The DOI matches its Crossref record; 224 of the 224 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status
Abstract
Hierarchy is such a defining and pervasive feature of organizations that its forms and basic functions are often taken for granted in organizational research. In this review, we revisit some basic psychological and sociological elements of hierarchy and argue that status and power are two important yet distinct bases of hierarchical differentiation. We first define power and status and distinguish our definitions from previous conceptualizations. We then integrate a number of different literatures to explain why status and power hierarchies tend to be self‐reinforcing. Power, related to one’s control over valued resources, transforms individual psychology such that the powerful think and act in ways that lead to the retention and acquisition of power. Status, related to the respect one has in the eyes of others, generates expectations for behavior and opportunities for advancement that favor those with a prior status advantage. We also explore the role that hierarchy‐enhancing belief systems play in stabilizing hierarchy, both from the bottom up and from the top down. Finally, we address a number of factors that we think are instrumental in explaining the conditions under which hierarchies change. Our framework suggests a number of avenues for future research on the bases, causes, and consequences of hierarchy in groups and organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“formal power most often accrues to those who hold positions in the organization that reflect higher rank or position in the organization (Magee & Galinsky, 2008;Mechanic, 1962)”
From Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity (2010) · cites this paper as Magee & Galinsky, 2008
In the citing paper
“Lowstatus members are also less likely to deviate from expected behaviour or challenge high-rank users, since '[t]he consequences for violating expectancies are more severe for low-status than high-status individuals, especially when low-status individuals act above their rank' [13, 375].”
From Exploring incel group dynamics: a computational study of hierarchy and group-boundary policing (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“We posit that new users are more hesitant to call out individuals because, as discussed in the introduction, '[t]he consequences for violating expectancies are more severe for low-status than high-status individuals, especially when low-status individuals act above their rank'[13, 375].”
From Exploring incel group dynamics: a computational study of hierarchy and group-boundary policing (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Exchange and Power in Social Life.
Bierstedt, R., & Blau, P. M. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091154 · Cited by 13,625
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bargh J.A., 1995, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768, 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.768 · DOI
- Brauer M., 2005, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology
- Brief A.P., 2001, Groups at work: Theory and research, 471
- Deci E.L., 1987, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024, 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024 · DOI · Paper page
- DePaulo B.M., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, 2, 3
- French J.R.P., 1959, The bases of social power
- Greer L.L., 2007, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
- Guinote A., 2007, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 685
- Hollander E.P., 1985, The handbook of social psychology, 2, 485
- Kipnis D., 1976, The powerholders
- Lewin K., 1997, Field theory in social psychology, 337
- Marx K., 1970, The German ideology
- Milliken F.J., 2008, Seeing through the lens of power: Sense‐making and communication in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
- Morand D.A., 2001, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management
- Overbeck J., 2005, Research on managing groups and teams, 7, 171
- Roese N.J., 2007, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 91
- Rudman L.A., Research in organizational behavior
- Sivanathan N.S., 2008, Scurrilous competitors: Risk‐takers, bribers and saboteurs in promotion tournaments
- Weisman S.R., 1981, New York Times, A20
- Winter D.G., 1973, The power motive
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Unjust punishment in organizations
Mooijman, M., & Graham, J. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.001 · Cited by 43
Sense of Power: Policy Insights for Encouraging Consumers’ Healthy Food Choice
Wang, C., Minton, E. A., & Zhang, J. (2020) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915620902148 · Cited by 27
Duan, J., Peluso, A. M., Yu, L., & Pilati, M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.051 · Cited by 42
Why Difference Makes a Difference: Diversity, Inequality, and Institutionalization
DiTomaso, N. (2021) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12690 · Cited by 39
Conspiracy theories as opportunistic attributions of power
Nera, K., Bertin, P., & Klein, O. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101381 · Cited by 34
Seigner, B. D. C., Milanov, H., Lundmark, E., & Shepherd, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106282 · Cited by 35
Jackson, S. S., Fung, M.-C., Moore, M.-A. C., & Jackson, C. J. (2016) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.020 · Cited by 35
Status Differences and Knowledge Transfer: The Effect of Incentives
Haesebrouck, K., Cools, M., & den Abbeele, A. G. H. L. V. (2017) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51765 · Cited by 35
Employee responsibility and basic human values in the hospitality sector
Ariza‐Montes, A., Fuentes, J. M. A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2016) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.12.001 · Cited by 36
Zhu, Q., Martinescu, E., Beersma, B., & Wei, F. (2021) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12375 · Cited by 34
Decolonizing Organizational Communication
Pal, M., Kim, H., Harris, K. L., Long, Z., Linabary, J. R., Larson, E. W., Jensen, P. R., Gist‐Mackey, A. N., McDonald, J., Nieto-Fernandez, B., et al. (2022) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08933189221090255 · Cited by 34
Emotional contagion in online groups as a function of valence and status
Kane, A. A., Swol, L. M. V., & Sarmiento-Lawrence, I. G. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107543 · Cited by 37
The role of discrete emotions in job satisfaction: A meta‐analysis
Williams, C., Thomas, J. S., Bennett, A. A., Banks, G. C., Toth, A., Dunn, A. M., McBride, A. G., & Gooty, J. (2023) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2747 · Cited by 54
Ramos, G., Johnson, W. A., VanEpps, E. M., & Graham, J. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1427 · Cited by 40
How Do the Powerful Attain Status? The Roots of Legitimate Power Inequalities
Willer, R., Youngreen, R., Troyer, L., & Lovaglia, M. J. (2012) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.2554 · Cited by 34
The good and bad of group conformity: a call for a new programme of research in medical education
Beran, T., Kaba, A., Caird, J. K., & McLaughlin, K. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12510 · Cited by 34
Modeling Motivated Misreports to Sensitive Survey Questions
Böckenholt, U. (2013) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-013-9390-9 · Cited by 34
Faking It for the Higher-Ups: Status and Surface Acting in Workplace Meetings
Thomas, J. S., Olien, J. L., Allen, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., & Kello, J. E. (2017) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116687703 · Cited by 35
The rich are easily offended by unfairness: Wealth triggers spiteful rejection of unfair offers
Ding, Y., Wu, J., Ji, T., Chen, X., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.008 · Cited by 35
Managing Disruptive Behavior through Non-Hierarchical Governance
Kou, Y., Gui, X., Zhang, S., & Nardi, B. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134697 · Cited by 34
Gibson, C. B., Birkinshaw, J., Sumpter, D. M., & Ambos, T. C. (2019) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12443 · Cited by 40
Power influences the expression of Honesty-Humility: The power-exploitation affordances hypothesis
Barends, A. J., de Vries, R. E., & van Vugt, M. (2019) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103856 · Cited by 36
Fiske, S. T., & Bai, X. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.014 · Cited by 34
The Unintended Consequences of Empowering Leadership: Increased Deviance for Some Followers
Yam, K. C., Reynolds, S. J., Zhang, P., & Su, R. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04917-x · Cited by 35
“Diversity,” immigration, and the new American multi-racial hierarchy
Bell, M., Marquardt, D. J., & Berry, D. P. (2014) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-08-2012-0242 · Cited by 28
Liu, Y., Lam, L. W., & Loi, R. C. H. (2013) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-013-9364-6 · Cited by 34
He, V. F., von Krogh, G., & Sirén, C. A. (2021) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406211026114 · Cited by 41
To Whom Does Destination Anthropomorphism Appeal? Power and Perceived Control
Chan, E. Y., & Gohary, A. (2022) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875221095215 · Cited by 38
SimanTov‐Nachlieli, I. (2024) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2023.17515 · Cited by 32
Balconi, M., & Pagani, S. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.043 · Cited by 33
Hedge Fund Managers With Psychopathic Tendencies Make for Worse Investors
ten Brinke, L., Kish, A., & Keltner, D. J. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217733080 · Cited by 33
Chiu, S., Pathak, S. M., Hoskisson, R. E., & Johnson, R. A. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101459 · Cited by 33
Maoret, M., Tortoriello, M., & Iubatti, D. (2020) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1365 · Cited by 33
Brick, D. J., Zhou, L., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1260 · Cited by 33
Perceived senior leadership opportunities in MNCs: The effect of social hierarchy and capital
Levy, O., Taylor, S., Boyacigiller, N. A., Bodner, T., Peiperl, M. A., & Beechler, S. (2014) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.53 · Cited by 32
Goldstein, N. J., & Hays, N. A. (2011) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839212440972 · Cited by 33
Stoermer, S., Hitotsuyanagi‐Hansel, A., & Froese, F. J. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2016.1278254 · Cited by 32
In and out of control: Personal control and consumer behavior
Cutright, K. M., & Wu, E. C. (2022) · Consumer Psychology Review · doi:10.1002/arcp.1083 · Cited by 36
Schweisfurth, T. G., Schöttl, C. P., Raasch, C., & Zaggl, M. A. (2023) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3497 · Cited by 32
Horton, K. E., McClelland, C. R., & Griffin, M. A. (2014) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726713516374 · Cited by 32
Kopelman, S., Hardin, A. E., Myers, C. G., & Tost, L. P. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000065 · Cited by 36
Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.1 · Cited by 35
Self-citationHow pride influences product evaluation through construal level
Yang, P., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2016-0777 · Cited by 34
No One is Safe: Victimization Experiences of High-Status Youth
Dawes, M., & Malamut, S. T. (2018) · Adolescent Research Review · doi:10.1007/s40894-018-0103-6 · Cited by 32
Kretzer, M., & Maedche, A. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00523 · Cited by 36
Too powerless to speak up: Effects of social rejection on sense of power and employee voice
Kim, T. H., Lee, S. S., Oh, J.-H., & Lee, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12625 · Cited by 33
Halevy, N., Halali, E., & Cohen, T. R. (2019) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000213 · Cited by 32
Collectivism and Individualism in Status Hierarchies: Socialization and Social Identity Explanations
Iacoviello, V., & Lorenzi‐Cioldi, F. (2019) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.285 · Cited by 35
Hierarchical Fuzzy Opinion Networks: Top-Down for Social Organizations and Bottom-Up for Election
Wang, L.-X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2020.2965864 · Cited by 32
Linguistic Inclusion: Challenging Implicit Classed Communication Bias in Interview Methods
Gist‐Mackey, A. N., & Kingsford, A. N. (2020) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318920934128 · Cited by 32
The Diversity-Uncertainty-Valence (DUV) model of generalized trust development
Cao, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.03.007 · Cited by 32
Self-citationUnpacking Psychological Ownership: How Transactional and Transformational Leaders Motivate Ownership
Guarana, C. L., & Avolio, B. (2022) · Journal of leadership & organizational studies · doi:10.1177/15480518211066072 · Cited by 30
Kim, S. S. Y., Huang-Isherwood, K. M., Weiwei, Z., & Williams, D. C. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107291 · Cited by 39
Abuse for status: A social dominance perspective of abusive supervision.
Hu, L., & Liu, Y. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.06.002 · Cited by 37
The Social Effects of Emotion Regulation in Organizations
Kleef, G. A. V. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203100851-16 · Cited by 32
Robertson, D. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2017) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000186 · Cited by 32
Heuristics in Organizations: Toward an Integrative Process Model
Vuori, N., Burkhard, B., Laamanen, T. M. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2024) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2022.0194 · Cited by 30
The hubris penalty: Biased responses to “Celebration” displays of black football players
Hall, E. V., & Livingston, R. W. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.004 · Cited by 31
Team-based primary care: The medical assistant perspective
Sheridan, B., Chien, A. T., Peters, A. S., Rosenthal, M. B., Brooks, J. V., & Singer, S. J. (2016) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/hmr.0000000000000136 · Cited by 31
Locke, K. D., & Heller, S. (2016) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167216675333 · Cited by 34
The Experience of Power in Teacher–Student Relationships in Collectivistic Context
Aruta, J. J. B. R., Barretto, I. D. E., Shin, Y., & Jang, A. (2019) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-019-00523-0 · Cited by 31
Popa‐Wyatt, M. (2020) · Grazer Philosophische Studien · doi:10.1163/18756735-09701009 · Cited by 31
Gallus, J., & Bhatia, S. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.003 · Cited by 33
Purvanova, R. K., Charlier, S. D., Reeves, C. J., & Greco, L. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09698-0 · Cited by 37
Integrating Formal and Shared Leadership: the Moderating Influence of Role Ambiguity on Innovation
Ziegert, J. C., & Dust, S. B. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09722-3 · Cited by 39
Reducing the gap between pro‐environmental disposition and behavior: The role of feeling power
Dong, M., Vélez, G. F. P., & Wu, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12733 · Cited by 32
Schaerer, M., Foulk, T. A., du Plessis, C., Tu, M., & Krishnan, S. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.005 · Cited by 34
Powerlessness, variety-seeking, and the mediating role of need for autonomy
Wang, W., Raghunathan, R., & Gauri, D. K. (2022) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.004 · Cited by 34
Katyal, K., Dawra, J., & Soni, N. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.059 · Cited by 31
Learning Down to Train Up: Mentors Are More Effective When They Value Insights from Below
Zhang, T., Wang, D. J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2022) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2021.0430 · Cited by 39
Self-citationKleef, G. A. V., Oveis, C., Homan, A. C., van der Löwe, I., & Keltner, D. J. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614566857 · Cited by 34
Support for quotas for women in leadership: The influence of gender stereotypes
Mölders, S., Brosi, P., Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., & Welpe, I. M. (2017) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21882 · Cited by 41
Eye Gaze and Head Posture Jointly Influence Judgments of Dominance, Physical Strength, and Anger
Toscano, H., Schubert, T. W., & Giessner, S. R. (2018) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-018-0276-5 · Cited by 36
Acharya, A. G., & Pollock, T. G. (2020) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2017.1144 · Cited by 30
Zhong, R., Tang, P. M., & Lee, S. H. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12571 · Cited by 32
Faking It with the Boss’s Jokes? Leader Humor Quantity, Follower Surface Acting, and Power Distance
Hu, X., Parke, M. R., Peterson, R. S., & Simon, G. (2024) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2022.0195 · Cited by 30
Xiang, X., & Geng, Y. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122193 · Cited by 34
Sociometric status and peer control attempts: A multiple status hierarchies approach
de Klepper, M. C., Labianca, G., Sleebos, E., & Agneessens, F. (2017) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12242 · Cited by 31
A Structural-Emergence Model of Diversity in Teams
Joshi, A., & Neely, B. H. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062421 · Cited by 30
PIKULINA, E. S., & Tergiman, C. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104173 · Cited by 30
Qin, X., Dust, S. B., DiRenzo, M. S., & Wang, S. (2019) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09646-7 · Cited by 34
Culture Moderates the Relation Between Income Inequality and Subjective Well-Being
Li, C., Zuckerman, M., & Diener, E. (2019) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022119883019 · Cited by 30
Pieterse, A. N., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., Spitzmüller, M., Dimotakis, N., Karam, E. P., & Sleesman, D. J. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101343 · Cited by 41
Antecedents of leaders' power sharing: The roles of power instability and distrust
Feenstra, S., Jordan, J., Walter, F. H., & Stoker, J. I. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.01.005 · Cited by 32
Ha, T., Sah, Y. J., Park, Y., & Lee, S. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1846789 · Cited by 33
Nijs, S., Dries, N., Vlasselaer, V. V., & Sels, L. (2021) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12401 · Cited by 30
Hierarchical Inconsistency: A Monitoring Mechanism to Reduce Securities Fraud in Emerging Markets
Guo, Y., Luo, X. R., & Li, D. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1541 · Cited by 30
Bailey, E. R., Horton, C. B., & Galinsky, A. D. (2022) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2021.0081 · Cited by 30
Self-citationLoughlin, C. A., Arnold, K. A., & Crawford, J. B. (2011) · Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal · doi:10.1108/02610151211199218 · Cited by 30
Reviewer online engagement: the role of rank, well-being, and market helping behavior
Mosteller, J. R., & Mathwick, C. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-05-2014-0974 · Cited by 30
Kim, H. Y., & Pettit, N. C. (2014) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550614555030 · Cited by 32
Perspective—A New Look at Conflict Management in Work Groups
Carton, A. M., & Tewfik, B. A. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2016.1085 · Cited by 33
Leigh, A., & Desai, S. D. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1629 · Cited by 32
Uniting Through Difference: Rich Cultural-Identity Expression as a Conduit to Inclusion
Arnett, R. D. (2023) · Organization science (Providence, R.I.) · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1648 · Cited by 20
Dominance versus Prestige Hierarchies: How Social Hierarchy Base Shapes Conspicuous Consumption
Desmichel, P., & Rucker, D. D. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad024 · Cited by 35
Coleman, P. T., & Kugler, K. G. (2014) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1935 · Cited by 29
Race, Power, and Reflexive Gaze Following
Max Weisbuch, A., Pauker, K., Adams, R. B., Lamer, S. A., & Ambady, N. (2017) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2017.35.6.619 · Cited by 29
From being diverse to becoming diverse: A dynamic team diversity theory
Li, J., Meyer, B. M., Shemla, M., & Wegge, J. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2272 · Cited by 29
Love or hate, depends on who's saying it: How legitimacy of brand rejection alters brand preferences
Hu, M., Qiu, P., Wan, F., & Stillman, T. F. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.006 · Cited by 34
Power leads to action because it releases the psychological brakes on action
Pike, B. E., & Galinsky, A. D. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.028 · Cited by 33
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Magee, Joe C.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 351-398
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W4237123392
- Cited by
- 2,385
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 153 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 176 · 2022: 220 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 185 · 2019: 205 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 152 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 104 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 63
- FWCI
- 132.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- social hierarchy, power, status, power hierarchies, organizational hierarchy, belief systems, resource control, status expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review