The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatializing Blackness: Architectures of Confinement and Black Masculinity in Chicago
Abstract
Over 277,000 African Americans migrated to Chicago between 1900 and 1940, an influx unsurpassed in any other northern city. From the start, carceral powers literally and figuratively created a prison-like environment to contain these African Americans within the so-called Black Belt on the city's South Side. A geographic study of race and gender, this book casts light upon the ubiquitous—and ordinary—ways carceral power functions in places where African Americans live. Moving from the kitchenette to the prison cell, and mining forgotten facts from sources as diverse as maps and memoirs, the book explores the myriad architectures of confinement, policing, surveillance, urban planning, and incarceration. In particular, it investigates how the ongoing carceral effort oriented and imbued black male bodies and gender performance from the Progressive era to the present. The result is an essential interdisciplinary study that highlights the racialization of space, the role of containment in subordinating African Americans, the politics of mobility under conditions of alleged freedom, and the ways black men cope with—and resist—spacial containment. A timely response to the massive upswing in carceral forms within society, the book examines how these mechanisms came to exist, why society aimed them against African Americans, and the consequences for black communities and black masculinity both historically and today.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars of carceral geographies have demonstrated that policing, surveillance, architectural design, and rehabilitation programs all collectively work to reproduce the spatial confinement of Black communities.
“Scholars of carceral geographies have demonstrated that policing, surveillance, architectural design, and rehabilitation programs all collectively work to reproduce the spatial confinement of Black communities (Gurusami, 2018;Jefferson, 2017;Shabazz, 2015).”
From Black matters are spatial matters: Black geographies for the twenty‐first century (2019) · cites this paper as Shabazz, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Black matters are spatial matters: Black geographies for the twenty‐first century
Hawthorne, C. (2019) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12468 · Cited by 386
Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography
Moran, D., Turner, J., & Schliehe, A. K. (2018) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517710352 · Cited by 293
Wright, W. J. (2020) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2019.1664890 · Cited by 199
Elliott, J. R., Brown, P. L., & Loughran, K. (2020) · Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/2378023120905439 · Cited by 120
“Just as the federal government has historically engaged in flood control, it has also engaged in housing policy through the Federal Housing Administration, with past efforts (e.g., redlining) conspiring to keep metropolitan areas sharply divided along racial lines (Gotham 2014; Shabazz 2015).”
BackgroundTurner, D. C. (2021) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2021.1983317 · Cited by 22
The Carceral State: An American Story
Khan, A. (2022) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-013930 · Cited by 21
Seeking Justice in Black Spaces: The Geography, Memory, and Legacy of the Tulsa Race Massacre
Ike, N. (2024) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-024-00517-4 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shabazz, R.
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Press
- Published
- 2015-08-15
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review