The DOI matches its Crossref record; none of the 34 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 Sources not found · 7 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 21
- It may state two separate claims as one. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 3,401–3,500 of 4,457
Do LGBTQ-identified, postsecondary writing instructors come out in their classrooms?
Baumann, M. (2019) · ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository (University of Louisville) · doi:10.18297/etd/3331
Lépinard, É. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190077150.003.0002
Lépinard, É. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190077150.003.0007
Resisting Whiteness, Claiming Feminism
Lépinard, É. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190077150.003.0005
O PRECONCEITO E A DISCRIMINAÇÃO NA ESCOLA
Monteiro, S. A. D. S., Ribeiro, P. R. M., Molteni, C. M. C., Camilo, M., Cornélio, D. C. M., Bandeira, V. N., Borges, M. C., & Moreira, F. S. (2020) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.6762020035
de Abreu, J. M., de Almeida, B. H. M., & de Castro, L. A. (2020) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.67620200310
Bringing My Past into My Future as a Woman in the Academy
Burns, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3114-9_1
MORRO DA CONCEIÇÃO: HISTÓRIA DE FÉ E CULTURA QUE SE ENTRELAÇA NO SUBÚRBIO DA CIDADE
de Farias, L. P. D. S., & da Silva, S. B. (2020) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.6762020039
SEXUALIDADES E TRAMAS NARRATIVAS, UM MERGULHO COM ARTISTA LEONILSON
Andrade, K. D. S., & Chagas, J. S. (2020) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.67620200314
Ferreira, B. A. D. M., & Baía, I. V. D. M. (2020) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.6762020031
O crime do Cais do Valongo: quando a saga da diversidade negra se projeta para a contemporaneidade
Matias, J. L. (2020) · Fórum de Literatura Brasileira Contemporânea · doi:10.35520/flbc.2019.v11n22a31043
Women and the Reproduction of Unjust History in Egalitarian Contexts
Nuti, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108325592.006
Women as Fighters for their Land Freedom in Wa Thiongo's A Grain of Wheat (1967)
Al-Afifi, A. (2020) · International Journal of Instructional Technology and Educational Studies · doi:10.21608/ihites.2020.24575.1001
Griffith, J. (2020) · Digital Commons - URI (University of Rhode Island) · doi:10.23860/thesis-griffith-jaclyn-2020
Originalism, Infallibility, and the Institutionalization of White Supremacy
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0003
Dismantling White Supremacy and Racial Innocence
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0007
The Persistence of White Supremacy Beyond Desegregation
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0006
White Privilege, Racial Innocence, and the Costs of Anti-Racist Dissent, Mormon Examples
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0005
The Production of National Racial Innocence
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0004
American Christianity, White Supremacy, and Racial Innocence
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0001
The Religious Micropolitics of White Over Black
Brooks, J. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190081768.003.0002
A life course perspective on the start of Black middle-class women’s recreational running careers
Smith-Tran, A. (2020) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732173.2020.1781004
Inventive Methods of the Intimate Insider: Possibilities for Feminist Research
Lipton, B. (2020) · Palgrave studies in gender and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45062-5_2
Inclusion and Exclusion: Intersectionality and Gender-Based Violence
Warrier, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_49-1
A History of Feminist Film Theory
Miraka, F. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc063
Graphic Novel Text Sets and Social Justice Inquiry Projects
Jacobson, E. D. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.1073
Silko, L. M. (2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380016-003
Arteta, M. (2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380016-005
Wertzberger, E., Mendonca, A. L. R., Minchala, E., y Ortega, L. M., & Taylor, K. A. (2020) · Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación · doi:10.18682/cdc.vi117.4289
Dual charging practices in cases of domestic violence : perpetuating (in)equalities
Atrooshi, C. (2010) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2010-08925
Belonging, Believing, Being: A Journey Toward Social Justice
Williams, S. L. (2013) · Digital USD (University of San Diego) · doi:10.22371/05.2013.001
Russian Vicious Circles: The Facebook Flash Mob #яНеБоюсьСказать, Biopolitics, and Rape Culture
Korowin, E. (2020) · Societies and political orders in transition · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53130-0_8
Violences à l’acte, violences dans l’acte : pour une histoire des théâtres féministes états-uniens
Planeix-Crocker, M. (2020) · Les cahiers de l École du Louvre · doi:10.4000/cel.9971
Becerra, D. S. (2020) · Meridians · doi:10.1215/15366936-8117812
Rethinking Feminist Movements After World War II
Valk, A. M. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119522690.ch21
Work as feminist activism: a qualitative case study
Guard, N. S. (2001) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · doi:10.31274/rtd-20201118-204
“She who would be king”: identity, dignity and women’s narrative
Stone, L., Mooki, M., & Nxumalo, N. (2020) · Agenda · doi:10.1080/10130950.2020.1826173
Enke, F. (2020) · Genders and sexualities in the social sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48501-6_3
Futility of Feminist Aspirations in Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls: A Postfeminist Reading
Ramadan, M. R. (2017) · Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies /Egyptian Journal of English Language and Literature Studies · doi:10.21608/ejels.2017.134018
McDowell, T. (2015) · SpringerBriefs in family therapy · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15633-0_3
Raça e gênero no debate público sobre imigração na Itália
Garcia, F. D. F., & Zuin, J. C. S. (2021) · Simpósio Gênero e Políticas Públicas · doi:10.5433/sgpp.2018v5.p1361
Mariano, S. A., de Souza, M. F., & Ferreira, L. P. (2021) · Simpósio Gênero e Políticas Públicas · doi:10.5433/sgpp.2018v5.p150
NARRATIVAS PERIFÉRICAS DE DESIGUALDADES RACIAIS, TERRITORIAIS E DE GÊNERO.
Elvir, A. M., & Azevedo, A. J. (2020) · Revista Rural & Urbano · doi:10.51359/2525-6092.2020.247494
On Decolonizing Social Ontology and the Feminist Canon for Transnational Feminisms
Monque, P. (2021) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12468
Tricksters, cyborgs, and themusalsal: media movement and infrastructure gaps in Arab television
Jaber, H. (2021) · Critical Studies in Media Communication · doi:10.1080/15295036.2021.1884276
PATRIARCHY AND THE “OTHER” IN THE WESTERN IMAGINATION: HONOUR KILLINGS AND VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
Train, K. A. (2021) · International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies · doi:10.18357/ijcyfs121202120087
Beyond Idolatrous Whiteness II: Beholding Beauty
Boscaljon, D. (2021) · Religious Studies Review · doi:10.1111/rsr.15040
Women, Religion and COVID-19: Cohesive Agency, Resilience-Building and Inter-spatial Performance
Epafras, L. C., & Astuti, I. (2021) · International Symposium on Religious Life (ISRL) · doi:10.4108/eai.2-11-2020.2305062
Xuan, S., & Chen, X. (2016) · Journal of literature and art studies · doi:10.17265/2159-5836/2016.04.003
Hari Kondabolu as Philosopher: Enacting a Philosophy of Liberation
Heppard, B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97134-6_53-1
Reading the Forest: A history and analysis of Forest of Dean literature
Griffiths, J. (2019) · doi:10.46289/wesx0876
Teoria crítica, pluralidade e democracia: um estudo sobre a filosofia política de Seyla Benhabib
Matos, A. P. (2020) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.8.2020.tde-22032021-164419
Revealing Women’s Suffering through Displacing Meaning in William Blake’s Poems
Ramadhan, A., Wahyuni, W., & Jepri, J. (2021) · Prologue Journal on Language and Literature · doi:10.36277/jurnalprologue.v7i1.65
Killing Two Birds with One Stone?
Escobar, S., Pérez-Nievas, S., & Cordero, G. (2021) · Migraciones Publicación del Instituto Universitario de Estudios sobre Migraciones · doi:10.14422/mig.i51y2021.006
Nuti, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108325592.005
Lozano, A., Vianden, J., & Kieler, P. (2021) · JCSCORE · doi:10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2021.7.1.13-45
Cooper, J. (2021) · Journal of Feminist Scholarship · doi:10.23860/jfs.2021.18.01
(An)other Southern Rhetoric: Charlotte Hawkins Brown’s Mammy: An Appeal to the Heart of the South
Moss, C. (2021) · Rhetoric Review · doi:10.1080/07350198.2021.1883808
Kempen, C. (2021) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110726534-011
Gimenes, J. S. (2021) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.8.2021.tde-25052021-111009
Older Single Women in Transition: Moving to a Supportive Retirement Community
Hansen-Kyle, L. L. (2006) · doi:10.22371/07.2006.08
Queer: A 25 Year History, A Blooming Identity
Klepacki, G. (2021) · doi:10.15760/honors.1119
Basham, K. K. (1999) · Clinical Social Work Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1022830515470
The Evolution of Geographic Thought
Wyly, E. K. (2021) · Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie · doi:10.1111/tesg.12492
Garner, M. C. (2021) · ISU Red - Research and eData (Illinois State University) · doi:10.30707/etd2021.20210719070603175920.76
De-temporalising (Historical) Injustice
Nuti, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108325592.002
Stockdale, K. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197563564.003.0003
Stockdale, K. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197563564.003.0002
Stockdale, K. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197563564.003.0004
Horwitz, J. (2021) · MELUS Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States · doi:10.1093/melus/mlab023
Celebrating TGE Singers in Choral Classrooms
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0007
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0008
Honoring Gender Diversity in Music Classrooms
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0005
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0001
Understanding School Climate for Trans and Gender-Expansive Persons
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0003
Starting a Conversation about Trans and Gender-Expansive Persons
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0002
Safe People Creating Safe Spaces
Garrett, M. L., & Palkki, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197506592.003.0004
Shimshon-Santo, A. (2021) · GeoHumanities · doi:10.1080/2373566x.2021.1960179
Rizvi, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79573-3_2
Rizvi, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79573-3_5
Magnifying Gender and Sexual Rights
Rizvi, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79573-3_4
Seksistični grafiti in njihova preoblikovanja
Vičar, B. (2021) · Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) eBooks · doi:10.4312/ssjlk.57.29-36
van Veen, T. C. (2021) · TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.3138/topia-43-br09
Stereotyping in the novel Moelelwa: The dichotomy between laziness and maternal duties
Makgabo, C., Ramagoshi, R. M., & Zondi, N. B. (2021) · South African Journal of African Languages · doi:10.1080/02572117.2021.1948218
Bedford, A., & Chalmers, E. (2021) · Critical studies of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77011-2_7
KEEPING ON THE PATH IN FIVE POEMS BY ALICE WALKER
Rosada, R., & Ningsih, K. (2019) · English Language and Literature · doi:10.24036/ell.v8i2.104461
Utilizing Women In The Buddha In The Attic (2011) by Julie Otsuka
Rimadini, U., & Syafei, A. F. R. (2020) · English Language and Literature · doi:10.24036/ell.v9i1.108018
Las voces del silencio: feminismos poscoloniales
Baanante, A. P. (2021) · Tropelías/Tropelías · doi:10.26754/ojs_tropelias/tropelias.2021365334
Voices from the Hearth: An Afro-Feminist Reading of Accad’s Wounding Words
Danquah, G. (2021) · International Journal of Literature and Arts · doi:10.11648/j.ijla.20210905.12
“Not Free to Be Completely Human”
Russo, C. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108596237.001
Political Will, Leadership, and the Importance of Decolonization
Mukherjee, J. S. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197607251.003.0013
Nuti, A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108325592.004
História Trágica com Final Feliz: Criação de uma Experiência Feminista na Animação
Gil, C. C. (2021) · AVANCA | CINEMA · doi:10.37390/avancacinema.2021.a337
Babin, D. (2018) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-12988
Introduction to the Special Issue
Chan, C. D., Erby, A. N., & Fullen, M. C. (2021) · Adultspan Journal · doi:10.1002/adsp.12110
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
