CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 295Artificial Intelligence ApplicationsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation

AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges

Open access
Sapkota, Ranjan, Roumeliotis, Konstantinos I., Karkee, Manoj·2025·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2505.10468arXiv 2505.10468

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103599 · Paper page

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities. We begin by outlining the search strategy and foundational definitions, characterizing AI Agents as modular systems driven and enabled by LLMs and LIMs for task-specific automation. Generative AI is positioned as a precursor providing the foundation, with AI agents advancing through tool integration, prompt engineering, and reasoning enhancements. We then characterize Agentic AI systems, which, in contrast to AI Agents, represent a paradigm shift marked by multi-agent collaboration, dynamic task decomposition, persistent memory, and coordinated autonomy. Through a chronological evaluation of architectural evolution, operational mechanisms, interaction styles, and autonomy levels, we present a comparative analysis across both AI agents and agentic AI paradigms. Application domains enabled by AI Agents such as customer support, scheduling, and data summarization are then contrasted with Agentic AI deployments in research automation, robotic coordination, and medical decision support. We further examine unique challenges in each paradigm including hallucination, brittleness, emergent behavior, and coordination failure, and propose targeted solutions such as ReAct loops, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), automation coordination layers, and causal modeling. This work aims to provide a roadmap for developing robust, scalable, and explainable AI-driven systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2505.10468

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a growing consensus that AI agents must evolve from turn-based chatbots into long-term companions capable of sustained, context-aware collaboration.

    “There is a growing consensus that AI agents must evolve from turn-based chatbots into long-term companions capable of sustained, context-aware collaboration (Tran et al., 2025; Sapkota et al., 2025).”

    From RealMem: Benchmarking LLMs in Real-World Memory-Driven Interaction (2026) · cites this paper as Sapkota et al., 2025

    The discussion of incomplete agentic properties (p. 19) says AI agents should collaborate with humans over extended interactions and adapt to conversational context. The paper also describes a shift from static systems toward persistent memory and collaboration, but it does not characterize agents as long-term companions or establish a growing consensus that they must become such companions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Research works printed but not linked: 163

  1. [4][4] J. Ferber, G. Weiss, Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, Addison-wesley Reading, 1999.
  2. [5][5] R. Calegari, G. Ciatto, V. Mascardi, A. Omicini, Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review, Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 35 (1) (2021) 1.
  3. [6][6] R.C. Cardoso, A. Ferrando, A review of agent-based programming for multi-agent systems, Computers 10 (2) (2021) 16.
  4. [7][7] E. Shortliffe, Computer-based Medical Consultations: MYCIN, vol. 2, Elsevier, 2012.
  5. [11][11] J.E. Laird, The Soar Cognitive Architecture, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.
  6. [12][12] R.A. Brooks, A robust layered control system for a mobile robot, in: IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, vol. RA-2, (no. 1) IEEE, 1986, pp. 14–23.
  7. [13][13] J. Weizenbaum, ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine, Commun. ACM 9 (1) (1966) 36–45.
  8. [14][14] K.M. Colby, Artificial Paranoia: A Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes, Pergamon Press, New York, 1975.
  9. [15][15] H.P. Moravec, The stanford cart and the CMU rover, Proc. IEEE 71 (7) (1983) 872–884.
  10. [20][20] A. Guerra-Hernández, A. El Fallah-Seghrouchni, H. Soldano, Learning in BDI multi-agent systems, in: International Workshop on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems, Springer, 2004, pp. 218–233.
  11. [22][22] D.B. Acharya, K. Kuppan, B. Divya, Agentic AI: Autonomous intelligence for complex goals–a comprehensive survey, IEEE Access (2025).
  12. [23][23] M.Z. Pan, M. Cemri, L.A. Agrawal, S. Yang, B. Chopra, R. Tiwari, K. Keutzer, A. Parameswaran, K. Ramchandran, D. Klein, et al., Why do multiagent systems fail? in: ICLR 2025 Workshop on Building Trust in Language Models and Applications, 2025.
  13. [25][25] Z. Deng, Y. Guo, C. Han, W. Ma, J. Xiong, S. Wen, Y. Xiang, AI agents under threat: A survey of key security challenges and future pathways, ACM Comput. Surv. 57 (7) (2025) 1–36.
  14. [26][26] M. Gridach, J. Nanavati, K.Z.E. Abidine, L. Mendes, C. Mack, Agentic AI for scientific discovery: A survey of progress, challenges, and future directions, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08979. · arXiv
  15. [29][29] A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, I. Sutskever, et al., Improving language understanding by generative pre-training, 2018, Arxiv.
  16. [30][30] J. Sánchez Cuadrado, S. Pérez-Soler, E. Guerra, J. De Lara, Automating the development of task-oriented llm-based chatbots, in: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, 2024, pp. 1–10.
  17. [32][32] A. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. Sheng, X. Wang, T.-S. Chua, On generative agents in recommendation, in: Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2024, pp. 1807–1817.
  18. [33][33] S. Peng, E. Kalliamvakou, P. Cihon, M. Demirer, The impact of AI on developer productivity: Evidence from github copilot, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302. 06590.
  19. [34][34] J. Li, V. Lavrukhin, B. Ginsburg, R. Leary, O. Kuchaiev, J.M. Cohen, H. Nguyen, R.T. Gadde, Jasper: An end-to-end convolutional neural acoustic model, 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.03288. · arXiv
  20. [36][36] K. Basu, Bridging knowledge gaps in LLMs via function calls, in: Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2024, pp. 5556–5557.
  21. [37][37] Z. Liu, T. Hoang, J. Zhang, M. Zhu, T. Lan, J. Tan, W. Yao, Z. Liu, Y. Feng, R. RN, et al., Apigen: Automated pipeline for generating verifiable and diverse function-calling datasets, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37 (2024) 54463–54482.
  22. [38][38] H. Yang, S. Yue, Y. He, Auto-GPT for online decision making: Benchmarks and additional opinions, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02224. · arXiv
  23. [40][40] A. Das, S.-C. Chen, M.-L. Shyu, S. Sadiq, Enabling synergistic knowledge sharing and reasoning in large language models with collaborative multi-agents, in: 2023 IEEE 9th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing, CIC, IEEE, 2023, pp. 92–98.
  24. [42][42] Z. Duan, J. Wang, Exploration of LLM multi-agent application implementation based on LangGraph+ CrewAI, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.18241. · arXiv
  25. [43][43] B. Memarian, T. Doleck, Human-in-the-loop in artificial intelligence in edu- cation: A review and entity-relationship (ER) analysis, Comput. Hum. Behav.: Artif. Humans 2 (1) (2024) 100053.
  26. [45][45] F. Sado, C.K. Loo, W.S. Liew, M. Kerzel, S. Wermter, Explainable goal-driven agents and robots-a comprehensive review, ACM Comput. Surv. 55 (10) (2023) 1–41.
  27. [46][46] J. Heer, Agency plus automation: Designing artificial intelligence into interactive systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 (6) (2019) 1844–1850.
  28. [50][50] M. Chacon-Chamorro, L.F. Giraldo, N. Quijano, V. Vargas-Panesso, C. González, J.S. Pinzón, R. Manrique, M. Ríos, Y. Fonseca, D. Gómez-Barrera, et al., Cooperative resilience in artificial intelligence multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. (2025).
  29. [52][52] D. Leocádio, L. Guedes, J. Oliveira, J. Reis, N. Melão, Customer service with AI-powered human-robot collaboration (HRC): A literature review, Procedia Comput. Sci. 232 (2024) 1222–1232.
  30. [54][54] Y. Huang, J.X. Huang, Exploring ChatGPT for next-generation information retrieval: Opportunities and challenges, in: Web Intelligence, vol. 22, (no. 1) SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2024, pp. 31–44.
  31. [55][55] N. Holtz, S. Wittfoth, J.M. Gómez, The new era of knowledge retrieval: Multi- agent systems meet generative AI, in: 2024 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET, IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–10.
  32. [56][56] F. Poszler, B. Lange, The impact of intelligent decision-support systems on hu- mans' ethical decision-making: A systematic literature review and an integrated framework, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 204 (2024) 123403.
  33. [57][57] F. Khemakhem, H. Ellouzi, H. Ltifi, M.B. Ayed, Agent-based intelligent decision support systems: a systematic review, IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 14 (1) (2020) 20–34.
  34. [60][60] M. Wischnewski, Attributing mental states to non-embodied autonomous sys- tems: A systematic review, in: Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025, pp. 1–8.
  35. [61][61] K. Greshake, S. Abdelnabi, S. Mishra, C. Endres, T. Holz, M. Fritz, Not what you've signed up for: Compromising real-world llm-integrated applications with indirect prompt injection, in: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security, 2023, pp. 79–90.
  36. [62][62] Y. Talebirad, A. Nadiri, Multi-agent collaboration: Harnessing the power of intelligent llm agents, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03314. · arXiv
  37. [65][65] N. Krishnan, Advancing multi-agent systems through model context protocol: Architecture, implementation, and applications, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2504.21030. · arXiv
  38. [66][66] H. Padigela, C. Shah, D. Juyal, ML-dev-bench: Comparative analysis of AI agents on ML development workflows, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.00964. · arXiv
  39. [69][69] R. Khan, S. Sarkar, S.K. Mahata, E. Jose, Security threats in agentic AI system, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14728. · arXiv
  40. [71][71] M. Raees, I. Meijerink, I. Lykourentzou, V.-J. Khan, K. Papangelis, From explainable to interactive AI: A literature review on current trends in human-AI interaction, Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. (2024) 103301.
  41. [74][74] A. Zagalsky, D. Te'eni, I. Yahav, D.G. Schwartz, G. Silverman, D. Cohen, Y. Mann, D. Lewinsky, The design of reciprocal learning between human and artificial intelligence, Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact. 5 (CSCW2) (2021) 1–36.
  42. [76][76] S. Kapoor, B. Stroebl, Z.S. Siegel, N. Nadgir, A. Narayanan, AI agents that matter, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01502. · arXiv
  43. [77][77] X. Huang, J. Lian, Y. Lei, J. Yao, D. Lian, X. Xie, Recommender AI agent: Integrating large language models for interactive recommendations, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16505. 27 · arXiv
  44. [79][79] J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, L. Ahmad, I. Akkaya, F.L. Aleman, D. Almeida, J. Altenschmidt, S. Altman, S. Anadkat, et al., Gpt-4 technical report, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  45. [81][81] H. Honda, M. Hagiwara, Question answering systems with deep learning-based symbolic processing, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 152368–152378.
  46. [82][82] N. Karanikolas, E. Manga, N. Samaridi, E. Tousidou, M. Vassilakopoulos, Large language models versus natural language understanding and generation, in: Proceedings of the 27th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Progress in Computing and Informatics, 2023, pp. 278–290.
  47. [83][83] K.I. Roumeliotis, N.D. Tselikas, D.K. Nasiopoulos, LLMs for product classi- fication in e-commerce: A zero-shot comparative study of GPT and claude models, Nat. Lang. Process. J. 11 (2025) 100142, http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/J.NLP.2025.100142, URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S2949719125000184.
  48. [85][85] K.I. Roumeliotis, N.D. Tselikas, D.K. Nasiopoulos, Think before you classify: The rise of reasoning large language models for consumer complaint de- tection and classification, Electron. (2025) 1070, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ ELECTRONICS14061070.
  49. [86][86] A. Radford, J.W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark, et al., Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PmLR, 2021, pp. 8748–8763.
  50. [87][87] J. Li, D. Li, S. Savarese, S. Hoi, Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2023, pp. 19730–19742.
  51. [88][88] S. Sontakke, J. Zhang, S. Arnold, K. Pertsch, E. Bıyık, D. Sadigh, C. Finn, L. Itti, Roboclip: One demonstration is enough to learn robot policies, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36 (2023) 55681–55693.
  52. [90][90] S. Park, M. Lee, J. Kang, H. Choi, Y. Park, J. Cho, A. Lee, D. Kim, Vlaad: Vision and language assistant for autonomous driving, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2024, pp. 980–987.
  53. [91][91] S.H. Ahmed, S. Hu, G. Sukthankar, The potential of vision-language models for content moderation of children's videos, in: 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA, IEEE, 2023, pp. 1237–1241.
  54. [92][92] S.H. Ahmed, M.J. Khan, G. Sukthankar, Enhanced multimodal content mod- eration of children's videos using audiovisual fusion, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.06128. · arXiv
  55. [93][93] K.I. Roumeliotis, R. Sapkota, M. Karkee, N.D. Tselikas, D.K. Nasiopoulos, Plant disease detection through multimodal large language models and convolutional neural networks, 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.20419. · DOI
  56. [94][94] P. Chitra, A. Saleem Raja, Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm and models for embodied agents (robots and drones), in: Building Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains, Springer, 2025, pp. 417–441.
  57. [95][95] S. Kourav, K. Verma, M. Sundararajan, Artificial intelligence algorithm models for agents of embodiment for drone applications, in: Building Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains, Springer, 2025, pp. 79–101.
  58. [96][96] G. Natarajan, E. Elango, B. Sundaravadivazhagan, S. Rethinam, Artificial intelligence algorithms and models for embodied agents: Enhancing autonomy in drones and robots, in: Building Embodied AI Systems: The Agents, the Architecture Principles, Challenges, and Application Domains, Springer, 2025, pp. 103–132.
  59. [97][97] K. Pandya, M. Holia, Automating customer service using LangChain: Building custom open-source GPT chatbot for organizations, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2310.05421. · arXiv
  60. [98][98] Q. Wu, G. Bansal, J. Zhang, Y. Wu, B. Li, E. Zhu, L. Jiang, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Liu, et al., Autogen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08155. · arXiv
  61. [99][99] L. Gabora, J. Bach, A path to generative artificial selves, in: EPIA Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2023, pp. 15–29.
  62. [103][103] X. Liu, J. Wang, J. Sun, X. Yuan, G. Dong, P. Di, W. Wang, D. Wang, Prompting frameworks for large language models: A survey, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2311.12785. · arXiv
  63. [105][105] K. Alizadeh, S.I. Mirzadeh, D. Belenko, S. Khatamifard, M. Cho, C.C. Del Mundo, M. Rastegari, M. Farajtabar, LLM in a flash: Efficient large language model inference with limited memory, in: Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2024, pp. 12562–12584.
  64. [107][107] P. Denny, J. Leinonen, J. Prather, A. Luxton-Reilly, T. Amarouche, B.A. Becker, B.N. Reeves, Prompt problems: A new programming exercise for the generative AI era, in: Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, 2024, pp. 296–302.
  65. [108][108] C. Chen, S. Lee, E. Jang, S.S. Sundar, Is your prompt detailed enough? Exploring the effects of prompt coaching on users' perceptions, engagement, and trust in text-to-image generative AI tools, in: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, 2024, pp. 1–12.
  66. [110][110] A. Pan, E. Jones, M. Jagadeesan, J. Steinhardt, Feedback loops with language models drive in-context reward hacking, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402. 06627.
  67. [113][113] C. Wang, Y. Deng, Z. Lyu, L. Zeng, J. He, S. Yan, B. An, Q*: Improving multi-step reasoning for LLMs with deliberative planning, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14283. · arXiv
  68. [114][114] H. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. He, T. Xia, S. Pan, F. Liu, PlanGenLLMs: A modern survey of LLM planning capabilities, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11221. · arXiv
  69. [115][115] A. Bandi, P.V.S.R. Adapa, Y.E.V.P.K. Kuchi, The power of generative AI: A review of requirements, models, input–output formats, evaluation metrics, and challenges, Futur. Internet 15 (8) (2023) 260.
  70. [116][116] Y. Liu, H. Du, D. Niyato, J. Kang, Z. Xiong, Y. Wen, D.I. Kim, Generative AI in data center networking: Fundamentals, perspectives, and case study, IEEE Netw. (2025).
  71. [117][117] C. Guo, F. Cheng, Z. Du, J. Kiessling, J. Ku, S. Li, Z. Li, M. Ma, T. Molom-Ochir, B. Morris, et al., A survey: Collaborative hardware and software design in the era of large language models, IEEE Circuits Syst. Mag. 25 (1) (2025) 35–57.
  72. [118][118] T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J.D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, et al., Language models are few-shot learners, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 (2020) 1877–1901.
  73. [119][119] H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al., LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971. · arXiv
  74. [121][121] A. Yang, B. Xiao, B. Wang, B. Zhang, C. Bian, C. Yin, C. Lv, D. Pan, D. Wang, D. Yan, et al., Baichuan 2: Open large-scale language models, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.10305. · arXiv
  75. [122][122] K.M. Yoo, D. Park, J. Kang, S.-W. Lee, W. Park, GPT3Mix: Leveraging large-scale language models for text augmentation, 2021, arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08826. · arXiv
  76. [123][123] D. Zhou, X. Xue, X. Lu, Y. Guo, P. Ji, H. Lv, W. He, Y. Xu, Q. Li, L. Cui, A hierarchical model for complex adaptive system: From adaptive agent to AI society, ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. (2024).
  77. [126][126] X. Xiang, J. Xue, L. Zhao, Y. Lei, C. Yue, K. Lu, Real-time integration of fine- tuned large language model for improved decision-making in reinforcement learning, in: 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN, IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–8.
  78. [127][127] Z. Li, H. Zhang, C. Peng, R. Peiris, Exploring large language model-driven agents for environment-aware spatial interactions and conversations in virtual reality role-play scenarios, in: 2025 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR, IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–11.
  79. [128][128] T.R. McIntosh, T. Susnjak, T. Liu, P. Watters, M.N. Halgamuge, The inadequacy of reinforcement learning from human feedback-radicalizing large language models via semantic vulnerabilities, IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. (2024). 28
  80. [129][129] S. Lee, G. Lee, W. Kim, J. Kim, J. Park, K. Cho, Human strategy learning- based multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for online team sports game, IEEE Access (2025).
  81. [130][130] Z. Shi, S. Gao, L. Yan, Y. Feng, X. Chen, Z. Chen, D. Yin, S. Verberne, Z. Ren, Tool learning in the wild: Empowering language models as automatic tool agents, in: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 2025, pp. 2222–2237.
  82. [131][131] S. Yuan, K. Song, J. Chen, X. Tan, Y. Shen, R. Kan, D. Li, D. Yang, Easytool: Enhancing llm-based agents with concise tool instruction, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06201. · arXiv
  83. [132][132] B. Xu, X. Liu, H. Shen, Z. Han, Y. Li, M. Yue, Z. Peng, Y. Liu, Z. Yao, D. Xu, Gentopia: A collaborative platform for tool-augmented llms, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04030. · arXiv
  84. [133][133] H. Lu, X. Li, X. Ji, Z. Kan, Q. Hu, ToolFiVe: Enhancing tool-augmented LLMs via tool filtering and verification, in: ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP, IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5.
  85. [134][134] Y. Song, F. Xu, S. Zhou, G. Neubig, Beyond browsing: API-based web agents, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16464. · arXiv
  86. [135][135] V. Tupe, S. Thube, AI agentic workflows and enterprise APIs: Adapting API architectures for the age of AI agents, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17443. · arXiv
  87. [136][136] S. Yao, J. Zhao, D. Yu, N. Du, I. Shafran, K. Narasimhan, Y. Cao, React: Syn- ergizing reasoning and acting in language models, in: International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2023.
  88. [138][138] L. Ning, Z. Liang, Z. Jiang, H. Qu, Y. Ding, W. Fan, X.-y. Wei, S. Lin, H. Liu, P.S. Yu, et al., A survey of webagents: Towards next-generation AI agents for web automation with large foundation models, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23350. · arXiv
  89. [139][139] M.W.U. Rahman, R. Nevarez, L.T. Mim, S. Hariri, Multi-agent actor-critic generative AI for query resolution and analysis, IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell. (2025).
  90. [140][140] J. Lála, O. O'Donoghue, A. Shtedritski, S. Cox, S.G. Rodriques, A.D. White, Paperqa: Retrieval-augmented generative agent for scientific research, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07559. · arXiv
  91. [141][141] Z. Wu, C. Yu, C. Chen, J. Hao, H.H. Zhuo, Models as agents: Optimizing multi-step predictions of interactive local models in model-based multi-agent reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, (no. 9) 2023, pp. 10435–10443.
  92. [142][142] Z. Feng, R. Xue, L. Yuan, Y. Yu, N. Ding, M. Liu, B. Gao, J. Sun, G. Wang, Multi-agent embodied AI: Advances and future directions, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05108. · arXiv
  93. [143][143] A. Feriani, E. Hossain, Single and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for AI-enabled wireless networks: A tutorial, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 23 (2) (2021) 1226–1252.
  94. [144][144] R. Zhang, S. Tang, Y. Liu, D. Niyato, Z. Xiong, S. Sun, S. Mao, Z. Han, Toward agentic AI: generative information retrieval inspired intelligent communications and networking, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16866. · arXiv
  95. [146][146] E. Miehling, K.N. Ramamurthy, K.R. Varshney, M. Riemer, D. Bouneffouf, J.T. Richards, A. Dhurandhar, E.M. Daly, M. Hind, P. Sattigeri, et al., Agentic AI needs a systems theory, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.00237. · arXiv
  96. [147][147] W. Xu, Z. Liang, K. Mei, H. Gao, J. Tan, Y. Zhang, A-mem: Agentic memory for llm agents, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12110. · arXiv
  97. [150][150] H. Shirado, K. Shimizu, N.A. Christakis, S. Kasahara, Realism drives inter- personal reciprocity but yields to AI-assisted egocentrism in a coordination experiment, in: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025, pp. 1–21.
  98. [151][151] Y. Xiao, G. Shi, P. Zhang, Towards agentic AI networking in 6G: A generative foundation model-as-agent approach, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.15764. · arXiv
  99. [153][153] C. Qian, W. Liu, H. Liu, N. Chen, Y. Dang, J. Li, C. Yang, W. Chen, Y. Su, X. Cong, et al., ChatDev: Communicative agents for software development, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07924. · arXiv
  100. [154][154] J.S. Park, J. O'Brien, C.J. Cai, M.R. Morris, P. Liang, M.S. Bernstein, Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior, in: UIST 2023 - Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 3586183.3606763/SUPPL_FILE/3606763.ZIP, URL: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/ 10.1145/3586183.3606763. · DOI · Paper page
  101. [157][157] H. Hexmoor, J. Lammens, G. Caicedo, S.C. Shapiro, Behaviour Based AI, Cognitive Processes, and Emergent Behaviors in Autonomous Agents, vol. 1, WIT Press, 2025.
  102. [158][158] H. Zhang, Z. Li, F. Liu, Y. He, Z. Cao, Y. Zheng, Design and implementation of LangChain-based chatbot, in: 2024 International Seminar on Artificial Intelli- gence, Computer Technology and Control Engineering, ACTCE, IEEE, 2024, pp. 226–229.
  103. [160][160] S. Kupferschmid, J. Hoffmann, H. Dierks, G. Behrmann, Adapting an AI planning heuristic for directed model checking, in: International SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software, Springer, 2006, pp. 35–52.
  104. [161][161] W. Chen, Y. Su, J. Zuo, C. Yang, C. Yuan, C. Qian, C.-M. Chan, Y. Qin, Y. Lu, R. Xie, et al., Agentverse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors in agents, 2 (4) (2023) 6, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10848. · arXiv
  105. [162][162] T. Schick, J. Dwivedi-Yu, R. Dessì, R. Raileanu, M. Lomeli, E. Hambro, L. Zettlemoyer, N. Cancedda, T. Scialom, Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36 (2023) 68539–68551.
  106. [163][163] J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q.V. Le, D. Zhou, et al., Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35 (2022) 24824–24837.
  107. [164][164] S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, I. Shafran, T. Griffiths, Y. Cao, K. Narasimhan, Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36 (2023) 11809–11822.
  108. [165][165] J. Guo, N. Li, J. Qi, H. Yang, R. Li, Y. Feng, S. Zhang, M. Xu, Empowering working memory for large language model agents, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2312.17259. · arXiv
  109. [166][166] S. Agashe, J. Han, S. Gan, J. Yang, A. Li, X.E. Wang, Agent s: An open agentic framework that uses computers like a human, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08164. · arXiv
  110. [167][167] C. DeChant, Episodic memory in AI agents poses risks that should be studied and mitigated, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11739. · arXiv
  111. [169][169] G. Sarthou, A. Clodic, R. Alami, Ontologenius: A long-term semantic memory for robotic agents, in: 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–8.
  112. [171][171] A. Singh, A. Ehtesham, S. Kumar, T.T. Khoei, Agentic retrieval-augmented generation: A survey on agentic RAG, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09136. · arXiv
  113. [172][172] R. Akkiraju, A. Xu, D. Bora, T. Yu, L. An, V. Seth, A. Shukla, P. Gun- decha, H. Mehta, A. Jha, et al., FACTS about building retrieval augmented generation-based chatbots, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07858. · arXiv
  114. [173][173] A. Zhao, Y. Wu, Y. Yue, T. Wu, Q. Xu, M. Lin, S. Wang, Q. Wu, Z. Zheng, G. Huang, Absolute zero: Reinforced self-play reasoning with zero data, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03335. · arXiv
  115. [175][175] N. Karunanayake, Next-generation agentic AI for transforming healthcare, In- form. Heal. 2 (2) (2025) 73–83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoh.2025.03.001, URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949953425000141. · DOI · Paper page
  116. [176][176] R. Khanda, Agentic AI-driven technical troubleshooting for enterprise systems: A novel weighted retrieval-augmented generation paradigm, 2024, arXiv:2412. 12006.
  117. [177][177] G. Wang, Y. Xie, Y. Jiang, A. Mandlekar, C. Xiao, Y. Zhu, L. Fan, A. Anandkumar, Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291. · arXiv
  118. [178][178] G. Li, H. Hammoud, H. Itani, D. Khizbullin, B. Ghanem, Camel: Communicative agents for ''mind'' exploration of large language model society, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36 (2023) 51991–52008.
  119. [179][179] S. Reed, K. Zolna, E. Parisotto, S.G. Colmenarejo, A. Novikov, G. Barth-Maron, M. Gimenez, Y. Sulsky, J. Kay, J.T. Springenberg, et al., A generalist agent, 2022, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.06175. · arXiv
  120. [180][180] C.K. Thomas, C. Chaccour, W. Saad, M. Debbah, C.S. Hong, Causal reasoning: Charting a revolutionary course for next-generation AI-native wireless networks, IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. (2024).
  121. [181][181] Z. Tang, R. Wang, W. Chen, K. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Chen, L. Lin, Towards causalgpt: A multi-agent approach for faithful knowledge reasoning via promoting causal consistency in llms, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11914. · arXiv
  122. [182][182] Z. Gekhman, J. Herzig, R. Aharoni, C. Elkind, I. Szpektor, Trueteacher: Learning factual consistency evaluation with large language models, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11171. · arXiv
  123. [183][183] A. Wu, K. Kuang, M. Zhu, Y. Wang, Y. Zheng, K. Han, B. Li, G. Chen, F. Wu, K. Zhang, Causality for large language models, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15319. 29 · arXiv
  124. [184][184] S. Ashwani, K. Hegde, N.R. Mannuru, D.S. Sengar, M. Jindal, K.C.R. Kathala, D. Banga, V. Jain, A. Chadha, Cause and effect: can large language models truly understand causality? in: Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, vol. 4, (no. 1) 2024, pp. 2–9.
  125. [185][185] J. Richens, T. Everitt, Robust agents learn causal world models, in: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  126. [186][186] A. Chan, R. Salganik, A. Markelius, C. Pang, N. Rajkumar, D. Krasheninnikov, L. Langosco, Z. He, Y. Duan, M. Carroll, et al., Harms from increasingly agentic algorithmic systems, in: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2023, pp. 651–666.
  127. [187][187] A. Plaat, M. van Duijn, N. van Stein, M. Preuss, P. van der Putten, K.J. Batenburg, Agentic large language models, a survey, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23037. · arXiv
  128. [189][189] G.A. Gabison, R.P. Xian, Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2504.03255. · arXiv
  129. [192][192] S. Tonmoy, S. Zaman, V. Jain, A. Rani, V. Rawte, A. Chadha, A. Das, A comprehensive survey of hallucination mitigation techniques in large language models, 6, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01313. · arXiv
  130. [193][193] Z. Zhang, Y. Yao, A. Zhang, X. Tang, X. Ma, Z. He, Y. Wang, M. Gerstein, R. Wang, G. Liu, et al., Igniting language intelligence: The hitchhiker's guide from chain-of-thought reasoning to language agents, ACM Comput. Surv. 57 (8) (2025) 1–39.
  131. [194][194] Y. Wan, K.-W. Chang, White men lead, black women help? Benchmarking language agency social biases in LLMs, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10508. · arXiv
  132. [195][195] A. Borah, R. Mihalcea, Towards implicit bias detection and mitigation in multi-agent llm interactions, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02584. · arXiv
  133. [196][196] X. Liu, H. Yu, H. Zhang, Y. Xu, X. Lei, H. Lai, Y. Gu, H. Ding, K. Men, K. Yang, et al., Agentbench: Evaluating llms as agents, 2023, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03688. · arXiv
  134. [197][197] G. He, G. Demartini, U. Gadiraju, Plan-then-execute: An empirical study of user trust and team performance when using LLM agents as a daily assistant, in: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2025, pp. 1–22.
  135. [198][198] Z. Ke, F. Jiao, Y. Ming, X.-P. Nguyen, A. Xu, D.X. Long, M. Li, C. Qin, P. Wang, S. Savarese, et al., A survey of frontiers in LLM reasoning: Inference scaling, learning to reason, and agentic systems, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.09037. · arXiv
  136. [199][199] M. Luo, X. Shi, C. Cai, T. Zhang, J. Wong, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Huang, Z. Chen, J.E. Gonzalez, et al., Autellix: An efficient serving engine for LLM agents as general programs, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13965. · arXiv
  137. [200][200] K. Hatalis, D. Christou, J. Myers, S. Jones, K. Lambert, A. Amos-Binks, Z. Dannenhauer, D. Dannenhauer, Memory matters: The need to improve long- term memory in LLM-agents, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, vol. 2, (no. 1) 2023, pp. 277–280.
  138. [201][201] H. Jin, X. Han, J. Yang, Z. Jiang, Z. Liu, C.-Y. Chang, H. Chen, X. Hu, Llm maybe longlm: Self-extend llm context window without tuning, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01325. · arXiv
  139. [202][202] M. Wooldridge, N.R. Jennings, Intelligent agents: theory and practice, Knowl. Eng. Rev. 10 (2) (1995) 115–152, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ S0269888900008122.
  140. [203][203] M. Yu, F. Meng, X. Zhou, S. Wang, J. Mao, L. Pang, T. Chen, K. Wang, X. Li, Y. Zhang, et al., A survey on trustworthy llm agents: Threats and countermeasures, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09648. · arXiv
  141. [204][204] H. Chi, H. Li, W. Yang, F. Liu, L. Lan, X. Ren, T. Liu, B. Han, Unveiling causal reasoning in large language models: Reality or mirage? Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37 (2024) 96640–96670.
  142. [205][205] H. Wang, A. Zhang, N. Duy Tai, J. Sun, T.-S. Chua, et al., ALI-agent: Assessing LLMs' alignment with human values via agent-based evaluation, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37 (2024) 99040–99088.
  143. [207][207] Y. Yang, Q. Peng, J. Wang, W. Zhang, Multi-llm-agent systems: Techniques and business perspectives, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.14033. · arXiv
  144. [208][208] L. Hammond, A. Chan, J. Clifton, J. Hoelscher-Obermaier, A. Khan, E. McLean, C. Smith, W. Barfuss, J. Foerster, T. Gavenčiak, et al., Multi-agent risks from advanced ai, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14143. · arXiv
  145. [211][211] S. Raza, R. Qureshi, A. Zahid, J. Fioresi, F. Sadak, M. Saeed, R. Sapkota, A. Jain, A. Zafar, M.U. Hassan, et al., Who is responsible? The data, models, users or regulations? A comprehensive survey on responsible generative AI for a sustainable future, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.08650. · arXiv
  146. [212][212] M. Puvvadi, S.K. Arava, A. Santoria, S.S.P. Chennupati, H.V. Puvvadi, Coding agents: A comprehensive survey of automated bug fixing systems and bench- marks, in: 2025 IEEE 14th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, CSNT, IEEE, 2025, pp. 680–686.
  147. [213][213] C. Newton, J. Singleton, C. Copland, S. Kitchen, J. Hudack, Scalability in modeling and simulation systems for multi-agent, AI, and machine learning applications, in: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications III, vol. 11746, SPIE, 2021, pp. 534–552.
  148. [214][214] H.D. Le, X. Xia, Z. Chen, Multi-agent causal discovery using large language models, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15073. · arXiv
  149. [216][216] P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V. Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. Küttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rocktäschel, et al., Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 (2020) 9459–9474.
  150. [217][217] Y. Ma, Z. Gou, J. Hao, R. Xu, S. Wang, L. Pan, Y. Yang, Y. Cao, A. Sun, H. Awadalla, et al., Sciagent: Tool-augmented language models for scientific reasoning, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11451. · arXiv
  151. [218][218] K. Dev, S.A. Khowaja, K. Singh, E. Zeydan, M. Debbah, Advanced architectures integrated with agentic AI for next-generation wireless networks, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01089. · arXiv
  152. [219][219] L. Xie, C. Zheng, H. Xia, H. Qu, C. Zhu-Tian, Waitgpt: Monitoring and steering conversational llm agent in data analysis with on-the-fly code visualization, in: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 2024, pp. 1–14.
  153. [220][220] A. Chan, C. Ezell, M. Kaufmann, K. Wei, L. Hammond, H. Bradley, E. Bluemke, N. Rajkumar, D. Krueger, N. Kolt, et al., Visibility into AI agents, in: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2024, pp. 958–973. 30
  154. [221][221] W. Murikah, J.K. Nthenge, F.M. Musyoka, Bias and ethics of AI systems applied in auditing-a systematic review, Sci. Afr. (2024) e02281.
  155. [222][222] S. Banerjee, V.K. Verma, A. Mukherjee, D. Gupta, V.P. Namboodiri, P. Rai, Verse: Virtual-gradient aware streaming lifelong learning with anytime infer- ence, in: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, IEEE, 2024, pp. 493–500.
  156. [223][223] A. Boyle, A. Blomkvist, Elements of episodic memory: insights from artificial agents, Philos. Trans. B 379 (1913) (2024) 20230416.
  157. [224][224] Y. Du, W. Huang, D. Zheng, Z. Wang, S. Montella, M. Lapata, K.-F. Wong, J.Z. Pan, Rethinking memory in AI: Taxonomy, operations, topics, and future directions, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00675. · arXiv
  158. [225][225] K.-T. Tran, D. Dao, M.-D. Nguyen, Q.-V. Pham, B. O'Sullivan, H.D. Nguyen, Multi-agent collaboration mechanisms: A survey of LLMs, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06322. · arXiv
  159. [226][226] K. Tallam, From autonomous agents to integrated systems, a new paradigm: Orchestrated distributed intelligence, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13754. · arXiv
  160. [229][229] N. Shinn, F. Cassano, A. Gopinath, K. Narasimhan, S. Yao, Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36 (2023) 8634–8652.
  161. [230][230] F. Kamalov, D.S. Calonge, L. Smail, D. Azizov, D.R. Thadani, T. Kwong, A. Atif, Evolution of AI in education: Agentic workflows, 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20082. · arXiv
  162. [231][231] A. Sulc, T. Hellert, R. Kammering, H. Hoschouer, J.S. John, Towards agentic AI on particle accelerators, 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06336. · arXiv
  163. [232][232] J. Yang, C. Jimenez, A. Wettig, K. Lieret, S. Yao, K. Narasimhan, O. Press, Swe-agent: Agent-computer interfaces enable automated software engineering, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37 (2024) 50528–50652.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sapkota, R., Roumeliotis, K. I., & Karkee, M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Peloponnese (GR)
Corresponding author
  • Sapkota, Ranjan
  • Karkee, Manoj
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2025
Volume
126
Pages
103599-103599
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2505.10468
arXiv
2505.10468
OpenAlex
W4413427262
Cited by
295
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 270 · 2025: 25
FWCI
118.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information Fusion (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (1029004, 1031712)
  • Hellenic Academic Libraries Link
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2024 67022-41788, AWD003473., 1029004, AWD004595)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Keywords
AI agents, agentic AI, large language models, agent cooperation, task decomposition, persistent memory, autonomous AI systems, generative AI, hallucinations, emergent behavior, retrieval-augmented generation, causal models, research automation, clinical decision support, customer service automation, data summarization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review