CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6,068Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorTeam Dynamics and PerformanceEmployee Performance and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE.

Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A.·1994·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.2307/256701
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present study integrated a number of streams of research on the antecedents of innovation to develop and test a model of individual innovative behavior. Hypothesizing that leadership, individual problem-solving style, and work group relations affect innovative behavior directly and indirectly through their influence on perceptions of the climate for innovation, we used structural equation analysis to test the parameters of the proposed model simultaneously and also explored the moderating effect of task characteristics. The model explained approximately 37 percent of the variance in innovative behavior. Task type moderated the relationship between leader role expectations and innovative behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256701

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6,068

Metadata

Authors
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • University of Louisville (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
1994-06-01
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
580-607
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.2307/256701
OpenAlex
W2050123202
Cited by
6,068
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 408 · 2025: 428 · 2024: 416 · 2023: 439 · 2022: 486 · 2021: 404 · 2020: 386 · 2019: 310 · 2018: 307 · 2017: 266 · 2016: 289 · 2015: 251 · 2014: 251 · 2013: 256 · 2012: 215
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
innovative behavior, individual innovation, workplace innovation, leadership, problem-solving styles, climate for innovation, task characteristics, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review