Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy
Open accessAbstract
Desires motivate humans to interact autonomously with the complex world. In contrast, current AI agents require explicit task specifications, such as instructions or reward functions, which constrain their autonomy and behavioral diversity. In this paper, we introduce a Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) that can enable a large language model (LLM) to autonomously propose and select tasks, motivated by satisfying its multi-dimensional desires. Specifically, the motivational framework of D2A is mainly constructed by a dynamic Value System, inspired by the Theory of Needs. It incorporates an understanding of human-like desires, such as the need for social interaction, personal fulfillment, and self-care. At each step, the agent evaluates the value of its current state, proposes a set of candidate activities, and selects the one that best aligns with its intrinsic motivations. We conduct experiments on Concordia, a text-based simulator, to demonstrate that our agent generates coherent, contextually relevant daily activities while exhibiting variability and adaptability similar to human behavior. A comparative analysis with other LLM-based agents demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances the rationality of the simulated activities.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Our idea is inspired by the Theory of Needs (Maslow, 1943; McClelland, 1987), which suggests that human behavior can be understood as driven by the motivation to fulfill various intrinsic desires.”
Buffel, C., van Aalst, J., Bangels, A., Toelen, J., Allegaert, K., Verschueren, S., & Stichele, G. V. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.12431 · Cited by 5,871
Verheij, B., & Wiering, M. (2017) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76892-2 · Cited by 3,570 · cited 1×
“The quest to create human-like autonomous agents (Wang et al., 2016; 2024b) has long been a prominent theme in artificial intelligence (AI) (Fetzer, 1990).”
Conklin, E. S. (1932) · The Journal of Religion · doi:10.1086/481244 · Cited by 2,958 · cited 1×
“Our idea is inspired by the Theory of Needs (Maslow, 1943; McClelland, 1987), which suggests that human behavior can be understood as driven by the motivation to fulfill various intrinsic desires.”
A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models
Chang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, J., Wu, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, K., Chen, H., Yi, X., Wang, C., Wang, Y., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3641289 · Cited by 2,842 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The remarkable progress in large language models (LLMs) (Chang et al., 2024; Achiam et al., 2023) has spurred considerable research into LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b), revealing their potential for achieving human-like intelligence.”
Self-citationGenerative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior
Park, J. S., O'Brien, J., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023) · Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3586183.3606763 · Cited by 2,187 · see citing works
A survey on large language model based autonomous agents
Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1 · Cited by 1,941 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The remarkable progress in large language models (LLMs) (Chang et al., 2024; Achiam et al., 2023) has spurred considerable research into LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b), revealing their potential for achieving human-like intelligence.”
Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models
Yao, S., Yu, D., Zhao, J., Shafran, I., Griffiths, T. L., Cao, Y., & Narasimhan, K. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.10601 · Cited by 1,158 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Inspired by the work of Tree of Thoughts (Yao et al., 2024), we argue that the paradigm of presenting multiple candidate activities and evaluating them enables the agent to select the best action.”
The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey
Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07864 · Cited by 972 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The remarkable progress in large language models (LLMs) (Chang et al., 2024; Achiam et al., 2023) has spurred considerable research into LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b), revealing their potential for achieving human-like intelligence.”
ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models
Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K., & Cao, Y. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.03629 · Cited by 608 · cited 5× · see citing works
“We compare our Desire-Driven Agent with 3 baselines: ReAct (Yao et al. (2023)) agent reasons before taking actions; LLMob (Wang et al. (2024a)) generates activity plans by extracting motivations from the profile and producing the most likely activities accordingly; BabyAGI (Nakajima (2023))…”
InfluentialHuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face
Shen, Y., Song, K., Tan, X., Li, D., Lu, W., & Zhuang, Y. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.17580 · Cited by 477 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Techniques such as task decomposition, reflection, and memory retrieval can be integrated to further improve agents’ task execution success rates (Shen et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024).”
LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language Models
Song, C. H., Sadler, B. M., Wu, J., Chao, W.-L., Washington, C., & Su, Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00280 · Cited by 435 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, previous works focus primarily on fixed environments and measure agent performance on predetermined tasks without addressing activity generation (Song et al., 2023).”
Pinar Saygin, A., Cicekli, I., & Akman, V. (2000) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1023/a:1011288000451 · Cited by 383 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Early pioneers such as Alan Turing laid the groundwork for evaluating intelligence through frameworks such as the Turing Test (Pinar Saygin et al., 2000), which posited that a key measure of an agent’s intelligence is the ability to produce behavior indistinguishable from that of a human.”
Camel: Communicative agents for" mind" exploration of large language model society
Li, G., Hammoud, H., Itani, H., Khizbullin, D., & Ghanem, B. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2264 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models
Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., & Anandkumar, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16291 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Fontana, A. (1987) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001245 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Large Language Models as Urban Residents: An LLM Agent Framework for Personal Mobility Generation
Wang, J.-W., Jiang, R., Yang, C., et al. (2024) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14744 · Cited by 188 · cited 5×
“We compare our Desire-Driven Agent with 3 baselines: ReAct (Yao et al. (2023)) agent reasons before taking actions; LLMob (Wang et al. (2024a)) generates activity plans by extracting motivations from the profile and producing the most likely activities accordingly; BabyAGI (Nakajima (2023))…”
InfluentialA Systematic Study on Reinforcement Learning Based Applications
Sivamayilvelan, K., Rajasekar, E., Aljafari, B., Nikolovski, S., Subramaniyaswamy, V., & Indragandhi, V. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16031512 · Cited by 179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While some approaches use external rewards in open environments to induce more human-like behavior (Sivamayil et al., 2023), the rewards are highly task-specific and fail to model intrinsic motivations that drive more adaptable behaviors, resulting in poor transferability and generalization ability.”
Forecasting and uncertainty in the economic and business world
Makridakis, S., Hogarth, R., & Gaba, A. (2009) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.05.012 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
A Review of Agent and Service-Oriented Concepts Applied to Intelligent Energy Systems
Vrba, P., Mařı́k, V., Siano, P., Leitão, P., Zhabelova, G., Vyatkin, V. V., & Strasser, T. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2326411 · Cited by 158 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such capabilities can also enhance user engagement and trust in various applications of AI agents, from service-oriented intelligent assistants that foster realistic interactions (Vrba et al., 2014) to virtual agents in games that create immersive experiences (Hoogendoorn & Soumokil, 2010).”
Learning to Simulate Human Mobility
Feng, J., Yang, Z., Xu, F., Yu, H., Wang, M., & Li, Y. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3412862 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
DiffTraj: Generating GPS Trajectory with Diffusion Probabilistic Model
Zhu, Y., Ye, Y., Zhang, S., et al. (2023) · Neural Information Processing Systems · doi:10.52202/075280-2843 · Cited by 137
A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model-based Agents
Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., & Wen, J.-R. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3748302 · Cited by 118 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Techniques such as task decomposition, reflection, and memory retrieval can be integrated to further improve agents’ task execution success rates (Shen et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2024).”
Cognitive psychology-based artificial intelligence review
Zhao, J. G., Wu, M., Zhou, L., Wang, X., & Jia, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1024316 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Yang, A., Yang, B., Hui, B., Zheng, B., Yu, B., Zhou, C., Li, C., Li, C., Liu, D., Huang, F., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.10671 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Besides, as illustrated in Figure 12, D2A demonstrates the ability to generate activities that are well-balanced across diverse categories.”
Practical Synthetic Human Trajectories Generation Based on Variational Point Processes
Long, Q., Wang, H., Li, T., Huang, L., Wang, K., Wu, Q., Li, G., Liang, Y., Yu, L., & Li, Y. (2023) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3580305.3599888 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
SIMADL: Simulated Activities of Daily Living Dataset
Alshammari, T. A., Alshammari, N. O., Sedky, M., & Howard, C. (2018) · Data · doi:10.3390/data3020011 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Chapter 11 Psychological Explanations of Participation in Everyday Activities
Gärling, T., & Garvill, J. (1993) · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)60047-3 · Cited by 41
Augmenting Autotelic Agents with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Colas, C., Teodorescu, L., Oudeyer, P., et al. (2023) · CoLLAs · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.12487 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Multilevel simulation of daily activities: Why and how?
Kormanyos, B., & Pataki, B. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Virtual Environments for Measurement Systems and Applications (CIVEMSA) · doi:10.1109/civemsa.2013.6617386 · Cited by 35
Learning to Simulate Daily Activities via Modeling Dynamic Human Needs
Yuan, Y., Wang, H., Ding, J., Jin, D., & Li, Y. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583276 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Humanoid Agents: Platform for Simulating Human-like Generative Agents
Wang, Z., Chiu, Y. Y., & Chiu, Y. C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.05418 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Modeling Autobiographical Memory in Human-Like Autonomous Agents
Wang, D., Tan, A., & Miao, C. (2016) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.65109/frsz4603 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“The quest to create human-like autonomous agents (Wang et al., 2016; 2024b) has long been a prominent theme in artificial intelligence (AI) (Fetzer, 1990).”
Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions
Liu, R., Yang, R., Jia, C., Zhang, G., Zhou, D., Dai, A. M., Yang, D., & Vosoughi, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.16960 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Vezhnevets, A. S., Agapiou, J. P., Aharon, A., Ziv, R., Matyas, J., Duéñez-Guzmán, E. A., Cunningham, W. A., Osindero, S., Karmon, D., & Leibo, J. Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.03664 · Cited by 15 · cited 6× · see citing works
“The environments are based on Concordia (Vezhnevets et al., 2023), with a Game Master providing relevant observations to the agent.”
InfluentialEvaluation of virtual agents utilizing theory of mind in a real time action game
Hoogendoorn, M., & Soumokil, J. (2010) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1145/1838206.1838215 · Cited by 15 · cited 1×
“Such capabilities can also enhance user engagement and trust in various applications of AI agents, from service-oriented intelligent assistants that foster realistic interactions (Vrba et al., 2014) to virtual agents in games that create immersive experiences (Hoogendoorn & Soumokil, 2010).”
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774 · cited 1×
“The remarkable progress in large language models (LLMs) (Chang et al., 2024; Achiam et al., 2023) has spurred considerable research into LLM-based agents (Xi et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2024b), revealing their potential for achieving human-like intelligence.”
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tommy Gärling and Jörgen Garvill. Psychological explanations of participation in everyday activi- ties. In Advances in Psychology, volume 96, pp. 270-297. Elsevier, 1993.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhong, Z., Zhang, H., Ozaki, J., Zhou, Y., Zhao, X., Dan, D., & Wang, C. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.130791 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A Conceptual Framework for Exploring AI’s Quasi-Needs in User Dialogue
Воронин, А. Н., & Семеновна, Р. А. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09747-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The evidence, while encouraging, remains limited in breadth and requires further validation across different contexts (Prakki, 2024 ; Wang et al., 2024).”
Piao, J., Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, N., Yan, J., Lan, X., Lu, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, J. Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.08691 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“To improve this, they have drawn on some theories from psychology to create agents with socially intelligent designs [101, 6].”
Influential
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhong, F., Ma, L., & Wang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2024
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2412.06435
- OpenAlex
- W4405254210
- Semantic Scholar
- 74ffc0667698691685e33e7a412e5dcdffda04d3
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Peking University
- National Science and Technology Major Project (2022ZD0114904)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- LLM agents, needs theory, intrinsic motivation, human-like behavior, agent rationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
