The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. We describe a method of evaluating systematic errors in measurements of total column dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) from space, and we illustrate the method by applying it to the v2.8 Atmospheric CO2 Observations from Space retrievals of the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (ACOS-GOSAT) measurements over land. The approach exploits the lack of large gradients in XCO2 south of 25° S to identify large-scale offsets and other biases in the ACOS-GOSAT data with several retrieval parameters and errors in instrument calibration. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the method by comparing the ACOS-GOSAT data in the Northern Hemisphere with ground truth provided by the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). We use the observed correlation between free-tropospheric potential temperature and XCO2 in the Northern Hemisphere to define a dynamically informed coincidence criterion between the ground-based TCCON measurements and the ACOS-GOSAT measurements. We illustrate that this approach provides larger sample sizes, hence giving a more robust comparison than one that simply uses time, latitude and longitude criteria. Our results show that the agreement with the TCCON data improves after accounting for the systematic errors, but that extrapolation to conditions found outside the region south of 25° S may be problematic (e.g., high airmasses, large surface pressure biases, M-gain, measurements made over ocean). A preliminary evaluation of the improved v2.9 ACOS-GOSAT data is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., et al. (1996) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:tnyrp>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 28,360
The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database
Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hill, C., Kochanov, R. V., Tan, Y., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K. V., et al. (2017) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.038 · Cited by 7,721
Self-citationThe HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database
Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I. E., Barbe, A., Benner, D. C., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Brown, L. R., Campargue, A., Champion, J.-P., et al. (2009) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.013 · Cited by 3,335
Self-citationA leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice
Rodgers, C. D. (2000) · Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics · doi:10.1142/3171 · Cited by 3,057
The Total Carbon Column Observing Network
Wunch, D., Toon, G. C., Blavier, J.-F. L., Washenfelder, R. A., Notholt, J., Connor, B. J., Griffith, D. W. T., Sherlock, V., & Wennberg, P. O. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2010.0240 · Cited by 1,309
Self-citationUnified equations for the slope, intercept, and standard errors of the best straight line
York, D., Evensen, N. M., Martı́nez, M. L., & De Basabe Delgado, J. (2004) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1632486 · Cited by 1,197
An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker
Peters, W., Jacobson, A. R., Sweeney, C., Andrews, A. E., Conway, T. J., Masarie, K., Miller, J. B., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Pétron, G., Hirsch, A. I., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0708986104 · Cited by 1,051
Self-citationIntercomparison of remote sounding instruments
Rodgers, C. D., & Connor, B. J. (2003) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2002jd002299 · Cited by 826
Self-citationFirst observations of global and seasonal terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from space
Joiner, J., Yoshida, Y., Vasilkov, A. P., Yoshida, Y., Corp, L. A., & Middleton, E. M. (2011) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-8-637-2011 · Cited by 611
Cited by
The HITRAN2016 molecular spectroscopic database
Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hill, C., Kochanov, R. V., Tan, Y., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K. V., et al. (2017) · Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.06.038 · Cited by 7,721
Self-citationComparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Osterman, G., Fisher, B., Naylor, B., Roehl, C. M., O'Dell, C., Mandrake, L., Viatte, C., Kiel, M., et al. (2017) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017 · Cited by 477
Self-citationO'Dell, C. W., Eldering, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crisp, D., Gunson, M. R., Fisher, B., Frankenberg, C., Kiel, M., Lindqvist, H., Mandrake, L., et al. (2018) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-11-6539-2018 · Cited by 434
Self-citationThe Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes
Eldering, A., Wennberg, P. O., Crisp, D., Schimel, D. S., Gunson, M. R., Chatterjee, A., Liu, J., Schwandner, F. M., Sun, Y., O’Dell, C. W., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam5745 · Cited by 305
Self-citationThe Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: first 18 months of science data products
Eldering, A., O'Dell, C. W., Wennberg, P. O., Crisp, D., Gunson, M. R., Viatte, C., Avis, C., Braverman, A., Castano, R., Chang, A., et al. (2017) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-10-549-2017 · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Connor, B. J., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Frankenberg, C., Mandrake, L., O'Dell, C., Ahonen, P., Biraud, S. C., Castano, R., Cressie, N., Crisp, D., Deutscher, N. M., Eldering, A., Fisher, M. L., Griffith, D. W. T., Gunson, M., Heikkinen, P., Keppel-Aleks, G., Kyrö, E., Lindenmaier, R., Macatangay, R., Mendonca, J., Messerschmidt, J., Miller, C. E., Morino, I., Notholt, J., Oyafuso, F. A., Rettinger, M., Robinson, J., Roehl, C. M., Salawitch, R. J., Sherlock, V., Strong, K., Sussmann, R., Tanaka, T., Thompson, D. R., Uchino, O., Warneke, T., & Wofsy, S. C.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2011-12-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 12317-12337
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W1990194058
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 20.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011
- The paper
- Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Toon, G. C., Connor, B. J., Fisher, B., Osterman, G. B., Frankenberg, C., Mandrake, L., O'Dell, C., Ahonen, P., Biraud, S. C., Castano, R., Cressie, N., Crisp, D., Deutscher, N. M., Eldering, A., Fisher, M. L., Griffith, D. W. T., Gunson, M., . . . Wofsy, S. C. (2011). A method for evaluating bias in global measurements of CO 2 total columns from space. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12317-2011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
