CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 781Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceTeam Dynamics and PerformanceOrganizational Management and Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 182 of the 186 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

9 Creativity in Organizations

George, Jennifer M.·2007·Academy of Management Annals
DOI 10.5465/078559814
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this chapter, I review contemporary theories and research on creativity in organizations. After discussing key definitional issues in this domain, I review the contemporary scholarly literature proceeding from the most molecular of perspectives focusing on within-individual processes to the more molar perspective of the collective creativity that can take place in work groups. While the within-individual process featured most prominently in the extant literature is intrinsic motivation, after a treatment of some fundamental issues surrounding the intrinsic motivation construct, I review research on conscious and unconscious thinking and positive and negative affect as key internal processes relevant to understanding creativity. Next, I focus on contextual influences on creativity including safety signals, creativity prompts, supervisors, leadership, and networks. Lastly, I focus on creativity in groups (from both an input and a process perspective). In closing, I reiterate a recurrent theme throughout the review. This is an exciting era for research on creativity in organizations with many intriguing questions awaiting future scholarly inquiry.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/078559814

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 186 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context
  2. Argyris C., 1990, Knowledge for action: Changing the status quo
  3. Brass D. J., 1995, Creative action in organizations, 94
  4. Burke J., 1978, Connections
  5. Clore G. L., 2001, Handbook of affect and cognition, 121
  6. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1995, The nature of insight, 329
  7. Dijksterhuis A., 2005, The new unconscious, 77
  8. Florida R., 2005, Harvard Business Review, 125
  9. Frijda N. H., 1988, American Psychologist, 43, 349, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349 · DOI
  10. George J. M., 2007, Research on managing groups and teams: Affect and groups, 10, 97
  11. Hardin C. D., 2000, Future directions in social cognition, 3
  12. Hardin C. D., 1996, Handbook of motivation and cognition, 3, 28
  13. Hirt E. R., 1996, Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation, 303
  14. Jackson S., 1992, Group process and productivity, 138
  15. Kenrick D. T., 1988, American Psychologist, 43, 23, 10.1037/0003-066X.43.1.23 · DOI
  16. Levine J. M., 2004, Team cognition: Process and performance at the interindividual level, 163
  17. Levine J. M., 2001, Social influence in social reality, 33
  18. Lewis J. D., 1985, Social Forces, 63, 967, 10.1093/sf/63.4.967 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Martin L. L., 1993, Advances in social cognition, 6, 147
  20. Martin L. L., 1996, Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation, 279
  21. Nemeth C. J., 1992, Productivity and process in groups, 95
  22. Rhodes M., 1961, Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics, 216
  23. Runco M. A., 1994, Creativity and affect, 102
  24. Schwarz N., 2002, The wisdom in feelings, 144
  25. Schwarz N., 1988, Affect, cognition, and social behavior, 44
  26. Schwarz N., 2003, Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296, 10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20 · DOI
  27. Staw B. M., 1980, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1, 253
  28. Staw B. M., 1995, Creative action in organizations, 161
  29. Unsworth K., 2001, Academy of Management Review, 26, 289, 10.5465/amr.2001.4378025 · DOI
  30. Williams K., 1998, Research in organizational behavior, 21, 77
  31. Woodman R. W., 1993, Academy of Management Review, 18, 293, 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–780 of 780

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
George, J. M.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
George, Jennifer M.
Venue
Academy of Management Annals
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2007-12
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
439-477
ISSN
  • 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-6520
DOI
10.5465/078559814
OpenAlex
W2153661603
Cited by
781
References
186
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 33
FWCI
15.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
Keywords
organizational creativity, intrinsic motivation, positive and negative affect, safety signals, leadership, social networks, team creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review