The DOI matches its Crossref record; 224 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Abstract
Hierarchy is such a defining and pervasive feature of organizations that its forms and basic functions are often taken for granted in organizational research. In this review, we revisit some basic psychological and sociological elements of hierarchy and argue that status and power are two important yet distinct bases of hierarchical differentiation. We first define power and status and distinguish our definitions from previous conceptualizations. We then integrate a number of different literatures to explain why status and power hierarchies tend to be self‐reinforcing. Power, related to one’s control over valued resources, transforms individual psychology such that the powerful think and act in ways that lead to the retention and acquisition of power. Status, related to the respect one has in the eyes of others, generates expectations for behavior and opportunities for advancement that favor those with a prior status advantage. We also explore the role that hierarchy‐enhancing belief systems play in stabilizing hierarchy, both from the bottom up and from the top down. Finally, we address a number of factors that we think are instrumental in explaining the conditions under which hierarchies change. Our framework suggests a number of avenues for future research on the bases, causes, and consequences of hierarchy in groups and organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“formal power most often accrues to those who hold positions in the organization that reflect higher rank or position in the organization (Magee & Galinsky, 2008;Mechanic, 1962)”
From Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity (2010) · cites this paper as Magee & Galinsky, 2008
In the citing paper
“Lowstatus members are also less likely to deviate from expected behaviour or challenge high-rank users, since '[t]he consequences for violating expectancies are more severe for low-status than high-status individuals, especially when low-status individuals act above their rank' [13, 375].”
From Exploring incel group dynamics: a computational study of hierarchy and group-boundary policing (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“We posit that new users are more hesitant to call out individuals because, as discussed in the introduction, '[t]he consequences for violating expectancies are more severe for low-status than high-status individuals, especially when low-status individuals act above their rank'[13, 375].”
From Exploring incel group dynamics: a computational study of hierarchy and group-boundary policing (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,625
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bargh J.A., 1995, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768 · DOI
- Brauer M., 2005, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology
- Brief A.P., 2001, Groups at work: Theory and research, 471
- Deci E.L., 1987, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024 · DOI · Paper page
- DePaulo B.M., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 2, 3
- French J.R.P., 1959, The bases of social power
- Greer L.L., 2007, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
- Guinote A., 2007, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 685
- Hollander E.P., 1985, The handbook of social psychology, 2, 485
- Kipnis D., 1976, The powerholders
- Lewin K., 1997, Field theory in social psychology, 337
- Marx K., 1970, The German ideology
- Milliken F.J., 2008, Seeing through the lens of power: Sense‐making and communication in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
- Morand D.A., 2001, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
- Overbeck J., 2005, Research on managing groups and teams, 7, 171
- Roese N.J., 2007, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 91
- Rudman L.A., Research in organizational behavior
- Sivanathan N.S., 2008, Scurrilous competitors: Risk‐takers, bribers and saboteurs in promotion tournaments
- Weisman S.R., 1981, New York Times, A20
- Winter D.G., 1973, The power motive
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,003
George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., & Zhang, L. L. (2011) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0606 · Cited by 55
Visual attention to powerful postures: People avert their gaze from nonverbal dominance displays
Holland, E., Wolf, E. B., Looser, C. E., & Cuddy, A. J. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.001 · Cited by 64
Zhu, H., Wong, N., & Huang, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.008 · Cited by 55
Children’s Developing Judgments About the Physical Manifestations of Power
Terrizzi, B., Brey, E., Shutts, K., & Beier, J. (2018) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000657 · Cited by 57
Does power corrupt the mind? The influence of power on moral reasoning and self-interested behavior
Giurge, L. M., van Dijke, M., Zheng, X., & Cremer, D. D. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.03.003 · Cited by 61
Pitesa, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0115 · Cited by 55
Or, M. H., & Berkovich, I. (2021) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432211001364 · Cited by 54
Uenal, F., Sidanius, J., Maertens, R., Hudson, S. T. J., Davis, G., & Ghani, A. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101783 · Cited by 53
Dupree, C. H. (2024) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392231223142 · Cited by 66
The loss of power: How illusions of alliance contribute to powerholders’ downfall
Brion, S., & Anderson, C. P. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.005 · Cited by 54
Gender diversity in leadership succession: Preparing for the future
Virick, M., & Greer, C. R. (2012) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21487 · Cited by 56
Fragale, A. R., Sumanth, J. J., Tiedens, L. Z., & Northcraft, G. B. (2012) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839212461439 · Cited by 57
The Uniplex Third: Enabling Single-domain Role Transitions in Multiplex Relationships
Li, J. B., & Piezunka, H. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219845875 · Cited by 54
Power and decision making: new directions for research in the age of artificial intelligence
Fast, N. J., & Schroeder, J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.039 · Cited by 55
Joosten, A., van Dijke, M., Hiel, A. V., & Cremer, D. D. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126377 · Cited by 60
Gray, S., Bunderson, J. S., van der Vegt, G. S., Rink, F. A., & Gedik, Y. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1136 · Cited by 54
Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Li, P., & Henry, S. E. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12398 · Cited by 53
“Say on Pay”: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?
Mangen, C., & MAGNAN, M. L. (2012) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2010.0098 · Cited by 52
Social activity and network formation
Baetz, O. (2015) · Theoretical Economics · doi:10.3982/te1487 · Cited by 53
People perception: Social vision of groups and consequences for organizing and interacting
Phillips, L. T., Max Weisbuch, A., & Ambady, N. (2014) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2014.10.001 · Cited by 59
Auster, E. R., & Prasad, A. (2016) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0607-0 · Cited by 53
Potipiroon, W., & Ford, M. T. (2019) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12263 · Cited by 53
Procedural fairness and endorsement of prototypical leaders: Leader benevolence or follower control?
van Dijke, M., & Cremer, D. D. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.004 · Cited by 56
Social power, product conspicuousness, and the demand for luxury brand counterfeit products
Bian, X., Haque, S., & Smith, A. (2014) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12073 · Cited by 53
Shooting from the Hip: A Habit Perspective of Voice
Lam, C. F., Rees, L. L., Levesque, L. L., & Ornstein, S. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0366 · Cited by 49
van Dijke, M., Cremer, D. D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000260 · Cited by 55
Lahiri, A., Pahnke, E. C., Howard, M. D., & Boeker, W. (2019) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1331 · Cited by 52
Bingham, J. B., Oldroyd, J. B., Thompson, J. A., Bednar, J. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0827 · Cited by 51
Kim, Y. J., & Toh, S. M. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1322 · Cited by 50
Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (2019) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.002 · Cited by 50
Impression (mis)management: When what you say is not what they hear
Sezer, O. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.025 · Cited by 50
Phillips, L. T., Jun, S., & Shakeri, A. (2022) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0314 · Cited by 60
Pfrombeck, J., Levin, C., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2022) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2022.100179 · Cited by 63
Self-citationThe Effect of Self-Esteem on Corrupt Intention: The Mediating Role of Materialism
Liang, Y., Liu, L., Tan, X., Huang, Z., Dang, J., & Zheng, W. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01063 · Cited by 53
Power and Persuasion: Processes by Which Perceived Power Can Influence Evaluative Judgments
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Durso, G. R. O., & Rucker, D. D. (2017) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000119 · Cited by 59
Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & von Hippel, W. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.004 · Cited by 55
Jerkies, tacos, and burgers: Subjective socioeconomic status and meat preference
Chan, E. Y., & Zlatevska, N. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.027 · Cited by 54
Chon, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2021) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0079 · Cited by 59
Han, J., & Pollock, T. G. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2018.1091 · Cited by 49
Jiang, Z., DeHart‐Davis, L., & Borry, E. L. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13494 · Cited by 49
Pride or empathy? Exploring effective CSR communication strategies on social media
He, Z., Liu, S., Ferns, B. H., & Countryman, C. C. (2022) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2021-1182 · Cited by 49
Academic publishing requires linguistically inclusive policies
Arenas‐Castro, H., Berdejo‐Espinola, V., Chowdhury, S., Rodríguez‐Contreras, A., James, A. R. M., Raja, N. B., Dunne, E. M., Bertolino, S., Emídio, N. B., Derez, C. M., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.2840 · Cited by 49
Hsu, D. Y., Huang, L. Y., Nordgren, L. F., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614542345 · Cited by 50
Self-citationDoyle, S., Lount, R. B., Wilk, S. L., & Pettit, N. C. (2015) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2014.0104 · Cited by 49
Gibson, K. R., Harari, D., & Marr, J. C. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.001 · Cited by 57
Yu, A., Hays, N. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.03.011 · Cited by 59
Kark, R., Meister, A., & Peters, K. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063211020358 · Cited by 65
The Evolutionary Foundations of Status Hierarchy
van Vugt, M., & Tybur, J. M. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych232 · Cited by 56
Research on Anti-Black Racism in Organizations: Insights, Ideas, and Considerations
King, D. D., Hall, A. V., Johnson, L. U., CARTER, J. H., Burrows, D. N., & Samuel, N. N. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09804-4 · Cited by 58
The Effects of CEO Awards on Corporate Social Responsibility Focus
Yin, J., Li, J., & Ma, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05411-2 · Cited by 48
Self- and Other-Orientation in High Rank: A Cultural Psychological Approach to Social Hierarchy
Gobel, M. S., & Miyamoto, Y. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683231172252 · Cited by 65
Telecommuting and the role of supervisory power in China
Raghuram, S., & Fang, D. (2013) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9360-x · Cited by 48
The neural substrates of person perception: Spontaneous use of financial and moral status knowledge
Cloutier, J., Ambady, N., Meagher, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.010 · Cited by 58
An Expanded Model of Status Dynamics: The Effects of Status Transfer and Interfirm Coordination
Cowen, A. P. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0743 · Cited by 48
When She Brings Home the Job Status: Wives’ Job Status, Status Leakage, and Marital Instability
Byrne, A., & Barling, J. I. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1120 · Cited by 51
Individuals’ power and their social network accuracy: A situated cognition perspective
Marineau, J. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Borgatti, S. P., & Vecchi, P. (2018) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2018.01.006 · Cited by 48
Hong, S. (2020) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1743346 · Cited by 48
Hwang, Y., Su, N., & Mattila, A. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-05-2019-0422 · Cited by 39
Frank, D., & Otterbring, T. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12780 · Cited by 49
Pride: The Emotional Foundation of Social Rank Attainment
Tracy, J. L., Mercadante, E., & Hohm, I. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-040321 · Cited by 57
Pettit, N. C., & Sivanathan, N. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211431166 · Cited by 47
Zaheer, A., & Kamal, D. F. (2010) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2010.49 · Cited by 47
Botha, J., & Κουρκούτας, Η. (2015) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1111448 · Cited by 73
Reaching the top and avoiding the bottom: How ranking motivates unethical intentions and behavior
Vriend, T., Jordan, J., & Janssen, O. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.09.003 · Cited by 50
Schaerer, M., Kern, M. C., Berger, G. A., Medvec, V. H., & Swaab, R. I. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.09.002 · Cited by 52
When goals are known: The effects of audience relative status on goal commitment and performance.
Klein, H. J., Lount, R. B., Park, H. M., & Linford, B. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000441 · Cited by 51
Schweitzer, V., & Simon, F. L. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.027 · Cited by 48
Power Heightens Sensitivity to Unfairness Against the Self
Sawaoka, T., Hughes, B., & Ambady, N. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215588755 · Cited by 51
Gaining the ultimate power edge: Women in the dual role of CEO and Chair
Muller‐Kahle, M. I., & Schiehll, E. (2013) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.05.001 · Cited by 46
Leader Self-Concept and Self-Interested Behavior
Wisse, B. M., & Rus, D. (2012) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000054 · Cited by 46
Zilioli, S., Mehta, P. H., & Watson, N. V. (2014) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.022 · Cited by 46
Toward a Psychological Science of Globalization
Gelfand, M. J., Lyons, S., & Lun, J. (2011) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01731.x · Cited by 46
Repetitive disclosures in the MD&A
Li, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/jbfa.12405 · Cited by 46
Fleischmann, A., Lammers, J., Conway, P. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550617744022 · Cited by 46
Self-citationBindl, U. K. (2018) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726718778086 · Cited by 49
Up, Up, and Away: Upgrading as a Response to Dissimilar Brand Users
Wang, Y., & John, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/0022243718820572 · Cited by 46
Does the devil wear Prada? Luxury product experiences can affect prosocial behavior
Wang, Y.-J., John, D. R., & Griskevicious, V. (2020) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.04.001 · Cited by 36
The Genesis Effect: Digital Goods in the Metaverse
Yang, H. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad072 · Cited by 45
Getting Down to Basics: A Situated Model of Conflict in Social Relations
Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K. G., Bui‐Wrzosinska, L., Nowak, A. K., & Vallacher, R. R. (2012) · Negotiation Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00324.x · Cited by 50
Where is context? Advancing status research with a contextual value perspective
Li, H., Chen, Y.-R., & Blader, S. L. (2016) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.003 · Cited by 51
Why to cooperate is better than to compete: brain and personality components
Balconi, M., Crivelli, D., & Vanutelli, M. E. (2017) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/s12868-017-0386-8 · Cited by 45
Landis, B. D., Kilduff, M. J., Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, G. J. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000299 · Cited by 47
van Dijke, M., Gobena, L. B., & Verboon, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01632 · Cited by 57
Personality predictors of social status attainment
Grosz, M. P., Leckelt, M., & Back, M. D. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.023 · Cited by 49
Acquiring Information through Peers
Herskovic, B., & Ramos, J. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181798 · Cited by 46
Menges, J. I., Kilduff, M. J., Kern, S., & Bruch, H. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.06.002 · Cited by 47
On the origins of informal hierarchy: The interactive role of formal leadership and task complexity
Oedzes, J. J., van der Vegt, G. S., Rink, F. A., & Walter, F. H. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2330 · Cited by 44
CEO given names and corporate green investment
Jia, F., Li, G., Xiao-yan, L., & Xie, S. (2021) · Emerging Markets Review · doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100808 · Cited by 48
Korman, J. V., Quaquebeke, N. V., & Tröster, C. (2021) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09733-8 · Cited by 56
Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment
Sievers, B., Welker, C. L., Hasson, U., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. P. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43253-8 · Cited by 69
The interpersonal nature of power and status
Smith, P. K., & Magee, J. C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.04.007 · Cited by 44
Self-citationDispositional Anxiety Blocks the Psychological Effects of Power
Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Menzel, A. J., & Kunstman, J. W. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212453341 · Cited by 44
Third-party punishment and symbolic intragroup status
Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.001 · Cited by 44
Status Inertia and Member Replacement in Role-Differentiated Teams
Bunderson, J. S., van der Vegt, G. S., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0835 · Cited by 44
How Power States Influence the Persuasiveness of Top‐Dog versus Underdog Appeals
Jin, L., & Huang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1069 · Cited by 44
Into the fray: Adaptive approaches to studying novel teamwork forms
Kerrissey, M. J., Satterstrom, P., & Edmondson, A. C. (2020) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386620912833 · Cited by 53
Power, status, and hierarchy: current trends and future challenges
Kleef, G. A. V., & Cheng, J. T. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.011 · Cited by 50
Sarfraz, M., Shah, S. G. M., Fareed, Z., & Shahzad, F. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2014 · Cited by 44
Locke, C. C., & Anderson, C. P. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.12.004 · Cited by 47
Theories of power: Perceived strategies for gaining and maintaining power.
ten Brinke, L., & Keltner, D. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000345 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Magee, Joe C.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 351-398
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W4237123392
- Cited by
- 2,385
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 185 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 63
- FWCI
- 132.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- social hierarchy, power, status, power hierarchies, organizational hierarchy, belief systems, resource control, status expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review