Cited by 515Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensory Processing and Classroom Emotional, Behavioral, and Educational Outcomes in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Ashburner, Jill, Ziviani, Jenny, Rodger, Sylvia·2008·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. We explored the associations between sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD. Twenty-eight children with ASD (with average-range IQ) were compared with 51 age- and gender-matched typically developing peers on sensory processing and educational outcomes. RESULTS. For children with ASD, the Short Sensory Profile scores Underresponsive/Seeks Sensation and Auditory Filtering explained 47% of the variance in academic performance, yet estimated intelligence was not a significant predictor of academic performance. Significant negative correlations were found between (1) auditory filtering and inattention to cognitive tasks, (2) tactile hypersensitivity and hyperactivity and inattention, and (3) movement sensitivity and oppositional behavior. CONCLUSION. A pattern of auditory filtering difficulties, sensory underresponsiveness, and sensory seeking was associated with academic underachievement in the children with ASD. Children who have difficulty processing verbal instructions in noisy environments and who often focus on sensory-seeking behaviors appear more likely to underachieve academically.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.62.5.564

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 515

Metadata

Authors
Ashburner, J., Ziviani, J., & Rodger, S.
Affiliations
  • Jill Ashburner, BOccThy, PhD, is Principal Research and Development Officer, Autism Queensland, PO Box 354, Sunnybank, Queensland, Australia 4109;
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2008-09
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
564-573
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2053804096
Cited by
515
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory processing, academic performance, academic underachievement, auditory filtering, sensory seeking, tactile hypersensitivity, movement sensitivity, inattention, hyperactivity, oppositional behavior, classroom behavior, children
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Sensation Disorders, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review