CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to the special issue “Contested urban territories: decolonized perspectives”

Schwarz, Anke, Streule, Monika·2020·Geographica Helvetica
DOI 10.5194/gh-75-11-2020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract. This paper serves as an introduction to the “Contested urban territories: decolonized perspectives” special issue. The idea for this issue emerged during our reflections on a socioterritorial perspective, preeminent in the current Latin American analysis of contemporary urban struggles (Schwarz and Streule, 2016). It aims to contribute to these ongoing debates about a specific understanding of urban territories from a postcolonial and decolonized perspective by combining contributions from two paper sessions we organized at the 2017 meeting of the American Association of Geographers in Boston with additional papers by scholars who could not participate in the conference. All seven contributions tackle the question of what a relational and dynamic conceptualization of territory may contribute to current debates in the urban studies field. Put more precisely, to which extent are socioterritorial approaches of value for a further decentering and pluralizing of urban theory? What is their significance to research on urban social movements? And, finally, how does such a socioterritorial perspective nurture and complement an analysis of the social production of space? The present special issue invites the reader to get familiar with new concepts and engage in a critical reflection on the conditions of knowledge production in urban geography and beyond.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/gh-75-11-2020

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indigenous territorial practices are often identified as the symbolic inspiration for counterhegemonic movements in Latin America.

    “Indigenous territorial practices are often identified as the symbolic inspiration for counterhegemonic movements in Latin America (Zibechi 2012;Schwarz and Streule 2020).”

    From Maroon Socioterritorial Movements (2022) · cites this paper as Schwarz and Streule 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Agnew, J.: The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory, Rev. Int. Polit. Econ., 1, 53–80, 1994. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barnes, T. J. and Minca, C.: Nazi spatial theory: the dark geographies of Carl Schmitt and Walter Christaller, Annals of AAG, 103, 669–687, 2012. · DOI
  3. Bauman, Z.: Retrotopia, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2017. · DOI
  4. Bhambra, G. K.: Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues, Postcolonial Studies, 17, 115–121, 2014. · DOI
  5. Clare, N., Habermehl, V., and Mason-Deese, L.: Territories in contestation: relational power in Latin America, Territory, Politics, Governance, 6, 302–321, 2018. · DOI
  6. Debarbieux, B.: Prendre position: réflexions sur les ressources et les limites de la notion d'identité en géographie, L'Espace géographique, 35, 340–354, 2006. · DOI
  7. dell'Agnese, E.: The political challenge of relational territory, in: Spatial politics: essays for Doreen Massey, edited by: Featherstone, D. and Painter J., Wiley, Oxford, 115–124, 2012. · DOI
  8. Dhawan, N. and Castro Varela, M. d. M.: What difference does difference make? Diversity, intersectionality, and transnational feminist politics, Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women's and Gender Studies, 16, 9–43, 2016.
  9. Edensor, T. and Jayne, M.: Urban theory beyond the west: a world of cities, Routledge, London, New York, 2012. · DOI
  10. Elden, S.: The birth of territory, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2013. · DOI
  11. Elden, S.: Territory/Territoriality, in: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, edited by: Orum, A. M., Wiley, Oxford, 2167–2177, 2019. · DOI
  12. Escobar, A.: Worlds and knowledges otherwise: The Latin American modernity/coloniality research program, Cult. Stud., 21, 179–210, 2007. · DOI
  13. Escobar, A.: Territorios de diferencia: la ontología política de los “derechos al territorio”, Cuadernos de Antropología Social, 41, 25–38, 2015. · DOI
  14. Garcia-Ramon, M. D.: Las diferencias que crea el lugar. Una mirada crítica a la hegemonía angloamericana en geografía, Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica, 58, 307–319, 2012. · DOI
  15. Giraut, F.: Territoire multisitué, complexité territoriale et postmodernité territoriale: des concepts opératoires pour rendre compte de territorialités contemporaines?, L'Espace Géographique, 42, 293–305, 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Gottmann, J.: The significance of territory, University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, 1973.
  17. Gräbel, C.: Die Erforschung der Kolonien. Expeditionen und koloniale Wissenskultur deutscher Geographen, 1884–1919, Transcript, Bielefeld, 2015. · DOI
  18. Gutiérrez, J. and López-Nieva, P.: Are international journals of human geography really international?, Prog. Hum. Geog., 25, 53–69, 2001. · DOI
  19. Haesbaert, R.: A global sense of place and multi-territoriality: Notes for dialogue from a “peripheral” point of view, in: Spatial politics: Essays for Doreen Massey, edited by: Featherstone, D. and Painter, J., Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, 146–157, 2012. · DOI
  20. Halvorsen, S., Fernandes, B. M., and Torres, F. V.: Mobilizing territory: socioterritorial movements in comparative perspective, Annals of the AAG 109, 1454–1470, 2019. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Harley, J. B.: Maps, knowledge and power, in: The iconography of landscape, edited by: Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 277–312, 1988.
  22. Hepp, A. and Couldry, N.: What should comparative media research be comparing? Towards a transcultural approach to “media cultures”, in: Internationalizing Media Studies, edited by: Thussu, D. K., Routledge, Abingdon, 32–48, 2009.
  23. Houssay-Holzschuch, M. and Milhaud, O.: Geography after Babel – a view from the French province, Geogr. Helv., 68, 51–55, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-51-2013, 2013. · DOI
  24. Husseini de Araújo, S. and Kersting, P.: Welche Praxis nach der postkolonialen Kritik? Human- und physisch-geographische Feldforschung aus übersetzungstheoretischer Perspektive, Geogr. Helv., 67, 139–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-139-2012, 2012. · DOI
  25. Klauser, F. R.: Thinking through territoriality: Introducing Claude Raffestin to Anglophone sociospatial theory, Environ. Plan. D, 30, 106–120, 2012. · DOI
  26. Kong, L. and Qian, J.: Knowledge circulation in urban geography/urban studies, 1990–2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns, Urban Stud., 56, 44–80, 2019. · DOI
  27. Lefebvre, H.: The production of space, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, 1991.
  28. Leitner, H. and Sheppard, E.: Provincializing critical urban theory: Extending the ecosystem of possibilities, IJURR, 40, 228–235, 2016. · DOI
  29. Lindón, A.: The lived city: everyday experiences, urban scenarios, and topological networks, Geogr. Helv., 74, 31–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-31-2019, 2019. · DOI
  30. López, C. M.: Contesting double displacement: internally displaced campesinos and the social production of urban territory in Medellín, Colombia, Geogr. Helv., 74, 249–259, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-249-2019, 2019. · DOI
  31. Lossau, J.: Die Politik der Verortung. Eine postkoloniale Reise zu einer ANDEREN Geographie der Welt, Transcript, Bielefeld, 2002. · DOI
  32. Lugones, M.: Toward a decolonial feminism, Hypatia, 25, 742–759, 2010. · DOI
  33. Maia, J. M. E.: Space, social theory and peripheral imagination: Brazilian intellectual history and de-colonial debates, Int. Sociol., 26, 392–407, 2011. · DOI
  34. Masi de Casanova, E. and Mose, T. R.: Translation in ethnography. Representing Latin American studies in English, Translation and Interpreting Studies, 12, 1–23, 2017. · DOI
  35. Mason-Deese, L., Habermehl, V., and Clare, N.: Producing territory: territorial organizing of movements in Buenos Aires, Geogr. Helv., 74, 153–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-153-2019, 2019. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Massey, D.: A global sense of place, in: Space, place and gender, edited by: Massey, D., Polity Press, Cambridge, 146–156, 1994.
  37. Mbembe, A.: Provisional notes on the postcolony, Africa, Journal of the International African Institute, 62, 3–37, 1992. · DOI
  38. McCann, E. and Ward, K.: Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world, Geoforum, 41, 175–184, 2010. · DOI
  39. Minca, C. and Rowan, R.: On Schmitt and space, Routledge, London, New York, 2016. · DOI
  40. Moine, A.: Le territoire comme un système complexe: un concept opératoire pour l'aménagement et la géographie, L'Espace Géographique, 35, 115–132, 2006. · DOI
  41. Müller, M.: What's in a word? Problematizing translation between languages, Area, 39, 206–213, 2007. · DOI
  42. Neuburger, M. and Schmitt, T.: Editorial Theorie der Entwicklung – Entwicklung der Theorie Post-Development und Postkoloniale Theorien als Herausforderung für eine Geographische Entwicklungsforschung, Geogr. Helv., 67, 121–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-67-121-2012, 2012. · DOI
  43. Orsini, F. and Srivastava, N.: Translation and the postcolonial. Interventions, International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 15, 323–331, 2013. · DOI
  44. Paasi, A.: Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces, Environ. Plan. A, 37, 769–789, 2005. · DOI
  45. Painter, J.: Rethinking territory, Antipode, 42, 1090–1118, 2010. · DOI
  46. Portal, M. A. (Ed.): Ciudad global, procesos locales. Megaproyectos, transformaciones socioespaciales y conflictos urbanos en la ciudad de México, UAM-Iztapalapa, Juan Pablos Editores, Mexico City, 2017.
  47. Quijano, A.: Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America, Int. Sociol., 15, 215–232, 2000. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Radcliffe, S. A.: Development and geography: towards a postcolonial development geography?, Prog. Hum. Geog., 29, 291–298, 2005. · DOI
  49. Radcliffe, S. A.: Decolonising geographical knowledges, T. I. Brit. Geogr., 42, 329–333, 2017. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Radcliffe, S. A.: Geography and indigeneity III: Co-articulation of colonialism and capitalism in indigeneity's economies, Pro. Hum. Geog., 1–15, available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0309132519827387 (last access: 23 January 2020), 2019. · DOI
  51. Raffestin, C.: Territorialité : concept ou paradigme de la géographie sociale?, Geogr. Helv., 41, 91–96, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-41-91-1986, 1986. · DOI
  52. Rivera Cusicanqui, S.: Ch'ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization, S. Atl. Q., 111, 95–109, 2012. · DOI
  53. Robinson, J. and Roy, A.: Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory, IJURR, 40, 181–186, 2016. · DOI
  54. Sack, R. D.: Human territoriality: Its theory and history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
  55. Saquet, M. A.: A perspective of counter-hegemonic analysis and territorial transformation, Geogr. Helv., 73, 347–355, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-347-2018, 2018. · DOI
  56. Saquet, M. A. and Sposito, E. (Eds.): Territórios e territorialidades: teorias, processos e conflitos, Expressão Popular, São Paulo, 2009.
  57. Sassen, S.: When territory deborders territoriality, Territory, Politics, Governance, 1, 21–45, 2013. · DOI
  58. Schwarz, A. and Streule, M.: A transposition of territory: Decolonized perspectives in current urban research, IJURR, 40, 1000–1016, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12439, 2016. · DOI
  59. Smirnova, V.: Territory, enclosure, and state territorial mode of production in the Russian imperial periphery, Geogr. Helv., 74, 13–25, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-13-2019, 2019. · DOI
  60. Stienen, A.: (Re)claiming territory: Colombia's “territorial peace” approach and the city, Geogr. Helv., in preparation, 2020. · DOI
  61. Streule, M.: Post- und dekoloniale Perspektiven der Stadtforschung. Eine andere Lesart der Urbanización Popular von Mexiko-Stadt, in: subalternativen. Postkoloniale Kritik und dekolonialer Widerstand in Lateinamerika, edited by: Steger, R., Ludwig, M., Brychcy, J., Pütz E., und Sell, K., edition assemblage, Münster, 79–104, 2017.
  62. Streule, M.: Doing mobile ethnography: Grounded, situated, and comparative, Urban Stud., 57, 421–438, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018817418, 2020. · DOI
  63. Streule, M. and Schwarz, A.: “Not all spaces are territories”: creating other possible urban worlds in and from Latin America – an interview with Raúl Zibechi, Geogr. Helv., 74, 105–111, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-74-105-2019, 2019. · DOI
  64. Ther Ríos, F.: Antropología del territorio, Polis, 11, 493–510, 2012. · DOI
  65. Vanier, M. (Ed.): Territoires, territorialité, territorialisation: controverses et perspectives, Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 2009.
  66. Zambrano, C. V.: Territorios plurales. Cambio sociopolítico y gobernabilidad cultural, Boletim Goiano de Geografia, 21, 9–49, 2001. · DOI
  67. Zaragocin, S.: Gendered geographies of elimination: Decolonial feminist geographies in Latin American settler contexts, Antipode, 51, 373–392, 2018. · DOI
  68. Zibechi, R.: Territories in resistance. A cartography of Latin American social movements, AK Press, Oakland, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schwarz, A., & Streule, M.
ORCID
Venue
Geographica Helvetica
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Published
2020-02-07
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
2194-8798
DOI
10.5194/gh-75-11-2020
Cited by
15
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review