The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined Effects Of Organizational And Professional Identification On The Reciprocity Dynamic For Professional Employees
Abstract
We consider when professional employees reciprocate perceived organizational treatment. In a large sample of physician employees, the association between perceived organizational support (POS) and employee work performance was (1) most positive when organizational identification was high and professional identification was low and (2) least positive when organizational identification was low and professional identification was high. We also found that the association between perceived psychological contract violation (PPCV) and employee work performance was (1) most negative when organizational identification was low and professional identification was high and (2) least negative when organizational identification was high and professional identification was low.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200001203420301 · Cited by 8,663
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
Sahlins, M., & Graeber, D. (2017) · Routledge (orig. 1972) · doi:10.4324/9781315184951 · Cited by 3,159
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x · Cited by 2,977
Cited by
Shen (2016) · doi:10.1177/0149206314522300 · Cited by 543
Doing Well by Making Well: The Impact of Corporate Wellness Programs on Employee Productivity
Gubler, T., Larkin, I., & Pierce, L. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2883 · Cited by 222
A Fresh Look at the Dark Side of Contemporary Careers: Toward a Realistic Discourse
Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12107 · Cited by 195
Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillment
Conway, N., Guest, D., & Trenberth, L. (2011) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.01.003 · Cited by 195
KREINDLER, S. A., DOWD, D. A., DANA STAR, N., & GOTTSCHALK, T. (2012) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00666.x · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 506-526
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2153105378
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 20.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
