The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation
Abstract
Literature on diversity in organisations is limited and even fewer studies investigate its impact on innovation. Therefore, the aim of this research is to study how gender diversity within R&D teams, among other factors, impacts innovation, drawing on data from an innovation survey in Spain. Our findings support the assertion that gender diversity within R&D teams generates certain dynamics that foster novel solutions leading to radical innovation. The results indicate that gender diversity is positively related to radical innovation. However it does not promote incremental innovation in the same way. The positive relation occurs under particular conditions of the task (a higher degree of novelty), as the two types of innovation might require different skills for their effective performance. These results have several implications for academics, politicians and practitioners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110 · Cited by 3,470
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217 · Cited by 3,413
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Cited by
Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J. F., Otaye‐Ebede, L., Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2040 · Cited by 406
I'd blush if I could: closing gender divides in digital skills through education
UNESCO, & Coalition, E. S. (2019) · doi:10.54675/rapc9356 · Cited by 262
Kijima, R., & Sun, K. L. (2021) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.12307 · Cited by 28
Legg, E., & Karner, E. (2021) · Sport, Education and Society · doi:10.1080/13573322.2021.1907325 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Jose Sáez-Martínez, F.
- Venue
- Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-160
- ISSN
- 1447-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 2204-0226
- OpenAlex
- W4241696707
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149
- The paper
- Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Jose Sáez-Martínez, F. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2013.15.2.149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
