Cited by 6Ginger and Zingiberaceae researchGastrointestinal motility and disordersGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

The Effects of Ginger on Gallbladder Motility in Healthy Male Humans

Open access
Chuah, Seng-Kee, Wu, Keng-Liang, Tai, Wei-Chen, Changchien, Chi-Sin·2011·Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ginger has been used to treat a number of diseases including those affecting the digestive tract. This study was aimed to investigate the effects of ginger on gallbladder volume and gastrointestinal sensation in healthy male subjects. METHODS: Nineteen healthy male volunteers (age 21.3 ± 3.9 years, body mass index 21.6 ± 1.9 kg/m(2)) were studied on 2 occasions in a double blind randomized crossover design. After ingesting ginger (1,200 mg) or placebo capsules (starch), abdominal ultrasound was used to measure the gallbladder volume (calculated from gallbladder width, depth and diameter) and ejection fraction following a standard test meal. Gastrointestinal symptoms were also recorded at regular intervals by visual analogue scales. RESULTS: There were no differences in gallbladder volume or ejection fraction between ginger and placebo. Abdominal symptoms of bloating, fullness, nausea, discomfort and hunger was not different between the 2 occasions. CONCLUSIONS: Ginger (1,200 mg) may not affect gallbladder ejection fraction and possible relevant abdominal symptoms in healthy male human subjects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.4.411

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Yamahara J Miki K Chisaka T Cholagogic effect of ginger and its active constituents J Ethnopharmacol 1985 13 217 225 4021519

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuah, S.-K., Wu, K.-L., Tai, W.-C., & Changchien, C.-S.
Affiliations
Chang Gung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wu, Keng-Liang
Venue
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Published
2011-10-31
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
411-415
ISSN
  • 2093-0879 (ISSN-L)
  • 2093-0887
OpenAlex
W2017527057
Cited by
5
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Ginger and Zingiberaceae research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Keywords
ginger, gallbladder motility, gallbladder ejection fraction, gallbladder volume, gastrointestinal symptoms, bloating, nausea, hunger, healthy men, herbal medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review