Cited by 32Media Studies and CommunicationMisinformation and Its ImpactsJournalism and Media Studies

Journalism, the pressures of verification and notions of post-truth in civil society

Open access
Martin, Nora·2017·Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal

Abstract

‘Post-truth’ was not a new concept when it was selected as the international word of the year (2016) by Oxford Dictionaries. In the context of communications research, scholars were discussing journalism in the ‘post-factual’ age some thirty years ago (Ettema 1987). In the digital era, journalistic practice itself has changed; stories are generated by a multiplicity of actors in a participative and interactive way. This paper contemplates the nature of journalists’ information practices in the 21st century and relates these to the roles of information and social media in civil society. The methodology draws on the findings of pilot research studies investigating journalists’ information practices in the digital realm (Martin 2014; 2015) and investigates the pressures of verification. The author posits that that we are ostensibly living in a ‘post-truth’ society largely due to the impact of changes in the news milieu in the digital age. With so many diverse voices in the mix, it is increasingly difficult for citizens to separate fact from fiction; journalists thus have a role as verifiers. It is crucial for information consumers (citizenry) to have the requisite skills and knowledge to critically evaluate media content and deal with information and communication overload.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5476

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithmic content filtering can create echo chambers that trap users by only exposing them to opinions and beliefs they are already in agreement with.

    “This is compounded by the rise of algorithmic content filtering, such as that populating Facebook users' feeds or seen in the news dissemination system 'WhatsUp' [6], that can create echo chambers which trap users by only exposing them to opinions and beliefs they are already in agreement with [19,23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Champagne, P. 2005, 'The "double dependency": The journalistic field between politics and markets', in Benson, R. and Neveu, E. (eds.) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 48-63.
  2. Schwartz, D. and Zolberg, V. (eds.), After Bourdieu, Kluwer Academic, pp. 165-189.
  3. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. 1967, Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis, Sociology Press, Mill Valley.
  4. Hjørland, B., and Albrechtsen, H. 1995, 'Toward a new horizon in Information Science: Domain analysis', Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 400-425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID- ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y Keane, J. 1999, 'Public life in the era of communicative abundance', Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 24, no. 2, Accessed 25 March 2017, <http://www.cjc- online.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/1094/1000>. · DOI
  5. Martin, N. 2016, 'Information verification in the digital age: The news library perspective', Synthesis Lectures on Emerging Trends in Librarianship, (4). Morgan and Claypool, San Rafael, CA. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00722ED1V01Y201607ETL0040>. · DOI
  6. Steele, B. 2014, 'Journalism ethics then and now', in McBride, K. and Rosenstiel, T (eds.), The New Ethics of Journalism, CQ Press, Thousand Oaks.
  7. Sukovic, S. 2017, Transliteracy in Complex Information Environments, Chandos, Cambridge, MA.
  8. Tuchman, G. 1978, 'The Web of Facticity', in Making News: A Study in the Construction in Reality, Free Press, New York, pp. 82-103.
  9. Watkins, J., Park. S., Blood, R.W., Deas, M., Dunne Breen, M., Fisher, C., Fuller, G., Lee, J.Y., Papandrea, F. and Ricketson, M. 2016, Digital News Report: Australia 2016, News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra. <http://dx.doi.10.4225/50/5754F7090A5C5.15>. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, N.
Affiliations
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Martin, Nora
Venue
Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Published
2017-07-21
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
41-56
ISSN
1837-5391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738465742
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
post-truth, journalism, verification, digital journalism, social media, civil society, fact-checking, media literacy, information overload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review