CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisPlant and soil sciences

Un indicateur évaluant la diversité globale des rotations : de la diversité des cultures aux services écosystémiques

Open access
Keichinger, O, Viguier, L, Corre-Hellou, G, Messéan, A, Angevin, F, Bockstaller, C·2021·Zenodo
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.5549720
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

La diversification (allongement des rotations, introduction de cultures intermédiaires, cultures relais, associations…) est un des leviers majeurs pour une transition agroécologique des systèmes de culture. Cependant, toute diversification n’est pas bonne en soi car ses performances dépendent des cultures introduites et de la manière de les assembler. Pour aider les acteurs à orienter leur choix de configuration des systèmes de culture, nous avons développé un indicateur de diversité globale des cultures de la rotation (I-DGC) basé sur une construction en arbre hiérarchique. Celui-ci comprend une évaluation des diversités temporelle et spatiale. La diversité temporelle est ensuite décomposée en un indicateur de diversité taxonomique et un de diversité fonctionnelle, celle-ci étant liée à la fourniture de douze services écosystémiques (SE). L’indicateur global calculé à partir des données sur les cultures permet d’estimer a priori, l’effet potentiel de la diversification d’une rotation. L’estimation des douze SE sur un ensemble de rotations typiques des agroécosystèmes montre des variations importantes. Par ailleurs, l’allongement de la rotation et l’augmentation du nombre de cultures ne sont pas suffisants ; ils doivent être associés à un choix adéquat des cultures et de leur succession. Diversification (lengthening of rotations, introduction of catch and cover crops, relay cropping, associations...) is one of the major levers for an agroecological transition of cropping systems. However, any diversification is not good in itself, its performance depending on the crops introduced and their sequence. To contribute to this, we have developed an indicator of global crop diversity in the rotation (I-DGC) based on a hierarchical tree construction. It includes an assessment of temporal and spatial diversity. The temporal diversity is then decomposed into a taxonomic diversity indicator and a functional diversity indicator which is linked to the provision of twelve ecosystem services (ES). The global indicator calculated from the crop data allows the evaluation of the effect of diversification of a rotation or the comparison of several rotations. The evaluation of the twelve ES on a set of different rotations shows that lengthening the rotation and increasing the number of crops are not sufficient and that they must be combined with an adequate choice of crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.5549720

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Adeux, G., Munier-Jolain, N., Meunier, D., Farcy, P., Carlesi, S., Barberi, P., & Cordeau, S. (2019). Diversified grain-based cropping systems provide long-term weed control while limiting herbicide use and yield losses. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(4), 1-13.
  2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., Smith, M., & others. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
  3. Bailey, K., & Lazarovits, G. (2003). Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments. Soil \& Tillage Research -SOIL TILL RES, 72, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167- 1987(03)00086-2 · DOI
  4. Beaudoin, N., Saad, J. K., Van Laethem, C., Machet, J. M., Maucorps, J., & Mary, B. (2005). Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: Effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations. Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment, 111(1-4), 292-310.
  5. Bockstaller, Christian, & Girardin, P. (2003). How to validate environmental indicators. Agricultural Systems, 76(2), 639-653.
  6. Boizard, H., Richard, G., Defossez, P., Estrade, J. R., & Boiffin, J. (2004). Etude de l'effet à moyen et long terme des systèmes de culture sur la structure d'un sol limoneux-argileux du Nord du Bassin Parisien. Etudes et Gestions Des Sols, 11(1), 11-20.
  7. Boller, E. F., Malavolta, C., & Jörg, E. (1997). Guidelines for Integrated Production of Arable Crops in Europe: IOBC Technical Guideline III. IOBC Wprs Bulletin, 20.
  8. Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., & Potts, S. G. (2013). Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends in Ecology \& Evolution, 28(4), 230-238.
  9. Chao, A., Chiu, C.-H., & Jost, L. (2014). Unifying Species Diversity, Phylogenetic Diversity, Functional Diversity, and Related Similarity and Differentiation Measures Through Hill Numbers. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 45(1), 297-324. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540 · DOI
  10. Colnenne-David, C., & Doré, T. (2014). Designing innovative productive cropping systems with quantified and ambitious environmental goals. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 30(6), 487-502.
  11. Davaine, J.-B. (2012). Evolution récente de la ressource mellifère dans le paysage agricole français: le cas des grandes cultures et des productions fourragères. Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France.
  12. Davis, A. S., Hill, J. D., Chase, C. A., Johanns, A. M., & Liebman, M. (2012). Increasing Cropping System Diversity Balances Productivity, Profitability and Environmental Health. PLOS ONE, 7(10), e47149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047149 · DOI
  13. El Titi, A., Boller, E., & Gendrier, J. P. (1993). Production Intégrée. Principes et directives techniques. Bulletin OILB.
  14. Fahrig, L., Baudry, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F. G., Crist, T. O., Fuller, R. J., Sirami, C., Siriwardena, G. M., & Martin, J.-L. (2011). Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecology Letters, 14(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Fahrig, L., Girard, J., Duro, D., Pasher, J., Smith, A., Javorek, S., King, D., Lindsay, K. F., Mitchell, S., & Tischendorf, L. (2015). Farmlands with smaller crop fields have higher within-field biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment, 200, 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.018 · DOI
  16. Félix, I. (2015). Effet de la rotation sur le potentiel de rendement des cultures. Synthèse d'essais de longue durée. Le Courrier de l'environnement de l'INRA, 65(65), 71-86.
  17. Gaba, S., Fried, G., Kazakou, E., Chauvel, B., & Navas, M.-L. (2014). Agroecological weed control using a functional approach: a review of cropping systems diversity. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(1), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0166-5 · DOI
  18. Ghorbani, R., Wilcockson, S., Koocheki, A., & Leifert, C. (2008). Soil management for sustainable crop disease control: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 6(3), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-008-0147-0 · DOI
  19. Girardin, P., Bockstaller, C., & der Werf, H. (2000). Assessment of potential impacts of agricultural practices on the environment: the AGRO* ECO method. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(2), 227-239.
  20. Hass, A. L., Kormann, U. G., Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Baillod, A. B., Sirami, C., Fahrig, L., Martin, J.-L., Baudry, J., Bertrand, C., Bosch, J., Brotons, L., Burel, F., Georges, R., Giralt, D., Marcos-García, M. Á., Ricarte, A., Siriwardena, G., & Batáry, P. (2018). Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1872), 20172242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2242 · DOI
  21. Hill, M. O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427-432.
  22. Hufnagel, J., Reckling, M., & Ewert, F. (2020). Diverse approaches to crop diversification in agricultural research. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(2), 1-17.
  23. Iocola, I., Angevin, F., Bockstaller, C., Catarino, R., Curran, M., Messéan, A., Schader, C., Stilmant, D., Van Stappen, F., Vanhove, P., & others. (2020). An Actor-Oriented Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework to Support a Transition towards Sustainable Agricultural Systems Based on Crop Diversification. Sustainability, 12(13), 5434.
  24. Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015). Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P. M., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G., & van der Putten, W. H. (2019). Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in Ecology \& Evolution, 34(2), 154-166.
  27. Krupinsky, J., Bailey, K., McMullen, M., Gossen, B., & Turkington, T. (2002). Managing Plant Disease Risk in Diversified Cropping Systems. Agronomy Journal, 94, 955--a. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.955a · DOI
  28. Leteinturier, B., Herman, J.-L., De Longueville, F., Quintin, L., & Oger, R. (2006). Adaptation of a crop sequence indicator based on a land parcel management system. Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment, 112(4), 324- 334.
  29. Maillard, A., Neyroud, J. ., & Vez, A. (1995). Résultats d'un essai de culture sans labour depuis plus de 20 ans à Changins II. Propriétés physiques du sol. Revue Suisse d'Agriculture, 27(1), 5-10.
  30. Martin, A. E., Collins, S. J., Crowe, S., Girard, J., Naujokaitis-Lewis, I., Smith, A. C., Lindsay, K., Mitchell, S., & Fahrig, L. (2020). Effects of farmland heterogeneity on biodiversity are similar to-or even larger than-the effects of farming practices. Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment, 288, 106698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106698 · DOI
  31. Meynard, J.-M., Messéan, A., Charlier, A., Charrier, F., Le Bail, M., Magrini, M.-B., Savini, I., & others. (2013). Freins et leviers à la diversification des cultures: étude au niveau des exploitations agricoles et des filières. Ocl, 20(4), D403.
  32. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. European Comission, Ispra, 15(1), 19-20.
  33. Palomo-Campesino, S., González, J. A., & Garc\'\ia-Llorente, M. (2018). Exploring the connections between agroecological practices and ecosystem services: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(12), 4339.
  34. Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., Alewell, C., Lugato, E., & Montanarella, L. (2015). Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale. Land Use Policy, 48, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021 · DOI
  35. Pikul, J. L., Hammack, L., & Riedell, W. E. (2005). Corn yield, nitrogen use, and corn rootworm infestation of rotations in the northern Corn Belt. Agronomy Journal, 97(3), 854-863.
  36. Ratnadass, A., Fernandes, P., Avelino, J., & Habib, R. (2012). Plant species diversity for sustainable management of crop pests and diseases in agroecosystems: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 273-303.
  37. Rusch, A., Bommarco, R., Jonsson, M., Smith, H. G., & Ekbom, B. (2013). Flow and stability of natural pest control services depend on complexity and crop rotation at the landscape scale. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(2), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12055 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rusch, A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Gardiner, M. M., Hawro, V., Holland, J., Landis, D., Thies, C., Tscharntke, T., Weisser, W. W., Winqvist, C., Woltz, M., & Bommarco, R. (2016). Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: A quantitative synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems \& Environment, 221, 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.039 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schüpbach, B., Junge, X., Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Walter, T. (2016). Seasonality, diversity and aesthetic valuation of landscape plots: An integrative approach to assess landscape quality on different scales. Land Use Policy, 53, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.032 · DOI
  40. Sirami, C., Gross, N., Baillod, A. B., Bertrand, C., Carrié, R., Hass, A., Henckel, L., Miguet, P., Vuillot, C., Alignier, A., Girard, J., Batáry, P., Clough, Y., Violle, C., Giralt, D., Bota, G., Badenhausser, I., Lefebvre, G., Gauffre, B., … Fahrig, L. (2019). Increasing crop heterogeneity enhances multitrophic diversity across agricultural regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(33), 16442. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906419116 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Soulé, E., Michonneau, P., Michel, N., & Bockstaller, C. (n.d.). Environmental sustainability assessment in agricultural systems or the tower of Babel: a conceptual and methodological review. Journal of Cleaner Production.
  42. Thuiller, W., Pironon, S., Psomas, A., Barbet-Massin, M., Jiguet, F., Lavergne, S., Pearman, P. B., Renaud, J., Zupan, L., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2014). The European functional tree of bird life in the face of global change. Nature Communications, 5(1), 1-10.
  43. Uthes, S., Kelly, E., & König, H. J. (2020). Farm-level indicators for crop and landscape diversity derived from agricultural beneficiaries data. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105725 · DOI
  44. Viguier, L., Cavan, N., Bockstaller, C., Cadoux, S., Corre-Hellou, G., Dubois, S., Duval, R., Keichinger, O., Toqué, C., Toupet de Cordoue, A.-L., & Angevin, F. (2021). Combining diversification practices to enhance the sustainability of conventional cropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2021.126279 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Weisberger, D., Nichols, V., & Liebman, M. (2019). Does diversifying crop rotations suppress weeds? A meta- analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0219847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219847 · DOI
  46. Zhang, J., Heijden, M. G. A., Zhang, F., & Bender, S. F. (2020). Soil biodiversity and crop diversification are vital components of healthy soils and agricultural sustainability. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 7(3), 236. articles sont publiés sous la licence Creative Commons 2.0. La citation ou la reproduction de tout article doit mentionner son titre, le nom de tous les auteurs, la mention de sa publication dans la revue AE&S et de son URL, ainsi que la date de publication.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Keichinger, O., Viguier, L., Corre-Hellou, G., Messéan, A., Angevin, F., & Bockstaller, C.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • École Supérieure d'Agriculture (ESA), INRAE, LEVA, F-49007 Angers, France
ORCID
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
183-201
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.5549720
OpenAlex
W4287109035
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (727482)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
Keywords
crop rotation, crop diversity, agroecological transition, ecosystem services, diversity indices, temporal diversity, spatial diversity, taxonomic diversity, functional diversity, catch crops, cover crops, relay cropping, crop associations, agroecosystems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review