The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time: A New Research Lens
Abstract
The article discusses the issue of time as it pertains to organizational research. The author believes that looking at research in terms of time is a powerful tool in assessing organizational phenomena. According to the author, temporal research allows researchers to gain more perspective when looking at organizational issues such as decision making, group performance and organizational transformation. The author notes that the field of temporal research is translated into concepts including pacing, timing and sequencing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Others have a temporal personality that exhibits this feeling of slow passage of time even when there is no logical reason (Ancona et al., 2001;Mosakowski & Earley, 2000;Orlikowski & Yates, 2002).”
From Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda (2023) · cites this paper as Ancona et al., 2001
Citations
Cites
Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 · Cited by 2,520
Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015) · Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 · Cited by 2,147
Learning in and about complex systems
Sterman, J. D. (1994) · System Dynamics Review · doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100214 · Cited by 1,279
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis
He, Z.-L., & Wong, P.-K. (2004) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 · Cited by 3,737
A review of the time management literature
Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2007) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480710726136 · Cited by 792
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0441 · Cited by 778
Diener, E., Thapa, S., & Tay, L. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044908 · Cited by 373
Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close
Wilson, J. M., Boyer O'Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. R. (2008) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607083105 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Goodman, Paul S.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 645
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163296813
- Cited by
- 870
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 35.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Business and Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Management Research
- Keywords
- time, organizational phenomena, pacing, timing, sequencing, organizational decision-making, group performance, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
