Cited by 149Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Financial Literacy and Credit Card Behaviors: A Cross-Sectional Analysis by Age

Open access
Allgood, Sam, Walstad, William·2013·Numeracy

Abstract

In this study, we use a measure of financial literacy that includes both a test score of actual financial literacy and a self-rating of perceived financial literacy to investigate how financial literacy affects five credit card behaviors: (1) always paying a credit card balance in full; (2) carrying over a credit card balance and being charged interest; (3) making only a minimum payment on a credit card balance; (4) being charged a fee for a late payment; and (5) being charged a fee for exceeding a credit limit. Probit analysis was used to assess each behavior with a large nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (N = 28,146) divided into groups to reflect the five major decades in the adult life cycle (18–29; 30–39; 40–49; 50–59; and 60–69 and older). Perceived financial literacy was found to be a stronger predictor of less costly practices in credit card use than actual financial literacy for the five credit card behaviors and across each of the five age groups. The study also shows that the combination of the subjective assessment with the objective assessment of financial literacy provides a more comprehensive analysis of how financial literacy affects each credit card behavior. This combined approach to assessment produced the largest estimates of the effects of financial literacy on credit card behavior. The findings hold across the five credit card behaviors and the five age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.3

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with low levels of financial literacy are significantly less likely to use their credit cards efficiently.

    “Other recent studies document that individuals with low levels of financial literacy are significantly less likely to use their credit cards efficiently (e.g., Lusardi and Tufano 2015;Mottola 2013;Allgood and Walstad 2013).”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Allgood and Walstad 2013

  • The influence of self-assessed financial literacy on costly credit card practices is greater than that of test-based financial literacy.

    “The authors also show that the influence of self-assessed financial literacy on costly credit card practices is greater than that of test-based financial literacy, providing evidence that the two concepts are distinct from each other.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Allgood and Walstad (2013)

  • Among U.S. adults, there is a robust negative relation between financial literacy and costly credit card practices.

    “Analyzing U.S. adults, Allgood and Walstad (2013) find a robust negative relation between financial literacy and costly credit card practices.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Allgood and Walstad (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allgood, S., & Walstad, W.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
Numeracy
Published
2013-07
Volume
6
Issue
2
ISSN
1936-4660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970900868
Cited by
149
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
27.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Numeracy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, minimum payments, late payment fees, interest expenses, age differences, adult life cycle, consumer credit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review