Exploring genetic interaction manifolds constructed from rich single-cell phenotypes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Manifold destiny: Mapping of genetic interactions (GIs) is usually based on cell fitness as the phenotypic readout, which obscures the mechanistic origin of interactions. Norman et al. developed a framework for mapping and understanding GIs. This approach leverages high-dimensional single-cell RNA sequencing data gathered from CRISPR-mediated, pooled perturbation screens. Diverse transcriptomic phenotypes construct a “manifold” representing all possible states of the cell. Each perturbation and GI projects the cell state to a particular position on this manifold, enabling unbiased ordering of genes in pathways and systematic classifications of GIs. Science , this issue p. 786
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 37 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
A relatively small number of genetic interactions deviated from the linear model expectation, quantified by distance correlation d.
“A relatively small number of GIs (lower mode in Fig. 4B) deviated from the expectation given by the linear model (which we quantified by distance correlation d, Methods, fig. S11D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Synergistic or synthetic lethal interactions tended to result in two larger coefficients (e.g., CBL/CNN1, c1=1.24, c2=0.8).
“Finally, as discussed above, synergistic or synthetic lethal interactions tended to result in two larger coefficients (e.g. CBL/CNN1, c1 = 1.24, c2 = 0.8, Fig. 3C and fig. S11C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The KLF1/CEBPA genetic interaction resulted from genetic epistasis, with smaller asymmetrical coefficients (c1=0.19, c2=0.72).
“Analysis by Perturb-seq revealed that the GI between KLF1 and CEBPA resulted from genetic epistasis (i.e. one single overexpression phenotype masking the other), resulting in smaller, asymmetrical coefficients (c1 = 0.19, c2 = 0.72, Fig. 4D and fig. S11A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some cells overexpressing both DUSP9 and MAPK1 appeared to suppress each other's activity entirely.
“In particular, we observed cells in which DUSP9 and MAPK1 appeared to suppress each other’s activity entirely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells overexpressing both DUSP9 and MAPK1 showed a range of phenotypes spanning the transcriptional states observed in cells overexpressing either DUSP9 or MAPK1 alone.
“For example, cells overexpressing both DUSP9 and MAPK1 showed a range of phenotypes spanning the transcriptional states observed in cells overexpressing either DUSP9 or MAPK1 alone (Fig. 5G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
The type of interaction in which MAPK1 acts at least partly by upregulating ETS2 was uncommon in the dataset.
“This type of interaction, in which a perturbation (MAPK1) acts at least partly by upregulating its partner (ETS2), was uncommon in our dataset (fig. S11G).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both canonical genes such as KLF1 and GATA1 and unexpected genes such as CNN1 interacted to promote differentiation to erythrogenesis.
“We also identified both canonical (e.g. KLF1, GATA1) and unexpected genes (e.g. CNN1) that interacted to promote differentiation to a specific cell state (erythrogenesis).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was minimal correlation between fold activation and the number of differentially expressed genes (R=0.07).
“Finally, there was minimal correlation between fold activation and the number of differentially expressed genes, implying that even small increases in the mRNA abundance of some genes can strongly alter a cell’s state (R=0.07; Fig. 1H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
DUSP9 and MAPK1 antagonized each other's activities.
“Similarly, DUSP9 and MAPK1 antagonized each other’s activities (Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Many interactions surrounding CBL, its regulators UBASH3A/B, and several multi-substrate tyrosine phosphatases such as PTPN9/12 induced erythroid markers, suggesting a common mechanism in regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.
“For example, many interactions surrounding CBL, its regulators UBASH3A/B, and several multi-substrate tyrosine phosphatases (e.g. PTPN9/12) induced erythroid markers, suggesting a common mechanism in regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Kowanetz K, Crosetto N, Haglund K, Schmidt MHH, Heldin C-H, Dikic I, Suppressors of T-cell Receptor Signaling Sts-1 and Sts-2 Bind to Cbl and Inhibit Endocytosis of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. J. Biol. Chem 279, 32786– 32795 (2004). 15159412 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Overexpression of CBL and CNN1 transgenes in HUDEP2 cells individually and in combination also induced markers of erythroid differentiation.
“Furthermore, overexpression of CBL and CNN1 transgenes in a human erythroid progenitor model (HUDEP2 cells) individually and in combination also induced markers of erythroid differentiation (Fig. 3F–G and fig. S10C–D) (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Kurita R, Suda N, Sudo K, Miharada K, Hiroyama T, Miyoshi H, Tani K, Nakamura Y, Establishment of immortalized human erythroid progenitor cell lines able to produce enucleated red blood cells. PLoS ONE 8, e59890 (2013). 23533656 PMC3606290 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Clusters of perturbations induced erythroid, granulocyte, or megakaryocyte markers, consistent with the known multilineage potential of the K562 model.
“Interestingly, we observed clusters of perturbations that caused cells to induce erythroid, granulocyte or megakaryocyte markers, which is consistent with the known multilineage potential of the K562 model (Fig. 2B, 3A–B and fig. S9) (16, 17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Alitalo R, Induced differentiation of K562 leukemia cells: a model for studies of gene expression in early megakaryoblasts. Leuk. Res 14, 501– 514 (1990). 2197510 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Orkin SH, Zon LI, Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology. Cell 132, 631– 644 (2008). 18295580 PMC2628169 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Relatively rare instances occurred where double phenotypes appeared completely unexpected (e.g., PLK4/STIL, d=0.53).
“We also observed relatively rare instances where double phenotypes appeared to be completely unexpected (e.g. the physical interactors PLK4/STIL ((24) d = 0.53, fig. S11F)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Ohta M, Ashikawa T, Nozaki Y, Kozuka-Hata H, Goto H, Inagaki M, Oyama M, Kitagawa D, Direct interaction of Plk4 with STIL ensures formation of a single procentriole per parental centriole. Nat Commun 5, 5267 (2014). 25342035 PMC4220463 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Overexpression of CBL and CNN1 caused strong induction of erythroid markers: hemoglobin genes (6-39-fold), SLC25A37 (13-fold), and GYPA (2-fold).
“Consistent with an erythroid transcriptional program, overexpression of CBL and CNN1 caused strong induction of canonical markers: hemoglobin genes (6 – 39-fold), an iron importer involved in heme biosynthesis (SLC25A37, 13-fold), and the blood group antigen CD235a (GYPA, 2-fold) (Fig. 3C and 3E and fig. S10A–B) (17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Orkin SH, Zon LI, Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology. Cell 132, 631– 644 (2008). 18295580 PMC2628169 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
A common neomorphic behavior, similar to one observed in yeast, occurred when a perturbation with little transcriptional effect alone enhanced the effects of a second perturbation (e.g., FEV/CBFA2T3, d=0.74).
“A common neomorphic behavior, similar to one observed in yeast (22), occurred when a perturbation that had little transcriptional effect on its own appeared to enhance the effects of a second perturbation (e.g. FEV/CBFA2T3, d = 0.74, fig. S11E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] van Wageningen S, Kemmeren P, Lijnzaad P, Margaritis T, Benschop JJ, de Castro IJ, van Leenen D, Groot Koerkamp MJA, Ko CW, Miles AJ, Brabers N, Brok MO, Lenstra TL, Fiedler D, Fokkens L, Aldecoa R, Apweiler E, Taliadouros V, Sameith K, van de Pasch LAL, van Hooff SR, Bakker LV, Krogan NJ, Snel B, Holstege FCP, Functional overlap and regulatory links shape genetic interactions between signaling pathways. Cell 143, 991– 1004 (2010). 21145464 PMC3073509 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The linear model δab = c1δa + c2δb + ε explained more than 70% of the variance in gene expression on average (mean R2 = 0.71).
“This linear model of transcriptional GIs explained more than 70% of the variance in gene expression on average (Fig. 4B; mean R2 = 0.71).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Use of Perturb-seq-derived single perturbation profiles as side information substantially improved performance.
“Notably, the use of Perturb–seq–derived single perturbation profiles as side information substantially improved performance (fig. S14D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
- Findingown data
The degree of fitness defect was related to the number of differentially expressed genes.
“The degree of fitness defect was related to the number of differentially expressed genes (fig. S7C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Examining median-filtered gene expression along a principal curve revealed distinct classes of transcripts regulated by DUSP9 or MAPK1 activity (e.g., GYPA appeared more sensitive to DUSP9 activity than HBZ).
“Examining median-filtered gene expression (Methods) along this curve revealed distinct classes of transcripts regulated by DUSP9 or MAPK1 activity (e.g. GYPA appeared to be more sensitive to DUSP9 activity than HBZ, Fig. 5H and fig. S12A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The granulocyte cluster mostly contained perturbations of canonical regulators C/EBP-α, -β, -ε and PU.1.
“By contrast, the granulocyte cluster mostly contained perturbations of canonical regulators such as C/EBP-α, -β, -ε (CEBPA/B/E) and PU.1 (SPI1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a robust anti-correlation (R = −0.72) between the magnitude of coefficients c1 and c2 and the fitness-based genetic interaction score.
“We observed a robust anti-correlation (R = −0.72) between the magnitude of the coefficients c1 and c2 and the fitness-based GI score (Fig. 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Many metazoan cell types are quiescent or post-mitotic and are not amenable to growth-based screens.
“Furthermore, many metazoan cell types are quiescent or post-mitotic, and as such are not amenable to growth-based screens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Highly parallelizable readouts such as growth rate obscure the mechanistic or molecular basis for any particular genetic interaction.
“This scale has necessitated the use of highly parallelizable readouts of phenotype, such as growth rate, that obscure the mechanistic or molecular basis for any particular interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Genes that exhibit phenotypes when expressed alone have a higher rate of genetic interactions with other genes.
“Genes that exhibit phenotypes when expressed alone have a higher rate of genetic interactions with other genes (1, 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M, Kuzmin E, van Leeuwen J, Mair B, Moffat J, Boone C, Andrews B, Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship. Cell 177, 85– 100 (2019). 30901552 PMC6817365 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Domingo J, Baeza-Centurion P, Lehner B, The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis). Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet (2019), 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857. 31082279 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Bulk measures of cell properties may obscure important cell-to-cell variability.
“Finally, bulk measures of their properties may obscure important cell-to-cell variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Gene-level genetic interaction scores averaged across sgRNAs were well correlated between replicates (R=0.80, p<10−300).
“The gene-level GI scores obtained by averaging sgRNAs targeting the same gene were also well correlated between replicates (gene-level GI R=0.80, p<10−300; Fig. 1E, S3A, Table S5)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The A and B positions of the sgRNA cassette performed similarly.
“The A and B positions of the sgRNA cassette performed similarly (Fig. 1G, fig. S6D–E)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The structure of the CRISPRa genetic interaction map, like past loss-of-function maps, can assign function to individual genes by similarity of genetic interaction profiles.
“Thus the structure of the CRISPRa GI map, like past efforts based on loss-of-function alleles, can assign function to individual genes by the similarity of GI profiles (1, 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M, Kuzmin E, van Leeuwen J, Mair B, Moffat J, Boone C, Andrews B, Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship. Cell 177, 85– 100 (2019). 30901552 PMC6817365 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Domingo J, Baeza-Centurion P, Lehner B, The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis). Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet (2019), 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857. 31082279 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Transcriptional profiles can distinguish distinct outcomes such as cell death, slow growth, and differentiation to various cell states that would appear equivalent at the fitness level.
“First, the transcriptional profiles can distinguish distinct outcomes such as cell death, slow growth, and differentiation to a variety of cell states that would appear equivalent at fitness level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Single-cell resolution can reveal phenotypic heterogeneity for some genetic interactions, yielding further insight into mechanism.
“The single-cell resolution afforded by Perturb-seq can reveal phenotypic heterogeneity for some GIs that we reasoned could yield further insight into mechanism (Fig. 5F and cf. fig S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model's parameters provided a simple, useful summary of how perturbations combine.
“The model’s parameters thus provided a simple, useful summary of how perturbations combine (Table S9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Even small increases in the mRNA abundance of some genes can strongly alter a cell's state.
“implying that even small increases in the mRNA abundance of some genes can strongly alter a cell’s state”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The shape of the genetic interaction manifold can reveal how genetic interactions arise.
“Second, the shape of the GI manifold can reveal how GIs arise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The large collection of matched single and double overexpression phenotypes allows quantitative modeling of genetic interactions directly from transcription profiles without appealing to the fitness genetic interaction map.
“Our large collection of matched single and double overexpression transcriptional phenotypes provides us with the opportunity to quantitatively model GIs directly from transcription profiles, without appealing to the fitness GI map.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The linear genetic interaction model allowed hypotheses about gene regulation by identifying which single perturbation phenotype better explains the double perturbation phenotype.
“The linear GI model allowed us to make hypotheses about gene regulation, as it can identify, for example, which single perturbation phenotype better explains the double perturbation phenotype.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cell differentiation or priming and a concomitant decrease in proliferation explained some of the structure of the genetic interaction manifold.
“These results suggested that cell differentiation/priming and a concomitant decrease in proliferation explained some of the structure of the GI manifold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Perturb-seq analysis can directly lead to a hypothesis about the biology underlying a genetic interaction even when one component is poorly understood.
“This example highlighted how Perturb-seq analysis can directly lead to a hypothesis about the biology underlying a GI even when one of the components is poorly understood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Perturb-seq can reveal graded phenotypes resulting from antagonism between two proteins.
“Perturb-seq can therefore reveal graded phenotypes resulting from antagonism between two proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model allowed orientation of all buffering interactions in which one perturbation is epistatic to another.
“Following similar logic, the model allowed us to orient all the buffering interactions in which one perturbation is epistatic to another (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Expression of genes neighboring the target was generally unperturbed except when transcripts shared promoter regions.
“and expression of genes neighboring the target was generally unperturbed except when transcripts shared promoter regions (Methods; fig. S7A–B, Table S8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results suggest that the hybrid approach can nominate blocks of genetic interactions for in-depth study.
“These results suggest that the hybrid approach can nominate blocks of GIs for in-depth study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
- Interpretationown data
The results provide a strategy for exploring large spaces of combinatorial genetic interactions by measuring only a subset of fitness-level genetic interactions.
“Our results provide a strategy for exploring large spaces of combinatorial genetic interactions by measuring only a subset of fitness-level GIs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The approach is complementary to efforts based on composite measurements, compressed sensing, and rich readouts to predict unmeasured genetic interactions.
“This provides a complementary approach to efforts based on composite measurements, compressed sensing, and rich readouts to predict unmeasured GIs (7, 28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco CP, Jerby-Arnon L, Marjanovic ND, Dionne D, Burks T, Raychndhury R, Adamson B, Norman TM, Lander ES, Weissman JS, Friedman N, Regev A, Perturb-seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853– 1866. e17 (2016). 27984732 PMC5181115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [28] Cleary B, Cong L, Cheung A, Lander ES, Regev A, Efficient Generation of Transcriptomic Profiles by Random Composite Measurements. Cell 171, 1424– 1436. e18 (2017). 29153835 PMC5726792 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe CRISPRa genetic interaction map contained fewer clusters than expected in a random map, consistent with the typical low-rank structure of genetic interaction maps.
“In addition, the map contained fewer clusters than would be expected in a random map (fig. S5C–D), consistent with the typical low-rank structure of GI maps (i.e. groups of genes interact similarly so that there are fewer overall degrees of freedom than total genes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe variation in sensitivity did not appear to result from stable differences in MAPK1 and DUSP9 expression, suggesting possible roles for historical differences or stochastic gene expression.
“This variation did not appear to be the result of stable differences in the expression of MAPK1 and DUSP9 (fig. S12B), suggesting a possible role either for historical differences or stochastic gene expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the DUSP9/ETS2 interaction, the DUSP9 phenotype dominated, suggesting that DUSP9 overexpression antagonized ETS2.
“In the DUSP9/ETS2 interaction (Fig. 5A), the DUSP9 phenotype dominated, suggesting that DUSP9 overexpression antagonized ETS2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was modest concordance between genetic interaction profile and Perturb-seq profile correlations (R=0.29, p<10−103), suggesting that transcriptional data provide a complementary scalable means of comparing genes that might inform genetic interaction prediction.
“We examined the Perturb-seq profiles of single gene overexpression (fig. S13A) and found that there was a modest concordance between GI profile and Perturb-seq profile correlations (R=0.29, p<10−103; fig. S13B), suggesting that the transcriptional data provided a complementary, scalable means of comparing genes that might inform GI prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe approach was substantially better than random sampling at predicting the top 10% of interactions and reasonably preserved rank order (Spearman ρ≈0.5 at 10% sampling) and pairwise similarities.
“Our approach was also substantially better than random sampling at predicting the top 10% of interactions and reasonably preserved both the rank order of all interactions (Spearman ρ ≈ 0.5 at 10% sampling; Fig. 6D–E and fig S14C) and the pairwise similarities between GI profiles (Fig. 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two-dimensional visualization and clustering identified numerous distinct categories of interaction, showing that the model generalizes the one-dimensional buffering versus synthetic lethal paradigm.
“The resulting figure (Fig. 4F) identified numerous distinct categories of interaction, showing that the model can serve as a generalization of the one-dimensional “buffering vs. synthetic lethal” paradigm that has typically been used to categorize genetic interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Cheng Y, Wong MT, van der Maaten L, Newell EW, Categorical Analysis of Human T Cell Heterogeneity with One-Dimensional Soli-Expression by Nonlinear Stochastic Embedding. J. Immunol 196, 924– 932 (2016). 26667171 PMC4705595 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe matrix factorization model constrained by transcriptional similarity predicted unobserved genetic interactions and preserved much of the large-scale structure of the map.
“The end result (Fig. 6B–D) preserved much of the large–scale structure of the map as seen through block averaging of GI scores (Fig. 6C–D; fig. S14B and materials and methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataLevels of target gene activation spanned a broad range, with a general trend that poorly expressed targets were more highly induced.
“Levels of target gene activation spanned a broad range (Fig. 1G and fig. S6B–C), with a general trend that poorly expressed targets were more highly induced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTranscriptional readouts were obtained for 287 perturbations across approximately 110,000 single cells, with a median of 273 cells per condition.
“In total, we obtained transcriptional readouts for 287 perturbations measured across ~110,000 single cells (median 273 cells per condition, Methods, fig S1, and Table S7) in one pooled experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Many genetic interactions within blocks of the fitness genetic interaction map are likely explained by similar mechanisms, so sampling 132 gene pairs broadly samples the biological processes represented.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationHighly correlated genes in the genetic interaction map were enriched for genes with the same DAVID term annotations, allowing unbiased annotation of clusters.
“Highly correlated genes were enriched for genes with the same DAVID term annotations (13), allowing for unbiased annotation of clusters (Fig. 1B and fig. S5A–B, Table S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA, Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 37, 1– 13 (2009). 19033363 PMC2615629 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA cluster of perturbations induced CD41 but the cells did not adopt characteristic megakaryocyte morphology, suggesting at best priming towards megakaryocytic differentiation.
“Finally, a cluster of perturbations induced expression of the canonical megakaryocyte marker CD41, but these cells did not adopt the characteristic morphological features of megakaryocytes by microscopy (fig. S9G), suggesting that they are at best primed towards megakaryocytic differentiation (16, 17).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Alitalo R, Induced differentiation of K562 leukemia cells: a model for studies of gene expression in early megakaryoblasts. Leuk. Res 14, 501– 514 (1990). 2197510 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Orkin SH, Zon LI, Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology. Cell 132, 631– 644 (2008). 18295580 PMC2628169 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PTPN12/SNAI1 genetic interaction resulted from genetic suppression, with two smaller coefficients (c1=0.60, c2=0.57).
“By contrast, the PTPN12/SNAI1 GI resulted from genetic suppression (i.e. when combined overexpression of two genes attenuated each other’s individual phenotypes), resulting in two smaller coefficients (e.g. PTPN12/SNAI1, c1 = 0.60, c2 = 0.57, Fig. 4E and fig. S11B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA cluster of mean expression profiles labeled G1 cell cycle arrest contained canonical cell cycle regulators, and single-cell data confirmed that these perturbations induced cell cycle arrest in the expected stages, explaining the growth defect.
“For example, one cluster of mean expression profiles (“G1 cell cycle arrest”) contained canonical regulators of the cell cycle. In this case, the underlying single-cell data confirmed that these perturbations induced cell cycle arrest in the expected cell cycle stages (Fig. 2E–F), explaining the growth defect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDown-sampling analyses indicated that as few as 50 cells per perturbation could be sufficient, meaning approximately 10^6 cells to collect side information for the entire set of protein coding sequences.
“By down-sampling our measured perturbations and re-performing our analyses, we observed that as few as 50 cells per perturbation could be sufficient, meaning ~106 cells to collect side information for the entire set of protein coding sequences (Fig. 6G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth fitness and genetic interaction scores were distributed throughout the genetic interaction manifold, consistent with scalar fitness measurements collapsing a larger landscape of transcriptional states.
“Both fitness and GI scores were distributed throughout the GI manifold (Fig. 2C–D), in accordance with the idea that scalar fitness measurements collapse the much larger landscape of transcriptional states (Fig. 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataETS2 and MAPK1 induced similar phenotypes, and ETS2 transcription was activated in all backgrounds (9.3-fold in MAPK1, 9.2-fold in ETS2, and 35.8-fold in MAPK1/ETS2 overexpression).
“Finally, ETS2 and MAPK1 induced similar phenotypes, and ETS2 transcription was activated in all backgrounds (9.3-fold in MAPK1, 9.2-fold in ETS2, and 35.8-fold in MAPK1/ETS2 overexpression, Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGene-level genetic interaction scores followed a bell-shaped distribution with interactions ranging beyond the expectation from negative control sgRNAs.
“and followed a bell-shaped distribution but with GIs ranging well beyond the expectation from negative control sgRNAs (Fig. 1F and fig. S3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverexpressing either CBL or CNN1 induced similar transcriptional changes, and single-cell analysis revealed progression from unperturbed through singly perturbed to doubly perturbed CBL/CNN1 cells.
“Overexpressing either gene induced similar transcriptional changes, and single-cell analysis revealed an apparent progression of phenotypes from unperturbed through singly-perturbed to doubly-perturbed CBL/CNN1 cells (Fig. 3C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataIndependent replicate experiments showed high concordance for sgRNA-level genetic interaction scores and genetic interaction profile correlations, and independent sgRNAs targeting the same gene were more similar than the background (median R=0.50 versus 0.04).
“Independent replicate experiments showed high levels of concordance for sgRNA-level GI scores and GI profile correlations, and independent sgRNAs targeting the same gene were much more similar than the background of all sgRNA GI correlations (median R=0.50 compared to 0.04; Fig. 1C,D and fig. S3A, Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPerturb-seq pairs CRISPR-based screens with single-cell RNA sequencing, allowing each cell to be an independent experiment connecting a genetic perturbation to its transcriptional consequences.
“For example, Perturb-seq pairs CRISPR-based screens with single-cell RNA sequencing (5–8). Each individual cell is in effect an independent experiment connecting a genetic perturbation to its transcriptional consequences, allowing hundreds of thousands of parallel measurements (9, 10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [5] Jaitin DA, Weiner A, Yofe I, Lara-Astiaso D, Keren-Shaul H, David E, Salame TM, Tanay A, van Oudenaarden A, Amit I, Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Cell 167, 1883– 1896. e15 (2016). 27984734 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [6] Adamson B, Norman TM, Jost M, Cho MY, Nuñez JK, Chen Y, Villalta JE, Gilbert LA, Horlbeck MA, Hein MY, Pak RA, Gray AN, Gross CA, Dixit A, Parnas O, Regev A, Weissman JS, A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell 167, 1867– 1882. e21 (2016). 27984733 PMC5315571 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco CP, Jerby-Arnon L, Marjanovic ND, Dionne D, Burks T, Raychndhury R, Adamson B, Norman TM, Lander ES, Weissman JS, Friedman N, Regev A, Perturb-seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853– 1866. e17 (2016). 27984732 PMC5181115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Datlinger P, Rendeiro AF, Schmidl C, Krausgruber T, Traxler P, Klughammer J, Schuster LC, Kuchler A, Alpar D, Bock C, Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat. Methods 14, 297– 301 (2017). 28099430 PMC5334791 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [9] Gasperini M, Hill AJ, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Martin B, Kim S, Zhang MD, Jackson D, Leith A, Schreiber J, Noble WS, Trapnell C, Ahituv N, Shendure J, A Genome-wide Framework for Mapping Gene Regulation via Cellular Genetic Screens. Cell 176, 377– 390. e19 (2019). 30612741 PMC6690346 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Replogle JM, Xu A, Norman TM, Meer EJ, Terry JM, Riordan D, Srinivas N, Mikkelsen TS, Weissman JS, Adamson B, Direct capture of CRISPR guides enables scalable, multiplexed, and multi-omic Perturb-seq. bioRxiv, 503367 (2018).
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGenetic interactions can reveal synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in tumors, identify suppressors of inherited and acquired disorders, and guide the design of gene cocktails to drive differentiation between cell types.
“GIs can reveal synthetic lethal vulnerabilities in tumors, identify suppressors of inherited and acquired disorders, and guide the design of cocktails of genes to drive differentiation between cell types (3, 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Hartman JL, Garvik B, Hartwell L, Principles for the buffering of genetic variation. Science 291, 1001– 1004 (2001). 11232561 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [4] Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663– 676 (2006). 16904174 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe genetic interaction manifold carries more information about interactions than a traditional genetic interaction map and is intrinsically more interpretable, including resolving distinct outcomes and modeling how perturbations combine.
“We argue that this GI manifold carries much more information about interactions than a traditional GI map, and is intrinsically more interpretable in several ways, including the ability to resolve the distinct outcomes underlying GIs and to model the different ways genetic perturbations combine to yield new phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenMapping pairwise interactions among approximately 10,000 transcribed genes in a human cell would require measuring approximately 50 million double mutants.
“For example, mapping pairwise interactions among the ~10,000 transcribed genes in a human cell would require measuring ~50 million double mutants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPioneering yeast genetic interaction maps between all gene pairs enabled systematic determination of gene function, identification of protein complexes, and definition of gene regulatory networks.
“Pioneering efforts in yeast to construct systematic GI maps between all gene pairs have enabled systematic determination of gene function, identification of protein complexes and definition of gene regulatory networks in a principled and unbiased manner (1, 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M, Kuzmin E, van Leeuwen J, Mair B, Moffat J, Boone C, Andrews B, Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship. Cell 177, 85– 100 (2019). 30901552 PMC6817365 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Domingo J, Baeza-Centurion P, Lehner B, The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis). Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet (2019), 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857. 31082279 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationA split experimental and computational approach, in which a subset of interactions are sampled and the remainder are predicted computationally, is a possible strategy to address the scale of genetic interactions.
“One possible strategy to address the scale of genetic interactions is to pursue a split experimental/computational approach, in which only a subset of interactions are sampled (either randomly or through “compressed” experimental designs (28)) and the remainder are predicted computationally (Fig. 6A) (7, 29, 30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco CP, Jerby-Arnon L, Marjanovic ND, Dionne D, Burks T, Raychndhury R, Adamson B, Norman TM, Lander ES, Weissman JS, Friedman N, Regev A, Perturb-seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853– 1866. e17 (2016). 27984732 PMC5181115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Madhukar NS, Elemento O, Pandey G, Prediction of Genetic Interactions Using Machine Learning and Network Properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3, 172 (2015). 26579514 PMC4620407 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [30] Žitnik M, Zupan B, Data Imputation in Epistatic MAPs by Network-Guided Matrix Completion. Journal of Computational Biology 22, 595– 608 (2015). 25658751 PMC4449711 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe geometric genetic interaction model identified different ways in which genetic perturbations combine to yield new phenotypes, allowing ordering of genes into linear pathways.
“We derived a simple, geometric GI model and used it to identify the different ways in which genetic perturbations combine to yield new phenotypes, for example allowing us to order genes into linear pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese results suggested a linear regulatory pathway in which DUSP9 inhibits MAPK1, which activates ETS2, consistent with known biology.
“Taken together, these results suggested a linear regulatory pathway in which DUSP9 (a phosphatase) inhibits MAPK1 (a kinase) that activates ETS2 (a transcription factor), which is consistent with the known biology of these gene families (Fig. 5D) (26).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Caunt CJ, Keyse SM, Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs). FEBS J 280, 489– 504 (2013). 22812510 PMC3594966 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe genetic interaction map robustly identified many strong interactions, but the origins of specific interactions were difficult to deduce because each interaction was characterized only by a scalar value.
“However, though the GI map robustly identified many strong GIs, the origins of specific interactions were difficult to deduce as each GI was characterized only by a single scalar value (i.e. deviation from expected growth rate).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFunctionally related genes interact similarly, making the genetic interaction manifold highly constrained and enabling imputation strategies.
“We and others have established that functionally related genes interact similarly—in geometric terms the GI manifold is therefore highly constrained, enabling imputation strategies (1, 2, 7, 12, 29).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [1] Costanzo M, Kuzmin E, van Leeuwen J, Mair B, Moffat J, Boone C, Andrews B, Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship. Cell 177, 85– 100 (2019). 30901552 PMC6817365 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [2] Domingo J, Baeza-Centurion P, Lehner B, The Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis). Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet (2019), 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857. 31082279 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco CP, Jerby-Arnon L, Marjanovic ND, Dionne D, Burks T, Raychndhury R, Adamson B, Norman TM, Lander ES, Weissman JS, Friedman N, Regev A, Perturb-seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853– 1866. e17 (2016). 27984732 PMC5181115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Horlbeck MA, Xu A, Wang M, Bennett NK, Park CY, Bogdanoff D, Adamson B, Chow ED, Kampmann M, Peterson TR, Nakamura K, Fischbach MA, Weissman JS, Gilbert LA, Mapping the Genetic Landscape of Human Cells. Cell 174, 953– 967. e22 (2018). 30033366 PMC6426455 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [29] Madhukar NS, Elemento O, Pandey G, Prediction of Genetic Interactions Using Machine Learning and Network Properties. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3, 172 (2015). 26579514 PMC4620407 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPerturb-seq provides a scalable means of constraining searches for genetic interactions, enabling exploration of the genetic interaction landscape.
“Perturb-seq provides a scalable means of constraining these types of searches (7), enabling exploration of the GI landscape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Dixit A, Parnas O, Li B, Chen J, Fulco CP, Jerby-Arnon L, Marjanovic ND, Dionne D, Burks T, Raychndhury R, Adamson B, Norman TM, Lander ES, Weissman JS, Friedman N, Regev A, Perturb-seq: Dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853– 1866. e17 (2016). 27984732 PMC5181115 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBecause the approach is sensitive to single-cell phenotypes, incomplete differentiation, and multiple differentiation states, it could facilitate higher-order combinatorial perturbation screens for driving cells into distinct differentiation states.
“More generally, because our approach was sensitive to single-cell phenotypes, incomplete differentiation and could simultaneously detect signatures of multiple differentiation states, it could facilitate higher-order combinatorial perturbation screens aimed at improving protocols for driving cells into distinct differentiation states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBuffering interactions travel less far along the genetic interaction manifold, with smaller coefficients, while synthetic sick or lethal interactions travel further, with bigger coefficients.
“An intuitive explanation was that buffering interactions travel less “far” (smaller coefficients) along the GI manifold while SSL interactions travel further (bigger coefficients) (Fig. 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningBy intelligently measuring and exploring the genetic interaction manifold, one can start to create a global view of the nonlinear mapping between genotype and phenotype.
“By intelligently measuring and exploring the GI manifold, one can start to create a global view of the nonlinear mapping between genotype and phenotype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Many genetic interactions within blocks of the fitness genetic interaction map are likely explained by similar mechanisms, so sampling 132 gene pairs broadly samples the biological processes represented.
“Given the low-rank structure of the fitness GI map, we reasoned that we could broadly sample the biological processes represented without measuring all gene pairs, as many GIs that fell into the “blocks” in the GI map were likely explained by similar mechanisms (Methods).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Predicting genetic interactions is substantially similar to predicting shopping preferences, so recommender system algorithms are applicable.
“There is substantial similarity between this problem and that of predicting a person’s shopping preferences based on past buying behavior, which is commonly addressed via “recommender system” algorithms.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even for combinations of a small number of entities, such as pairs or sets of perturbations, experimental design becomes exceedingly challenging.
“Even for combinations of a small number of entities, exemplified in the case of enumerating pairs or sets of perturbations,47,90 experimental design becomes exceedingly challenging.”
From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [90]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredHigh-throughput perturbation screens based on RNA-seq, optical pooled screens (OPS), or other technologies offer a rich resource through which the AIVC can be trained to predict perturbation effects.
“Here, high-throughput perturbation screens—based on RNA-seq,28,83,90 optical pooled screens (OPS),29,39,91 or other technologies—offer a rich resource through which the AIVC can be trained to predict these effects.”
From How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [90]
Using the full Norman et al. dataset, 5,035 genetic interactions were identified out of potentially 124,000 at a false discovery rate of 5%.
“Using the full dataset, we identified 5,035 genetic interactions (out of potentially 124,000) at a false discovery rate of 5%.”
From Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines (2025) · cites this paper as Norman et al.11
The dataset labeled 'NormanWeissman2019' had the largest mean E-distance between all perturbations compared with datasets of similar size.
“The dataset labeled 'NormanWeissman2019' had the largest mean E-distance between all perturbations49 compared with datasets of similar size.”
From scPerturb: harmonized single-cell perturbation data (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
More than 100 genes perturbed with CRISPRa in one dataset are perturbed with CRISPRi perturbations in another dataset of the same cell line, either in one publication or across multiple studies.
“More than 100 genes perturbed with CRISPRa in one dataset are perturbed with CRISPRi perturbations in another dataset of the same cell line, either in one publication21 or across multiple studies20,49.”
From scPerturb: harmonized single-cell perturbation data (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Combinatorial perturbations can reveal epistasis and other genetic interactions.
“In particular, the ability to perform combinatorial perturbations represents an opportunity to decode complex regulatory networks, with pioneering work demonstrating the ability to identify epistasis and other genetic interactions5–7.”
From Efficient combinatorial targeting of RNA transcripts in single cells with Cas13 RNA Perturb-seq (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
The linear regression model δab = c1δa + c2δb + ε was used to decompose double perturbation profiles, as previously introduced.
“As previously introduced7, we model the average z-scale profiles using: δab=c1δa+c2δb+ϵ with δa and δb being the pseudobulk z-scaled profile for cells assigned to single perturbations a and b, repectively, while δab is the pseudobulk z-scaled profile for cells assigned to double perturbation ab.”
From Efficient combinatorial targeting of RNA transcripts in single cells with Cas13 RNA Perturb-seq (2023) · cites this paper as [7]
Primary human cell types such as skin fibroblasts or blood cells can be reprogrammed into iPSCs by transient expression of four transcription factors, including the Yamanaka factors.
“Primary cell types readily obtained from human adult donors, such as skin fibroblasts or peripheral blood cells, can be reprogrammed to become induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by the transient expression of four transcription factors, such as the so-called “Yamanaka factors”89,90”
From CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease (2020) · cites this paper as [90]
A CPA model with CBL + CNN1 held out successfully predicted the synergistic interaction, recapitulating patterns similar to real data and in line with the original findings.
“We observed that our model successfully predicted this synergistic interaction, recapitulating patterns similar to real data and inline with the original findings (Fig 5C).”
From Predicting cellular responses to complex perturbations in high‐throughput screens (2023) · cites this paper as Norman et al, 2019
Overexpression of both CBL and CNN1 up-regulates known gene markers such as hemoglobins.
“Overexpression of both CBL and CNN1 up‐regulate known gene markers (Norman et al, 2019) such as hemoglobins (see HBA1/2 and HBG1/2 in Fig 5B).”
From Predicting cellular responses to complex perturbations in high‐throughput screens (2023) · cites this paper as Norman et al, 2019
CPA predicted the previously reported genetic epistatic interaction between DUSP9 and ETS1, leading to domination of the DUSP9 phenotype in doubly perturbed cells.
“We further evaluated CPA to predict a previously reported (Norman et al, 2019) genetic epistatic interaction between DUSP9 and ETS1, leading to domination of the DUSP9 phenotype in doubly perturbed cells (Fig 5C).”
From Predicting cellular responses to complex perturbations in high‐throughput screens (2023) · cites this paper as Norman et al, 2019
Previous work by Norman et al (2019) proposed a set of metrics to annotate and classify gene-gene interactions based on responder genes.
“In the case of genetic screening, previous work by Norman et al (2019) proposed a set of metrics to annotate and classify gene–gene interactions based on responder genes.”
From Predicting cellular responses to complex perturbations in high‐throughput screens (2023) · cites this paper as Norman et al (2019)
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673 · see citing works
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn923 · Cited by 14,108 · see citing works
Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update
Kuleshov, M. V., Jones, M. R., Rouillard, A. D., Fernandez, N. F., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Koplev, S., Jenkins, S. L., Jagodnik, K. M., Lachmann, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377 · Cited by 10,799 · see citing works
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection
McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N., & Großberger, L. (2018) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00861 · Cited by 9,826 · see citing works
Trapnell, C., Cacchiarelli, D., Grimsby, J., Pokharel, P., Li, S., Morse, M., Lennon, N. J., Livak, K. J., Mikkelsen, T. S., & Rinn, J. L. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2859 · Cited by 7,314 · see citing works
UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Melville, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426 · Cited by 7,101 · see citing works
Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues
GTEx Consortium (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24277 · Cited by 4,036 · see citing works
hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering
McInnes, L., Healy, J., & Astels, S. (2017) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00205 · Cited by 2,833 · see citing works
Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex
Konermann, S., Brigham, M. D., Trevino, A. E., Joung, J., Abudayyeh, O. O., Barcena, C., Hsu, P. D., Habib, N., Gootenberg, J. S., Nishimasu, H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14136 · Cited by 2,825 · see citing works
Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation
Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Adamson, B., Villalta, J. E., Chen, Y., Whitehead, E. H., Guimaraes, C., Panning, B., Ploegh, H. L., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 · Cited by 2,728 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances
Székely, G. J., Rizzo, M. L., & Bakirov, N. K. (2007) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053607000000505 · Cited by 2,684 · see citing works
Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology
Orkin, S. H., & Zon, L. I. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.025 · Cited by 2,570 · see citing works
The Genetic Landscape of a Cell
Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Bellay, J., Kim, Y., Spear, E. D., Sevier, C. S., Ding, H., Koh, J. L. Y., Toufighi, K., Mostafavi, S., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1180823 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants
Tong, A. H. Y., Evangelista, M., Parsons, A. B., Xu, H., Bader, G. D., Pagé, N., Robinson, M., Raghibizadeh, S., Hogue, C. W. V., Bussey, H., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065810 · Cited by 2,138 · see citing works
Dixit, A., Parnas, O., Li, B., Chen, J., Fulco, C. P., Jerby-Arnon, L., Marjanovic, N. D., Dionne, D., Burks, T., Raychowdhury, R., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.038 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Self-citationBCL-2 family proteins: changing partners in the dance towards death
Kale, J., Osterlund, E. J., & Andrews, D. W. (2018) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.186 · Cited by 1,574 · see citing works
Adamson, B., Norman, T. M., Jost, M., Cho, M. Y., Nuñez, J. K., Chen, Y., Villalta, J. E., Gilbert, L. A., Horlbeck, M. A., Hein, M. Y., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048 · Cited by 1,193 · see citing works
Self-citationPooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout.
Datlinger, P., Rendeiro, A. F., Schmidl, C., Krausgruber, T., Traxler, P., Klughammer, J., Schuster, L. C., Kuchler, A., Alpar, D., & Bock, C. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4177 · Cited by 1,096 · see citing works
Schuldiner, M., Collins, S. R., Thompson, N. J., Denic, V., Bhamidipati, A., Punna, T., Ihmels, J., Andrews, B., Boone, C., Greenblatt, J. F., et al. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.031 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Self-citationPrinciples for the Buffering of Genetic Variation
Hartman IV, J. L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5506.1001 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Principles for the buffering of genetic variation
Hartman, J. L., Garvik, B., & Hartwell, L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1056072 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq
Jaitin, D. A., Weiner, A., Yofe, I., Lara-Astiaso, D., Keren-Shaul, H., David, E., Salame, T. M., Tanay, A., van Oudenaarden, A., & Amit, I. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.039 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Massive mining of publicly available RNA-seq data from human and mouse
Lachmann, A., Torre, D., Keenan, A. B., Jagodnik, K. M., Lee, H. J., Wang, L., Silverstein, M. C., & Ma’ayan, A. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03751-6 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
A Genome-wide Framework for Mapping Gene Regulation via Cellular Genetic Screens
Gasperini, M., Hill, A. J., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Martin, B., Kim, S., Zhang, M. D., Jackson, D., Leith, A., Schreiber, J., Noble, W. S., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.029 · Cited by 613 · see citing works
Dual‐specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs): Shaping the outcome of MAP kinase signalling
Caunt, C. J., & Keyse, S. M. (2013) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08716.x · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Direct capture of CRISPR guides enables scalable, multiplexed, and multi-omic Perturb-seq
Replogle, J. M., Xu, A., Norman, T. M., Meer, E. J., Terry, J. M., Riordan, D., Srinivas, N., Mikkelsen, T. S., Weissman, J. S., & Adamson, B. (2018) · doi:10.1101/503367 · Cited by 465 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each individual cell is in effect an independent experiment connecting a genetic perturbation to its transcriptional consequences, allowing hundreds of thousands of parallel measurements ( 9, 10 ).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRewiring of Genetic Networks in Response to DNA Damage
Bandyopadhyay, S., Mehta, M., Kuo, D., Sung, M.-K., Chuang, R., Jaehnig, E. J., Bodenmiller, B., Licon, K., Copeland, W., Shales, M., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1195618 · Cited by 447 · see citing works
Kurita, R., Suda, N., Sudo, K., Miharada, K., Hiroyama, T., Miyoshi, H., Tani, K., & Nakamura, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059890 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
A Systematic Mammalian Genetic Interaction Map Reveals Pathways Underlying Ricin Susceptibility
Bassik, M. C., Kampmann, M., Lebbink, R. J., Wang, S., Hein, M. Y., Poser, I., Weibezahn, J., Horlbeck, M. A., Chen, S., Mann, M., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.030 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Self-citationCombinatorial CRISPR–Cas9 screens for de novo mapping of genetic interactions
Shen, J. P., Zhao, D., Sasik, R., Luebeck, J., Birmingham, A., Bojorquez-Gomez, A., Licon, K., Klepper, K., Pekin, D., Beckett, A. N., et al. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4225 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Optical Pooled Screens in Human Cells
Feldman, D., Singh, A., Schmid-Burgk, J. L., Carlson, R. J., Mezger, A., Garrity, A. J., Zhang, F., & Blainey, P. C. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.016 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Mapping the Genetic Landscape of Human Cells
Horlbeck, M. A., Xu, A., Wang, M., Bennett, N. K., Park, C. Y., Bogdanoff, D., Adamson, B., Chow, E. D., Kampmann, M., Peterson, T. R., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.010 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Causes and Consequences of Genetic Interactions (Epistasis)
Domingo, J., Baeza-Centurion, P., & Lehner, B. (2019) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-014857 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship
Costanzo, M., Kuzmin, E., van Leeuwen, J., Mair, B., Moffat, J., Boone, C., & Andrews, B. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.033 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Ohta, M., Ashikawa, T., Nozaki, Y., Kozuka-Hata, H., Goto, H., Inagaki, M., Oyama, M., & Kitagawa, D. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6267 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Alitalo, R. (1990) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/0145-2126(90)90002-q · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Calponin: Thin filament-linked regulation of smooth muscle contraction
Winder, S. J., & Walsh, M. P. (1993) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/0898-6568(93)90029-l · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Kowanetz, K., Crosetto, N., Haglund, K., Schmidt, M. H. H., Heldin, C.-H., & Dikic, I. (2004) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m403759200 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Functional Overlap and Regulatory Links Shape Genetic Interactions between Signaling Pathways
van Wageningen, S., Kemmeren, P., Lijnzaad, P., Margaritis, T., Benschop, J. J., de Castro, I. J., van Leenen, D., Groot Koerkamp, M. J. A., Ko, C. W., Miles, A. J., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.021 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Kampmann, M., Bassik, M. C., & Weissman, J. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1307002110 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Generation of Transcriptomic Profiles by Random Composite Measurements
Cleary, B., Cong, L., Cheung, A., Lander, E. S., & Regev, A. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.023 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Epistasis analysis with global transcriptional phenotypes
Driessche, N. V., Demšar, J., Booth, E. O., Hill, P., Juvan, P., Zupan, B., Kuspa, A., & Shaulsky, G. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1545 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Wong, M. T., van der Maaten, L., & Newell, E. W. (2016) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1501928 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Prediction of Genetic Interactions Using Machine Learning and Network Properties
Madhukar, N. S., Elemento, O., & Pandey, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00172 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Changes in the Cell Surface Markers During Normal Hematopoiesis: A Guide to Cell Isolation
Attar, A. (2014) · Global Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · doi:10.15379/2408-9877.2014.01.01.4 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Data Imputation in Epistatic MAPs by Network-Guided Matrix Completion
Žitnik, M., & Zupan, B. (2015) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2014.0158 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- M. Xu R. Jin Z.-H. Zhou in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems M. I. Jordan Y. LeCun S. A. Solla Eds. (MIT Press 2013) pp. 2301–2309.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
scGPT: Towards Building a Foundation Model for Single-Cell Multi-omics Using Generative AI
Cui, H., Wang, C., Maan, H., Pang, K., Luo, F., & Wang, B. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.30.538439 · Cited by 1,383 · see citing works
“For the perturbation prediction task, we evaluated our model using two perturbation datasets of 171 K562 leukemia cell lines: the Adamson Pertub-seq dataset [36] consisting of 87 one-gene perturba172 tions and the Norman Perturb-Seq dataset [37] consisting of 131 two-gene perturbations and 105 173 one-gene perturbatio…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMethods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics
Vandereyken, K., Sifrim, A., Thienpont, B., & Voet, T. (2023) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-023-00580-2 · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq
Replogle, J. M., Saunders, R. A., Pogson, A. N., Hussmann, J. A., Lenail, A., Guna, A., Mascibroda, L., Wagner, E. J., Adelman, K., Lithwick-Yanai, G., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.013 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Self-citationLarge-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics
Hao, M., Gong, J., Zeng, X., Liu, C., Guo, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, T., Ma, J., Zhang, X., & Song, L. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02305-7 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
“We used the robust regression with a Theil–Sen estimator following the same procedure used in previous study 72 .”
Combinatorial single-cell CRISPR screens by direct guide RNA capture and targeted sequencing
Replogle, J. M., Norman, T. M., Xu, A., Hussmann, J. A., Chen, J., Cogan, J. Z., Meer, E. J., Terry, J. M., Riordan, D. P., Srinivas, N., et al. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0470-y · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Self-citationHow to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: Priorities and opportunities
Bunne, C., Roohani, Y., Rosen, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, X., Roed, M., Alexandrov, T., AlQuraishi, M., Brennan, P., Burkhardt, D. B., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.11.015 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
“Even for combinations of a small number of entities, exemplified in the case of enumerating pairs or sets of perturbations, 47,90 experimental design becomes exceedingly challenging.”
Predicting transcriptional outcomes of novel multigene perturbations with GEARS
Roohani, Y., Huang, K., & Leskovec, J. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01905-6 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Predicting cellular responses to complex perturbations in high‐throughput screens
Lotfollahi, M., Klimovskaia Susmelj, A., De Donno, C., Hetzel, L., Ji, Y., Ibarra, I. L., Srivatsan, S. R., Naghipourfar, M., Daza, R. M., Martin, B., et al. (2023) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.202211517 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
A new era in functional genomics screens
Przybyla, L., & Gilbert, L. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00409-w · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationHamamoto, R., Suvarna, K., Yamada, M., Kobayashi, K., Shinkai, N., Miyake, M., Takahashi, M., Jinnai, S., Shimoyama, R., Sakai, A., et al. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12123532 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
McFarland, J. M., Paolella, B. R., Warren, A., Geiger-Schuller, K., Shibue, T., Rothberg, M., Kuksenko, O., Colgan, W. N., Jones, A., Chambers, E., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17440-w · Cited by 173 · see citing works
scPerturb: harmonized single-cell perturbation data
Peidli, S., Green, T. D., Shen, C., Gross, T., Min, J., Garda, S., Yuan, B., Schumacher, L. J., Taylor-King, J. P., Marks, D. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02144-y · Cited by 194 · see citing works
CRISPR-based functional genomics for neurological disease
Kampmann, M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-020-0373-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Leveraging Uncertainty in Machine Learning Accelerates Biological Discovery and Design
Hie, B., Bryson, B. D., & Berger, B. (2020) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.007 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“Many of these conditions induced differentiation of K562, including strong differentiated signatures consistent with an erythroid state (Norman et al., 2019) (Figure 7B).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAhlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02772-6 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Yang, X., Liu, G., Feng, G., Bu, D., Wang, P., Jiang, J., Chen, S., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y., Man, Z., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.26.559542 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Rood, J. E., Hupalowska, A., & Regev, A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.035 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Machine learning for perturbational single-cell omics
Ji, Y., Lotfollahi, M., Wolf, F. A., & Theis, F. J. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.016 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Epistasis-driven identification of SLC25A51 as a regulator of human mitochondrial NAD import
Girardi, E., Agrimi, G., Goldmann, U., Fiume, G., Lindinger, S., Sedlyarov, V., Srndic, I., Gürtl, B., Agerer, B., Kartnig, F., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19871-x · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Large Scale Foundation Model on Single-cell Transcriptomics
Hao, M., Gong, J., Zeng, X., Liu, C., Guo, Y., Cheng, X., Wang, T., Ma, J., Song, L., & Zhang, X. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.29.542705 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Scalable genetic screening for regulatory circuits using compressed Perturb-seq
Yao, D., Binan, L., Bezney, J., Simonton, B., Freedman, J., Frangieh, C. J., Dey, K., Geiger-Schuller, K., Eraslan, B., Gusev, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01964-9 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
SCEPTRE improves calibration and sensitivity in single-cell CRISPR screen analysis
Barry, T., Wang, X., Morris, J. A., Roeder, K., & Katsevich, E. (2021) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02545-2 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with State
Adduri, A. K., Gautam, D., Bevilacqua, B., Naghipourfar, M., Imran, A., Shah, R., Teyssier, N., Verma, R., Carpenter, C., Eraslan, B., et al. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.07.052 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient combinatorial targeting of RNA transcripts in single cells with Cas13 RNA Perturb-seq
Wessels, H.-H., Méndez-Mancilla, A., Hao, Y., Papalexi, E., Mauck, W. M., Lu, L., Morris, J. A., Mimitou, E. P., Smibert, P., Sanjana, N. E., et al. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01705-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Mapping the multiscale structure of biological systems
Schaffer, L. V., & Ideker, T. (2021) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Isolating salient variations of interest in single-cell data with contrastiveVI
Weinberger, E., Lin, C., & Lee, S.-I. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-01955-3 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ahlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.16.613342 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Viñas Torné, R., Wiatrak, M., Piran, Z., Fan, S., Jiang, L., Teichmann, S. A., Nitzan, M., & Brbić, M. (2026) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02777-8 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Benchmarking foundation cell models for post-perturbation RNA-seq prediction
Csendes, G., Sanz, G., Szalay, K. Z., & Szalai, B. (2025) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11600-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“The Norman dataset [15] includes 91,205 single cells subjected to single or dual CRISPRa (overexpression).”
High-resolution characterization of gene function using single-cell CRISPR tiling screen
Yang, L., Chan, A. K. N., Miyashita, K., Delaney, C. D., Wang, X., Li, H., Pokharel, S. P., Li, S., Li, M., Xu, X., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24324-0 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Squidiff: predicting cellular development and responses to perturbations using a diffusion model
He, S., Zhu, Y., Tavakol, D. N., Ye, H., Lao, Y.-H., Zhu, Z., Xu, C., Chauhan, S., Garty, G., Tomer, R., et al. (2026) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02877-y · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Sparse dictionary learning recovers pleiotropy from human cell fitness screens
Pan, J., Kwon, J. J., Talamas, J. A., Borah, A. A., Vazquez, F., Boehm, J. S., Tsherniak, A., Zitnik, M., McFarland, J. M., & Hahn, W. C. (2022) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2021.12.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lo, Y.-H., Horn, H. T., Huang, M.-F., Yu, W.-C., Young, C.-M., Liu, Q., Tomaske, M., Towers, M., Dominguez, A., Bassik, M. C., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62818-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“We also conducted a similar analysis, implementing a “ linear model ” of epistasis as previously published 52 , which reached the same conclusions.”
Self-citationPerturbNet predicts single-cell responses to unseen chemical and genetic perturbations
Yu, H., Qian, W., Song, Y., & Welch, J. D. (2025) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/s44320-025-00131-3 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A Systematic Comparison of Single-Cell Perturbation Response Prediction Models
Li, L., You, Y., Fu, Y., Liao, W., Fan, X., Lu, S., Cao, Y., Li, B., Ren, W., Kong, J., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.23.630036 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Additionally, we downloaded the Norman ( 44 ) and Adamson ( 45 ) dataset from the following links: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/ datafile/6154020 , https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/access/datafile/ 6154417 , along with the Kang ( 46 ), Haber ( 47 ), and Hagai ( 48 ) datasets from the scGen study ( https:/…”
scELMo: Embeddings from Language Models are Good Learners for Single-cell Data Analysis
Liu, T., Chen, T., Zheng, W., Luo, X., Chen, Y., & Zhao, H. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.07.569910 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
PerturbNet predicts single-cell responses to unseen chemical and genetic perturbations
Yu, H., & Welch, J. D. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500854 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“229 We used data from a CRISPRa screen in K562 cells with 230 perturbations (GI) [10], the LINCS 230 dataset with 4,109 shRNA perturbations (LINCS-Gene) [23], and the genome-scale Perturb-seq 231 dataset with 9499 CRISPRa perturbations (GSPS) [25].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWong, D. R., Hill, A. S., & Moccia, R. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf317 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Sailem, H. Z., Rittscher, J., & Pelkmans, L. (2020) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20199083 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
He, F., Fei, R., Krull, J. E., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Cheng, H., Gao, M., Su, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01170-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Evaluating the learnability of single-cell large language models on multiple tasks
Yan, Y., Wang, X., & Song, D. (2026) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8919408/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Evaluating the learnability of single-cell large language models on multiple tasks
Yan, Y., Wang, X., & Song, D. (2026) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-026-12975-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A systematic comparison of single-cell perturbation response prediction models
Li, L., You, Y., Fu, Y., Liao, W., Fan, X., Lu, S., Cao, Y., Li, B., Ren, W., Kong, J., et al. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aed3414 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CauTrigger: deciphering biological system state transitions by hierarchical causal decomposition
Zhang, C., Cai, D., Aihara, K., & Chen, L. (2026) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-026-03274-9
An immune world model for multiscale forecasting and therapeutic hypothesis generation
Cui, T., Wang, X., Li, Z., Ding, J., You, L., Xu, Y., Xu, W., Wu, F., Ying, K., Ouyang, W., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.14709
- Authors
- Norman, T. M., Horlbeck, M. A., Replogle, J. M., Ge, A. Y., Xu, A., Jost, M., Gilbert, L. A., & Weissman, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Norman, Thomas M.
- Gilbert, Luke A.
- Weissman, Jonathan S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2019-08-23
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 6455
- Pages
- 786-793
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC6746554
- OpenAlex
- W2969093152
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 116 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (U01 CA168370, R01 DA036858, R00 CA204602, DP2 CA239597, 1RM1 HG009490, T32 GM007618, P50 GM102706, U01 CA217882, F32 GM116331)
- Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation (DRG-[2211-15])
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Defense Sciences Office, DARPA (HR0011-19-2-0007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Keywords
- genetic interactions, single-cell RNA sequencing, cell fitness, interaction classification
- MeSH terms
- Calponins, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Epistasis, Genetic, Erythropoiesis, Female, Granulocytes, Humans, Microfilament Proteins, Apoptosis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Erythroid Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-cbl, Single-Cell Analysis, Cell Cycle Checkpoints, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review