Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 664

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Responsibility: The new business imperative

Waddock, Sandra A., Bodwell, Charles, Graves, Samuel B.·2002·Academy of Management Perspectives

Abstract

Executive Overview Businesses today are experiencing profound pressures to reform and improve stakeholder-related practices and their impacts on stakeholders and the natural environment--in short, to manage responsibly as well as profitably. Pressures for expanding the emphasis on profits to managing responsibly derive from three general sources: primary stakeholders such as owners, employees, customers, and suppliers; secondary stakeholders such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs), activists, communities, and governments; and general societal trends and institutional forces. The latter include a proliferation of 'best of' rankings, the steady emergence and development of global principles and standards that are raising public expectations about corporate responsibility, and new reporting initiatives emphasizing the so-called triple bottom lines of economic, social, and environmental performance. To respond to these pressures, many multinational corporations (MNCs) in particular are developing what we have called total responsibility management (TRM) systems approaches for managing their responsibilities to stakeholders and the natural environment. In this article we outline the dominant pressures pushing the evolution of total responsibility management and present a managerial framework that highlights the three main components of TRM approaches--inspiration (vision), integration, and improvement/innovation--with the indicators inherent to a responsibility measurement approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/ame.2002.7173581

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Waddock, S. A., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. B.
Venue
Academy of Management Perspectives
Published
2002-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
132-148
ISSN
  • 1558-9080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4529
OpenAlex
W2158511089
Cited by
664
References
1
FWCI
39.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.