PreprintCited by 0Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningModel Reduction and Neural Networks

JEPA-Anything: Learning Predictive Models across Different Worlds

Open access
Cui, Taoyong, Wang, Zhongyao, Xu, Xinyue, Liu, Weiyang, Yu, Zhaochen, Zhang, Yuying, Gao, Qiang, Yang, Mengyue +5 more·2026·arXiv

Abstract

World modeling enables intelligence to anticipate consequences, guide interventions, and learn from interaction. Yet predictive models remain domain-specific: can a common learning principle support world modeling across radically different systems? We introduce JEPA-Anything, a domain-agnostic framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization (OPF). Extending joint-embedding predictive architectures, OPF decomposes latent targets into complementary factors, learns them through dedicated pathways, and recombines them within a shared predictive design. We evaluate JEPA-Anything across seven domains: vision, biology, clinical trajectories, control, molecular dynamics, physical fields, and weather. Experiments span representation learning, intervention prediction, out-of-distribution generalization, and long-horizon dynamics, including 10 matched dynamics tasks, forecasting of over 1,000 clinical events, and 100-step molecular rollouts across four systems. Against matched JEPA baselines, JEPA-Anything improves reported metrics on all 10 dynamics tasks and reduces single-intervention prediction error on Interventional Pong by 34.8%. It achieves the lowest one-step and 100-step molecular errors among compared methods in all four systems. Beyond prediction, a factor-nominated biological intervention receives experimental support in cell co-cultures, patient-derived organoids, tumor fragments, and mice; latent orbital modes recover the Keplerian scaling exponent with a fitted slope of -1.4991. These results support a common factorized predictive principle across heterogeneous worlds, connecting world modeling with intervention and experimentally grounded scientific discovery. Code: https://github.com/Gen-Verse/JEPA-Anything

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2609.20800

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • JEPA-Anything provides a shared framework for world-model construction across heterogeneous domains.

    “JEPA-Anything provides a shared framework for world-model construction across heterogeneous domains [9].”
  • OPF decomposes latent targets into complementary factors, learns dedicated predictors, and recombines their outputs into a complete latent state.

    “Its orthogonal predictive factorization (OPF) decomposes latent targets into complementary factors, learns dedicated predictors, and recombines their outputs into a complete latent state [9].”
  • JEPA-Anything extends this line through OPF across heterogeneous data types.

    “and JEPA-Anything extends this line through OPF across heterogeneous data types [9].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Britt Adamson, Thomas M. Norman, Marco Jost, Min Y. Cho, James K. Nuñez, Yuwen Chen, Jacqueline E. Villalta, Luke A. Gilbert, Max A. Horlbeck, Marco Y. Hein, Ryan A. Pak, Andrew N. Gray, Carol A. Gross, Atray Dixit, Ophir Parnas, Aviv Regev, and Jonathan S. Weissman. A multi- plexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded pro- tein response. Cell, 167(7):1867-1882.e21, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ossama Ahmed, Frederik Träuble, Anirudh Goyal, Alexander Neitz, Yoshua Bengio, Bernhard Schölkopf, Manuel Wüthrich, and Stefan Bauer. CausalWorld: A robotic manipulation benchmark for causal structure and transfer learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=SK7Wm7_dHu.
  3. Mahmoud Assran, Quentin Duval, Ishan Misra, Piotr Bojanowski, Pascal Vincent, Michael Rabbat, Yann LeCun, and Nicolas Ballas. Self-supervised learning from images with a joint-embedding predictive architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15619-15629, 2023. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.01501. URL https: //openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/html/Assran_Self-Supervised_Le arning_From_Images_With_a_Joint-Embedding_Predictive_Architecture_CVPR_ 2023_paper.html. · DOI
  4. Mido Assran, Adrien Bardes, David Fan, Quentin Garrido, Russell Howes, Mojtaba Komeili, Matthew Muckley, Ammar Rizvi, Claire Roberts, Koustuv Sinha, Artem Zholus, Sergio Arnaud, Abha Gejji, Ada Martin, François Robert Hogan, Daniel Dugas, Piotr Bojanowski, Vasil Khalidov, Patrick Labatut, Francisco Massa, Marc Szafraniec, Kapil Krishnakumar, Yong Li, Xiaodong Ma, Sarath Chandar, Franziska Meier, Yann LeCun, Michael Rabbat, and Nicolas Ballas. V-JEPA 2: Self-supervised video models enable understanding, prediction and planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.09985, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.09985. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09985. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Randall Balestriero and Yann LeCun. How learning by reconstruction produces uninformative features for perception. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 235 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2566-2585. PMLR, 2024. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/balestriero24a.html.
  6. Adrien Bardes, Jean Ponce, and Yann LeCun. VICReg: Variance-invariance-covariance regularization for self-supervised learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=xm6YD62D1Ub.
  7. Adrien Bardes, Quentin Garrido, Jean Ponce, Xinlei Chen, Michael Rabbat, Yann LeCun, Mahmoud Assran, and Nicolas Ballas. Revisiting feature prediction for learning visual representations from video. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024. ISSN 2835-8856. URL https://openre view.net/forum?id=WFYbBOEOtv.
  8. Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, and Yann LeCun. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 1, pages 539-546. IEEE, 2005. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.202. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.202. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Haotian Cui, Chloe Wang, Hassaan Maan, Kuan Pang, Fengning Luo, Nan Duan, and Bo Wang. scGPT: Toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Nature Methods, 21(8):1470-1480, 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41592-024-02201-0. URL https://doi.org/10.103 8/s41592-024-02201-0. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ali ElSheikh, Rui-Xi Wang, Weimin Wu, Yibo Wen, Payam Dibaeinia, Jennifer Yuntong Zhang, Jerry Yao-Chieh Hu, Mei Knudson, Sudarshan Babu, Shao-Hua Sun, Aly A. Khan, and Han Liu. Cell-JEPA: Latent representation learning for single-cell transcriptomics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02093, 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02093. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02093. · DOI
  11. Hejia Geng, Zesen Huang, Haoyang Li, Wenbin Li, Koutian Wu, Zihan Zhou, Yuanbo Pang, Weihao Liu, Zigong Xu, Zhiping Li, Zongzheng Zhang, Chuanfei Dong, Jiankai Sun, Tianzhe Zheng, Fengyu Xie, Yue Ma, Yueheng Shi, Tong Xie, Zonglin Di, Xianrong Liu, Qucheng Gao, Yimin Liu, Jiaming Pan, Sheng Huang, Xiao-Han Ma, Lanqing Yuan, Zhenlin Zhu, Ziang Liu, Ziyang Xu, Junkai Wang, Kangkai Liang, Jiayi Xian, Zehong Zhao, Liuwei Xu, Jingxu Xie, Peijin Zhang, Qiang Gao, Chengyi Xing, Zhe Zhao, Xi Wang, Yaopeng Xing, Xing Meng, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu, and Ling Yang. Scienceide: Turning world's scientific codebase into agent learnable environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.19134, 2026. · arXiv
  12. David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Recurrent world models facilitate policy evolution. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31, pages 2451-2463.
  13. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/2de5d16682c3c35007e4e 92982f1a2ba-Abstract.html.
  14. Raia Hadsell, Sumit Chopra, and Yann LeCun. Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 1735-1742. IEEE, 2006. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.100. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1109/CVPR.2006.100. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Danijar Hafner, Jurgis Pasukonis, Jimmy Ba, and Timothy Lillicrap. Mastering diverse control tasks through world models. Nature, 640(8059):647-653, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08744-2. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Nicklas Hansen, Hao Su, and Xiaolong Wang. TD-MPC2: Scalable, robust world models for continuous control. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024. URL https://openrevi ew.net/forum?id=Oxh5CstDJU.
  17. Irina Higgins, Loïc Matthey, Arka Pal, Christopher Burgess, Xavier Glorot, Matthew Botvinick, Shakir Mohamed, and Alexander Lerchner. 𝛽-VAE: Learning basic visual concepts with a constrained variational framework. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=Sy2fzU9gl.
  18. Thomas Kipf, Elise van der Pol, and Max Welling. Contrastive learning of structured world models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020. URL https://openreview.net /forum?id=H1gax6VtDB.
  19. Felix Koehler, Simon Niedermayr, Rüdiger Westermann, and Nils Thuerey. APEBench: A benchmark for autoregressive neural emulators of PDEs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 37.
  20. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_f iles/paper/2024/hash/d9875ebcf74bccdc5076acab0dbee62c-Abstract-Dataset s_and_Benchmarks_Track.html.
  21. Harold W. Kuhn. The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1-2):83-97, 1955. doi: 10.1002/nav.3800020109. URL https://doi.org/10.100 2/nav.3800020109. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Yann LeCun, Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, and Fu Jie Huang. A tutorial on energy-based learning. In Gökhan Bakir, Thomas Hofmann, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, and Ben Taskar, editors, Predicting Structured Data, pages 191-246. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006. ISBN 978-0-262-02582-8.
  23. Phillip Lippe, Sara Magliacane, Sindy Löwe, Yuki M. Asano, Taco Cohen, and Stratis Gavves. CITRIS: Causal identifiability from temporal intervened sequences. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 13557- 13603. PMLR, 2022. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/lippe22a.html.
  24. Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Mario Lucic, Gunnar Raetsch, Sylvain Gelly, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Olivier Bachem. Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4114-4124. PMLR, 2019. URL https://proc eedings.mlr.press/v97/locatello19a.html.
  25. Francesco Locatello, Dirk Weissenborn, Thomas Unterthiner, Aravindh Mahendran, Georg Heigold, Jakob Uszkoreit, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Kipf. Object-centric learning with slot attention. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 11525-11538.
  26. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/8511df98c02 ab60aea1b2356c013bc0f-Abstract.html.
  27. Thomas M. Norman, Max A. Horlbeck, Joseph M. Replogle, Alex Y. Ge, Albert Xu, Marco Jost, Luke A. Gilbert, and Jonathan S. Weissman. Exploring genetic interaction manifolds constructed from rich single-cell phenotypes. Science, 365(6455):786-793, 2019. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4438. URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax4438. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Stephan Rasp, Stephan Hoyer, Alexander Merose, Ian Langmore, Peter Battaglia, Tyler Russell, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vivian Yang, Rob Carver, Shreya Agrawal, Matthew Chantry, Zied Ben Bouallegue, Peter Dueben, Carla Bromberg, Jared Sisk, Luke Barrington, Aaron Bell, and Fei Sha. WeatherBench 2: A benchmark for the next generation of data-driven global weather models. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 16(6):e2023MS004019, 2024. doi: 10.1029/2023MS004019. URL https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS004019. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Oriane Siméoni, Huy V. Vo, Maximilian Seitzer, Federico Baldassarre, Maxime Oquab, Cijo Jose, Vasil Khalidov, Marc Szafraniec, Seungeun Yi, Michaël Ramamonjisoa, Francisco Massa, Daniel Haziza, Luca Wehrstedt, Jianyuan Wang, Timothée Darcet, Théo Moutakanni, Leonel Sentana, Claire Roberts, Andrea Vedaldi, Jamie Tolan, John Brandt, Camille Couprie, Julien Mairal, Hervé Jégou, Patrick Labatut, and Piotr Bojanowski. DINOv3. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.10104, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.10104. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10104. · DOI
  30. Vlad Sobal, Jyothir S V, Siddhartha Jalagam, Nicolas Carion, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yann LeCun. Joint embedding predictive architectures focus on slow features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10831, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2211.10831. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10831. · DOI
  31. Makoto Takamoto, Timothy Praditia, Raphael Leiteritz, Dan MacKinlay, Francesco Alesiani, Dirk Pflüger, and Mathias Niepert. PDEBench: An extensive benchmark for scientific machine learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 1596-1611.
  32. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/hash /0a9747136d411fb83f0cf81820d44afb-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks.html.
  33. Yuval Tassa, Yotam Doron, Alistair Muldal, Tom Erez, Yazhe Li, Diego de Las Casas, David Budden, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Josh Merel, Andrew Lefrancq, Timothy Lillicrap, and Martin Riedmiller. Deepmind control suite. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00690, 2018. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1801.00690. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.00690. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Fabian L. Thiemann, Thiago Reschützegger, Massimiliano Esposito, Tseden Taddese, Juan D. Olarte- Plata, and Fausto Martelli. Force-free molecular dynamics through autoregressive equivariant networks. Nature Machine Intelligence, 8:764-776, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s42256-026-01227-7. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-026-01227-7. · DOI
  35. Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5026-5033. IEEE, 2012. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6386109. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.63 86109. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Michael Tschannen, Alexey Gritsenko, Xiao Wang, Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Nikhil Parthasarathy, Talfan Evans, Lucas Beyer, Ye Xia, Basil Mustafa, Olivier Hénaff, Jeremiah Harmsen, Andreas Steiner, and Xiaohua Zhai. SigLIP 2: Multilingual vision-language encoders with improved semantic understanding, localization, and dense features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14786, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14786. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14786. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Shuhan Xue, Jianyuan Zhong, Ziyuan Nan, Wenbin Li, Zhaochen Yu, Jinchao Ding, Qiang Gao, Pengyu Zhan, Yuntong Zhang, Tian Cheng, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu, and Ling Yang. Science- buddy: Recursive-in-recursive self-improvement for interactive scientific agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.17523, 2026. · arXiv
  38. Ling Yang, Zhenfei Yin, and Yingcheng Wu. Discovery foundation models: Toward open-ended discovery intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.15973, 2026. · arXiv
  39. Jure Zbontar, Li Jing, Ishan Misra, Yann LeCun, and Stéphane Deny. Barlow twins: Self-supervised learning via redundancy reduction. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 12310-12320. PMLR, 2021. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/zbontar21a.html.
  40. Gaoyue Zhou, Hengkai Pan, Yann LeCun, and Lerrel Pinto. DINO-WM: World models on pre-trained visual features enable zero-shot planning. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 267 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 79115-79135.
  41. PMLR, 2025. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v267/zhou25t.html.

Authors
Cui, T., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Liu, W., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., Gao, Q., Yang, M., Ouyang, W., Heng, P. A., Wu, Y., Yin, Z., & Yang, L.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2026
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7213604633
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
world modeling, JEPA, intervention prediction, out-of-distribution generalization, representation learning, patient-derived organoids, co-culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review