The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class
Open accessAbstract
Neo-liberal policies and institutional changes have produced a huge and growing number of people with sufficiently common experiences to be called an emerging class. In this book Guy Standing introduces what he calls the Precariat - a growing number of people across the world living and working precariously, usually in a series of short-term jobs, without recourse to stable occupational identities or careers, stable social protection or protective regulations relevant to them. They include migrants, but also locals. Standing argues that this class of people could produce new instabilities in society. They are increasingly frustrated and dangerous because they have no voice, and hence they are vulnerable to the siren calls of extreme political parties. He outlines a new kind of good society, with more people actively involved in civil society and the precariat re-engaged. He goes on to consider one way to a new better society -- an unconditional basic income for everyone, contributed by the state, which could be topped up through earned incomes. This is a topical, and a radical book, which will appeal to a broad market concerned by the increasing problems of labour insecurity and civic disengagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human resource management and employee well-being: towards a new analytic framework
Guest, D. E. (2017) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12139 · Cited by 1,362
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839218759646 · Cited by 744
The “sharing” economy: labor, inequality, and social connection on for‐profit platforms
Schor, J. B., & Attwood‐Charles, W. (2017) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12493 · Cited by 379
Precarity of place: a complement to the growing precariat literature
Banki (2013) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1080/23269995.2014.881139 · Cited by 153
Peeling an onion: the “refugee crisis” from a historical perspective
Lucassen, L. (2018) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1355975 · Cited by 120
The experience of precarity: low-paid economic migrants’ housing in Manchester
Lombard, M. (2023) · Housing Studies · doi:10.1080/02673037.2021.1882663 · Cited by 74
Young precariat and a new work order? A case for historical sociology
Bessant, J. (2018) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2017.1420762 · Cited by 53
Bourdieu, Foucault and the politics of precarity
Masquelier, C. (2019) · Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1080/1600910x.2018.1549999 · Cited by 37
Hammer, A. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1554537 · Cited by 32
Platformization and Informality: Pathways of Change, Alteration, and Transformation
Surie, A., & Huws, U. (2023) · Dynamics of Virtual Work · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11462-5_1 · Cited by 22
Blurring the Boundaries between Leisure and Work: Professionals as Devotees in the Mind-Sport Bridge
Russell, Z., Punch, S., & McIntosh, I. (2022) · International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure · doi:10.1007/s41978-021-00099-y · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Standing, G.
- Venue
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
- Published
- 2011
- OpenAlex
- W4253286927
- Cited by
- 1,998
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 103.88
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.