The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ambidextrous Organization: Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
Among the current concepts suggested for managers to deal with turbulence and multidimensionality in the business climate, organizational ambidexterity is listed. It seems to be quite enticing but difficult to incorporate the idea of incorporating both evolutionary and innovative organizational changes. While it has been widely debated for more than twenty years in management-related literature, it has not been extensively explored and is still an important subject for further research. The purpose of the paper is to examine the contribution of literature to the advancement of the idea of ambidextrous organization and recognize the major problems and trends in research production. The research method aims to address the following questions: (1) What are the main contributions of literature in the field to the concept's development? (2) What are the key topics of study and developments in the field? The applied methodology is a systematic literature survey. For the sampling process, the Scopus database is used as a source. The analysis highlights the following main areas of research interest in the field: (1) ambidexterity and ambidextrous conceptualization of organizations, (2) context of organizational management (including managers) where these assumptions are embedded and studied, (3) innovations, processes of organizational learning and creativity, and (4) aspects of strategic management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165852 · Cited by 4,950
Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308316058 · Cited by 2,702
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 · Cited by 2,224
Conducting research literature reviews: from the Internet to paper
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-6198 · Cited by 1,854
A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research
Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1954824 · Cited by 1,849
(1997) · Journal of Business Strategy · doi:10.1108/eb039871 · Cited by 1,839
The new public service: serving, not steering
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5440 · Cited by 1,376
An Ambidexterity Perspective Toward Multinational Enterprises From Emerging Economies.
Luo, Y., & Rui, H. (2009) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2009.45590140 · Cited by 414
Cited by
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002 · Cited by 489
Technological Diversification, Coherence, and Performance of Firms
Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00272.x · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Mana-Ay, D., Kashyap, A., Forhad, J. B., & Darakhshan, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership
- Publisher
- HAR PRESS INDONESIA
- Published
- 2020-05-31
- Pages
- 39-50
- ISSN
- 2722-0249 (ISSN-L)
- 2774-6143
- OpenAlex
- W3125193598
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 28.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambidextrous Organization: Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.51629/ijeamal.v1i1.6
- The paper
- Mana-Ay, D., Kashyap, A., Forhad, J. B., & Darakhshan, T. (2020). Ambidextrous Organization: Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v1i1.6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.