Cited by 12Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeAvian ecology and behavior

The Soundscapes to Landscapes Project: Development of a Bioacoustics-Based Monitoring Workflow with Multiple Citizen Scientist Contributions

Open access
Snyder, Rose, Clark, Matthew, Salas, Leonardo, Schackwitz, Wendy, Leland, David, Stephens, Taylour, Erickson, Tiffany, Tuffli, Teresa +2 more·2022·Citizen Science: Theory and Practice

Abstract

Citizen science is an important approach for ecological studies that require county-scale or broader geographic coverage. Here we report on project management, technology, and the variety of roles and levels of engagement of citizen scientists in the Soundscapes to Landscapes project, focused in Sonoma County, California, USA. The project uses low-cost autonomous recording units (ARUs) and bioacoustic analysis to monitor bird diversity and soundscape components at a regional scale. In five years, 259 citizen scientists collectively volunteered 8,390 hours on a range of tasks, with 40% field work and 41% bioacoustic reference data collection, but also including geographic information systems, social media, and data upload. Citizen scientists were a mix of expert collaborators, community volunteers, and undergraduate students. In five distinct field campaigns, 141 citizen scientists deployed recording devices during the breeding bird season at 1,281 sites on public and private lands, and collected 12,431 hours of raw audio recordings. For bioacoustic analysis, we used a custom web-based citizen science interface to produce labeled reference data, through which seven expert citizen scientists and 105 user-level citizen scientists produced 230,066 labeled audio clips. We found that word-of-mouth and personal connections were the best strategies for recruitment and retainment of citizen scientists. Levels of engagement among citizen scientists varied, and community volunteers who participated in more than one task contributed more time to the project overall. Undergraduate students were a valuable citizen scientist group in the project, contributing 48% of the total citizen scientist effort and were particularly important for field work success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/cstp.391

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large initiatives like Soundscapes to Landscapes show that volunteers can deploy hundreds of recorders successfully, multiplying coverage and enabling biodiversity maps at a resolution unthinkable a decade ago.

    “Large initiatives like Soundscapes to Landscapes show that volunteers can deploy hundreds of recorders successfully, multiplying coverage and enabling biodiversity maps at a resolution that would have been unthinkable just a decade ago”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. (self.__next_s=self.__next_s||[]).push([0,{"children":"window.__ENV__ = {\"RECAPTCHA_SITE_KEY\":\"6LcxADcmAAAAAAuzXat_nO9ywhyvJEKalkmZaJtH\",\"SERVICE_CODE\":\"up-j-cstp\",\"FRONTEND_URL\":\"https://theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org\",\"FRONTEND_DOMAIN\":\"theoryandpractice.citizenscienceassociation.org\",\"OJS_API_URL\":\"https://api.account.up-j-cstp.ubiquityjournal.website/api/journal/1\"};","id":"public-env"}])This page is for printing. If you wish to read this article, please visit its full version.The Soundscapes to Landscapes Project: Development of a Bioacoustics-Based Monitoring Workflow with Multiple Citizen Scientist ContributionsRose SnyderMatthew ClarkLeonardo SalasWendy SchackwitzDavid LelandTaylour StephensTiffany EricksonTeresa TuffliMiles TuffliKathleen ClasAbstractCitizen science is an important approach for ecological studies that require county-scale or broader geographic coverage. Here we report on project management, technology, and the variety of roles and levels of engagement of citizen scientists in the Soundscapes to Landscapes project, focused in Sonoma County, California, USA. The project uses low-cost autonomous recording units (ARUs) and bioacoustic analysis to monitor bird diversity and soundscape components at a regional scale. In five years, 259 citizen scientists collectively volunteered 8,390 hours on a range of tasks, with 40% field work and 41% bioacoustic reference data collection, but also including geographic information systems, social media, and data upload. Citizen scientists were a mix of expert collaborators, community volunteers, and undergraduate students. In five distinct field campaigns, 141 citizen scientists deployed recording devices during the breeding bird season at 1,281 sites on public and private lands, and collected 12,431 hours of raw audio recordings. For bioacoustic analysis, we used a custom web-based citizen science interface to produce labeled reference data, through which seven expert citizen scientists and 105 user-level citizen scientists produced 230,066 labeled audio clips. We found that word-of-mouth and personal connections were the best strategies for recruitment and retainment of citizen scientists. Levels of engagement among citizen scientists varied, and community volunteers who participated in more than one task contributed more time to the project overall. Undergraduate students were a valuable citizen scientist group in the project, contributing 48% of the total citizen scientist effort and were particularly important for field work success.Year: 2022Volume: 7 Issue: 1Page/Article: 24DOI: 10.5334/cstp.391Accepted on Apr 17, 2022Published on May 27, 2022Peer ReviewedCC BY 4.0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snyder, R., Clark, M., Salas, L., Schackwitz, W., Leland, D., Stephens, T., Erickson, T., Tuffli, T., Tuffli, M., & Clas, K.
Affiliations
  • Point Blue Conservation Science (US)
  • Sonoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Snyder, Rose
Venue
Citizen Science: Theory and Practice
Published
2022-05-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
24
ISSN
2057-4991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281770717
Cited by
12
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Citizen Science Theory and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Citizen Science: Theory and Practice (Citizen Science Association) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
NASA’s Citizen Science for Earth Systems Program (CSESP) (80NSSC18M0107)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
citizen science, bioacoustics, soundscape monitoring, bird diversity, autonomous recording units, volunteer recruitment and retention, Sonoma County

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review