silvio, Fei-Fei, Li, Garg, Animesh, Bohg, Jeannette·2019·2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

Contact-rich manipulation tasks in unstructured environments often require both haptic and visual feedback. However, it is non-trivial to manually design a robot controller that combines modalities with very different characteristics. While deep reinforcement learning has shown success in learning control policies for high-dimensional inputs, these algorithms are generally intractable to deploy on real robots due to sample complexity. We use self-supervision to learn a compact and multimodal representation of our sensory inputs, which can then be used to improve the sample efficiency of our policy learning. We evaluate our method on a peg insertion task, generalizing over different geometry, configurations, and clearances, while being robust to external perturbations. We present results in simulation and on a real robot.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra.2019.8793485

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Ngiam, A. Khosla, M. Kim, J. Nam, H. Lee, and A. Y. Ng, "Mul- timodal deep learning", in Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11), 2011, pp. 689-696.
  2. J. Oh, X. Guo, H. Lee, R. L. Lewis, and S. Singh, "Action- conditional video prediction using deep networks in atari games", in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, pp. 2863- 2871.
  3. N. Srivastava and R. R. Salakhutdinov, "Multimodal learning with deep boltzmann machines", in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012, pp. 2222-2230.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, M. A., Zhu, Y., Srinivasan, K., Shah, P., Savarese, S., Fei-Fei, L., Garg, A., & Bohg, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
8943-8950
ISSN
1050-4729 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897170587
Cited by
349
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 27
FWCI
83.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Toyota Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
self-supervised learning, multimodal representation, contact-rich manipulation, robotic manipulation, sample efficiency, deep reinforcement learning, peg insertion, vision and touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review