CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of Deccan Traps eruption rates using geochronologic data

Schoene, Blair, Eddy, Michael P., Keller, C. Brenhin, Samperton, Kyle M.·2021·Geochronology
DOI 10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent attempts to establish the eruptive history of the Deccan Traps large igneous province have used both U−Pb (Schoene et al., 2019) and 40Ar/39Ar (Sprain et al., 2019) geochronology. Both of these studies report dates with high precision and unprecedented coverage for a large igneous province and agree that the main phase of eruptions began near the C30n–C29r magnetic reversal and waned shortly after the C29r–C29n reversal, totaling ∼ 700–800 kyr duration. These datasets can be analyzed in finer detail to determine eruption rates, which are critical for connecting volcanism, associated volatile emissions, and any potential effects on the Earth's climate before and after the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary (KPB). It is our observation that the community has frequently misinterpreted how the eruption rates derived from these two datasets vary across the KPB. The U−Pb dataset of Schoene et al. (2019) was interpreted by those authors to indicate four major eruptive pulses before and after the KPB. The 40Ar/39Ar dataset did not identify such pulses and has been largely interpreted by the community to indicate an increase in eruption rates coincident with the Chicxulub impact (Renne et al., 2015; Richards et al., 2015). Although the overall agreement in eruption duration is an achievement for geochronology, it is important to clarify the limitations in comparing the two datasets and to highlight paths toward achieving higher-resolution eruption models for the Deccan Traps and for other large igneous provinces. Here, we generate chronostratigraphic models for both datasets using the same statistical techniques and show that the two datasets agree very well. More specifically, we infer that (1) age modeling of the 40Ar/39Ar dataset results in constant eruption rates with relatively large uncertainties through the duration of the Deccan Traps eruptions and provides no support for (or evidence against) the pulses identified by the U−Pb data, (2) the stratigraphic positions of the Chicxulub impact using the 40Ar/39Ar and U−Pb datasets do not agree within their uncertainties, and (3) neither dataset supports the notion of an increase in eruption rate as a result of the Chicxulub impact. We then discuss the importance of systematic uncertainties between the dating methods that challenge direct comparisons between them, and we highlight the geologic uncertainties, such as regional stratigraphic correlations, that need to be tested to ensure the accuracy of eruption models. While the production of precise and accurate geochronologic data is of course essential to studies of Earth history, our analysis underscores that the accuracy of a final result is also critically dependent on how such data are interpreted and presented to the broader community of geoscientists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Geography and stratigraphy of the Deccan Traps in the Western Ghats Region. a) Map of India (© Google Earth), showing in red the footprint of the Deccan Traps; white box indicates the study area, called the western Ghats, enlarged in (b). b) Colored relief map (© OpenStreetMap contributors 2020. Distributed under a Creative Commons BY-SA License) of 620 the Western Ghats showing several cities and cross-section line from (d). c) Stratigraphic column of the major basalt unit subdivisions in the Western Ghats. Stratigraphy measured as cumulative volume, using the volume model for each formation from (Richards et al., 2015), which was used in both Schoene et al. (2019) and Sprain et al. (2019). d) Cross section through the Western Ghats. Cross-section line chosen to go through the sampling sites in Schoene et al. 625 (2019). All figures modified from Schoene et al. (2015), Schoene et al. (2019), and references therein.
Fig. 1 Geography and stratigraphy of the Deccan Traps in the Western Ghats Region. a) Map of India (© Google Earth), showing in red the footprint of the Deccan Traps; white box indicates the study area, called the western Ghats, enlarged in (b). b) Colored relief map (© OpenStreetMap contributors 2020. Distributed under a Creative Commons BY-SA License) of 620 the Western Ghats showing several cities and cross-section line from (d). c) Stratigraphic column of the major basalt unit subdivisions in the Western Ghats. Stratigraphy measured as cumulative volume, using the volume model for each formation from (Richards et al., 2015), which was used in both Schoene et al. (2019) and Sprain et al. (2019). d) Cross section through the Western Ghats. Cross-section line chosen to go through the sampling sites in Schoene et al. 625 (2019). All figures modified from Schoene et al. (2015), Schoene et al. (2019), and references therein.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Eruption rate model for the Deccan Traps, based on U-Pb geochronology. (A) Results from the MCMC algorithm used to generate the age model in Fig. 1, converted to a probabilistic volumetric eruption rate for the Deccan Traps shown with contours up to 68% credible intervals. The U-Pb date for the Chicxulub impact is the same as in Fig. 1. Total global volcanic productivity (~3-4 km³/year) includes mid-ocean ridges and volcanic arcs (28).
Fig. 2 Eruption rate model for the Deccan Traps, based on U-Pb geochronology. (A) Results from the MCMC algorithm used to generate the age model in Fig. 1, converted to a probabilistic volumetric eruption rate for the Deccan Traps shown with contours up to 68% credible intervals. The U-Pb date for the Chicxulub impact is the same as in Fig. 1. Total global volcanic productivity (~3-4 km³/year) includes mid-ocean ridges and volcanic arcs (28).CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Recalculated eruption rates from Fig. 4 of Sprain et al. (2019). Original figure was converted to an eruption rate by dividing the total volume of each formation (the heights in their Fig. 4), by their estimated durations for each formation, to give units of km 3 /a. Time on the xaxis, and color and width of each box is left as from their original figure. See Fig. 4 of this paper for probabilistic eruption rates.
Fig. 3 Recalculated eruption rates from Fig. 4 of Sprain et al. (2019). Original figure was converted to an eruption rate by dividing the total volume of each formation (the heights in their Fig. 4), by their estimated durations for each formation, to give units of km 3 /a. Time on the xaxis, and color and width of each box is left as from their original figure. See Fig. 4 of this paper for probabilistic eruption rates.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Age models and eruption rates for the Deccan Traps. Age models and eruptions rates produced using geochronologic data from Schoene et al. (2019; red) and Sprain et al. 650 (2019; blue), using the same methods as described in Schoene et al. (2019). Data and model for Schoene et al. (2019) are identical to those in the original publication. Note the units on the stratigraphy in the top panel are cumulative km 3 , not m, and so the slope of the age models are km 3 /a, which is plotted in the lower panel. Volume model is from Richards et al. (2015). Stratigraphic heights for the Sprain et al. (2019) samples are taken from their Fig. 2. Also plotted 655 is the probability of the stratigraphic position of the Chicxulub impact as calculated during the MCMC age modeling by querying where an accepted age model intersects an age for the KPg. U-Pb age model is compared to U-Pb KPg date from Clyde et al., (2016); 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age model is compared to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar KPg date from (Sprain et al., 2018).
Fig. 4 Age models and eruption rates for the Deccan Traps. Age models and eruptions rates produced using geochronologic data from Schoene et al. (2019; red) and Sprain et al. 650 (2019; blue), using the same methods as described in Schoene et al. (2019). Data and model for Schoene et al. (2019) are identical to those in the original publication. Note the units on the stratigraphy in the top panel are cumulative km 3 , not m, and so the slope of the age models are km 3 /a, which is plotted in the lower panel. Volume model is from Richards et al. (2015). Stratigraphic heights for the Sprain et al. (2019) samples are taken from their Fig. 2. Also plotted 655 is the probability of the stratigraphic position of the Chicxulub impact as calculated during the MCMC age modeling by querying where an accepted age model intersects an age for the KPg. U-Pb age model is compared to U-Pb KPg date from Clyde et al., (2016); 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age model is compared to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar KPg date from (Sprain et al., 2018).CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 6 Synthetic dataset subjected to MCMC age modeling to test the age precision 675 necessary to resolve pulses in eruptions. Upper left shows the dataset, meant to approximate the age model of Schoene et al. (2019), but shown here with negligible uncertainties (±10 ka 2sigma). Other panels show model outputs for eruption rates generated for different 2sigma uncertainties on the input data themselves (i.e., uncertainties on 'data' from upper left panel). The results indicate that a threshold of precision is required for geochronology 680 to resolve pulses and hiatuses of given durations. Also shown in red are the average reported 2sigma uncertainties on eruption ages from the U-Pb dataset of Schoene et al. (2019) and the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dataset from Sprain et al. (2019). The point is that the lower precision 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dataset cannot possibly test the hiatus and pulse model observed by the U-Pb dataset.
Fig. 6 Synthetic dataset subjected to MCMC age modeling to test the age precision 675 necessary to resolve pulses in eruptions. Upper left shows the dataset, meant to approximate the age model of Schoene et al. (2019), but shown here with negligible uncertainties (±10 ka 2sigma). Other panels show model outputs for eruption rates generated for different 2sigma uncertainties on the input data themselves (i.e., uncertainties on 'data' from upper left panel). The results indicate that a threshold of precision is required for geochronology 680 to resolve pulses and hiatuses of given durations. Also shown in red are the average reported 2sigma uncertainties on eruption ages from the U-Pb dataset of Schoene et al. (2019) and the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dataset from Sprain et al. (2019). The point is that the lower precision 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dataset cannot possibly test the hiatus and pulse model observed by the U-Pb dataset.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V.: Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction, Science, 208, 1095–1108, 1980. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andersen, N. L., Jicha, B. R., Singer, B. S., and Hildreth, W.: Incremental heating of Bishop Tuff sanidine reveals preeruptive radiogenic Ar and rapid remobilization from cold storage, P. Natl. A. Sci. USA, 114, 12407, 10.1073/pnas.1709581114, 2017. · DOI
  3. Barry, T., Kelley, S., Reidel, S., Camp, V., Self, S., Jarboe, N., Duncan, R., Renne, P., Ross, M., and Wolff, J.: Eruption chronology of the Columbia River Basalt Group, in: The Columbia River Flood Basalt Province, Geological Society of America, Special Paper, 497, 45–66, 2013. · DOI
  4. Beane, J. E., Turner, C. A., Hooper, P. R., Subbarao, K. V., and Walsh, J. N.: Stratigraphy, composition and form of the Deccan Basalts, Western Ghats, India, B. Volcanol., 48, 61–83, 10.1007/BF01073513, 1986. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Blaauw, M. and Christen, J. A.: Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process, Bayesian Anal., 6, 457–474, 2011. · DOI
  6. Black, B. A. and Gibson, S. A.: Deep Carbon and the Life Cycle of Large Igneous Provinces, Elements, 15, 319–324, 10.2138/gselements.15.5.319, 2019. · DOI
  7. Black, B. A. and Manga, M.: Volatiles and the tempo of flood basalt magmatism, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 458, 130–140, 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.09.035, 2017. · DOI
  8. Blackburn, T. J., Olsen, P. E., Bowring, S. A., McLean, N. M., Kent, D. V., Puffer, J., McHone, G., Rasbury, E. T., and Et-Touhami, M.: Zircon U-Pb Geochronology Links the End-Triassic Extinction with the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, Science, 340, 941–945, 2013. · DOI
  9. Bond, D. P. G. and Wignall, P. B.: Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions: An update, Geol. S. Am. S., 505, 29–55, 2014. · DOI
  10. Burgess, S.: Deciphering mass extinction triggers, Science, 363, 815–816, 2019. · DOI
  11. Burgess, S., Muirhead, J., and Bowring, S.: Initial pulse of Siberian Traps sills as the trigger of the end-Permian mass extinction, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–6, 2017. · DOI
  12. Burgess, S. D. and Bowring, S. A.: High-precision geochronology confirms voluminous magmatism before, during, and after Earth's most severe extinction, Sci. Adv., 1, e1500470, 10.1126/sciadv.1500470, 2015. · DOI
  13. Byrnes, J. S. and Karlstrom, L.: Anomalous K-Pg–aged seafloor attributed to impact-induced mid-ocean ridge magmatism, Sci. Adv., 4, eaao2994, 10.1126/sciadv.aao2994, 2018. · DOI
  14. Chenet, A., Quidelleur, X., Fluteau, F., Courtillot, V., and Bajpai, S.: 40K-40Ar dating of the Main Deccan large igneous province: Further evidence of KTB age and short duration, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 263, 1–15, 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.011, 2007. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Chenet, A.-L., Fluteau, F., Courtillot, V., Gérard, M., and Subbarao, K. V.: Determination of rapid Deccan eruptions across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary using paleomagnetic secular variation: Results from a 1200 m-thick section in the Mahabaleshwar escarpment, J. Geophys. Res., 113, B04101, 10.1029/2006jb004635, 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chenet, A.-L., Courtillot, V., Fluteau, F., Gérard, M., Quidelleur, X., Khadri, S. F. R., Subbarao, K. V., and Thordarson, T.: Determination of rapid Deccan eruptions across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary using paleomagnetic secular variation: 2. Constraints from analysis of eight new sections and synthesis for a 3500 m-thick composite section, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B06103, 10.1029/2008jb005644, 2009. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Clyde, W. C., Ramezani, J., Johnson, K. R., Bowring, S. A., and Jones, M. M.: Direct high-precision U-Pb geochronology of the end-Cretaceous extinction and calibration of Paleocene astronomical timescales, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 452, 272–280, 2016. · DOI
  18. Condon, D., Schoene, B., McLean, N., Bowring, S., and Parrish, R.: Metrology and traceability of U-Pb isotope dilution geochronology (EARTHTIME Tracer Calibration Part I), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 464–480, 2015. · DOI
  19. Corfu, F.: A century of U-Pb geochronology: The long quest towards concordance, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 125, 33–47, 2013. · DOI
  20. Courtillot, V., Besse, J., Vandamme, D., Montigny, R., Jaeger, J.-J., and Cappetta, H.: Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary?, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 80, 361–374, 10.1016/0012-821X(86)90118-4, 1986. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Courtillot, V., Feraud, G., Maluski, H., Vandamme, D., Moreau, M. G., and Besse, J.: Deccan flood basalts and the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, Nature, 333, 843–846, 1988. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Davies, J., Marzoli, A., Bertrand, H., Youbi, N., Ernesto, M., and Schaltegger, U.: End-Triassic mass extinction started by intrusive CAMP activity, Nat. Commun., 8, 15596, 10.1038/ncomms15596, 2017. · DOI
  23. Duraiswami, R. A., Sheth, H., Gadpallu, P., Youbi, N., and Chellai, E. H.: A simple recipe for red bole formation in continental flood basalt provinces: weathering of flow-top and flow-bottom breccias, Arab. J. Geosci., 13, 1–14, 2020. · DOI
  24. Eddy, M. P., Schoene, B., Samperton, K. M., Keller, G., Adatte, T., and Khadri, S. F.: U-Pb zircon age constraints on the earliest eruptions of the Deccan Large Igneous Province, Malwa Plateau, India, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 540, 116249, 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116249, 2020. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Ellis, B. S., Mark, D. F., Pritchard, C. J., and Wolff, J. A.: Temporal dissection of the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff using the 40Ar/39Ar dating technique, Quat. Geochronol., 9, 34–41, 2012. · DOI
  26. Ernst, R. E. and Youbi, N.: How Large Igneous Provinces affect global climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in the geological record, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 478, 30–52, 2017. · DOI
  27. Galeotti, S., Sahy, D., Agnini, C., Condon, D., Fornaciari, E., Francescone, F., Giusberti, L., Pälike, H., Spofforth, D. J. A., and Rio, D.: Astrochronology and radio-isotopic dating of the Alano di Piave section (NE Italy), candidate GSSP for the Priabonian Stage (late Eocene), Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 525, 115746, 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115746, 2019. · DOI
  28. Ganino, C. and Arndt, N. T.: Climate changes caused by degassing of sediments during the emplacement of large igneous provinces, Geology, 37, 323–326, 2009. · DOI
  29. Ghosh, P., Sayeed, M. R. G., Islam, R., and Hundekari, S. M.: Inter-basaltic clay (bole bed) horizons from Deccan traps of India: Implications for palaeo-weathering and palaeo-climate during Deccan volcanism, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 242, 90–109, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.05.018, 2006. · DOI
  30. Haslett, J. and Parnell, A.: A simple monotone process with application to radiocarbon-dated depth chronologies, J. R. Stat. Soc. C.-Appl., 57, 399–418, 2008. · DOI
  31. Henehan, M. J., Ridgwell, A., Thomas, E., Zhang, S., Alegret, L., Schmidt, D. N., Rae, J. W. B., Witts, J. D., Landman, N. H., Greene, S. E., Huber, B. T., Super, J. R., Planavsky, N. J., and Hull, P. M.: Rapid ocean acidification and protracted Earth system recovery followed the end-Cretaceous Chicxulub impact, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 22500, 10.1073/pnas.1905989116, 2019. · DOI
  32. Hildebrand, A. R., Penfield, G. T., Kring, D. A., Pilkington, M., Camargo, Z., A., Jacobsen, S. B., and Boynton, W. V.: Chicxulub crater: a possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, Geology, 19, 867–871, 1991. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Hull, P. M., Bornemann, A., Penman, D. E., Henehan, M. J., Norris, R. D., Wilson, P. A., Blum, P., Alegret, L., Batenburg, S. J., and Bown, P. R.: On impact and volcanism across the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Science, 367, 266–272, 2020. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Jay, A. E. and Widdowson, M.: Stratigraphy, structure and volcanology of the SE Deccan continental flood basalt province: implications for eruptive extent and volumes, J. Geol. Soc. London, 165, 177–188, 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kale, V. S., Dole, G., Shandilya, P., and Pande, K.: Stratigraphy and correlations in Deccan Volcanic Province, India: Quo vadis?, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 132, 588–607, 2020. · DOI
  36. Kasbohm, J. and Schoene, B.: Rapid eruption of the Columbia River flood basalt and correlation with the mid-Miocene climate optimum, Sci. Adv., 4, eaat8223, 10.1126/sciadv.aat8223, 2018. · DOI
  37. Kasbohm, J., Schoene, B., and Burgess, S.: Radiometric Constraints on the Timing, Tempo, and Effects of Large Igneous Province Emplacement, in: Large Igneous Provinces: A Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, edited by: Ernst, R. E., Dickson, A. J., and Bekker, A., American Geophysical Union, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 27–82, 10.1002/9781119507444.ch2, 2020. · DOI
  38. Keller, C. B.: Chron.jl: A Bayesian framework for integrated eruption age and age-depth modelling, OSF (Open Science Framework), 10.17605/osf.io/TQX3F, 2018. · DOI
  39. Keller, C. B., Schoene, B., and Samperton, K. M.: A stochastic sampling approach to zircon eruption age interpretation, Geochem. Perspect. Lett., 8, 31–35, 2018. · DOI
  40. Keller, G., Adatte, T., Gardin, S., Bartolini, A., and Bajpai, S.: Main Deccan volcanism phase ends near the K–T boundary: Evidence from the Krishna–Godavari Basin, SE India, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 268, 293–311, 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.01.015, 2008. · DOI
  41. Kerr, A. C. and Ward, P. D.: A Dominant Role for The K-Pg Impact, available at: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6429/862/tab-e-letters, last access: 17 August 2019.
  42. Knight, K. B., Renne, P. R., Halkett, A., and White, N.: 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Rajahmundry Traps, Eastern India and their relationship to the Deccan Traps, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 208, 85–99, 10.1016/s0012-821x(02)01154-8, 2003. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kuiper, K. F., Deino, A., Hilgen, F. J., Krijgsman, W., Renne, P. R., and Wijbrans, J. R.: Synchronizing rocks clocks of Earth history, Science, 320, 500–504, 10.1126/science.1154339 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kwon, J., Min, K., Bickel, P. J., and Renne, P. R.: Statistical methods for jointly estimating the decay constant of 40K and the age of a dating standard, Math. Geol., 34, 457–474, 2002. · DOI
  45. Linzmeier, B. J., Jacobson, A. D., Sageman, B. B., Hurtgen, M. T., Ankney, M. E., Petersen, S. V., Tobin, T. S., Kitch, G. D., and Wang, J.: Calcium isotope evidence for environmental variability before and across the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction, Geology, 48, 34–38, 2020. · DOI
  46. Machlus, M. L., Shea, E. K., Hemming, S. R., Ramezani, J., and Rasbury, E. T.: An assessment of sanidine from the Fire Clay tonstein as a Carboniferous 40Ar/39Ar monitor standard and for inter-method comparison to U-Pb zircon geochronology, Chem. Geol., 539, 119485, 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119485, 2020. · DOI
  47. Mahood, G. A. and Benson, T. R.: Using 40Ar/39Ar ages of intercalated silicic tuffs to date flood basalts: Precise ages for Steens Basalt Member of the Columbia River Basalt Group, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 459, 340–351, 2017. · DOI
  48. Mark, D. F., Renne, P. R., Dymock, R. C., Smith, V. C., Simon, J. I., Morgan, L. E., Staff, R. A., Ellis, B. S., and Pearce, N. J.: High-precision 40Ar/39Ar dating of Pleistocene tuffs and temporal anchoring of the Matuyama-Brunhes boundary, Quat. Geochronol., 39, 1–23, 2017. · DOI
  49. Marzoli, A., Callegaro, S., Dal Corso, J., Davies, J. H., Chiaradia, M., Youbi, N., Bertrand, H., Reisberg, L., Merle, R., and Jourdan, F.: The Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP): A Review, in: The Late Triassic World, edited by: Tanner, L., Topics in Geobiology, vol 46, Springer, Cham, 10.1007/978-3-319-68009-5_4, 2018. · DOI
  50. Mattinson, J. M.: Revising the “gold standard” – the uranium decay constants of Jaffey et al., 1971, Eos Trans. AGU, Spring Meet. Suppl., Abstract V61A-02, 2000.
  51. Mattinson, J. M.: Zircon U-Pb chemical-abrasion (“CA-TIMS”) method: combined annealing and multi-step dissolution analysis for improved precision and accuracy of zircon ages, Chem. Geol., 220, 47–56, 2005. · DOI
  52. Mattinson, J. M.: Analysis of the relative decay constants of 235U and 238U by multi-step CA-TIMS measurements of closed-system natural zircon samples, Chem. Geol., 275, 186–198, 2010. · DOI
  53. McDougall, I. and Harrison, T. M.: Geochronology and Thermochronology by the 40Ar/39Ar method, 2nd edn., Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1999.
  54. McLean, D. M.: Deccan Traps mantle degassing in the terminal Cretaceous marine extinctions, Cretaceous Res., 6, 235–259, 1985. · DOI
  55. McLean, N. M., Condon, D. J., Schoene, B., and Bowring, S. A.: Evaluating uncertainties in the calibration of isotopic reference materials and multi-element isotopic tracers (EARTHTIME Tracer Calibration Part II), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 164, 481–501, 2015. · DOI
  56. Milligan, J. N., Royer, D. L., Franks, P. J., Upchurch, G. R., and McKee, M. L.: No evidence for a large atmospheric CO2 spike across the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 3462–3472, 2019. · DOI
  57. Min, K., Mundil, R., Renne, P. R., and Ludwig, K. R.: A test for systematic errors in 40Ar/39Ar geochronology through comparison with U-Pb analysis of a 1.1 Ga rhyolite, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 73–98, 2000. · DOI
  58. Minnis, P., Harrison, E. F., Stowe, L. L., Gibson, G., Denn, F. M., Doelling, D., and Smith, W.: Radiative climate forcing by the Mount Pinatubo eruption, Science, 259, 1411–1415, 1993. · DOI
  59. Mitchell, C. and Widdowson, M.: A geological map of the southern Deccan Traps, India and its structural implications, J. Geol. Soc. London, 148, 495–505, 1991. · DOI
  60. Parisio, L., Jourdan, F., Marzoli, A., Melluso, L., Sethna, S. F., and Bellieni, G.: 40Ar/39Ar ages of alkaline and tholeiitic rocks from the northern Deccan Traps: implications for magmatic processes and the K–Pg boundary, J. Geol. Soc. London, 173, 679–688, 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  61. Parnell, A. C., Buck, C. E., and Doan, T. K.: A review of statistical chronology models for high-resolution, proxy-based Holocene palaeoenvironmental reconstruction, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 30, 2948–2960, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.07.024, 2011. · DOI
  62. Parsons-Davis, T., Wimpenny, J., Keller, C. B., Thomas, K., Samperton, K. M., Renne, P. R., Mundil, R., Moody, K., Knight, K., and Kristo, M. J.: New measurement of the 238U decay constant with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch., 318, 711–721, 2018. · DOI
  63. Rampino, M. R. and Caldeira, K.: Antipodal hotspot pairs on the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 2011–2014, 1992. · DOI
  64. Reiners, P. W., Carlson, R. W., Renne, P. R., Cooper, K. M., Granger, D. E., McLean, N. M., and Schoene, B.: Geochronology and thermochronology, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2017. · DOI
  65. Renne, P.: Interactive comment on “An evaluation of Deccan Traps eruptions rates using geochronologic data” by Blair Schoene et al., Geochronology Discuss., 10.5194/gchron-2020-11-RC3, 2020. · DOI
  66. Renne, P. R., Karner, D. B., and Ludwig, K. R.: Absolute ages aren't exactly, Science, 282, 1840–1841, 1998. · DOI
  67. Renne, P. R., Mundil, R., Balco, G., Min, K., and Ludwig, K. R.: Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar/40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 74, 5349–5367, 2010. · DOI
  68. Renne, P. R., Balco, G., Ludwig, K. R., Mundil, R., and Min, K.: Response to the comment by WH Schwarz et al. on “Joint determination of 40K decay constants and 40Ar*/40K for the Fish Canyon sanidine standard, and improved accuracy for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology” by P. R. Renne et al. (2010), Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 75, 5097–5100, 2011. · DOI
  69. Renne, P. R., Deino, A. L., Hilgen, F. J., Kuiper, K. F., Mark, D. F., Mitchell III, W. S., Morgan, L. E., Mundil, R., and Smit, J.: Time scales of critical events around the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Science, 339, 684–687, 10.1126/science.1230492, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Renne, P. R., Sprain, C. J., Richards, M. A., Self, S., Vanderkluysen, L., and Pande, K.: State shift in Deccan volcanism at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, possibly induced by impact, Science, 350, 76–78, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Ricci, J., Quidelleur, X., Pavlov, V., Orlov, S., Shatsillo, A., and Courtillot, V.: New 40Ar/39Ar and K-Ar ages of the Viluy traps (Eastern Siberia): further evidence for a relationship with the Frasnian–Famennian mass extinction, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 386, 531–540, 2013. · DOI
  72. Rivera, T. A., Storey, M., Zeeden, C., Hilgen, F. J., and Kuiper, K.: A refined astronomically calibrated 40Ar/39Ar age for Fish Canyon sanidine, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 311, 420–426, 2011. · DOI
  73. Robock, A.: Volcanic eruptions and climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 191–219, 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Sahy, D., Condon, D. J., Hilgen, F. J., and Kuiper, K. F.: Reducing Disparity in Radio-Isotopic and Astrochronology-Based Time Scales of the Late Eocene and Oligocene, Paleoceanography, 32, 1018–1035, 10.1002/2017PA003197, 2017. · DOI
  75. Sayyed, M., Pardeshi, R., and Islam, R.: Palaeoweathering characteristics of an intrabasaltic red bole of the Deccan Flood Basalts near Shrivardhan of western coast of India, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 123, 1717–1728, 2014. · DOI
  76. Schaltegger, U., Schmitt, A., and Horstwood, M.: U-Th-Pb zircon geochronology by ID-TIMS, SIMS, and laser ablation ICP-MS: Recipes, interpretations, and opportunities, Chem. Geol., 402, 89–110, 2015. · DOI
  77. Schöbel, S., de Wall, H., Ganerød, M., Pandit, M. K., and Rolf, C.: Magnetostratigraphy and 40Ar-39Ar geochronology of the Malwa Plateau region (Northern Deccan Traps), central western India: Significance and correlation with the main Deccan Large Igneous Province sequences, J. Asian Earth Sci., 89, 28–45, 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.03.022, 2014. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Schoene, B.: U-Th-Pb geochronology, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, edited by: Rudnick, R., Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 341–378, 2014. · DOI
  79. Schoene, B., Crowley, J. L., Condon, D. C., Schmitz, M. D., and Bowring, S. A.: Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U-Pb data, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 70, 426–445, 2006. · DOI
  80. Schoene, B., Guex, J., Bartolini, A., Schaltegger, U., and Blackburn, T. J.: Correlating the end-Triassic mass extinction and flood basalt volcanism at the 100 000 year level, Geology, 38, 387–390, 10.1130/G30683.1, 2010. · DOI
  81. Schoene, B., Samperton, K. M., Eddy, M. P., Keller, G., Adatte, T., Bowring, S. A., Khadri, S. F., and Gertsch, B.: U-Pb geochronology of the Deccan Traps and relation to the end-Cretaceous mass extinction, Science, 347, 182–184, 2015. · DOI · Paper page
  82. Schulte, P., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J. A., Barton, P. J., Bown, P. R., Bralower, T. J., Christeson, G. L., Claeys, P., and Cockell, C. S.: The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary, Science, 327, 1214–1218, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  83. Self, S., Blake, S., Sharma, K., Widdowson, M., and Sephton, S.: Sulfur and chlorine in late Cretaceous Deccan magmas and eruptive gas release, Science, 319, 1654–1657, 10.1126/science.1152830, 2008. · DOI · Paper page
  84. Self, S., Schmidt, A., and Mather, T. A.: Emplacement characteristics, time scales, and volcanic gas release rates of continental flood basalt eruptions on Earth, Geol. S. Am. S., 505, 319–337, 2014. · DOI
  85. Sepúlveda, J., Alegret, L., Thomas, E., Haddad, E., Cao, C., and Summons, R. E.: Stable Isotope Constraints on Marine Productivity Across the Cretaceous–Paleogene Mass Extinction, Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol., 34, 1195–1217, 10.1029/2018pa003442, 2019. · DOI
  86. Shellnutt, J. G., Denyszyn, S. W., and Mundil, R.: Precise age determination of mafic and felsic intrusive rocks from the Permian Emeishan large igneous province (SW China), Gondwana Res., 22, 118–126, 2012. · DOI
  87. Sheth, H., Vanderkluysen, L., Demonterova, E. I., Ivanov, A. V., and Savatenkov, V. M.: Geochemistry and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Nandurbar-Dhule mafic dyke swarm: Dyke-sill-flow correlations and stratigraphic development across the Deccan flood basalt province, Geol. J., 54, 157–176, 2019. · DOI · Paper page
  88. Simon, J. I., Renne, P. R., and Mundil, R.: Implications of pre-eruptive magmatic histories of zircons for U-Pb geochronology of silicic extrusions, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 266, 182–194, 2008. · DOI
  89. Smit, J. and Hertogen, J.: An extraterrestrial event at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, Nature, 285, 198–200, 1980. · DOI
  90. Sprain, C. J.: Interactive comment on “An evaluation of Deccan Traps eruptions rates using geochronologic data” by Blair Schoene et al., Geochronology Discuss., 10.5194/gchron-2020-11-RC2, 2020. · DOI
  91. Sprain, C. J., Renne, P. R., Clemens, W. A., and Wilson, G. P.: Calibration of chron C29r: New high-precision geochronologic and paleomagnetic constraints from the Hell Creek region, Montana, Bulletin, 130, 1615–1644, 2018. · DOI · Paper page
  92. Svensen, H., Planke, S., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., Jamtveit, B., Myklebust, R., Eidem, T. R., and Rey, S. S.: Release of methane from a volcanic basin as a mechanism for initial Eocene global warming, Nature, 429, 542–545, 2004. · DOI
  93. Svensen, H., Planke, S., and Corfu, F.: Zircon dating ties NE Atlantic sill emplacement to initial Eocene global warming, J. Geol. Soc. London, 167, 433–436, 2010. · DOI
  94. Svensen, H., Corfu, F., Polteau, S., Hammer, Ø., and Planke, S.: Rapid magma emplacement in the Karoo large igneous province, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 325, 1–9, 2012. · DOI
  95. Thordarson, T. and Self, S.: The Roza Member, Columbia River Basalt Group: A gigantic pahoehoe lava flow field formed by endogenous processes?, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 103, 27411–27445, 1998. · DOI · Paper page
  96. Villeneuve, M., Sandeman, H. A., and Davis, W. J.: A method for intercalibration of U-Th-Pb and 40Ar-39Ar ages in the Phanerozoic, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 64, 4017–4030, 2000. · DOI
  97. Voosen, P.: Did volcanic eruptions help kill off the dinosaurs?, AAAS, Washington, D.C., 10.1126/science.aax1020, 2019. · DOI
  98. Widdowson, M., Walsh, J. N., and Subbarao, K. V.: The geochemistry of Indian bole horizons: palaeoenvironmental implications of Deccan intravolcanic palaeosurfaces, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 120, 269–281, 10.1144/gsl.sp.1997.120.01.17, 1997. · DOI
  99. Wotzlaw, J.-F., Schaltegger, U., Frick, D. A., Dungan, M. A., Gerdes, A., and Günther, D.: Tracking the evolution of large-volume silicic magma reservoirs from assembly to supereruption, Geology, 41, 867–870, 2013. · DOI
  100. Wright, A. J., Edwards, R. J., van de Plassche, O., Blaauw, M., Parnell, A. C., van der Borg, K., de Jong, A. F., Roe, H. M., Selby, K., and Black, S.: Reconstructing the accumulation history of a saltmarsh sediment core: Which age-depth model is best?, Quat. Geochronol., 39, 35–67, 2017. · DOI

Cited by

See all 73

Metadata

Authors
Schoene, B., Eddy, M. P., Keller, C. B., & Samperton, K. M.
ORCID
Venue
Geochronology
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Published
2021-04-16
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
181-198
ISSN
2628-3719
DOI
10.5194/gchron-3-181-2021
Cited by
73
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review