Cited by 255Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersWorkplace Health and Well-being

Insomnia, excessive sleepiness, excessive fatigue, anxiety, depression and shift work disorder in nurses having less than 11 hours in-between shifts

Open access
Eldevik, Maria Fagerbakke, Flo, Elisabeth, Moen, Bente Elisabeth, Pallesen, Ståle, Bjorvatn, Bjørn·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess if less than 11 hours off work between work shifts (quick returns) was related to insomnia, sleepiness, fatigue, anxiety, depression and shift work disorder among nurses. METHODS: A questionnaire including established instruments measuring insomnia (Bergen Insomnia Scale), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), fatigue (Fatigue Questionnaire), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and shift work disorder was administered. Among the 1990 Norwegian nurses who participated in the study; 264 nurses had no quick returns, 724 had 1-30 quick returns and 892 had more than 30 quick returns during the past year. 110 nurses did not report the number of quick returns during the past year. The prevalence of insomnia, excessive sleepiness, excessive fatigue, anxiety, depression and shift work disorder was calculated within the three groups of nurses. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the relation between quick returns and such complaints. RESULTS: We found a significant positive association between quick returns and insomnia, excessive sleepiness, excessive fatigue and shift work disorder. Anxiety and depression were not related to working quick returns. CONCLUSIONS: There is a health hazard associated with quick returns. Further research should aim to investigate if workplace strategies aimed at reducing the number of quick returns may reduce complaints among workers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0070882

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rapid transitions to night shift work did not affect anxiety levels in a questionnaire study of nurses.

    “However, rapid transitions to night shift work did not affect anxiety levels in a questionnaire study of nurses100.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [100]

    The Discussion (‘Anxiety and depression’; page unavailable) reports no significant association between quick returns and anxiety in the nurses surveyed. But the paper defines quick returns as less than 11 hours between shifts, not specifically transitions to night shifts. Its cross-sectional design also cannot establish that those transitions ‘did not affect’ anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For nurses, shift work and long work hours are related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.

    “For nurses, shift work and long work hours have been shown to be related to adverse health outcomes and indicators of reduced functioning.208–217”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eldevik, M. F., Flo, E., Moen, B. E., Pallesen, S., & Bjorvatn, B.
Affiliations
Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Corresponding author
Eldevik, Maria Fagerbakke
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-08-15
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
e70882
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085377943
Cited by
255
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9
FWCI
21.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
quick returns, shift work, shift work disorder, insomnia, excessive sleepiness, anxiety, depression, nurses, sleep deprivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Nurses, Occupational Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Sleep, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review