Cited by 51Plant and soil sciencesSoil Management and Crop YieldAgroforestry and silvopastoral systems

Natural vegetation management to conserve biodiversity and soil water in olive orchards

Open access
Simoes, Maria P., Belo, Anabela F., Pinto-Cruz, Carla, Pinheiro, Anacleto C.·2014·Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Abstract

The combined impact of soil tillage intensification and expansion of olive farming is resulting in soil degradation and biodiversity decline. We hypothesized that, instead of tilling, mowing to control the natural vegetation in spring can increase biodiversity and improve soil quality. We compared the effects of natural vegetation mowing (NVM) with those of tillage (NVT) on plant community composition and cover, soil water content and resistance to penetration, and olive yield over an 8-year period, in a Mediterranean rainfed olive orchard. NVM had an average of 28 more species and showed a strong positive correlation with Poaceae and Fabaceae, and also with geophytes and hemicryptophytes. In contrast, NVT was negatively correlated with species richness and diversity, with perennial life forms, and positively correlated with Convolvulaceae. Proportions of grass and straw cover in spring were higher in NVM from the beginning of the study (average difference was about 20%). In autumn, grass cover became higher in NVM than in NVT from year five (13% more) and straw cover from year two (30% more). Olive production did not differ between treatments in any of the years. Soil water was higher in NVM, at both soil depths, particularly in mid-summer and after the first autumn rains (1 to 2%). Soil resistance to penetration was 1 Mpa higher in NVM than in NVT. As compared to conventional tillage, natural vegetation cover mowed in spring seems to be an effective management practice to improve the overall rainfed olive orchard biodiversity and soil quality, without affecting production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5424/sjar/2014123-5255

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A seven-year study on Portuguese rainfed olive orchards showed that mowing, compared to tillage, did not reduce olive yields.

    “In a seven year study on Portuguese rainfed olive orchards it was shown that mowing, compared to tillage, did not reduce olive yields”

    From Almond farm profitability under agroecological management in south-eastern Spain: Accounting for externalities and opportunity costs (2020) · cites this paper as Simoes et al., 2014

    The Study site section locates the rainfed orchard in southeast Portugal, and Plant cover and olive production reports that yield was not significantly affected by mowing versus tillage. However, the Introduction describes the comparison as an eight-year study, not a seven-year one. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simoes, M. P., Belo, A. F., Pinto-Cruz, C., & Pinheiro, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Évora (PT)
Venue
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
Published
2014-07-18
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
633-643
ISSN
  • 1695-971X (ISSN-L)
  • 2171-9292
OpenAlex
W2030355642
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Keywords
mowing, tillage, olive groves, biodiversity conservation, soil water, soil quality, soil penetration resistance, floristic composition, rainfed agriculture, soil degradation, olive yield, geophytes, Fabaceae, Poaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review