The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Responsibility: The new business imperative
Abstract
Executive Overview Businesses today are experiencing profound pressures to reform and improve stakeholder-related practices and their impacts on stakeholders and the natural environment--in short, to manage responsibly as well as profitably. Pressures for expanding the emphasis on profits to managing responsibly derive from three general sources: primary stakeholders such as owners, employees, customers, and suppliers; secondary stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), activists, communities, and governments; and general societal trends and institutional forces. The latter include a proliferation of 'best of' rankings, the steady emergence and development of global principles and standards that are raising public expectations about corporate responsibility, and new reporting initiatives emphasizing the so-called triple bottom lines of economic, social, and environmental performance. To respond to these pressures, many multinational corporations (MNCs) in particular are developing what we have called total responsibility management (TRM) systems approaches for managing their responsibilities to stakeholders and the natural environment. In this article we outline the dominant pressures pushing the evolution of total responsibility management and present a managerial framework that highlights the three main components of TRM approaches--inspiration (vision), integration, and improvement/innovation--with the indicators inherent to a responsibility measurement approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765030003900302 · Cited by 2,077
Cited by
Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025 · Cited by 408
Shen, J., Dumont, J., & Deng, X. (2018) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601116664610 · Cited by 251
RetractedThe impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns
Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650315586594 · Cited by 95
Structuring the phenomenon of procurement digitalisation: Contexts, interventions and mechanisms
Lorentz, H., Aminoff, A., Kaipia, R., & Srai, J. S. (2021) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2020-0150 · Cited by 51
Miller, E., Buys, L., & Summerville, J. (2007) · International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics · doi:10.1504/ijbge.2007.014314 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. B.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 132-148
- ISSN
- 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2158511089
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.