The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Sources not found · 7 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,201–1,300 of 4,457
Bauer, D. M. (2002) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822384311-015 · Cited by 18
Kannan, S., Bessette, D., & Makai, L. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103687 · Cited by 18
“I Love Being a Mom So I Don’t Mind Doing It All”: The Cost of Maternal Identity
Hauser, O. (2015) · Sociological Focus · doi:10.1080/00380237.2015.1059158 · Cited by 18
Defining My Own Oppression: Neoliberalism and the Demands of Victimhood
Shi, C.-C. (2018) · Historical Materialism · doi:10.1163/1569206x-00001638 · Cited by 18
Petermon, J. D., & Spencer, L. G. (2019) · Critical Studies in Media Communication · doi:10.1080/15295036.2019.1607518 · Cited by 18
Reyes, G., Aronson, B. A., Batchelor, K. E., Ross, G., & Radina, R. (2021) · Action in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/01626620.2021.1883149 · Cited by 18
Barnett, J. T., & Johnson, C. W. (2013) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i5-4369 · Cited by 18
Reception and use of intersectionality. A reading from French perspective
Blidon, M. (2018) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2018.1457015 · Cited by 18
Faculty members engaging in transformative PETE: a feminist perspective
Lynch, S., & Curtner‐Smith, M. D. (2018) · Sport Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2018.1560255 · Cited by 18
First things first: Black women situating identity in the first-year faculty experience
Gray-Nicolas, N. M., & Nash, A. M. (2021) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2021.1969907 · Cited by 18
Disrupting the Transitional Justice Circuit: Everyday Transformative Gender Justice in Colombia
Monroy-Santander, L., & Otálora-Gallego, G. (2024) · Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding · doi:10.1080/17502977.2024.2314239 · Cited by 18
We to Me: An Autoethnographic Discovery of Self, In and Out of Domestic Abuse
Fletcher, M. (2018) · Women s Studies in Communication · doi:10.1080/07491409.2017.1423526 · Cited by 18
A critical look at equity in international doctoral education at a distance: A duo's journey
Abdelghaffar, A., & Eid, L. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13566 · Cited by 18
Fan studies and/as feminist methodology
Hannell, B. (2020) · Transformative Works and Cultures · doi:10.3983/twc.2020.1689 · Cited by 18
Creating spaces of refusal in the neoliberal academy
Museus, S. D., & Sasaki, C. T. (2021) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2021.2003889 · Cited by 18
Brant, J. (2023) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.2023.2200809 · Cited by 18
Meyer, M. D. E. (2007) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370600998293 · Cited by 18
Kark, R., Blatt, R., & Wiesel, V. (2023) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267231161426 · Cited by 18
Ramos, M. M. (2021) · Revista Direito e Práxis · doi:10.1590/2179-8966/2020/50776 · Cited by 18
Removing the Veil of Whiteness in Qualitative Research Using Sista Circle Methodology
Palmer, D. L., & Udoh, E. E. (2024) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069241278161 · Cited by 18
Social Psychology: Humanist Roots and Feminist Future
Lott, B. E. (1991) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00426.x · Cited by 17
Clarke, J., Mills-Minster, S., & Gudge, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64838-5_11 · Cited by 17
The Faith, the Honor of Women, the Land: The Druze Women in Israel
Halabi, R. (2014) · Journal of Asian and African Studies · doi:10.1177/0021909614533094 · Cited by 17
Showalter, D. (2020) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.102629 · Cited by 17
Migrant margins: The streetlife of discrimination
Hall, S. M. (2018) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026118771282 · Cited by 17
Territorial formation on the margin: urban anti-planning in Brooklyn
Steinberg, P. E. (1994) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/0962-6298(94)90051-5 · Cited by 17
Sreberny‐Mohammadi, A. (1996) · Journal of International Communication · doi:10.1080/13216597.1996.9751820 · Cited by 17
Cultural Criminology and Gender Consciousness: Moving Feminist Theory From Margin to Center
Naegler, L., & Salman, S. (2020) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.12693101.v1 · Cited by 17
Cultural Criminology and Gender Consciousness: Moving Feminist Theory From Margin to Center
Naegler, L., & Salman, S. (2020) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.12693101 · Cited by 17
Marcus Board Jr. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197605226.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Young Adult Offending: Intersectionality of Gender and Race
Bell, K. E. (2012) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-012-9170-3 · Cited by 17
McArdle, F. (2008) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.2304/ciec.2008.9.4.365 · Cited by 17
Gurrieri, L., Previte, J., & Prothero, A. (2020) · Journal of Macromarketing · doi:10.1177/0276146720952530 · Cited by 17
Tomboys: Meanings, Marginalization, and Misunderstandings
Hall, J. M. (2008) · Issues in Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1080/01612840802048691 · Cited by 17
Cultivating the next generation of academics in South Africa
Portnoi, L. M. (2009) · Africa Education Review · doi:10.1080/18146620903274704 · Cited by 17
Barton, A. C. (1998) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405849809543819 · Cited by 17
Teaching rhetorical criticism withThelma and Louise
Griffin, C. L. (1995) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634529509379008 · Cited by 17
Dhamoon, R. K. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0003 · Cited by 17
Fernandes, F. (2003) · European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling · doi:10.1080/1364253042000281351 · Cited by 17
Nash, M. (2013) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783313504053 · Cited by 17
Examining the World Around Us: Critical Media Literacy in Teacher Education
Joanou, J. P. (2017) · Multicultural Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15210960.2017.1267514 · Cited by 17
Petteway, R. J. (2021) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839921999048 · Cited by 17
Leadership Education from within a Feminist Ethos
Dentith, A. M., & Peterlin, B. (2011) · Journal of Research on Leadership Education · doi:10.1177/194277511100600201 · Cited by 17
Samek, A. A., & Donofrio, T. A. (2013) · Women s Studies in Communication · doi:10.1080/07491409.2012.754388 · Cited by 17
A “Community” of Discipline: The Paradox of Diversity Within an Intercultural Church
Jenkins, J. J. (2013) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.845793 · Cited by 17
Matthew, R. A., & Bransburg, V. (2016) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109916678027 · Cited by 17
Undocumented and Mixed-Status Latinx Families: Sociopolitical Considerations for Systemic Practice
Walsdorf, A. A., Machado‐Escudero, Y., & Bermúdez, J. M. (2019) · International Journal of Systemic Therapy · doi:10.1080/08975353.2019.1679607 · Cited by 17
Munch, S. (2006) · Social Work in Health Care · doi:10.1300/j010v43n01_02 · Cited by 17
Documenting conversion: Framings of female converts to Islam in British and Swiss documentaries
Spoliar, L., & van den Brandt, N. (2020) · European Journal of Women s Studies · doi:10.1177/1350506820920912 · Cited by 17
Pender, K. N., Hope, E. C., & Sondel, B. (2022) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2662 · Cited by 17
Anderson, J. N., Paladino, A. J., Blue, R., Dangerfield, D. T., Eggly, S. S., Martin, M. Y., Schwartzberg, L. S., Vidal, G. A., & Graetz, I. (2023) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-023-01511-0 · Cited by 17
Confronting White Ignorance: White Psychology and Rational Self‐Regulation
Glazer, T., & Liebow, N. (2020) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12349 · Cited by 17
Carrino, E. A., Bryen, C. P., Maheux, A. J., Stewart, J., Roberts, S. R., Widman, L. M., & Choukas‐Bradley, S. (2022) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-021-01260-3 · Cited by 17
Who is (Not) Protected by Title IX? A Critical Review of 45 Years of Research
Meyer, E. J., & Quantz, M. (2021) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146812112300203 · Cited by 17
“She’s a friend of my mind”: a reflection of Black sisterhood in academia
Turner, C. R., & Allen, K. R. (2022) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/13613324.2022.2088724 · Cited by 17
Todić, J., & Christensen, M. C. (2022) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/24972 · Cited by 17
Examining the State of Robot Identity
Miranda, L., Castellano, G., & Winkle, K. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3580168 · Cited by 17
Narrativa de las protagonistas trans en la teleserie Veneno
Durán, S. C., & Escudero, S. O. (2021) · Zer - Revista de Estudios de Comunicación · doi:10.1387/zer.23007 · Cited by 17
I Need You to Tell My Story: Qualitative Inquiry for/With Transnational Black Women
Burkhard, T. J. (2018) · Culture Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies · doi:10.1177/1532708618817883 · Cited by 17
Richardson-Self, L. V. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10019-5 · Cited by 17
Cavazzoni, F., Veronese, G., Sousa, C., Ayoub, H., & Shalhoub‐Kevorkian, N. (2023) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593535231181760 · Cited by 17
What is ‘6B4T’ in China? New wave of radical digital feminism on Douban
Li, S., & Gu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Gender Studies · doi:10.1080/09589236.2025.2521682 · Cited by 17
Willett, A., & Etowa, J. B. (2023) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.12564 · Cited by 17
Mukherjee, J. S. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197607251.003.0006 · Cited by 17
Callaway, A. A. (2008) · San José State University ScholarWorks (San Jose State University) · doi:10.31979/etd.yxmy-ds98 · Cited by 17
Moura–Koçoğlu, M. (2017) · Contemporary Women s Writing · doi:10.1093/cww/vpx015 · Cited by 17
Knight, M., Ferguson, R. N., Ferguson, R. N., & Reece, R. (2021) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci10060210 · Cited by 17
Twenty Years of Feminist Philosophy
Ferguson, A. (1994) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00457.x · Cited by 16
Exploring a Moral Landscape: Genetic Science and Ethics
Nicholas, B. (2001) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb01048.x · Cited by 16
Specificity: Beyond Equality and Difference
Phelan, S. (1991) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-3-1-128 · Cited by 16
Relational Remembering and Oppression
Koggel, C. M. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12079 · Cited by 16
Redrawing the Map: Medina on Epistemic Vices and Skepticism
McGlynn, A. (2019) · International Journal for the Study of Skepticism · doi:10.1163/22105700-20191386 · Cited by 16
The Baltimore Uprising and the Stunted Transformation of Urban Black Politics
Marcus Board, & King-Meadows, T. D. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003169833-11 · Cited by 16
Language in the middle: Class and sexuality on the Hinglish continuum
Hall, K. (2021) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12485 · Cited by 16
Questions of gender in a multicultural society
Gressgård, R., & Jacobsen, C. (2003) · NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research · doi:10.1080/08038740310002923 · Cited by 16
Blunt, A., & Lee, J.-A. (1994) · Adult Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/074171369404400301 · Cited by 16
The General Will, the Common Good, and a Democracy of Standards
Pettit, P. N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108630153.002 · Cited by 16
Some feminist contributions to community social psychology
Mayorga, C. (2014) · Athenea Digital Revista de pensamiento e investigación social · doi:10.5565/rev/athenead/v14n1.1089 · Cited by 16
White, A. M., Potgieter, C. A., Strube, M., Fisher, S. L., & Umana, E. (1997) · Journal of Black Psychology · doi:10.1177/00957984970234007 · Cited by 16
Transgressing borders: Teaching about whiteness in women's studies
Avakian, A. V. (1999) · Identities · doi:10.1080/1070289x.1999.9962639 · Cited by 16
How to … bring a JEDI (justice, equity, diversity and inclusion) lens to your research
Jain, N. R., Nimmon, L., & Bulk, L. Y. (2023) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.13660 · Cited by 16
Rebounding on the Tenure Track: Carving Out a Place of Your Own in the Academy
Sinclair‐Chapman, V. (2018) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096518001270 · Cited by 16
Challenging Islamophobia in Canada: non-Muslim social workers as allies with the Muslim community
Smith, S. J. (2019) · Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought · doi:10.1080/15426432.2019.1651240 · Cited by 16
Gupta, A., Nugent, D., & Sreenath, S. (2015) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1111/amet.12157 · Cited by 16
Healthcare experiences of a Black lesbian in the United States
Ejaife, O. L., & Ho, I. K. (2017) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105317690036 · Cited by 16
Champeau, D., & Shaw, S. M. (2002) · Women & Health · doi:10.1300/j013v36n03_03 · Cited by 16
Who Counts (or Doesn’t Count) What as Feminist Theory?
Winter, B. (2000) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647000022229092 · Cited by 16
Senanayake, N. (2022) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486221113963 · Cited by 16
You Can’t Steal My Joy! Practices and Possibilities for Black Joy in Urban Education
Edwards, E. B., & Reynolds, A. D. (2024) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/00420859241227950 · Cited by 16
The Black Feminist Erotic Imagination
Jones, A. (2025) · Sex & Sexualities · doi:10.1177/3033371251324187 · Cited by 16
Kohl, E., & Co, T. N. F. C. W. (2016) · Capitalism Nature Socialism · doi:10.1080/10455752.2015.1104705 · Cited by 16
Labor-market Inequality: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Class
Browne, I., & Misra, J. (2007) · Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470996973.ch9 · Cited by 16
Marquardt, N., & Schreiber, V. (2014) · Urban Geography · doi:10.1080/02723638.2014.961358 · Cited by 16
Gender in Public Administration: Looking Back and Moving Forward
Carey, G. E., & Dickinson, H. (2015) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12172 · Cited by 16
Chan, C. D., Steen, S., Howard, L. C., & Ali, A. I. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05900-2_5 · Cited by 16
Foster, J. E., & Foster‐Palmer, S. (2023) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12581 · Cited by 16
Experiencing second-wave feminism in the USA
Biklen, S. K., Marshall, C., & Pollard, D. S. (2008) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596300802410185 · Cited by 16
Inclusion and Exclusion: Intersectionality and Gender-Based Violence
Warrier, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-89999-2_49 · Cited by 16
Jefferies, K., Martin‐Misener, R., Murphy, G. T., Gahagan, J., & Bernard, W. T. (2022) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.220019 · Cited by 16
Stories of hope, imagination, and transformative learning: A dialogue
Butterwick, S. J., & Lawrence, R. L. (2023) · New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education · doi:10.1002/ace.20478 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
