The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Sources not found · 7 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,201–3,300 of 4,457
Malotra-Gaudet, L. (2015) · Journal of Student Research · doi:10.47611/jsr.v4i2.235
El papel de la clase trabajadora (otras mujeres) en la educación crítica
Merrill, B. (2009) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks.3975
Perl, E. J. (1996) · About Campus Enriching the Student Learning Experience · doi:10.1002/abc.6190010205
SING A BLACK GIRL'S SONG: NTOZAKE SHANGE E O FEMINISMO AFRO-AMERICANO
Reyes, J., & LaGuardia, A. (2013) · Cadernos do IL · doi:10.22456/2236-6385.29433
The Korowai Framework: Assessing GE through the Values the ART Confederation Associates with Ngarara
Baker, M.-A.-R. (2010) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16973782.v1
Liminaire: Access, Responsibility
Godard, B. (1992) · Tessera · doi:10.25071/1923-9408.24947
Permeable Boundaries: Globalizing Form in Contemporary American and British Literature
Caronia, N. (2015) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-caronia-nancy-2015
Hancock, A. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0411
Kenna, A. C. (2008) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e509372008-001
From Second‐Wave to Postructuralist Feminism
Marie, H. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444361506.wbiems991
Taylor, W. (2015) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/2231
Roper, K. (2012) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/1232
Special Section on Learning in Communities: Introduction
Carroll, J. M., & Bishop, A. P. (2006) · The Journal of Community Informatics · doi:10.15353/joci.v2i2.2084
Tactics Toward a Thirdspace Classroom
Driggs, J. O. (2015) · Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/15505170.2015.1055409
Woehrle, L. M. (1996) · Peace Review · doi:10.1080/10402659608425989
VIII. Working with and Against Male-Dominated Culture
McLaren, A. T. (1996) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353596061021
Book Review: Feminism With Men: Bridging the Gender Gap
Cohen, M. (2006) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.1177/0092055x0603400211
Al-Fartousi, M. (2013) · Contemporary Justice Review · doi:10.1080/10282580.2013.828915
Levinas' asymmetry and the question of women's oppression
de Salazar, M. C. C. (2008) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700108086366
The indeterminate province: Storytelling in legal theory and legal education
Green, K., Lim, H., & Roche, J. (1994) · The Law Teacher · doi:10.1080/03069400.1994.9992888
Preparing students for the 21st century: Alternative (re)writings in contemporary feminist thought
Meyer, M. D. E. (2004) · Review of Communication · doi:10.1080/1535859042000289423
Reading Catharine MacKinnon in Europe
Labio, C. (1996) · The European Legacy · doi:10.1080/10848779608579520
Gentile, K. (2011) · Studies in Gender and Sexuality · doi:10.1080/15240657.2011.536069
Diasporan subjectivity and the dynamics of empowerment in Buchi Emecheta'sHead Above Water
Fongang, D. (2012) · African and Black Diaspora An International Journal · doi:10.1080/17528631.2012.739913
Men in Feminism: Theorizing Sexual Violence
Morra, N. N., & Smith, M. D. (1993) · The Journal of Men s Studies · doi:10.3149/jms.0201.15
Dialogue on feminism and academic change
Cain, W. E., & Messer‐Davidow, E. (1990) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691729008578555
A virada espacial nos novos estudos de letramento: em busca do terceiro espaço
Scheifer, C. L. (2014) · Calidoscópio · doi:10.4013/cld.2014.121.01
THEORIZING CITIZENSHIP FROM THE MARGINS
Brettschneider, M. (1998) · Southeastern Political Review · doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.1998.tb00496.x
For Whom Does the Speaking Woman Speak?
Eebee, V. E. (2014) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n26p22
Women's Resistance in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Jacoby, T. A. (2010) · Minerva Journal of Women and War · doi:10.3172/min.4.1.7
Challenging the Genteel Supports of Atrocities: A Response to The Atrocity Paradigm
Bell, L. A. (2009) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.00010.x
Transgressing the Boundaries: Re-Imagining Gender in Education
Moloi, K. C., & Dimema, M. (2013) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n13p119
García, L. G. (2014) · The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies · doi:10.17561/grove.v0i21.2203
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.002
Romanienko, L. A. (2003) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas.1999.787354
Reflections of Undergraduate Business Education Alumnae: Shifting Perspectives on Gender and Work
Phelps, A. D. (2015) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/diss-phelps-aimee-2015
van Driel, B., Kamińska-Sztark, K., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2010) · Power and Education · doi:10.2304/power.2010.2.3.341
Trading the Picket Fence: Perceptions of Childbirth, Marriage, and Career
Parham-Payne, W., Dickerson, B. J., & Everette, T. D. (2013) · The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare · doi:10.15453/0191-5096.3747
Vivanco, S. S. (2009) · Gredos (University of Salamanca) · doi:10.14201/gredos.76325
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.005
NGANGA, I. K. (2015) · Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management · doi:10.61426/sjbcm.v2i2.161
The Ethical Significance of Pregnancy
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.004
MARTABAT DALAM ITS WAVERING IMAGE KARYA PENULIS PEREMPUAN CHINA-AMERIKA, SUI SIN FAR
Kusharyanto, J. (2014) · Jurnal Kawistara · doi:10.22146/kawistara.5673
(2022) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.130
Reed, A. M., & Tull, R. G. (2020) · ASEE International Forum · doi:10.18260/1-2--17151
Citation Network Analysis of Comparative Education Texts
Lee, M., & Friedrich, T. (2011) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-722-6_7
Galvão, J. D. C. (2015) · RIUnB Institutional Repository (University of Brasília) · doi:10.26512/2015.08.d.19502
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.001
Academic Feminist Activism on a Traditional STEM Campus: The Case of a Feminist Newspaper at MTU
Snyder, K. (2015) · Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/47
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.009
‘I’m feeling some sapphic vibes comin’ off of you.’
DeCeuninck, A., & Dhoest, A. (2016) · Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies · doi:10.5117/tvgn2016.1.ceun
UMA HISTÓRIA DE MULHERES: A GENEALOGIA FEMININA EM SULA, DE TONI MORRISON
Carreira, S. D. S. G. (2010) · Revista da Anpoll · doi:10.18309/anp.v1i28.168
Jordan, N. A., & Luzader, J. (2016) · Journal of College and Character · doi:10.1080/2194587x.2016.1159225
Gervais, C. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230119253_9
Η σημασία της μεθόδου ‘Ιστορίες Ζωής’ στην Έρευνα για τη Δια Βίου Εκπαίδευση: Διεθνείς Προοπτικές.
Παζιώνη-Καλλή, Κ. (2016) · Διεθνές Συνέδριο για την Ανοικτή & εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση · doi:10.12681/icodl.491
The Politics of Networking in the Grassroots Environmental Justice Movement
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0005
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.003
Off the Record: Voices of Ordinary Jewish Survivors of the Shoah
Gerlind, M. (2007) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230607262_5
Gendered Models of Social Relations: How Moral and Political Culture Closes Minds and Hearts
Meyers, D. T. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195140419.003.0003
The Unread Red Feminists: Silenced Precursors of the U.S. Second Wave
Mann, S. A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1529-212620150000020024
Social Stratification and Opportunities
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.002
Introduction: The Environmental Challenge to Pluralism
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0001
6 Restorative Justice for Domestic and Family Violence
Nancarrow, H. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335484.003.0006
THE SUBJECT OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, WITH POSTSCRIPT 2007
Walker, M. U. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315394.003.0001
Women and Their Changing Positions
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.012
Twenty Volumes of Feminism at the Center of Social Science and Knowledge
Segal, M. T., & Demos, V. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1529-212620150000020002
Difference and Social Identity
Pompper, D. (2014) · International perspectives on equality, diversity and inclusion · doi:10.1108/s2051-2333(2014)0000001001
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.008
8.3. Die Perspektiven von Seelsorge und Beratung
(2001) · Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks · doi:10.13109/9783666623677.300
Communicative Practices and Communicative Demands in the Environmental Justice Movement
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0006
A Gendered Approach for Policy in United Nations Peacekeeping Missions
Keaney-Mischel, C. (2010) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230111974_7
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.007
Components of a Critical Pluralism: Ethics and Processes
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0004
Walker, M. U. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315394.003.0003
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0002
Pluralism and Difference: A Genealogy of Multiplicity
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199256411.003.0003
9 The Politics of Transparency and the Moral Work of Truth
Walker, M. U. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315394.003.0009
Live Ordnance in the Cultural Field: Gender Imagery, Sexism, and the Fragility of Feminist Gains
Meyers, D. T. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195140419.003.0007
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.006
A History of Courage and the Continuous Search for Political Expression
Gasa, N. (2009) · Graduate Institute Publications eBooks · doi:10.4000/books.iheid.6307
Class and the Structure of Inequality
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.005
Walker, M. U. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315394.003.0007
Introduction: Centering Sexual Orientation Politics
Calhoun, C. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199257663.003.0001
Alcoff, L. M. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195137345.003.0001
Caring for Children, Caring for Friends, Caring by Children
Mullin, A. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814280.007
The Shape of Lesbian and Gay Subordination
Calhoun, C. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0199257663.003.0004
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.013
Public Policy and Social Stratification
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.016
The Vagina Monologues: Theoretical, Geopolitical, and Pedagogical Concerns
Williams, K. A. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230119475_10
Understanding Social Stratification
Keister, L. A., & Southgate, D. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511842986.004
Feminist and Gender Criticism and “The Secret Sharer”
Schwarz, D. R. (1997) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-14424-2_7
Cheah, J., & Kim, G. J.-S. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137370334_3
Feministische Aufbrüche: Impulse aus den USA
Lennox, S. (1999) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-03218-8_39
Bibliographie der zitierten Literatur
Körte, B., Müller, K. P., & Schmied, J. J. (2004) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05036-6_8
A case study of Tracie Morris's Project Princess
Jenkins, T. (2013) · Louisiana State University · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.79
Gender, Metal and the Media: An Introduction
Hill, R. L. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-55441-3_1
Hunter, M. A. (2016) · National symposium on family issues · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43847-4_11
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
