Cited by 36Advanced Operator Algebra ResearchRelativity and Gravitational TheoryNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

TOPOLOGICAL MEASURE AND GRAPH-DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY ON THE QUOTIENT SPACE OF CONNECTIONS

Open access
LEWANDOWSKI, JERZY·1994·International Journal of Modern Physics D

Abstract

Integral calculus on the space [Formula: see text] of gauge equivalent connections is developed. By carring out a non-linear generalization of the theory of cylindrical measures on topological vector spaces, a faithfull, diffeomorphism invariant measure is introduced on a suitable completion of [Formula: see text]. The strip (i.e. momentum) operators are densely-defined in the resulting Hilbert space and interact with the measure correctly

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1142/s0218271894000307

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The definition of C [ N ] is plagued by ordering ambiguities.

    “The definition of C [ N ] is plagued by ordering ambiguities [32,33,43].”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [32]

  • The ambiguity in the definition of C[N] was fixed in [32] and [33] to a large extent arbitrarily.

    “Recall that the ambiguity in the definition of C [ N ] was fixed in [32] and [33] to a large extent arbitrarily.”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. A. Ashtekar, Non-perturbative canonical quantum gravity (Notes prepared in collaboration with R.S. Tate), (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
  2. [2]2. A. Ashtekar, in: Proceedings of the 1992 Les Houches summer school on 'Gravitation and Quantization'
  3. [6]6. J. Baez, In: Proceedings of the conference on quantum topology (to appear, 1993)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEWANDOWSKI, J.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
LEWANDOWSKI, JERZY
Venue
International Journal of Modern Physics D
Published
1994-03
Volume
03
Issue
01
Pages
207-210
ISSN
  • 0218-2718 (ISSN-L)
  • 1793-6594
OpenAlex
W2102370110
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Modern Physics D (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
cylindrical measures, topological vector spaces, momentum operator, gauge theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review