The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Working shifts and mental health – findings from the British Household Panel Survey (1995–2005)
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the impact of shift work on mental health at the population level. We expected that this impact would depend on duration of exposure, type of shift work, and gender. METHODS: We analyzed longitudinal data (1995-2005) from the British Household Panel Survey. From the 2005 wave, we selected a subsample of people aged 21-73 years who had been followed annually from 1995 to 2005. We used responses in 2005 to the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ, 12-item) and self-reported anxiety/depression as dependent variables. Controlling for age, marital status, education, number of years working in six occupational categories (1995-2005), and baseline mental health, we performed nested logistic regression models to examine the effect of the duration of night work and varied shift patterns on mental health for men and women. RESULTS: Undertaking night work for > or =4 years in men was associated with an increased risk of having a GHQ score reflecting mental ill health and reporting anxiety/depression [odds ratios (OR) 2.58, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.22-5.48; OR 6.08, 95% CI 2.06-17.92, respectively]. Women were significantly more likely to report anxiety/depression (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.53-4.35 ) and to have a GHQ score reflecting mental ill health (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.45-11.98), after working varied shift patterns for 2-3 years, and >/=4 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Different types of shift work had a differential impact on mental health, but this impact varied according to gender. Women's mental health was more adversely affected by varied shift patterns, while night work had a greater negative impact on men's mental health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender differences in the effects from working conditions on mental health: A 4-year follow-up
Bildt, C., & Michélsen, H. (2002) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-001-0299-8 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Touitou, Y., Reinberg, A., & Touitou, D. (2017) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2017.02.008 · Cited by 738
Individual differences in tolerance to shift work – A systematic review
Saksvik, I. B., Bjorvatn, B., Hetland, H., Sandal, G. M., & Pallesen, S. (2011) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2010.07.002 · Cited by 479
Shift work and poor mental health: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Torquati, L., Mielke, G. I., Brown, W. J., Burton, N. W., & Kolbe-Alexander, T. L. (2019) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2019.305278 · Cited by 410
Eldevik, M. F., Flo, E., Moen, B. E., Pallesen, S., & Bjorvatn, B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070882 · Cited by 255
Night Shift Work and Risk of Depression: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
Lee, A., Myung, S.-K., Cho, J. J., Jung, Y.-J., Yoon, J. L., & Kim, M. Y. (2017) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.7.1091 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Bara, A.-C., & Arber, S.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 361-367
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2148448097
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Working shifts and mental health – findings from the British Household Panel Survey (1995–2005). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.1344
- The paper
- Bara, A.-C., & Arber, S. (2009). Working shifts and mental health – findings from the British Household Panel Survey (1995–2005). Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.