Cited by 76Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

AI and the Future of Learning: Expert Panel Report

Open access
Roschelle, Jeremy, Lester, James, Fusco, Judi·2020

Abstract

This report is based on the discussion that emerged from a convening of a panel of 22 experts in artificial intelligence (AI) and in learning. It introduces three layers that can frame the meaning of AI for educators. First, AI can be seen as “computational intelligence” and capability can be brought to bear on educational challenges as an additional resource to an educator’s abilities and strengths. Second, AI brings specific, exciting new capabilities to computing, including sensing, recognizing patterns, representing knowledge, making and acting on plans, and supporting naturalistic interactions with people. Third, AI can be used as a toolkit to enable us to imagine, study, and discuss futures for learning that don’t exist today. Experts voiced the opinion that the most impactful uses of AI in education have not yet been invented. The report enumerates important strengths and weaknesses of AI, as well as the respective opportunities and barriers to applying AI to learning. Through discussions among experts about these layers, we observed new design concepts for using AI in learning. The panel also made seven recommendations for future research priorities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51388/20.500.12265/106

Cites

45 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R. (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208-231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217u · DOI
  2. Kim, Y. et al. (2018). CIRCL Workshop: Robots, young children, & alternative input methods. https://circlcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WorkshopReport- RobotsYoungChildren-2018.pdf
  3. Murphy, R. F. (2019). Artificial intelligence applications to support K-12 teachers and teaching: A review of promising applications, challenges, and risks. RAND Corporation, https://doi. org/10.7249/PE315.html · DOI
  4. Richter, A., Gacic, T., Koelmel, B., Waidelich, L., & Glaser, P. (2019). A review of fundamentals and influential factors of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology, 8(4), 142-156. https://www.ijcit.com/archives/volume8/issue5/IJCIT080501.pdf
  5. Simon, H.A. (1969/1996). The sciences of the artificial (Third Edition). MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262193740
  6. Expert Panelists: Dr. Russell Almond, Florida State University; Dr. Ryan Baker, University of Pennsylvania; Dr. Avron Barr, IEEE; Dr. Gautam Biswas, Vanderbilt University; Dr. Justine Cassell, Carnegie Mellon University; John Cherniavsky, National Science Foundation;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roschelle, J., Lester, J., & Fusco, J.
Published
2020-11
OpenAlex
W3133271749
Cited by
76
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, future of learning, computational intelligence, AI capabilities, research priorities, expert panel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review