Cited by 120Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementDisaster Management and Resilience

Racial Inequities in the Federal Buyout of Flood-Prone Homes: A Nationwide Assessment of Environmental Adaptation

Open access
Elliott, James R., Brown, Phylicia Lee, Loughran, Kevin·2020·Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World

Abstract

One way the U.S. government is responding to the challenges of climate change is by funding the purchase of tens of thousands of flood-prone homes in more than 500 cities and towns across the country. This study provides a nationwide analysis of that program, extending beyond cost-benefit calculations to investigate racial inequities at different scales of local implementation, from county-level adoption, through neighborhood-level participation, to homeowner approval. Statistical analyses indicate that net of local flood damage, population, and incomes, the program disproportionately targets whiter counties and neighborhoods, especially in more urbanized areas where the program now concentrates. Yet it is neighborhoods of color in these areas that have been historically more likely to accept buyouts in greater numbers. The exception is the New York and New Jersey area after Hurricane Sandy. Implications for understanding how racial privilege works through government programs aimed at encouraging environmental adaptation are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2378023120905439

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Households in New York metropolitan area suburbs and exurbs have emissions footprints that are two to three times as large as those in parts of Brooklyn or Manhattan.

    “According to one report, households in New York metropolitan area suburbs and exurbs have emissions footprints that are two to three times as large as those in parts of Brooklyn or Manhattan.158”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, J. R., Brown, P. L., & Loughran, K.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
Elliott, James R.
Venue
Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
Published
2020-01
Volume
6
ISSN
2378-0231 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006041990
Cited by
120
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 2
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
Keywords
racial inequity, environmental adaptation, climate policy, homeownership, racial privilege, Hurricane Sandy, federal disaster assistance, urbanization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review