PreprintCited by 155Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchGeometric and Algebraic Topology

Representation Theory of Analytic Holonomy C* Algebras

Open access
Ashtekar, Abhay, Lewandowski, Jerzy·1993·arXiv

Abstract

Integral calculus on the space of gauge equivalent connections is developed. Loops, knots, links and graphs feature prominently in this description. The framework is well--suited for quantization of diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections. The general setting is provided by the abelian C* algebra of functions on the quotient space of connections generated by Wilson loops (i.e., by the traces of holonomies of connections around closed loops). The representation theory of this algebra leads to an interesting and powerful ``duality'' between gauge--equivalence classes of connections and certain equivalence classes of closed loops. In particular, regular measures on (a suitable completion of) connections/gauges are in 1--1 correspondence with certain functions of loops and diffeomorphism invariant measures correspond to (generalized) knot and link invariants. By carrying out a non--linear extension of the theory of cylindrical measures on topological vector spaces, a faithful, diffeomorphism invariant measure is introduced. This measure can be used to define the Hilbert space of quantum states in theories of connections. The Wilson--loop functionals then serve as the configuration operators in the quantum theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.gr-qc/9311010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. A. Ashtekar, Non-perturbative canonical quantum gravity (Notes pre- pared in collaboration with R.S. Tate), World Scientific, Singapore, (1991)
  2. J. Baez, In: Proceedings of the conference on quantum topology (to ap- pear)
  3. C. Di Bortolo, R. Gambini and J. Griego, preprint IFFI/9301; gr- qc/9303010
  4. M. Creutz, Quarks, Gluons and Lattices, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988, Chapter 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
1993
Pages
21
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133897949
Cited by
155
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
Keywords
Wilson loops, representation theory, cylindrical measures, quantum connection, gauge theory quantization, holonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review