The DOI matches its DataCite record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monetizing Generative AI: YouTubers' Collective Knowledge on Earning from Generative AI Content
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping creative labor by enabling the rapid production of text, images, and videos. On YouTube, creators are developing new ways to leverage these tools and share knowledge about how to pursue income through such strategies. However, little is known about what GenAI knowledge has been collectively constructed around monetizing GenAI as a community practice of acting both with and against algorithmically mediated platforms. We analyze 377 YouTube videos in which creators publicly promote workflows, revenue claims, and monetization strategies for GenAI-enabled content. Our analysis identifies ten shared use cases that frame AI-supported income opportunities, and examines how this GenAI knowledge repository embodies a collective effort to leverage platform infrastructures for monetization -- including advertising, direct sales, affiliate marketing, and revenue-sharing models. We further surface structural tensions in AI-mediated creative labor, including unverifiable income claims, content misappropriation, synthetic engagement practices, and shifting authorship norms. We conceptualize creators' collective understanding and adoption of GenAI in the context of monetizing creative labor, with implications for the design of creator-centered GenAI technologies and responsible platform policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Too Late to be Creative? AI-Empowered Tools in Creative Processes
Hwang, A. H.-C. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3503549 · Cited by 103
Ma, R., & Kou, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479573 · Cited by 102
Generative AI in the Wild: Prospects, Challenges, and Strategies
Sun, Y., Jang, E., Ma, F., & Wang, T. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642160 · Cited by 64
The Future of HCI-Policy Collaboration
Yang, Q., Wong, R. Y., Jackson, S., Junginger, S., Hagan, M. D., Gilbert, T., & Zimmerman, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642771 · Cited by 52
Mim, N. J., Nandi, D., Khan, S. S., Dey, A., & Ahmed, S. I. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3641951 · Cited by 42
“How it actually works”: Algorithmic lore videos as market devices
MacDonald, T. W. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448211021404 · Cited by 37
Platform-mediated Markets, Online Freelance Workers and Deconstructed Identities
Munoz, I., Dunn, M., Sawyer, S., & Michaels, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555092 · Cited by 31
Kim, J., & Kim, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642476 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Niu, S., Lyu, Y., Zhang, H., Li, N., Kim, B., & Cai, J.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2026
- arXiv
- 2603.07036
- References
- 8
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monetizing Generative AI: YouTubers' Collective Knowledge on Earning from Generative AI Content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2603.07036
- The paper
- Niu, S., Lyu, Y., Zhang, H., Li, N., Kim, B., & Cai, J. (2026). Monetizing Generative AI: YouTubers' Collective Knowledge on Earning from Generative AI Content. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2603.07036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
