PreprintCited by 62AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

A Multimodal Knowledge-enhanced Whole-slide Pathology Foundation Model

Open access
Xu, Yingxue, Wang, Yihui, Zhou, Fengtao, Ma, Jiabo, Jin, Cheng, Yang, Shu, Li, Jinbang, Zhang, Zhengyu +11 more·2024·arXiv

Abstract

Remarkable strides in computational pathology have been made in the task-agnostic foundation model that advances the performance of a wide array of downstream clinical tasks. Despite the promising performance, there are still several challenges. First, prior works have resorted to either vision-only or image-caption data, disregarding pathology reports with more clinically authentic information from pathologists and gene expression profiles which respectively offer distinct knowledge for versatile clinical applications. Second, the current progress in pathology FMs predominantly concentrates on the patch level, where the restricted context of patch-level pretraining fails to capture whole-slide patterns. Even recent slide-level FMs still struggle to provide whole-slide context for patch representation. In this study, for the first time, we develop a pathology foundation model incorporating three levels of modalities: pathology slides, pathology reports, and gene expression data, which resulted in 26,169 slide-level modality pairs from 10,275 patients across 32 cancer types, amounting to over 116 million pathological patch images. To leverage these data for CPath, we propose a novel whole-slide pretraining paradigm that injects the multimodal whole-slide context into the patch representation, called Multimodal Self-TAught PRetraining (mSTAR). The proposed paradigm revolutionizes the pretraining workflow for CPath, enabling the pathology FM to acquire the whole-slide context. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to incorporate three modalities at the whole-slide context for enhancing pathology FMs. To systematically evaluate the capabilities of mSTAR, we built the largest spectrum of oncological benchmark, spanning 7 categories of oncological applications in 15 types of 97 practical oncological tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2407.15362

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New types of foundation models have recently been proposed for encoding entire WSIs into slide-level general-purpose feature representations.

    “To overcome these limitations, new types of foundation models have recently been proposed for encoding entire WSIs into slide-level general-purpose feature representations57–72.”

    From A multimodal whole-slide foundation model for pathology (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [3][3] Ming Y Lu, Bowen Chen, Drew FK Williamson, Richard J Chen, Ivy Liang, Tong Ding, Guillaume Jaume, Igor Odintsov, Long Phi Le, Georg Gerber, et al. A visuallanguage foundation model for computational pathology. Nature Medicine , 30(3):863-874, 2024. -
  2. [5][5] Saghir Alfasly, Peyman Nejat, Sobhan Hemati, Jibran Khan, Isaiah Lahr, Areej Alsaafin, Abubakr Shafique, Nneka Comfere, Dennis Murphree, Chady Meroueh, et al. When is a foundation model a foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11510 , 2023. - · arXiv
  3. [6][6] Gemini Team, Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Yonghui Wu, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , 2023. - · arXiv
  4. [7][7] Muhammad Uzair Khattak, Hanoona Rasheed, Muhammad Maaz, Salman Khan, and Fahad Shahbaz Khan. Maple: Multimodal prompt learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 19113-19122, 2023. -
  5. [11][11] Maximilian Ilse, Jakub Tomczak, and Max Welling. Attention-based deep multiple instance learning. In International conference on machine learning , pages 2127-2136. PMLR, 2018. -
  6. [13][13] Zhuchen Shao, Hao Bian, Yang Chen, Yifeng Wang, Jian Zhang, Xiangyang Ji, et al. Transmil: Transformer based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classification. Advances in neural information processing systems , 34:2136-2147, 2021. -
  7. [21][21] Hanwen Xu, Naoto Usuyama, Jaspreet Bagga, Sheng Zhang, Rajesh Rao, Tristan Naumann, Cliff Wong, Zelalem Gero, Javier Gonz´ alez, Yu Gu, et al. A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data. Nature , pages 1-8, 2024. -
  8. [25][25] Gaurav Mendiratta, Eugene Ke, Meraj Aziz, David Liarakos, Melinda Tong, and Edward C Stites. Cancer gene mutation frequencies for the us population. Nature communications , 12(1):5961, 2021. -
  9. [26][26] Mike R Wilson, Jake J Reske, Jeanne Holladay, Genna E Wilber, Mary Rhodes, Julie Koeman, Marie Adams, Ben Johnson, RenWei Su, Niraj R Joshi, et al. Arid1a and pi3-kinase pathway mutations in the endometrium drive epithelial transdifferentiation and collective invasion. Nature communications , 10(1):3554, 2019. -
  10. [34][34] Ian F Pollack, Sydney D Finkelstein, Judith Burnham, Emiko J Holmes, Ronald L Hamilton, Allan J Yates, Jonathan L Finlay, Richard Sposto, and Children's Cancer Group. Age and tp53 mutation frequency in childhood malignant gliomas: results in a multi-institutional cohort. Cancer research , 61(20):7404-7407, 2001. -
  11. [36][36] Hironori Tashiro, Marian S Blazes, Rong Wu, Kathleen R Cho, Shikha Bose, Steven I Wang, Jing Li, Ramon Parsons, and Lora Hedrick Ellenson. Mutations in pten are frequent in endometrial carcinoma but rare in other common gynecological malignancies. Cancer research , 57(18):3935-3940, 1997. -
  12. [40][40] Yilan Zhang, Yingxue Xu, Jianqi Chen, Fengying Xie, and Hao Chen. Prototypical information bottlenecking and disentangling for multimodal cancer survival prediction. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations . -
  13. [41][41] Nathan Mantel et al. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep , 50(3):163-170, 1966. -
  14. [44][44] Eugene Vorontsov, Alican Bozkurt, Adam Casson, George Shaikovski, Michal Zelechowski, Siqi Liu, Philippe Mathieu, Alexander van Eck, Donghun Lee, Julian Viret, et al. Virchow: A million-slide digital pathology foundation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07778 , 2023. - · arXiv
  15. [47][47] Albert Gu and Tri Dao. Mamba: Lineartime sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752 , 2023. - · arXiv
  16. [48][48] Jiayu Ding, Shuming Ma, Li Dong, Xingxing Zhang, Shaohan Huang, Wenhui Wang, Nanning Zheng, and Furu Wei. Longnet: Scaling transformers to 1,000,000,000 tokens. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02486 , 2023. - · arXiv
  17. [55][55] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning - transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning , pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021. -
  18. [58][58] Alexander Hermans, Lucas Beyer, and Bastian Leibe. In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07737 , 2017. - · arXiv
  19. [59][59] Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 , 2020. - · arXiv
  20. [61][61] Jiahui Yu, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Legg Yeung, Mojtaba Seyedhosseini, and Yonghui Wu. Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01917 , 2022. - · arXiv
  21. [69][69] Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. Meteor 1.3: Automatic metric for reliable optimization and evaluation of machine translation systems. In Proceedings of the sixth workshop on statistical machine translation , pages 85-91, 2011. -
  22. [70][70] Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out , pages 74-81, 2004. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhou, F., Ma, J., Jin, C., Yang, S., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Zhao, C., Zhou, H., Li, Z., Lin, H., Wang, X., Wang, J., Han, A., Chan, R. C. K., Liang, L., Zhang, X., & Chen, H.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Nanfang Hospital (CN)
  • Kunming Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Hao
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2024
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
11406-11406
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417263460
Cited by
60
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2
FWCI
23.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Innovation and Technology Commission (PRP/034/22FX and ITCPD/17-9)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
computational pathology, pathology foundation models, multimodal learning, pathology reports, gene expression data, slide-level analysis, molecular prediction, cancer, MSTAR, self-supervised pre-training, multimodal dataset
MeSH terms
Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neoplasms, Pathology, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review